Background: To investigate the clinicopathologic pattern of prostate cancer (PCa) in elderly patients compared with their younger counterparts with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level below the low-risk threshold (< 10 ng/mL), which is often a deciding factor for biopsy. Methods: A nationwide database of PCa at the time of biopsy from 2010 to 2020 was constructed from 39 hospitals. Patients were categorized into age groups of < 64 years, 65–69 years, 70–74 years, and ≥ 75 years considering guidelines that recommend PSA testing only for those aged 55–69 years during the study period, the average age of Korean PCa registrants of 70.3 years (2010–2020), and the average life expectancy of Korean males of 80.3 years (2020). Results: The mean ± standard deviation age was 70.3 ± 8.2 years, which was normally distributed (kurtosis = 0.095). Among 14,548 subjects, 54.1%, 39.5%, and 6.4% of them had high-risk disease, intermediate-risk disease, and low-risk disease, respectively. Based on three risk parameters, a marked increase in high-risk cancer was observed in the oldest age group (linear combination, P < 0.001). The same pattern was observed among patients with low-risk disease (PSA < 10 ng/mL), who were divided into PSA tiers as follows: 4–5 ng/mL (P < 0.001), 5–6 ng/mL (P < 0.001), 6–7 ng/mL (P < 0.001), 7–8 ng/mL (P < 0.001), 8–9 ng/mL (P = 0.009), and 9–10 ng/mL (P < 0.001). In all PSA tiers between 4 and 10 ng/mL, multivariate analysis demonstrated a significantly higher prevalence of high-risk cancer in the oldest age group than in the youngest age group. In the lowest tier (4–5 ng/mL), 35.2% of those aged over 75 years had high-risk PCa. Conclusion The older the patient, the more aggressive the PCa. Moreover, there was an increase in high-risk PCa in older males compared with younger males even with a PSA level below the low-risk threshold of 10 ng/mL, suggesting the need to strengthen cancer screening policies in the older population.

Background: With growing elderly populations, management of patients with acute stroke is increasingly important. In South Korea, the Acute Stroke Quality Assessment Program (ASQAP) has contributed to improving the quality of stroke care and practice behavior in healthcare institutions. While the mortality of hemorrhagic stroke remains high, there are only a few assessment indices associated with hemorrhagic stroke. Considering the need to develop assessment indices to improve the actual quality of care in the field of acute stroke treatment, this study aims to investigate the current status of human resources and practices related to the treatment of patients with acute stroke through a nationwide survey. Methods: For the healthcare institutions included in the Ninth ASQAP of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA), data from January 2022 to December 2022 were collected through a survey on the current status and practice of healthcare providers related to the treatment of patients with acute stroke. The questionnaire consisted of 19 items, including six items on healthcare providers involved in stroke care and 10 items on the care of patients with acute stroke. Results: In the treatment of patients with hemorrhagic stroke among patients with acute stroke, neurosurgeons were the most common providers. The contribution of neurosurgeons in the treatment of ischemic stroke has also been found to be equivalent to that of neurologists. However, a number of institutions were found to be devoid of healthcare providers who perform definitive treatments, such as intra-arterial thrombectomy for patients with ischemic stroke or cerebral aneurysm clipping for subarachnoid hemorrhage. The intensity of the workload of healthcare providers involved in the care of patients with acute stroke, especially those involved in definitive treatment, was also found to be quite high. Conclusion Currently, there are almost no assessment indices specific to hemorrhagic stroke in the ASQAP for acute stroke. Furthermore, it does not reflect the reality of the healthcare providers and practices that provide definitive treatment for acute stroke. The findings of this study suggest the need for the development of appropriate assessment indices that reflect the realities of acute stroke care.

