Purpose: To define an MRI scoring system for differentiating xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis (XGC) from wall-thickening type gallbladder cancer (GBC) and compare the diagnostic performance of the scoring system with the visual assessment of radiologists. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 23 and 35 patients who underwent abdominal MRI and were pathologically diagnosed with XGC and wall-thickening-type GBC after surgery, respectively. Three radiologists reviewed all MRI findings. We defined a scoring system using these MRI findings for differentiating XGC from wall-thickening type GBC and compared the area under the curve (AUC) of the scoring system with the visual assessment of radiologists. Results: Nine MRI findings showed significant differences in differentiating the two diseases: diffuse gallbladder wall thickening (p < 0.001), mucosal uniformity (p = 0.002), intramural T2-high signal intensity (p < 0.001), mucosal retraction (p = 0.016), gallbladder stones (p < 0.001), T1-intermediate to high-signal intensity (p = 0.033), diffusion restriction (p = 0.005), enhancement pattern (p < 0.001), and phase of peak enhancement (p = 0.008). The MRI scoring system showed excellent diagnostic performance with an AUC of 0.972, which was significantly higher than the visual assessment of the reviewers. Conclusion The MRI scoring system showed better diagnostic performance than the visual assessment of radiologists to differentiate XGC from wall-thickening-type GBC.

Purpose: This study assessed the use of liver stiffness (LS) and dispersion slope (DS) in classifying patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) by the necessity of antiviral treatment. Methods: A retrospective review examined 249 patients with CHB (male:female, 107:142; mean age, 53±14 years) between April 2018 and March 2022. Patients for whom treatment was indicated, termed group 1, exhibited either serum alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase levels not exceeding five times the upper limit of normal and LS >13 kPa, or hepatitis B virus DNA >2,000 IU/mL and ALT >40 IU/L. The remaining patients comprised group 2 (treatment not required). In subgroup analysis, patients with LS <13 kPa were further examined. Results: Overall, group 1 exhibited significantly higher LS (12.64±6.76 vs. 6.31±1.67 kPa, P<0.001) and DS (15.52±4.95 vs. 11.04±1.93 [m/s]/kHz, P<0.001) than group 2. In subgroup analysis, group 1 also demonstrated significantly higher values (LS: 8.05±2.12 vs 6.31±1.67 kPa, P<0.001, DS: 13.06±2.75 vs. 11.04±1.93 [m/s]/kHz, P<0.001). The areas under the curve (AUCs) for LS and DS in group 1 were 0.855 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 0.90; P<0.001) and 0.810 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.86; P<0.001), respectively. In subgroup analysis, the AUCs for LS and DS in group 1 were 0.751 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.81; P<0.001) and 0.711 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.77; P<0.001), respectively. Within group 1, the AUCs for LS and DS did not differ significantly (P>0.05). Conclusion LS and DS assist in classifying patients with CHB by their need for antiviral treatment.

Purpose: This study assessed the use of liver stiffness (LS) and dispersion slope (DS) in classifying patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) by the necessity of antiviral treatment. Methods: A retrospective review examined 249 patients with CHB (male:female, 107:142; mean age, 53±14 years) between April 2018 and March 2022. Patients for whom treatment was indicated, termed group 1, exhibited either serum alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase levels not exceeding five times the upper limit of normal and LS >13 kPa, or hepatitis B virus DNA >2,000 IU/mL and ALT >40 IU/L. The remaining patients comprised group 2 (treatment not required). In subgroup analysis, patients with LS <13 kPa were further examined. Results: Overall, group 1 exhibited significantly higher LS (12.64±6.76 vs. 6.31±1.67 kPa, P<0.001) and DS (15.52±4.95 vs. 11.04±1.93 [m/s]/kHz, P<0.001) than group 2. In subgroup analysis, group 1 also demonstrated significantly higher values (LS: 8.05±2.12 vs 6.31±1.67 kPa, P<0.001, DS: 13.06±2.75 vs. 11.04±1.93 [m/s]/kHz, P<0.001). The areas under the curve (AUCs) for LS and DS in group 1 were 0.855 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 0.90; P<0.001) and 0.810 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.86; P<0.001), respectively. In subgroup analysis, the AUCs for LS and DS in group 1 were 0.751 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.81; P<0.001) and 0.711 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.77; P<0.001), respectively. Within group 1, the AUCs for LS and DS did not differ significantly (P>0.05). Conclusion LS and DS assist in classifying patients with CHB by their need for antiviral treatment.

