This study aimed to describe a facet-preserving modified transpedicular unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) approach for upwardly migrated thoracic disc herniation that allows safe decompression without spinal cord retraction or postoperative instability. Thoracic disc herniation is rare but often symptomatic, producing myelopathy that typically necessitates surgical intervention. Because of the spinal cord’s close proximity, traditional discectomy approaches carry a high risk of neural injury, and achieving complete disc removal without cord manipulation remains a significant surgical challenge. Although several techniques have been proposed, many are limited by the potential for incomplete decompression or iatrogenic instability. A facet-preserving modified transpedicular UBE approach may overcome these limitations by offering a minimally invasive surgical corridor while maintaining spinal stability. A 76-year-old woman presented with progressive bilateral lower extremity weakness and numbness over 6 months, with rapid deterioration during the past month. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed an upwardly migrated thoracic disc herniation at T10–11 compressing the spinal cord. A UBE discectomy using a facet-preserving modified transpedicular approach was performed. The herniated fragment was completely removed without spinal cord retraction. Postoperatively, the patient demonstrated neurological improvement without complications. MRI confirmed complete decompression of the cord, and computed tomography verified preservation of the facet joint. This video article introduces the modified transpedicular UBE approach as a safe and precise minimally invasive technique for thoracic ventral pathologies. By enabling direct ventral decompression while preserving spinal stability, it broadens the scope of endoscopic spine surgery and warrants further clinical validation.

Objective: : The insertion of a surgical paddle lead for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a cornerstone therapy for chronic refractory pain, with lower impedance and reduced battery usage than a percutaneous lead. However, the greater invasiveness of this procedure can cause complications. Methods: : This study introduces a novel SCS technique using the unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) approach, illustrated through intraoperative images and endoscopic videos. We retrospectively reviewed 14 patients who underwent SCS using the UBE technique. Clinical, surgical, and radiological data were collected from electronic medical records and surgical videos. Results: : A total of 14 patients (five females, nine males) were included in the study. The mean endoscopic operating time was 76.3±22.3 minutes. After the trial period, 13 patients (92.8%, 13/14) improved and underwent permanent implantation. The complication rate was 21.4%, with two cases of thoracic radiculopathy and one case of asymmetrical lead positioning. No lead migration was observed in these 13 patients. Conclusion : This study demonstrated the safety and efficacy of UBE-SCS as a minimally invasive alternative to conventional techniques, with high success rates and acceptable complications. However, further large-scale, long-term comparative studies are needed.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Objective: Despite the increasingly widespread adoption of unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis, the learning curve for surgeons new to endoscopic techniques remains a significant barrier. This study aimed to quantify this learning curve and identify strategies to expedite proficiency, focusing on reducing operative times and complications. Methods: The cumulative summation test was used to evaluate the learning curves for both the operative time and the degree of intraoperative dural tear occurrence. Moreover, clinical outcomes and postoperative complications were compared between the cranial and caudal approaches, depending on the direction of ligamentum flavum removal. Results: In total, 54 patients were included, with 22 in the cranial group and 32 in the caudal group. The operative time was notably shorter in the caudal group (cranial group, 110.86±32.63 minutes; caudal group, 79.56±24.21 minutes; p<0.01), and the complication rate was considerably lower (cranial group, 40%; caudal group, 15%; p=0.04). Twenty-six patients and 29 patients were needed to overcome the learning curves for operative time and intraoperative dural tear occurrence, respectively. Conclusion Although UBE surgery has a short learning curve, a considerable number of cases (26 and 29, respectively) were needed to achieve competency in terms of operative time and intraoperative dural tear occurrence. We highlight the caudal-to-cranial direction of ligamentum flavum dissection and removal as a way to decrease the number of dural tears and shorten the operative time.

Marjolin’s ulcer is a rare but aggressive form of skin cancer that often presents significant surgical challenges due to the complex anatomy of the pelvis and the necessity for wide excision to avoid recurrence. This case report highlights the innovative use of a 3-dimensional (3D)–printed model for the precise planning and successful execution of a high partial sacrectomy in a 48-year-old male patient with quadriplegia. This patient, who had sustained a cervical spine injury in 1996, developed a sacral pressure sore that progressed into a Marjolin's ulcer. Utilizing high-resolution 3D computed tomography scans, we created a detailed 3D-printed model of the patient's sacrum, which facilitated a thorough understanding of the tumor's anatomy and its spatial relationships with critical structures. This approach significantly aided the surgical team in executing a challenging excision while minimizing risk to the adjacent organs. This case underscores the potential of 3D printing technology to enhance surgical planning and outcomes in complex oncological resections, particularly in anatomically challenging regions.

Background: and Purpose: Dementia subtypes, including Alzheimer’s dementia (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), pose diagnostic challenges. This review examines the effectiveness of 18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography ( 18 F-FDG PET) in differentiating these subtypes for precise treatment and management. Methods: A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted using databases like PubMed and Embase to identify studies on the diagnostic utility of 18 F-FDG PET in dementia. The search included studies up to November 16, 2022, focusing on peer-reviewed journals and applying the goldstandard clinical diagnosis for dementia subtypes. Results: From 12,815 articles, 14 were selected for final analysis. For AD versus FTD, the sensitivity was 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88–0.98) and specificity was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.70–0.92). In the case of AD versus DLB, 18F-FDG PET showed a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.98) and specificity of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.70–0.92). Lastly, when differentiating AD from non-AD dementias, the sensitivity was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.80–0.91) and the specificity was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80–0.91). The studies mostly used case-control designs with visual and quantitative assessments. Conclusions 18 F-FDG PET exhibits high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating dementia subtypes, particularly AD, FTD, and DLB. This method, while not a standalone diagnostic tool, significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy in uncertain cases, complementing clinical assessments and structural imaging.

When death occurs, the supply of adenosine triphosphate through respiration ceases, and rigor mortis begins approximately 20 minutes after death. The underlying mechanisms of rigor mortis and cadaveric spasm are assumed to be similar. However, unlike rigor mortis, cadaveric spasm is a very rare phenomenon in which muscle stiffness develops almost immediately after death. Herein we describe a 27-year-old male with suspected cadaveric spasm. A forensic pathologist concluded that the cause of death was a head injury due to a fall. When the body was discovered, a cigarette remained in the mouth, suggesting a cadaveric spasm. Some opinions deny the existence of cadaveric spasm because there is no precise pathophysiological mechanism to support it. Cadaveric spasm could not be confirmed in the present case; however, while the complete mechanism is unclear, as in this case, it is sometimes difficult to rule out the presence of cadaveric spasm in forensic investigations. Therefore, a comprehensive forensic examination is necessary, and forensic examiners should be cautious.