1.Is Colonoscopy Alone Adequate for Surveillance in Stage I Colorectal Cancer?
Seijong KIM ; Jung Kyong SHIN ; Yoonah PARK ; Jung Wook HUH ; Hee Cheol KIM ; Seong Hyeon YUN ; Woo Yong LEE ; Yong Beom CHO
Cancer Research and Treatment 2025;57(2):507-518
Purpose:
While colonoscopy is the standard surveillance tool for stage I colorectal cancer according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, its effectiveness in detecting recurrence is debated. This study evaluates recurrence risk factors and patterns in stage I colorectal cancer to inform comprehensive surveillance strategies.
Materials and Methods:
A retrospective analysis of 2,248 stage I colorectal cancer patients who underwent radical surgery at Samsung Medical Center (2007-2018) was conducted. Exclusions were based on familial history, prior recurrences, preoperative treatments, and inadequate data. Surveillance included colonoscopy, laboratory tests, and computed tomography (CT) scans.
Results:
Stage I colorectal cancer patients showed favorable 5-year disease-free survival (98.3% colon, 94.6% rectum). Among a total of 1,467 colon cancer patients, 26 (1.76%) experienced recurrence. Of the 781 rectal cancer patients, 47 (6.02%) experienced recurrence. Elevated preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels and perineural invasion were significant recurrence risk factors in colon cancer, while tumor budding was significant in rectal cancer. Distant metastasis was the main recurrence pattern in colon cancer (92.3%), while rectal cancer showed predominantly local recurrence (50%). Colonoscopy alone detected recurrences in a small fraction of cases (3.7% in colon, 14.9% in rectum).
Conclusion
Although recurrence in stage I colorectal cancer is rare, relying solely on colonoscopy for surveillance may miss distant metastases or locoregional recurrence outside the colorectum. For high-risk patients, we recommend considering regular CT scans alongside colonoscopy. This targeted approach may enable earlier recurrence detection and improve outcomes in this subset while avoiding unnecessary scans for the low-risk majority.
2.Is Colonoscopy Alone Adequate for Surveillance in Stage I Colorectal Cancer?
Seijong KIM ; Jung Kyong SHIN ; Yoonah PARK ; Jung Wook HUH ; Hee Cheol KIM ; Seong Hyeon YUN ; Woo Yong LEE ; Yong Beom CHO
Cancer Research and Treatment 2025;57(2):507-518
Purpose:
While colonoscopy is the standard surveillance tool for stage I colorectal cancer according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, its effectiveness in detecting recurrence is debated. This study evaluates recurrence risk factors and patterns in stage I colorectal cancer to inform comprehensive surveillance strategies.
Materials and Methods:
A retrospective analysis of 2,248 stage I colorectal cancer patients who underwent radical surgery at Samsung Medical Center (2007-2018) was conducted. Exclusions were based on familial history, prior recurrences, preoperative treatments, and inadequate data. Surveillance included colonoscopy, laboratory tests, and computed tomography (CT) scans.
Results:
Stage I colorectal cancer patients showed favorable 5-year disease-free survival (98.3% colon, 94.6% rectum). Among a total of 1,467 colon cancer patients, 26 (1.76%) experienced recurrence. Of the 781 rectal cancer patients, 47 (6.02%) experienced recurrence. Elevated preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels and perineural invasion were significant recurrence risk factors in colon cancer, while tumor budding was significant in rectal cancer. Distant metastasis was the main recurrence pattern in colon cancer (92.3%), while rectal cancer showed predominantly local recurrence (50%). Colonoscopy alone detected recurrences in a small fraction of cases (3.7% in colon, 14.9% in rectum).
Conclusion
Although recurrence in stage I colorectal cancer is rare, relying solely on colonoscopy for surveillance may miss distant metastases or locoregional recurrence outside the colorectum. For high-risk patients, we recommend considering regular CT scans alongside colonoscopy. This targeted approach may enable earlier recurrence detection and improve outcomes in this subset while avoiding unnecessary scans for the low-risk majority.