Background: Rare cases of Kawasaki disease (KD) and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) have been reported following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination; however, the association between COVID-19 vaccination and the risk of developing KD/MIS-C has not yet been established. Methods: We conducted a self-controlled case series analysis using a large-linked database that connects the COVID-19 immunization registry with nationwide claims data. We identified individuals aged < 18 years who received their initial COVID-19 vaccination and had a KD/MIS-C diagnosis with a prescription for intravenous immunoglobulin or corticosteroids between October 18, 2021, and April 15, 2023. The observation period was set as 240 days from the date of the COVID-19 vaccination. The risk window was 60 days after vaccination, with the remaining observation period serving as the control window. The incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in the risk versus control windows were estimated using the conditional Poisson regression model. We further analyzed the vaccine doses and types for secondary analysis. We also performed subgroup analyses stratified by sex, age, comorbidities, and other conditions and sensitivity analyses by varying the length of the risk window and outcome definition. Results: Among 2,369,490 individuals who received the COVID-19 vaccination, 12 cases of KD/MIS-C were identified, which included five and seven patients in the risk and control windows, respectively. There was no increased risk of KD/MIS-C within the 60-day period of vaccination (IRR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.17–1.60). Secondary subgroup and sensitivity analyses showed no significant increase in the risk of KD/MIS-C after COVID-19 vaccination, which is consistent with the results of the main analysis. Conclusion The results of this nationwide study suggest that the risk of developing KD/MIS-C did not increase after COVID-19 vaccination. However, owing to the lack of a sufficient number of cases, future studies utilizing multinational long-term follow-up databases should be conducted. Considering the increasing incidence of KD/MIS-C and the limited understanding of its precise biological mechanisms, additional research on KD/MIS-C is warranted.

Background: Psychological test reports are essential in assessing intellectual functioning, aiding in diagnosing and treating intellectual disability (ID) and attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, these reports can have several problems because they are diverse, unstructured, subjective, and involve human errors. Additionally, physicians often do not read the entire report, and the number of reports is lower than that of diagnoses. Methods: We developed explainable predictive models for classifying IDs and ADHDs based on written reports to address these issues. The reports of 1,475 patients with IDs and ADHDs who underwent intelligence tests were used for the models. These models were developed by analyzing reports using natural language processing (NLP) and incorporating the physician’s diagnosis for each report. We selected n-gram features from the models’ results by extracting important features using SHapley Additive exPlanations and permutation importance to make the models explainable. Developing the n-gram feature-based original text search system compensated for the lack of human readability caused by NLP and enabled the reconstruction of human-readable texts from the selected n-gram features. Results: The maximum model accuracy was 0.92, and the 80 human-readable texts were restored from four models. Conclusion The results showed that the models could accurately classify IDs and ADHDs, even with a few reports. The models were also able to explain their predictions. The explainability-enhanced model can help physicians understand the classification process of IDs and ADHDs and provide evidence-based insights.

Background: Immunocompromised (IC) pediatric patients are at increased risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, but the viral kinetics and seroimmunologic response in pediatric IC patients are not fully understood. Methods: From April to June 2022, a prospective cohort study was conducted. IC pediatric patients hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were enrolled. Serial saliva swab and serum specimens were subjected to reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays with mutation sequencing, viral culture, anti-spike-protein, anti-nucleocapsid antibody assays, plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) and multiplex cytokine assays. Results: Eleven IC children were evaluated. Their COVID-19 symptoms resolved promptly (median, 2.5 days; interquartile range, 2.0–4.3). Saliva swab specimens contained lower viral loads than nasopharyngeal swabs (P = 0.008). All cases were BA.2 infection, and 45.5% tested negative within 14 days by saliva swab from symptom onset. Eight (72.7%) showed a time-dependent increase in BA.2 PRNT titers, followed by rapid waning. Multiplex cytokine assays revealed that monocyte/macrophage activation and Th 1 responses were comparable to those of non-IC adults. Activation of interleukin (IL)-1Ra and IL-6 was brief, and IL-17A was suppressed. Activated interferon (IFN)-γ and IL-18/IL-1F4 signals were observed. Conclusion IC pediatric patients rapidly recovered from COVID-19 with low viral loads.Antibody response was limited, but cytokine analysis suggested an enhanced IFN-γ- and IL-18-mediated immune response without excessive activation of inflammatory cascades. To validate our observation, immune cell-based functional studies need to be conducted among IC and non-IC children.