Purpose: This study assessed the use of liver stiffness (LS) and dispersion slope (DS) in classifying patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) by the necessity of antiviral treatment. Methods: A retrospective review examined 249 patients with CHB (male:female, 107:142; mean age, 53±14 years) between April 2018 and March 2022. Patients for whom treatment was indicated, termed group 1, exhibited either serum alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase levels not exceeding five times the upper limit of normal and LS >13 kPa, or hepatitis B virus DNA >2,000 IU/mL and ALT >40 IU/L. The remaining patients comprised group 2 (treatment not required). In subgroup analysis, patients with LS <13 kPa were further examined. Results: Overall, group 1 exhibited significantly higher LS (12.64±6.76 vs. 6.31±1.67 kPa, P<0.001) and DS (15.52±4.95 vs. 11.04±1.93 [m/s]/kHz, P<0.001) than group 2. In subgroup analysis, group 1 also demonstrated significantly higher values (LS: 8.05±2.12 vs 6.31±1.67 kPa, P<0.001, DS: 13.06±2.75 vs. 11.04±1.93 [m/s]/kHz, P<0.001). The areas under the curve (AUCs) for LS and DS in group 1 were 0.855 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 0.90; P<0.001) and 0.810 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.86; P<0.001), respectively. In subgroup analysis, the AUCs for LS and DS in group 1 were 0.751 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.81; P<0.001) and 0.711 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.77; P<0.001), respectively. Within group 1, the AUCs for LS and DS did not differ significantly (P>0.05). Conclusion LS and DS assist in classifying patients with CHB by their need for antiviral treatment.

Purpose: To define an MRI scoring system for differentiating xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis (XGC) from wall-thickening type gallbladder cancer (GBC) and compare the diagnostic performance of the scoring system with the visual assessment of radiologists. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 23 and 35 patients who underwent abdominal MRI and were pathologically diagnosed with XGC and wall-thickening-type GBC after surgery, respectively. Three radiologists reviewed all MRI findings. We defined a scoring system using these MRI findings for differentiating XGC from wall-thickening type GBC and compared the area under the curve (AUC) of the scoring system with the visual assessment of radiologists. Results: Nine MRI findings showed significant differences in differentiating the two diseases: diffuse gallbladder wall thickening (p < 0.001), mucosal uniformity (p = 0.002), intramural T2-high signal intensity (p < 0.001), mucosal retraction (p = 0.016), gallbladder stones (p < 0.001), T1-intermediate to high-signal intensity (p = 0.033), diffusion restriction (p = 0.005), enhancement pattern (p < 0.001), and phase of peak enhancement (p = 0.008). The MRI scoring system showed excellent diagnostic performance with an AUC of 0.972, which was significantly higher than the visual assessment of the reviewers. Conclusion The MRI scoring system showed better diagnostic performance than the visual assessment of radiologists to differentiate XGC from wall-thickening-type GBC.

Purpose: This study assessed the use of liver stiffness (LS) and dispersion slope (DS) in classifying patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) by the necessity of antiviral treatment. Methods: A retrospective review examined 249 patients with CHB (male:female, 107:142; mean age, 53±14 years) between April 2018 and March 2022. Patients for whom treatment was indicated, termed group 1, exhibited either serum alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase levels not exceeding five times the upper limit of normal and LS >13 kPa, or hepatitis B virus DNA >2,000 IU/mL and ALT >40 IU/L. The remaining patients comprised group 2 (treatment not required). In subgroup analysis, patients with LS <13 kPa were further examined. Results: Overall, group 1 exhibited significantly higher LS (12.64±6.76 vs. 6.31±1.67 kPa, P<0.001) and DS (15.52±4.95 vs. 11.04±1.93 [m/s]/kHz, P<0.001) than group 2. In subgroup analysis, group 1 also demonstrated significantly higher values (LS: 8.05±2.12 vs 6.31±1.67 kPa, P<0.001, DS: 13.06±2.75 vs. 11.04±1.93 [m/s]/kHz, P<0.001). The areas under the curve (AUCs) for LS and DS in group 1 were 0.855 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 0.90; P<0.001) and 0.810 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.86; P<0.001), respectively. In subgroup analysis, the AUCs for LS and DS in group 1 were 0.751 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.81; P<0.001) and 0.711 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.77; P<0.001), respectively. Within group 1, the AUCs for LS and DS did not differ significantly (P>0.05). Conclusion LS and DS assist in classifying patients with CHB by their need for antiviral treatment.

