Intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) is a minimally invasive procedure used to treat discogenic back pain and offers an alternative to surgical intervention in selected patients. Although it is generally considered safe, rare but significant complications can occur and may be difficult to diagnose because their symptoms overlap with those of other spinal conditions. We describe the case of a 69-year-old woman who presented with severe lower back and left buttock pain that was unresponsive to conservative treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed disc bulging with a high-intensity zone at the L4–5 and L5–S1 levels. IDET was performed at the L4–5 level, resulting in initial pain relief. However, the patient returned 7 days later with recurrent pain. Despite undergoing percutaneous epidural neuroplasty at the left L5–S1 level, a medial branch block, and a piriformis muscle block, her symptoms persisted. Further evaluation with spinal computed tomography revealed a retroperitoneal hematoma near the left psoas muscle. Referred pain from the hematoma mimicked discogenic pain, resulting in delayed diagnosis and unnecessary interventions. The patient remained hemodynamically stable and gradually improved with conservative management alone. This case highlights retroperitoneal hematoma as a rare complication of IDET and emphasizes the importance of accurate and timely diagnosis in patients with persistent or worsening symptoms after spinal procedures. Clinicians should consider non-discogenic sources of pain when treatment outcomes deviate from expected patterns.

Purpose: Obesity refers to a condition in which there is excessive fat in the body and is caused by an imbalanced diet and a decrease in physical activity. Accordingly, regular exercise is reported to help improve and prevent obesity. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of short-term resistance training (RT) on weight loss, lipid profiles, blood pressure, atherogenic indices, and inflammation in middle-aged mice. Methods: Adult mice (7.5-month-old) were randomly divided into three groups comprising 7 mice per group: a normal diet group (NDC); a high-fat diet group (HDC, 45% total calories as fat); and a high-fat diet plus resistance training group (HDRT). The mice in the resistance training group performed climbing exercises using a ladder for the experimental period of 5 days/week for 4 weeks. The indicated intensity load was adjusted by individual % of animal body weight. The load gradually increased every week, and a total of 4 repetitions/set and 3 sets/day with 1 minute of rest provided between sets were performed. After sacrifice, analysis of serum and mRNA expression in the tissues were performed. Results: The HDC group showed a significant increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP) compared to the NDC group, while the HDRT group had a lower SBP relative to the HDC group. RT significantly improved blood lipid levels (triglycerides [TG], low-density lipoprotein [LDL], non-high-density lipoprotein [nonHDL], and very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [VLDL-C]). Arteriosclerosis improved through resistance training as observed in the changes in the arteriosclerosis indices (atherogenic index of plasma [AIP], Castelli risk index [CRI]-I, CRI-II, and atherogenic coefficient [AC]). In addition, the HDRT group showed decreased mRNA expression levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (Tnfa), interleukin-1 beta (Il-1b), and Il-6 in muscle tissue when compared with the HDC. Conclusion This study confirmed that RT improves blood lipids and inflammation profiles, regulates blood pressure, and improves atherosclerosis in obese mice.

Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is called ‘smoker’s disease’ because it is strongly associated with smoking and most cases occur in smokers. However, it can also occur in never smokers. We investigated the clinical features of never smokers with SCLC and compared their treatment outcomes with those of smokers with SCLC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients who had proven SCLC and had received chemotherapy at a single cancer center between July 2002 and April 2021. Results: Of 1,643 patients, 1,416 (86.2%) were enrolled in this study. A total of 162 (11.4%) and 1,254 (88.6%) patients were never smokers and smokers, respectively. There were more female never smokers than smokers (n=130; 80.2% vs. 79, 6.3%, p=0.000), and the incidence of ischemic heart disease was lower among never smokers than among smokers (4/1,416, [2.5%] vs. 83/1,416 [6.6%], p=0.036). Never smokers showed less symptoms at diagnosis than smokers (80.9% vs. 87.2%, p=0.037); however, they showed more toxicity after first-line treatment (61.7% vs. 47.8%, p=0.001). The objective response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in never smokers (74.1% vs. 59.6%, p=0.000). In the multivariate analysis, never smoking and second-line treatment were associated with a better ORR. However, progression-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different between never smokers and smokers. Conclusion In conclusion, never smokers accounted for 11.4% of patients with SCLC. They had distinguishing clinical characteristics and showed better chemotherapeutic responses than smokers.

