Liver fibrosis arises from chronic hepatic injury and remains a major clinical challenge due to the lack of effective therapies.Although G-protein-coupled receptor 119 (GPR119) has been explored as a metabolic target in type 2 diabetes, its role in liver fibrogenesis is not well understood. In this study, the protein and mRNA expression of GPR119 were detected in mouse primary hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) using immunostaining and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. The anti-fibrotic activities of GPR119 agonists were assessed in primary HSCs, LX-2 cells, and a carbon tetrachloride (CCl₄)–induced mouse model of liver fibrosis. Treatment with the GPR119 agonists MBX-2982 and GSK1292263 inhibited HSC activation, suppressed transforming growth factor-β1 (TGFβ1)–induced Smad2/3 phosphorylation, and reduced the expression of fibrogenic genes. In vivo, oral administration of MBX-2982 attenuated collagen accumulation and decreased hepatic α-smooth muscle actin and TGFβ expression in CCl₄-treated mice. Mechanistically, MBX-2982 activated AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), and pharmacological inhibition of AMPK reversed its anti-fibrogenic effects. MBX-2982 further reduced Smad3 acetylation by disrupting the interaction between Smad3 and p300 and promoting AMPK-dependent proteasomal degradation of p300. These results identify GPR119 as a regulator of HSC activation and highlight GPR119 agonists as promising therapeutic candidates for liver fibrosis.

Purpose: The Korean Oral Biobank Network (KOBN) collects, stores, and provides oral samples for research. Quality control (QC) of biospecimens is necessary to ensure that they meet the basic prerequisites before being sent to researchers. This study presents the standard operating procedures (SOPs) for the QC of biospecimens. Methods: QC methods using molecular genetic techniques according to sample types, including teeth, blood, oral soft tissue, oral tissue-derived cells, saliva, mouth rinse solution, dental plaque, and gingival crevicular fluid, are described in detail. Results: The KOBN established SOP for oral biospecimen QC and assessment methods. Conclusions To ensure a stable supply of high-quality biospecimens for researchers, regular QC checks should be carried out according to the SOP following the specifications of the Korea Biobank Network under the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency.

Dental clinicians and researchers have recently recommended oral microbial examinations to more accurately diagnose and treat oral diseases, including periodontitis and dental caries. Theoretical and experimental evidence suggests that oral microbiota may also be associated with non-oral diseases, such as gastrointestinal and extra-gastrointestinal diseases. This review highlights studies demonstrating microbial alterations in the oral cavity associated with malignant tumors including gastric, colorectal, esophageal, and lung cancers, implying that these alterations may serve as early indicators for non-invasive diagnosis and risk assessment of cancer development. Furthermore, we addressed the implications of oral microbial co-occurrence with malignant tumors, such as Streptococcus anginosus, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Veillonella parvula, which are recognized as tumor-enriched oral pathogens involved in the development and progression of cancers in the stomach, colon, and lungs, respectively. Notably, we explored the immune and inflammatory mechanisms underlying reciprocal interactions between oral microbiota and tumors, underscoring that targeting these mechanistic pathways can contribute to preventing cancer development.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes and safety profiles of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT)+abiraterone/prednisone with those of ADT+docetaxel in patients with de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Materials and Methods: A web-based database system was established to collect prospective cohort data for patients with mHSPC in Korea. From May 2019 to November 2022, 928 patients with mHSPC from 15 institutions were enrolled. Among these patients, data from 122 patients who received ADT+abiraterone/prednisone or ADT+docetaxel as the primary systemic treatment for mHSPC were collected. The patients were divided into two groups: ADT+abiraterone/prednisone group (n=102) and ADT+docetaxel group (n=20). We compared the demographic characteristics, medical histories, baseline cancer status, initial laboratory tests, metastatic burden, oncological outcomes for mHSPC, progression after mHSPC treatment, adverse effects, follow-up, and survival data between the two groups. Results: No significant differences in the demographic characteristics, medical histories, metastatic burden, and baseline cancer status were observed between the two groups. The ADT+abiraterone/prednisone group had a lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression rate (7.8% vs. 30.0%; p=0.011) and lower systemic treatment discontinuation rate (22.5% vs. 45.0%; p=0.037). No significant differences in adverse effects, oncological outcomes, and total follow-up period were observed between the two groups. Conclusions ADT+abiraterone/prednisone had lower PSA progression and systemic treatment discontinuation rates than ADT+docetaxel. In conclusion, further studies involving larger, double-blinded randomized trials with extended follow-up periods are necessary.

Objective: We aimed to identify the expectations and preferences for medication and medical decision-making in patients with major psychiatric disorders. Methods: A survey was conducted among patients with major psychiatric disorders who visited psychiatric outpatient clinics at 15 hospitals between 2016 and 2018 in Korea. The survey consisted of 12 questions about demographic variables and opinions on their expectations for medication, important medical decision-makers, and preferred drug type. The most preferred value in each category in the total population was identified, and differences in the preference ratio of each item among the disease groups were compared. Results: A total of 707 participants were surveyed. In the total population, patients reported high efficacy (44.01%±21.44%) as the main wish for medication, themselves (37.39%±22.57%) and a doctor (35.27%±22.88%) as the main decision makers, and tablet/capsule (36.16%±30.69%) as the preferred type of drug. In the depressive disorders group, the preference ratio of high efficacy was significantly lower, and the preference ratio of a small amount was significantly higher than that of the psychotic disorder and bipolar disorder groups. The preference ratio of a doctor as an important decision maker in the bipolar disorder group was higher compared to the other groups. Conclusion This study revealed the preference for medications and showed differences among patients with psychiatric disorders. Providing personalized medicine that considers a patient’s preference for the drug may contribute to the improvement of drug compliance and outcomes.