Objectives: Clinical examination is considered the gold standard for monitoring periodontal disease. However, it requires significant resources. Self-reported assessment serves as a useful method for screening periodontal diseases in different cohorts. We aimed to evaluate the validity of a selfreported questionnaire for the surveillance of periodontal disease among Korean adults. Methods: The participants were 120 patients aged ≥19 years old who were examined using the community periodontal index. The questionnaire comprised 10 questions, translated from an English-version, that was used to identify periodontitis. The predictiveness of the measures from the self-reported questions was assessed by multivariable logistic regression modeling using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity. Results: For item 3, “Have you ever had treatment for gum disease, such as scaling and root planning”, the adjusted odds ratio was 4.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-17.67; and AUROC, 0.82. The sensitivity and specificity of this item were, 0.93 and 0.42, respectively. In Kendall’s Tau-b correlation analysis, items 1 (“Have gum disease”) and 10 Periodontal treatment and surgery under anesthesia”) had the strongest correlations with item 3, with correlation coefficients of 0.48 and 0.42, respectively. A model combining items 1, 3, and 10, adjusted for demographic variables, resulted in an AUROC of 0.86, sensitivity of 0.86, and specificity of 0.26. Conclusions An adapted Korean version (“Have gum disease”, “Treatment for gum disease, such as scaling and root planning”, and “periodontal treatment under anesthesia”) of the self-reported questionnaire demonstrated its capacity for epidemiological surveillance of periodontal disease in this study cohort.

Background: Healthcare-associated infections impose a significant burden on antibiotic usage, healthcare expenditures, and morbidity. Therefore, it is crucial to revise policies to minimize such losses. This nationwide survey aimed to evaluate infection prevention and control (IPC) components in healthcare facilities and encourage improvements in acute care hospitals with inadequate infection prevention settings. This study aims to enhance the infection control capabilities of healthcare facilities. Methods: From December 27, 2021, to May 13, 2022, we conducted a survey of 1,767 acute care hospitals in the Republic of Korea. A survey was conducted to evaluate the infection control components in 1,767 acute care hospitals. Infection control officers provided direct responses to a systematically developed questionnaire. Subsequently, 10% of the respondents were randomly selected for the site investigation. Results: Overall, 1,197 (67.7%) hospitals responded to the online survey. On-site investigations were conducted at 125 hospitals. Hospitals with ≥ 150 beds are advised to have an IPC team under Article 3 of the Medical Service Act; however, only 87.0% (598/687) of hospitals with ≥ 100 beds had one. Conversely, 22.7% (116/510) of hospitals with < 100 beds had an IPC team. Regulations for hand hygiene, waste management, healthcare worker protection and safety, environmental cleaning, standard precautions, and prevention of the transmission of multidrug-resistant pathogens were present in 84.2%, 80.1%, 77.4%, 76.2%, 75.8%, and 63.5% of the hospitals, respectively. Hospitals with < 100 beds had low availability of all categories of standard operating procedures. Conclusion This study is the first national survey of acute care hospitals in the Republic of Korea. The data presented in the current study will improve the understanding of IPC status and will help establish a survey system. Our survey provides a basis for improving policies related to IPC in healthcare facilities.

Objectives: Clinical examination is considered the gold standard for monitoring periodontal disease. However, it requires significant resources. Self-reported assessment serves as a useful method for screening periodontal diseases in different cohorts. We aimed to evaluate the validity of a selfreported questionnaire for the surveillance of periodontal disease among Korean adults. Methods: The participants were 120 patients aged ≥19 years old who were examined using the community periodontal index. The questionnaire comprised 10 questions, translated from an English-version, that was used to identify periodontitis. The predictiveness of the measures from the self-reported questions was assessed by multivariable logistic regression modeling using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity. Results: For item 3, “Have you ever had treatment for gum disease, such as scaling and root planning”, the adjusted odds ratio was 4.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-17.67; and AUROC, 0.82. The sensitivity and specificity of this item were, 0.93 and 0.42, respectively. In Kendall’s Tau-b correlation analysis, items 1 (“Have gum disease”) and 10 Periodontal treatment and surgery under anesthesia”) had the strongest correlations with item 3, with correlation coefficients of 0.48 and 0.42, respectively. A model combining items 1, 3, and 10, adjusted for demographic variables, resulted in an AUROC of 0.86, sensitivity of 0.86, and specificity of 0.26. Conclusions An adapted Korean version (“Have gum disease”, “Treatment for gum disease, such as scaling and root planning”, and “periodontal treatment under anesthesia”) of the self-reported questionnaire demonstrated its capacity for epidemiological surveillance of periodontal disease in this study cohort.

