Purpose: Obesity refers to a condition in which there is excessive fat in the body and is caused by an imbalanced diet and a decrease in physical activity. Accordingly, regular exercise is reported to help improve and prevent obesity. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of short-term resistance training (RT) on weight loss, lipid profiles, blood pressure, atherogenic indices, and inflammation in middle-aged mice. Methods: Adult mice (7.5-month-old) were randomly divided into three groups comprising 7 mice per group: a normal diet group (NDC); a high-fat diet group (HDC, 45% total calories as fat); and a high-fat diet plus resistance training group (HDRT). The mice in the resistance training group performed climbing exercises using a ladder for the experimental period of 5 days/week for 4 weeks. The indicated intensity load was adjusted by individual % of animal body weight. The load gradually increased every week, and a total of 4 repetitions/set and 3 sets/day with 1 minute of rest provided between sets were performed. After sacrifice, analysis of serum and mRNA expression in the tissues were performed. Results: The HDC group showed a significant increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP) compared to the NDC group, while the HDRT group had a lower SBP relative to the HDC group. RT significantly improved blood lipid levels (triglycerides [TG], low-density lipoprotein [LDL], non-high-density lipoprotein [nonHDL], and very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [VLDL-C]). Arteriosclerosis improved through resistance training as observed in the changes in the arteriosclerosis indices (atherogenic index of plasma [AIP], Castelli risk index [CRI]-I, CRI-II, and atherogenic coefficient [AC]). In addition, the HDRT group showed decreased mRNA expression levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (Tnfa), interleukin-1 beta (Il-1b), and Il-6 in muscle tissue when compared with the HDC. Conclusion This study confirmed that RT improves blood lipids and inflammation profiles, regulates blood pressure, and improves atherosclerosis in obese mice.

Purpose: Obesity refers to a condition in which there is excessive fat in the body and is caused by an imbalanced diet and a decrease in physical activity. Accordingly, regular exercise is reported to help improve and prevent obesity. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of short-term resistance training (RT) on weight loss, lipid profiles, blood pressure, atherogenic indices, and inflammation in middle-aged mice. Methods: Adult mice (7.5-month-old) were randomly divided into three groups comprising 7 mice per group: a normal diet group (NDC); a high-fat diet group (HDC, 45% total calories as fat); and a high-fat diet plus resistance training group (HDRT). The mice in the resistance training group performed climbing exercises using a ladder for the experimental period of 5 days/week for 4 weeks. The indicated intensity load was adjusted by individual % of animal body weight. The load gradually increased every week, and a total of 4 repetitions/set and 3 sets/day with 1 minute of rest provided between sets were performed. After sacrifice, analysis of serum and mRNA expression in the tissues were performed. Results: The HDC group showed a significant increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP) compared to the NDC group, while the HDRT group had a lower SBP relative to the HDC group. RT significantly improved blood lipid levels (triglycerides [TG], low-density lipoprotein [LDL], non-high-density lipoprotein [nonHDL], and very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [VLDL-C]). Arteriosclerosis improved through resistance training as observed in the changes in the arteriosclerosis indices (atherogenic index of plasma [AIP], Castelli risk index [CRI]-I, CRI-II, and atherogenic coefficient [AC]). In addition, the HDRT group showed decreased mRNA expression levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (Tnfa), interleukin-1 beta (Il-1b), and Il-6 in muscle tissue when compared with the HDC. Conclusion This study confirmed that RT improves blood lipids and inflammation profiles, regulates blood pressure, and improves atherosclerosis in obese mice.

Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is called ‘smoker’s disease’ because it is strongly associated with smoking and most cases occur in smokers. However, it can also occur in never smokers. We investigated the clinical features of never smokers with SCLC and compared their treatment outcomes with those of smokers with SCLC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients who had proven SCLC and had received chemotherapy at a single cancer center between July 2002 and April 2021. Results: Of 1,643 patients, 1,416 (86.2%) were enrolled in this study. A total of 162 (11.4%) and 1,254 (88.6%) patients were never smokers and smokers, respectively. There were more female never smokers than smokers (n=130; 80.2% vs. 79, 6.3%, p=0.000), and the incidence of ischemic heart disease was lower among never smokers than among smokers (4/1,416, [2.5%] vs. 83/1,416 [6.6%], p=0.036). Never smokers showed less symptoms at diagnosis than smokers (80.9% vs. 87.2%, p=0.037); however, they showed more toxicity after first-line treatment (61.7% vs. 47.8%, p=0.001). The objective response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in never smokers (74.1% vs. 59.6%, p=0.000). In the multivariate analysis, never smoking and second-line treatment were associated with a better ORR. However, progression-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different between never smokers and smokers. Conclusion In conclusion, never smokers accounted for 11.4% of patients with SCLC. They had distinguishing clinical characteristics and showed better chemotherapeutic responses than smokers.

Purpose: Obesity refers to a condition in which there is excessive fat in the body and is caused by an imbalanced diet and a decrease in physical activity. Accordingly, regular exercise is reported to help improve and prevent obesity. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of short-term resistance training (RT) on weight loss, lipid profiles, blood pressure, atherogenic indices, and inflammation in middle-aged mice. Methods: Adult mice (7.5-month-old) were randomly divided into three groups comprising 7 mice per group: a normal diet group (NDC); a high-fat diet group (HDC, 45% total calories as fat); and a high-fat diet plus resistance training group (HDRT). The mice in the resistance training group performed climbing exercises using a ladder for the experimental period of 5 days/week for 4 weeks. The indicated intensity load was adjusted by individual % of animal body weight. The load gradually increased every week, and a total of 4 repetitions/set and 3 sets/day with 1 minute of rest provided between sets were performed. After sacrifice, analysis of serum and mRNA expression in the tissues were performed. Results: The HDC group showed a significant increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP) compared to the NDC group, while the HDRT group had a lower SBP relative to the HDC group. RT significantly improved blood lipid levels (triglycerides [TG], low-density lipoprotein [LDL], non-high-density lipoprotein [nonHDL], and very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [VLDL-C]). Arteriosclerosis improved through resistance training as observed in the changes in the arteriosclerosis indices (atherogenic index of plasma [AIP], Castelli risk index [CRI]-I, CRI-II, and atherogenic coefficient [AC]). In addition, the HDRT group showed decreased mRNA expression levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (Tnfa), interleukin-1 beta (Il-1b), and Il-6 in muscle tissue when compared with the HDC. Conclusion This study confirmed that RT improves blood lipids and inflammation profiles, regulates blood pressure, and improves atherosclerosis in obese mice.

Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is called ‘smoker’s disease’ because it is strongly associated with smoking and most cases occur in smokers. However, it can also occur in never smokers. We investigated the clinical features of never smokers with SCLC and compared their treatment outcomes with those of smokers with SCLC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients who had proven SCLC and had received chemotherapy at a single cancer center between July 2002 and April 2021. Results: Of 1,643 patients, 1,416 (86.2%) were enrolled in this study. A total of 162 (11.4%) and 1,254 (88.6%) patients were never smokers and smokers, respectively. There were more female never smokers than smokers (n=130; 80.2% vs. 79, 6.3%, p=0.000), and the incidence of ischemic heart disease was lower among never smokers than among smokers (4/1,416, [2.5%] vs. 83/1,416 [6.6%], p=0.036). Never smokers showed less symptoms at diagnosis than smokers (80.9% vs. 87.2%, p=0.037); however, they showed more toxicity after first-line treatment (61.7% vs. 47.8%, p=0.001). The objective response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in never smokers (74.1% vs. 59.6%, p=0.000). In the multivariate analysis, never smoking and second-line treatment were associated with a better ORR. However, progression-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different between never smokers and smokers. Conclusion In conclusion, never smokers accounted for 11.4% of patients with SCLC. They had distinguishing clinical characteristics and showed better chemotherapeutic responses than smokers.

Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is called ‘smoker’s disease’ because it is strongly associated with smoking and most cases occur in smokers. However, it can also occur in never smokers. We investigated the clinical features of never smokers with SCLC and compared their treatment outcomes with those of smokers with SCLC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients who had proven SCLC and had received chemotherapy at a single cancer center between July 2002 and April 2021. Results: Of 1,643 patients, 1,416 (86.2%) were enrolled in this study. A total of 162 (11.4%) and 1,254 (88.6%) patients were never smokers and smokers, respectively. There were more female never smokers than smokers (n=130; 80.2% vs. 79, 6.3%, p=0.000), and the incidence of ischemic heart disease was lower among never smokers than among smokers (4/1,416, [2.5%] vs. 83/1,416 [6.6%], p=0.036). Never smokers showed less symptoms at diagnosis than smokers (80.9% vs. 87.2%, p=0.037); however, they showed more toxicity after first-line treatment (61.7% vs. 47.8%, p=0.001). The objective response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in never smokers (74.1% vs. 59.6%, p=0.000). In the multivariate analysis, never smoking and second-line treatment were associated with a better ORR. However, progression-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different between never smokers and smokers. Conclusion In conclusion, never smokers accounted for 11.4% of patients with SCLC. They had distinguishing clinical characteristics and showed better chemotherapeutic responses than smokers.

Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is called ‘smoker’s disease’ because it is strongly associated with smoking and most cases occur in smokers. However, it can also occur in never smokers. We investigated the clinical features of never smokers with SCLC and compared their treatment outcomes with those of smokers with SCLC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients who had proven SCLC and had received chemotherapy at a single cancer center between July 2002 and April 2021. Results: Of 1,643 patients, 1,416 (86.2%) were enrolled in this study. A total of 162 (11.4%) and 1,254 (88.6%) patients were never smokers and smokers, respectively. There were more female never smokers than smokers (n=130; 80.2% vs. 79, 6.3%, p=0.000), and the incidence of ischemic heart disease was lower among never smokers than among smokers (4/1,416, [2.5%] vs. 83/1,416 [6.6%], p=0.036). Never smokers showed less symptoms at diagnosis than smokers (80.9% vs. 87.2%, p=0.037); however, they showed more toxicity after first-line treatment (61.7% vs. 47.8%, p=0.001). The objective response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in never smokers (74.1% vs. 59.6%, p=0.000). In the multivariate analysis, never smoking and second-line treatment were associated with a better ORR. However, progression-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different between never smokers and smokers. Conclusion In conclusion, never smokers accounted for 11.4% of patients with SCLC. They had distinguishing clinical characteristics and showed better chemotherapeutic responses than smokers.

Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is called ‘smoker’s disease’ because it is strongly associated with smoking and most cases occur in smokers. However, it can also occur in never smokers. We investigated the clinical features of never smokers with SCLC and compared their treatment outcomes with those of smokers with SCLC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients who had proven SCLC and had received chemotherapy at a single cancer center between July 2002 and April 2021. Results: Of 1,643 patients, 1,416 (86.2%) were enrolled in this study. A total of 162 (11.4%) and 1,254 (88.6%) patients were never smokers and smokers, respectively. There were more female never smokers than smokers (n=130; 80.2% vs. 79, 6.3%, p=0.000), and the incidence of ischemic heart disease was lower among never smokers than among smokers (4/1,416, [2.5%] vs. 83/1,416 [6.6%], p=0.036). Never smokers showed less symptoms at diagnosis than smokers (80.9% vs. 87.2%, p=0.037); however, they showed more toxicity after first-line treatment (61.7% vs. 47.8%, p=0.001). The objective response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in never smokers (74.1% vs. 59.6%, p=0.000). In the multivariate analysis, never smoking and second-line treatment were associated with a better ORR. However, progression-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different between never smokers and smokers. Conclusion In conclusion, never smokers accounted for 11.4% of patients with SCLC. They had distinguishing clinical characteristics and showed better chemotherapeutic responses than smokers.