Purpose: Obesity refers to a condition in which there is excessive fat in the body and is caused by an imbalanced diet and a decrease in physical activity. Accordingly, regular exercise is reported to help improve and prevent obesity. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of short-term resistance training (RT) on weight loss, lipid profiles, blood pressure, atherogenic indices, and inflammation in middle-aged mice. Methods: Adult mice (7.5-month-old) were randomly divided into three groups comprising 7 mice per group: a normal diet group (NDC); a high-fat diet group (HDC, 45% total calories as fat); and a high-fat diet plus resistance training group (HDRT). The mice in the resistance training group performed climbing exercises using a ladder for the experimental period of 5 days/week for 4 weeks. The indicated intensity load was adjusted by individual % of animal body weight. The load gradually increased every week, and a total of 4 repetitions/set and 3 sets/day with 1 minute of rest provided between sets were performed. After sacrifice, analysis of serum and mRNA expression in the tissues were performed. Results: The HDC group showed a significant increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP) compared to the NDC group, while the HDRT group had a lower SBP relative to the HDC group. RT significantly improved blood lipid levels (triglycerides [TG], low-density lipoprotein [LDL], non-high-density lipoprotein [nonHDL], and very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [VLDL-C]). Arteriosclerosis improved through resistance training as observed in the changes in the arteriosclerosis indices (atherogenic index of plasma [AIP], Castelli risk index [CRI]-I, CRI-II, and atherogenic coefficient [AC]). In addition, the HDRT group showed decreased mRNA expression levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (Tnfa), interleukin-1 beta (Il-1b), and Il-6 in muscle tissue when compared with the HDC. Conclusion This study confirmed that RT improves blood lipids and inflammation profiles, regulates blood pressure, and improves atherosclerosis in obese mice.

Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is called ‘smoker’s disease’ because it is strongly associated with smoking and most cases occur in smokers. However, it can also occur in never smokers. We investigated the clinical features of never smokers with SCLC and compared their treatment outcomes with those of smokers with SCLC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients who had proven SCLC and had received chemotherapy at a single cancer center between July 2002 and April 2021. Results: Of 1,643 patients, 1,416 (86.2%) were enrolled in this study. A total of 162 (11.4%) and 1,254 (88.6%) patients were never smokers and smokers, respectively. There were more female never smokers than smokers (n=130; 80.2% vs. 79, 6.3%, p=0.000), and the incidence of ischemic heart disease was lower among never smokers than among smokers (4/1,416, [2.5%] vs. 83/1,416 [6.6%], p=0.036). Never smokers showed less symptoms at diagnosis than smokers (80.9% vs. 87.2%, p=0.037); however, they showed more toxicity after first-line treatment (61.7% vs. 47.8%, p=0.001). The objective response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in never smokers (74.1% vs. 59.6%, p=0.000). In the multivariate analysis, never smoking and second-line treatment were associated with a better ORR. However, progression-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different between never smokers and smokers. Conclusion In conclusion, never smokers accounted for 11.4% of patients with SCLC. They had distinguishing clinical characteristics and showed better chemotherapeutic responses than smokers.

Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is called ‘smoker’s disease’ because it is strongly associated with smoking and most cases occur in smokers. However, it can also occur in never smokers. We investigated the clinical features of never smokers with SCLC and compared their treatment outcomes with those of smokers with SCLC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients who had proven SCLC and had received chemotherapy at a single cancer center between July 2002 and April 2021. Results: Of 1,643 patients, 1,416 (86.2%) were enrolled in this study. A total of 162 (11.4%) and 1,254 (88.6%) patients were never smokers and smokers, respectively. There were more female never smokers than smokers (n=130; 80.2% vs. 79, 6.3%, p=0.000), and the incidence of ischemic heart disease was lower among never smokers than among smokers (4/1,416, [2.5%] vs. 83/1,416 [6.6%], p=0.036). Never smokers showed less symptoms at diagnosis than smokers (80.9% vs. 87.2%, p=0.037); however, they showed more toxicity after first-line treatment (61.7% vs. 47.8%, p=0.001). The objective response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in never smokers (74.1% vs. 59.6%, p=0.000). In the multivariate analysis, never smoking and second-line treatment were associated with a better ORR. However, progression-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different between never smokers and smokers. Conclusion In conclusion, never smokers accounted for 11.4% of patients with SCLC. They had distinguishing clinical characteristics and showed better chemotherapeutic responses than smokers.

Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is called ‘smoker’s disease’ because it is strongly associated with smoking and most cases occur in smokers. However, it can also occur in never smokers. We investigated the clinical features of never smokers with SCLC and compared their treatment outcomes with those of smokers with SCLC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients who had proven SCLC and had received chemotherapy at a single cancer center between July 2002 and April 2021. Results: Of 1,643 patients, 1,416 (86.2%) were enrolled in this study. A total of 162 (11.4%) and 1,254 (88.6%) patients were never smokers and smokers, respectively. There were more female never smokers than smokers (n=130; 80.2% vs. 79, 6.3%, p=0.000), and the incidence of ischemic heart disease was lower among never smokers than among smokers (4/1,416, [2.5%] vs. 83/1,416 [6.6%], p=0.036). Never smokers showed less symptoms at diagnosis than smokers (80.9% vs. 87.2%, p=0.037); however, they showed more toxicity after first-line treatment (61.7% vs. 47.8%, p=0.001). The objective response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in never smokers (74.1% vs. 59.6%, p=0.000). In the multivariate analysis, never smoking and second-line treatment were associated with a better ORR. However, progression-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different between never smokers and smokers. Conclusion In conclusion, never smokers accounted for 11.4% of patients with SCLC. They had distinguishing clinical characteristics and showed better chemotherapeutic responses than smokers.

Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is called ‘smoker’s disease’ because it is strongly associated with smoking and most cases occur in smokers. However, it can also occur in never smokers. We investigated the clinical features of never smokers with SCLC and compared their treatment outcomes with those of smokers with SCLC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients who had proven SCLC and had received chemotherapy at a single cancer center between July 2002 and April 2021. Results: Of 1,643 patients, 1,416 (86.2%) were enrolled in this study. A total of 162 (11.4%) and 1,254 (88.6%) patients were never smokers and smokers, respectively. There were more female never smokers than smokers (n=130; 80.2% vs. 79, 6.3%, p=0.000), and the incidence of ischemic heart disease was lower among never smokers than among smokers (4/1,416, [2.5%] vs. 83/1,416 [6.6%], p=0.036). Never smokers showed less symptoms at diagnosis than smokers (80.9% vs. 87.2%, p=0.037); however, they showed more toxicity after first-line treatment (61.7% vs. 47.8%, p=0.001). The objective response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in never smokers (74.1% vs. 59.6%, p=0.000). In the multivariate analysis, never smoking and second-line treatment were associated with a better ORR. However, progression-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different between never smokers and smokers. Conclusion In conclusion, never smokers accounted for 11.4% of patients with SCLC. They had distinguishing clinical characteristics and showed better chemotherapeutic responses than smokers.

Purpose: Obesity refers to a condition in which there is excessive fat in the body and is caused by an imbalanced diet and a decrease in physical activity. Accordingly, regular exercise is reported to help improve and prevent obesity. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of short-term resistance training (RT) on weight loss, lipid profiles, blood pressure, atherogenic indices, and inflammation in middle-aged mice. Methods: Adult mice (7.5-month-old) were randomly divided into three groups comprising 7 mice per group: a normal diet group (NDC); a high-fat diet group (HDC, 45% total calories as fat); and a high-fat diet plus resistance training group (HDRT). The mice in the resistance training group performed climbing exercises using a ladder for the experimental period of 5 days/week for 4 weeks. The indicated intensity load was adjusted by individual % of animal body weight. The load gradually increased every week, and a total of 4 repetitions/set and 3 sets/day with 1 minute of rest provided between sets were performed. After sacrifice, analysis of serum and mRNA expression in the tissues were performed. Results: The HDC group showed a significant increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP) compared to the NDC group, while the HDRT group had a lower SBP relative to the HDC group. RT significantly improved blood lipid levels (triglycerides [TG], low-density lipoprotein [LDL], non-high-density lipoprotein [nonHDL], and very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [VLDL-C]). Arteriosclerosis improved through resistance training as observed in the changes in the arteriosclerosis indices (atherogenic index of plasma [AIP], Castelli risk index [CRI]-I, CRI-II, and atherogenic coefficient [AC]). In addition, the HDRT group showed decreased mRNA expression levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (Tnfa), interleukin-1 beta (Il-1b), and Il-6 in muscle tissue when compared with the HDC. Conclusion This study confirmed that RT improves blood lipids and inflammation profiles, regulates blood pressure, and improves atherosclerosis in obese mice.

Purpose: With neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) broadening the surgical indication for advanced pancreatic cancer, the growing use of robotic platforms in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) necessitates the evaluation of its feasibility in advanced pancreatic cancer patients who have undergone NAT. Methods: We compared clinicopathological outcomes of advanced pancreatic cancer patients who received either robotassisted or open PD after NAT at a tertiary hospital from 2015 to 2023. Propensity score matching was performed based on age, sex, and TNM staging. Results: Among 223 patients who received conversion surgery after NAT, 42 open PD and 14 robot-assisted PD patients were matched in a 3:1 ratio. There was a trend of shorter hospital stays (11.4 days vs. 9.8 days, P = 0.218) and less severe postoperative complications (21.4% vs. 7.1%; P = 0.227) in the robot-assisted PD group. Lymph node (LN) yield, LN metastasis rate, and R0 resection rates were similar between the 2 groups. The overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates between the 2 groups were comparable (5-year OS rate: 55.7% vs. 72.7%, P = 0.264; 5-year DFS rate: 54.4% vs.58.4%, P = 0.759). Conclusion Robot-assisted PD offers comparable short-term and long-term outcomes to open PD, even in patients undergoing conversion surgery after NAT.