Background: Healthcare-associated infections impose a significant burden on antibiotic usage, healthcare expenditures, and morbidity. Therefore, it is crucial to revise policies to minimize such losses. This nationwide survey aimed to evaluate infection prevention and control (IPC) components in healthcare facilities and encourage improvements in acute care hospitals with inadequate infection prevention settings. This study aims to enhance the infection control capabilities of healthcare facilities. Methods: From December 27, 2021, to May 13, 2022, we conducted a survey of 1,767 acute care hospitals in the Republic of Korea. A survey was conducted to evaluate the infection control components in 1,767 acute care hospitals. Infection control officers provided direct responses to a systematically developed questionnaire. Subsequently, 10% of the respondents were randomly selected for the site investigation. Results: Overall, 1,197 (67.7%) hospitals responded to the online survey. On-site investigations were conducted at 125 hospitals. Hospitals with ≥ 150 beds are advised to have an IPC team under Article 3 of the Medical Service Act; however, only 87.0% (598/687) of hospitals with ≥ 100 beds had one. Conversely, 22.7% (116/510) of hospitals with < 100 beds had an IPC team. Regulations for hand hygiene, waste management, healthcare worker protection and safety, environmental cleaning, standard precautions, and prevention of the transmission of multidrug-resistant pathogens were present in 84.2%, 80.1%, 77.4%, 76.2%, 75.8%, and 63.5% of the hospitals, respectively. Hospitals with < 100 beds had low availability of all categories of standard operating procedures. Conclusion This study is the first national survey of acute care hospitals in the Republic of Korea. The data presented in the current study will improve the understanding of IPC status and will help establish a survey system. Our survey provides a basis for improving policies related to IPC in healthcare facilities.

Heart failure (HF) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in South Korea, imposing substantial physical, emotional, and financial burdens on patients and society. Despite the high burden of symptom and complex care needs of HF patients, palliative care and hospice services remain underutilized in South Korea due to cultural, institutional, and knowledge-related barriers. This position statement from the Korean Society of Heart Failure emphasizes the need for integrating palliative and hospice care into HF management to improve quality of life and support holistic care for patients and their families. By clarifying the role of palliative care in HF and proposing practical referral criteria, this position statement aims to bridge the gap between HF and palliative care services in South Korea, ultimately improving patient-centered outcomes and aligning treatment with the goals and values of HF patients.

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the effect of long-term oral OM-89 therapy on the urinary microflora in patients with urolithiasis. Materials and Methods: Patients underwent surgical removal of urinary stones followed by no OM-89 treatment for six months or daily OM-89 administration. Urine culture and urinary polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were performed at the baseline visit (V1) and at 2 months (V2) and 6 months (V3) after the operation. Results: A total of 113 patients completed the study. The rate of urinary bacteria detection by urine culture at V3 did not differ between OM-89 treated and untreated groups (p>0.999); however, the PCR detection rate tended to be higher in OM-89 untreated group than in OM-89 treated group (p=0.052). Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. were the bacteria most commonly detected via both urine culture and PCR at all timepoints. Risk factors for the detection of bacteria by urine culture at V3 were positive culture at V1 (p=0.048) and female sex (p=0.048), whereas positive PCR at V3 was associated with female sex (p=0.023), positive PCR at V2 (p<0.001), and no OM-89 treatment (p=0.038). The use of OM-89 was associated with decreased rates of bacterial detection by PCR at V2 and a further decrease at V3. Conclusions Long-term immunization with OM-89 could further decrease the frequency of urinary bacterial colonization after surgical removal of urinary stones. OM-89 could be used as a complementary therapy if a retrieved stone is suspected to be related to infection.

Objectives: Clinical examination is considered the gold standard for monitoring periodontal disease. However, it requires significant resources. Self-reported assessment serves as a useful method for screening periodontal diseases in different cohorts. We aimed to evaluate the validity of a selfreported questionnaire for the surveillance of periodontal disease among Korean adults. Methods: The participants were 120 patients aged ≥19 years old who were examined using the community periodontal index. The questionnaire comprised 10 questions, translated from an English-version, that was used to identify periodontitis. The predictiveness of the measures from the self-reported questions was assessed by multivariable logistic regression modeling using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity. Results: For item 3, “Have you ever had treatment for gum disease, such as scaling and root planning”, the adjusted odds ratio was 4.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-17.67; and AUROC, 0.82. The sensitivity and specificity of this item were, 0.93 and 0.42, respectively. In Kendall’s Tau-b correlation analysis, items 1 (“Have gum disease”) and 10 Periodontal treatment and surgery under anesthesia”) had the strongest correlations with item 3, with correlation coefficients of 0.48 and 0.42, respectively. A model combining items 1, 3, and 10, adjusted for demographic variables, resulted in an AUROC of 0.86, sensitivity of 0.86, and specificity of 0.26. Conclusions An adapted Korean version (“Have gum disease”, “Treatment for gum disease, such as scaling and root planning”, and “periodontal treatment under anesthesia”) of the self-reported questionnaire demonstrated its capacity for epidemiological surveillance of periodontal disease in this study cohort.