Purpose: To define an MRI scoring system for differentiating xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis (XGC) from wall-thickening type gallbladder cancer (GBC) and compare the diagnostic performance of the scoring system with the visual assessment of radiologists. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 23 and 35 patients who underwent abdominal MRI and were pathologically diagnosed with XGC and wall-thickening-type GBC after surgery, respectively. Three radiologists reviewed all MRI findings. We defined a scoring system using these MRI findings for differentiating XGC from wall-thickening type GBC and compared the area under the curve (AUC) of the scoring system with the visual assessment of radiologists. Results: Nine MRI findings showed significant differences in differentiating the two diseases: diffuse gallbladder wall thickening (p < 0.001), mucosal uniformity (p = 0.002), intramural T2-high signal intensity (p < 0.001), mucosal retraction (p = 0.016), gallbladder stones (p < 0.001), T1-intermediate to high-signal intensity (p = 0.033), diffusion restriction (p = 0.005), enhancement pattern (p < 0.001), and phase of peak enhancement (p = 0.008). The MRI scoring system showed excellent diagnostic performance with an AUC of 0.972, which was significantly higher than the visual assessment of the reviewers. Conclusion The MRI scoring system showed better diagnostic performance than the visual assessment of radiologists to differentiate XGC from wall-thickening-type GBC.

Purpose: This study assessed the use of liver stiffness (LS) and dispersion slope (DS) in classifying patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) by the necessity of antiviral treatment. Methods: A retrospective review examined 249 patients with CHB (male:female, 107:142; mean age, 53±14 years) between April 2018 and March 2022. Patients for whom treatment was indicated, termed group 1, exhibited either serum alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase levels not exceeding five times the upper limit of normal and LS >13 kPa, or hepatitis B virus DNA >2,000 IU/mL and ALT >40 IU/L. The remaining patients comprised group 2 (treatment not required). In subgroup analysis, patients with LS <13 kPa were further examined. Results: Overall, group 1 exhibited significantly higher LS (12.64±6.76 vs. 6.31±1.67 kPa, P<0.001) and DS (15.52±4.95 vs. 11.04±1.93 [m/s]/kHz, P<0.001) than group 2. In subgroup analysis, group 1 also demonstrated significantly higher values (LS: 8.05±2.12 vs 6.31±1.67 kPa, P<0.001, DS: 13.06±2.75 vs. 11.04±1.93 [m/s]/kHz, P<0.001). The areas under the curve (AUCs) for LS and DS in group 1 were 0.855 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 0.90; P<0.001) and 0.810 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.86; P<0.001), respectively. In subgroup analysis, the AUCs for LS and DS in group 1 were 0.751 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.81; P<0.001) and 0.711 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.77; P<0.001), respectively. Within group 1, the AUCs for LS and DS did not differ significantly (P>0.05). Conclusion LS and DS assist in classifying patients with CHB by their need for antiviral treatment.

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is an uncommon soft tissue tumor mimicking malignancy, which can be found in any part of the body. However, IMT involving the prostate is extremely rare. Previous reports on prostatic IMTs mainly focused on the pathological and immunohistochemical findings of the tumor and they lacked radiological findings. This report presents a case of prostatic IMT in a 60-year-old man who presented with voiding difficulty and elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level. On magnetic resonance imaging, a hypointense mass was observed on T2-weighted images with broad and extensive extracapsular extension, showing diffusion restriction, early well enhancement and delayed mild washout, which could mimic prostate cancer. On needle biopsy of the prostate mass, cancer cells were not detected; and a benign tumor was suspected with a normalized PSA level. Finally, prostatectomy was performed to rule out prostate cancer; and prostatic IMT was confirmed on histopathologic examination.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the usefulness of two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D SWE) in the assessment of liver stiffness (LS) and dispersion slope (DS) to evaluate hepatic fibrosis and the treatment response in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Methods: Patients diagnosed with AIH who underwent 2D SWE between June 2014 and June 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The patients were classified into four groups according to the histologic stage of fibrosis (F1-F4). The baseline characteristics, laboratory test results, histologic results, and 2D SWE results were analyzed. The diagnostic performance of LS measurements in hepatic fibrosis staging was investigated, and variables were compared before and after steroid treatment for AIH. Results: In total, 69 patients were analyzed. The LS values differed according to the stage of liver fibrosis (P<0.001). The area under the curve for LS was 0.903, 0.815, and 0.854 for ≥F2, ≥F3, and F4, respectively. The diagnostic performance of LS measurements was significantly greater than that of serum biomarkers, except for fibrosis index-4 for F4 (P<0.05). Significant differences were observed in follow-up examinations in both the LS value and DS in patients who received steroid therapy (P=0.012 and P=0.011, respectively). Conclusion In conclusion, 2D SWE is a useful method for the assessment of hepatic fibrosis in patients with AIH. In follow-up examinations, LS and DS can be used as reliable parameters to evaluate the treatment response of AIH.