3.Is Colonoscopy Alone Adequate for Surveillance in Stage I Colorectal Cancer?
Seijong KIM ; Jung Kyong SHIN ; Yoonah PARK ; Jung Wook HUH ; Hee Cheol KIM ; Seong Hyeon YUN ; Woo Yong LEE ; Yong Beom CHO
Cancer Research and Treatment 2025;57(2):507-518
Purpose:
While colonoscopy is the standard surveillance tool for stage I colorectal cancer according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, its effectiveness in detecting recurrence is debated. This study evaluates recurrence risk factors and patterns in stage I colorectal cancer to inform comprehensive surveillance strategies.
Materials and Methods:
A retrospective analysis of 2,248 stage I colorectal cancer patients who underwent radical surgery at Samsung Medical Center (2007-2018) was conducted. Exclusions were based on familial history, prior recurrences, preoperative treatments, and inadequate data. Surveillance included colonoscopy, laboratory tests, and computed tomography (CT) scans.
Results:
Stage I colorectal cancer patients showed favorable 5-year disease-free survival (98.3% colon, 94.6% rectum). Among a total of 1,467 colon cancer patients, 26 (1.76%) experienced recurrence. Of the 781 rectal cancer patients, 47 (6.02%) experienced recurrence. Elevated preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels and perineural invasion were significant recurrence risk factors in colon cancer, while tumor budding was significant in rectal cancer. Distant metastasis was the main recurrence pattern in colon cancer (92.3%), while rectal cancer showed predominantly local recurrence (50%). Colonoscopy alone detected recurrences in a small fraction of cases (3.7% in colon, 14.9% in rectum).
Conclusion
Although recurrence in stage I colorectal cancer is rare, relying solely on colonoscopy for surveillance may miss distant metastases or locoregional recurrence outside the colorectum. For high-risk patients, we recommend considering regular CT scans alongside colonoscopy. This targeted approach may enable earlier recurrence detection and improve outcomes in this subset while avoiding unnecessary scans for the low-risk majority.
4.A Phase II Study of Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy with Capecitabine Plus Simvastatin in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Hyunji JO ; Seung Tae KIM ; Jeeyun LEE ; Se Hoon PARK ; Joon Oh PARK ; Young Suk PARK ; Ho Yeong LIM ; Jeong Il YU ; Hee Chul PARK ; Doo Ho CHOI ; Yoonah PARK ; Yong Beom CHO ; Jung Wook HUH ; Seong Hyeon YUN ; Hee Cheol KIM ; Woo Yong LEE ; Won Ki KANG
Cancer Research and Treatment 2023;55(1):189-195
Purpose:
The purpose of this phase II trial was to evaluate whether the addition of simvastatin, a synthetic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with capecitabine confers a clinical benefit to patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).
Materials and Methods:
Patients with LARC (defined by clinical stage T3/4 and/or lymph node positivity) received preoperative radiation (45-50.4 Gy in 25-28 daily fractions) with concomitant capecitabine (825 mg/m2 twice per day) and simvastatin (80 mg, daily). Curative surgery was planned 4-8 weeks after completion of the CRT regimen. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR). The secondary endpoints included sphincter-sparing surgery, R0 resection, disease-free survival, overall survival, the pattern of failure, and toxicity.
Results:
Between October 2014 and July 2017, 61 patients were enrolled; 53 patients completed CRT regimen and underwent total mesorectal excision. The pCR rate was 18.9% (n=10) by per-protocol analysis. Sphincter-sparing surgery was performed in 51 patients (96.2%). R0 resection was achieved in 51 patients (96.2%). One patient experienced grade 3 liver enzyme elevation. No patient experienced additional toxicity caused by simvastatin.
Conclusion
The combination of 80 mg simvastatin with CRT and capecitabine did not improve pCR in patients with LARC, although it did not increase toxicity.