Background: Healthcare-associated infections impose a significant burden on antibiotic usage, healthcare expenditures, and morbidity. Therefore, it is crucial to revise policies to minimize such losses. This nationwide survey aimed to evaluate infection prevention and control (IPC) components in healthcare facilities and encourage improvements in acute care hospitals with inadequate infection prevention settings. This study aims to enhance the infection control capabilities of healthcare facilities. Methods: From December 27, 2021, to May 13, 2022, we conducted a survey of 1,767 acute care hospitals in the Republic of Korea. A survey was conducted to evaluate the infection control components in 1,767 acute care hospitals. Infection control officers provided direct responses to a systematically developed questionnaire. Subsequently, 10% of the respondents were randomly selected for the site investigation. Results: Overall, 1,197 (67.7%) hospitals responded to the online survey. On-site investigations were conducted at 125 hospitals. Hospitals with ≥ 150 beds are advised to have an IPC team under Article 3 of the Medical Service Act; however, only 87.0% (598/687) of hospitals with ≥ 100 beds had one. Conversely, 22.7% (116/510) of hospitals with < 100 beds had an IPC team. Regulations for hand hygiene, waste management, healthcare worker protection and safety, environmental cleaning, standard precautions, and prevention of the transmission of multidrug-resistant pathogens were present in 84.2%, 80.1%, 77.4%, 76.2%, 75.8%, and 63.5% of the hospitals, respectively. Hospitals with < 100 beds had low availability of all categories of standard operating procedures. Conclusion This study is the first national survey of acute care hospitals in the Republic of Korea. The data presented in the current study will improve the understanding of IPC status and will help establish a survey system. Our survey provides a basis for improving policies related to IPC in healthcare facilities.

Objectives: Clinical examination is considered the gold standard for monitoring periodontal disease. However, it requires significant resources. Self-reported assessment serves as a useful method for screening periodontal diseases in different cohorts. We aimed to evaluate the validity of a selfreported questionnaire for the surveillance of periodontal disease among Korean adults. Methods: The participants were 120 patients aged ≥19 years old who were examined using the community periodontal index. The questionnaire comprised 10 questions, translated from an English-version, that was used to identify periodontitis. The predictiveness of the measures from the self-reported questions was assessed by multivariable logistic regression modeling using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity. Results: For item 3, “Have you ever had treatment for gum disease, such as scaling and root planning”, the adjusted odds ratio was 4.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-17.67; and AUROC, 0.82. The sensitivity and specificity of this item were, 0.93 and 0.42, respectively. In Kendall’s Tau-b correlation analysis, items 1 (“Have gum disease”) and 10 Periodontal treatment and surgery under anesthesia”) had the strongest correlations with item 3, with correlation coefficients of 0.48 and 0.42, respectively. A model combining items 1, 3, and 10, adjusted for demographic variables, resulted in an AUROC of 0.86, sensitivity of 0.86, and specificity of 0.26. Conclusions An adapted Korean version (“Have gum disease”, “Treatment for gum disease, such as scaling and root planning”, and “periodontal treatment under anesthesia”) of the self-reported questionnaire demonstrated its capacity for epidemiological surveillance of periodontal disease in this study cohort.

Background: Healthcare-associated infections impose a significant burden on antibiotic usage, healthcare expenditures, and morbidity. Therefore, it is crucial to revise policies to minimize such losses. This nationwide survey aimed to evaluate infection prevention and control (IPC) components in healthcare facilities and encourage improvements in acute care hospitals with inadequate infection prevention settings. This study aims to enhance the infection control capabilities of healthcare facilities. Methods: From December 27, 2021, to May 13, 2022, we conducted a survey of 1,767 acute care hospitals in the Republic of Korea. A survey was conducted to evaluate the infection control components in 1,767 acute care hospitals. Infection control officers provided direct responses to a systematically developed questionnaire. Subsequently, 10% of the respondents were randomly selected for the site investigation. Results: Overall, 1,197 (67.7%) hospitals responded to the online survey. On-site investigations were conducted at 125 hospitals. Hospitals with ≥ 150 beds are advised to have an IPC team under Article 3 of the Medical Service Act; however, only 87.0% (598/687) of hospitals with ≥ 100 beds had one. Conversely, 22.7% (116/510) of hospitals with < 100 beds had an IPC team. Regulations for hand hygiene, waste management, healthcare worker protection and safety, environmental cleaning, standard precautions, and prevention of the transmission of multidrug-resistant pathogens were present in 84.2%, 80.1%, 77.4%, 76.2%, 75.8%, and 63.5% of the hospitals, respectively. Hospitals with < 100 beds had low availability of all categories of standard operating procedures. Conclusion This study is the first national survey of acute care hospitals in the Republic of Korea. The data presented in the current study will improve the understanding of IPC status and will help establish a survey system. Our survey provides a basis for improving policies related to IPC in healthcare facilities.