Prostate cancer (PCa) typically occurs in older adults and generally has a relatively long survival period, making it challenging to demonstrate the effectiveness of treatment. In 2012, medical guidelines recommending against PCa screening using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) became widespread, as randomized controlled trials had not consistently shown survival benefits.Current concepts: In South Korea, awareness of PCa has historically been very low, and the rate of PSA test screening has consequently been lower than that in other major developed countries. Additionally, PSA screening has tended to occur within a limited framework accessible only to individuals already aware of the test. Given that PCa is a high-risk cancer predominantly affecting older men in South Korea, unconditionally following medical guidelines from the 2010s that took a negative stance toward PSA screening may exacerbate health inequalities, increase metastatic cancer incidence, and elevate cancer-specific mortality, particularly in light of Korea’s rapidly aging population. Thus, recent shifts in clinical guidelines in the early 2020s, advocating the proactive implementation of PSA-based screening tests as announced by various countries, are significant. These shifts provide additional support for policy responses aligned with Korea’s epidemiological context. Discussion and conclusion: We advocate for increased public discourse on national PCa screening policies. Such policies should be rationally designed to reduce the incidence of high-risk PCa while minimizing the potential harms associated with overdiagnosis and overtreatment.

Objective: Acute coronary syndrome often requires urgent intervention. The 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend invasive procedures within 24 hours for high-risk cases. Nevertheless, there have been limited studies on non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in South Korea. This study compared the risk of complications based on the timing of intervention. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients with chest pain and elevated high-sensitivity troponin T from January to December 2021 in the emergency department. Patients were categorized into early (≤24 hr) and late (>24 hr) intervention groups. Primary outcomes (death, restenosis, or stroke) at 12 months were compared. Survival and subgroup analyses were performed to examine the factors affecting the outcomes in the two groups. Results: Three hundred seventy six patients were enrolled in the study, and 115 patients were excluded. Among 261 patients, 106 and 155 patients were in the early intervention group (≤24 hr), and late intervention group (>24 hr), respectively. The primary outcome (death or restenosis) showed no significant difference (hazard ratio [HR] in the early intervention group at 12 mo; 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-1.70; P=0.905). However, risk of stroke was lower in the early intervention group (HR in the early, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.00-0.66; P=0.013). Subgroup analysis showed no significant advantage for early intervention. Conclusion In NSTEMI patients, early intervention does not reduce death or restenosis but lowers stroke incidence. No specific risk factors favored early intervention.

Background: Long-term use of bisphosphonate is a risk factor for atypical femoral fractures (AFFs). Femoral bowing is known to be associated with AFFs. However, whether femoral bowing quickens the occurrence of AFF is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine whether AFF occurs earlier in patients with severe femoral bowing than in those without severe bowing. Methods: One hundred and sixty-four patients (186 AFFs) from January 2006 to December 2022 were included in this study.According to severity of femoral bowing, patients were divided into 2 groups: severe bowing group (26 femurs) and minimal to moderate bowing group (160 femurs). Age, sex, and completeness and location of AFF were compared between the 2 groups. We compared the time of AFF occurrence after bisphosphonate therapy using cumulative percentage between the 2 groups. Results: Age and sex were similar between the 2 groups, while body mass index (BMI) was lower (22.5 ± 3.0 kg/m 2 vs. 24.5 ± 3.5 kg/m 2 , p = 0.003) in the severe bowing group. The duration of bisphosphonate use was shorter in the severe bowing group than in the minimal to moderate bowing group (3.3 ± 3.8 years vs. 5.0 ± 4.0 years, p = 0.048). In the severe bowing group, 85% of AFFs were diaphyseal in contrast to the 46% in the minimal to moderate bowing group (p < 0.001). Cumulative percentage plot of AFFs in the severe bowing group was left-shifted compared to the minimal to moderate bowing group. Conclusions At the time of AFF diagnosis, the severe bowing group exhibited shorter duration of bisphosphonate use, lower BMI, and a higher incidence of diaphyseal location. Shortening the duration of bisphosphonate therapy may be advisable in patients with severe femoral bowing.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.