5.Regional Metabolic Changes Influencing Three-Dimensional Perception in Parkinson’s Disease
Yoonah PARK ; Kun-Woo PARK ; Chan-Nyoung LEE
Journal of Clinical Neurology 2022;18(4):447-452
Background:
and Purpose Stereopsis refers to the perception of depth and awareness of the distance of an object from the observer that results from the brain receiving visual stimuli from both eyes in combination. Patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (PD patients) typically experience problems with vision, eyeball movements, and visual perception due to degeneration of the cells that generate dopamine in the brain. We therefore hypothesized that stereopsis is affected more by visual cortical dysfunction in idiopathic PD than by retina and subcortical structural dysfunction.
Methods:
We analyzed stereopsis in 12 PD patients and 7 healthy controls using a three-dimensional (3D) television (TV). Before allowing patients to watch TV, we examined their visual acuity and strabismus using the Titmus Stereo Fly Test, and evaluated their cognitive function using cognitive tests. The patients watched 3D and two-dimensional (2D) versions of a movie with an approximate duration of 17 minutes, and then completed a questionnaire about stereopsis. All subjects underwent brain F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positronemission tomography after watching the 3D version of the movie. One week later, subjects watched the 2D version of the same movie under the same conditions. Each scan was analyzed using statistical parametric mapping (version 8) software.
Results:
The visual cortex was activated less in the PD patients than in the healthy controls when watching the 2D or 3D movie. However, there was no significant difference between watching 2D and 3D movies in the PD patients or healthy controls.
Conclusions
The lower activation of the primary visual cortex in PD patients suggests the presence of dysfunction of the visual cortex. In addition, there was less activation of the visual association cortex in PD patients when watching a 3D movie than in controls under the same conditions. This might be one reason why PD patients do not recognize real and dynamic stereopsis. These findings have clinical significance since they suggest that safety needs to be considered when making devices or programs using 3D or virtual reality for use by patients with various cerebral degenerative diseases.
9.Prescription Pattern of Antidepressants in Korea for Major Neurological Disorders: Before the Policy Change in 2017
Yoonah PARK ; Eun Sun BAEK ; Jimi CHOI ; Juneyoung LEE ; Su Hyeon LEE ; Kun Woo PARK
Journal of the Korean Neurological Association 2019;37(2):156-160
BACKGROUND: It is well known that patients with neurological disorders are vulnerable to depression. However, in Korea, National Health Insurance services had banned non-psychiatrists from prescribing antidepressants for more than 2 months until January 2017. Now, neurologists are able to prescribe antidepressants to patients with only four neurological disorders. Due to this recent change in national health insurance policy, there will be a large change in the prescription pattern of antidepressants. In this study, we performed an analysis of antidepressant prescription patterns in Korea prior to this recent policy change. METHODS: The source population of this retrospective cohort study is the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service database. We analyzed the claim database for patients who have one of four major neurologic disorders and had healthcare documentation submitted by healthcare providers between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2016. RESULTS: During 2012–2016, antidepressant prescription rates of 6.21% (127,192 of a total 2,048,165 patients), 9.93% (81,861 out of 824,290), 10.12% (173,582 of 1,714,776), and 13.36% (48,530 of 363,347) were found for cerebrovascular disease, epilepsy, dementia, and Parkinson's disease respectively. The most frequently prescribed antidepressant in cerebrovascular disease and epilepsy was tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs). In Parkinson's disease and dementia, the most frequently used antidepressant was selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: The overall prescription rate of antidepressants was much lower than the estimated rates reported in other countries. TCAs were the primarily prescribed antidepressant. It is now expected that TCAs will be replaced by newer antidepressants.
Antidepressive Agents
;
Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic
;
Cerebrovascular Disorders
;
Cohort Studies
;
Delivery of Health Care
;
Dementia
;
Depression
;
Epilepsy
;
Health Personnel
;
Humans
;
Insurance, Health
;
Korea
;
National Health Programs
;
Nervous System Diseases
;
Parkinson Disease
;
Prescriptions
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors
10.A Case of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Presented as Rapid Progressive Parkinsonism
Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders 2019;18(4):152-156
No abstract available.
Creutzfeldt-Jakob Syndrome
;
Parkinsonian Disorders

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail