Rectal cancer, which accounts for approximately 40% of colorectal cancers, remains a major clinical concern. Recent advances in diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment have steadily improved rectal cancer outcomes. Considering this, the Korean Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary (KRCM) Committee has aimed to provide clinicians and policymakers with up-to-date, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to support optimal decision-making, reflecting current evidence, the Korean healthcare context, and patient values and preferences. The Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rectal Cancer version 2.0 were developed through multidisciplinary collaboration with related academic societies, building upon and updating the KRCM Clinical Practice Guidelines version 1.0 (titled “Multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of rectal cancer”). These consensus guidelines of the KRCM were established based on a comprehensive literature review, evidence synthesis, with recommendation development guided by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology, and consideration of applicability in real-world clinical practice under the national health insurance system. Each recommendation has been presented with its strength and level of evidence.

Background: We compared the immunoglobulin (IG) heavy chain (IGH) leader and FR1 primer sets to measure clone sizes and detect immunoglobulin heavy chain variable (IGHV) region somatic hypermutations (SHMs) in Korean patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We also analyzed IGH and immunoglobulin kappa (IGK) to identify Korean-specific IGs in CLL. Methods: Next-generation sequencing (NGS)–based gene rearrangements and IGHV SHMs were assessed in 40 patients using IGH leader, IGH FR1, and IGK primers. Flow cytometry, karyotyping, interphase FISH, and NGS-based variant analyses were performed for 165 genes. Results: Clonal IGH and IGK rearrangements were detected in 100.0% and 97.5% of patients, respectively. Clonal size was generally smaller per NGS than per flow cytometry, particularly when using the IGH leader (median: 52.5%) versus the IGH FR1 primer set (73.2%). IGHV SHMs occurred in approximately 70% of patients; 10% showed primer set discrepancies. The incidence of IGHV SHMs was low in patients at high risk (i.e., with TP53 abnormalities; complex karyotypes; and ATM, NOTCH1, SF3B1, or BIRC3 variants). IGHV3 was the most common IGHV (58.3%), and IGHV4-34 was most frequently identified (14.6%). IGHV1 and IGHV1-69 usage differed significantly between Koreans and westerners. IGHJ4 was the most common IGHJ (56.3%). A single IGKV–IGKJ gene rearrangement was most frequently observed (18.9%), whereas intron-KDE was the most common rearrangement (30.6%). Conclusions NGS may underestimate CLL clonal size, particularly when using the IGH leader primer set. IGHV SHMs were inversely associated with negative prognostic factors.Our data suggest ethnic differences in CLL pathogenesis.

Objective: Although most gallbladder polyps are benign, some neoplastic polyps may be malignant or may serve as precursors to malignancy. Distinguishing neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps using imaging examinations remains a major challenge.This meta-analysis aimed to identify the ultrasound (US) features that are significantly associated with neoplastic polyps. Materials and Methods: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and KoreaMed databases were searched for articles published up to August 31, 2025. Bivariate random-effects models were used to calculate the meta-analytic pooled diagnostic odds ratios (DORs), sensitivities, and specificities, along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), for each US imaging feature in the diagnosis of neoplastic polyps. Results: Thirty studies evaluating 8,953 patients, including 1,216 (13.6%) patients with neoplastic polyps, were included.Among the nine evaluated US imaging features, namely, size ≥10 mm, sessile morphology, single polyp, coexisting gallstones, hypoechogenicity, heterogeneous echogenicity, gallbladder wall thickening (GBWT), absence of hyperechoic spot, and vascularity, eight were significantly associated with neoplastic polyps: size ≥10 mm (DOR: 6.23 [95% CI: 1.86– 20.90]), sessile morphology (DOR: 3.54 [1.93–5.97]), single polyp (DOR: 2.21 [1.76–2.74]), coexisting gallstones (DOR:1.86 [1.29–2.60]), hypoechogenicity (DOR: 3.55 [1.47–7.30]), GBWT (DOR: 9.38 [1.47–32.20]), absence of hyperechoic spots (DOR: 4.23 [2.46–6.83]), and vascularity (DOR: 9.72 [5.81–15.30]). Of these, size ≥10 mm demonstrated the highest pooled sensitivity (0.79 [95% CI: 0.68–0.87]), whereas hypoechogenicity showed the highest pooled specificity (0.93 [95% CI: 0.82–0.98]). Conclusion Eight US imaging features (size ≥10 mm, sessile morphology, single polyp, coexisting gallstones, hypoechogenicity, GBWT, absence of hyperechoic spots, and vascularity) were significantly associated with the presence of neoplastic polyps.These features may facilitate the management of gallbladder polyps.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the therapeutic outcomes of no-touch (NT) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) vs. tumorpuncture microwave ablation (MWA) in the treatment of single hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) measuring ≤3 cm. Materials and Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 304 patients who underwent either NT-RFA (n = 144) or MWA (n = 160) for a single HCC measuring ≤3 cm. Comparative analyses were conducted for the overall cohort, while 81 patients per group were matched using propensity score matching (PSM). The analyzed outcomes included technical success, primary technique efficacy, local tumor progression (LTP), and major complications. Cumulative LTP was estimated using Kaplan–Meier analysis and compared using the log-rank text, while the rate of ablative margin ≥5 mm and ablation time were compared using Chi-squared and Mann–Whitney U tests, respectively. Results: Technical success was achieved in 98.6% (142/144) and 100% (160/160) of in the NT-RFA and MWA patients, respectively before PSM (P = 0.224), and 98.8% (80/81) and 100% (81/81) after PSM (P = 1.000). The primary technique efficacies were 98.6% (142/144) and 100% (160/160) before PSM (P = 0.224), and 97.5 % (79/81) and 100% (81/81) after PSM (P = 0.497), respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative LTP rates were 1.4%, 1.4%, and 2.3%, respectively, for NTRFA and 5.1%, 8.6%, and 8.6%, respectively, for MWA before PSM (P = 0.013). After PSM, the corresponding rates were 0%, 0%, and 0% for NT-RFA, and 7.6%, 10.4%, and 10.4% for MWA (P = 0.006). Major complications were not observed. NT-RFA achieved a higher proportion, with an ablative margin ≥5 mm (88.7% [126/142] vs. 71.9% [115/160]; P < 0.001), but required longer ablation times (median, 10.0 vs. 6.0 min; P < 0.001). Conclusion NT-RFA showed superior local tumor control compared to MWA, despite greater procedural complexity and longer ablation times.

As sociocultural attitudes in South Korea continue to evolve, the growing visibility of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) individuals highlights an increasing need for medical education that addresses diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). In response to this need, Seoul National University College of Medicine (SNUCM) introduced an LGBTQ+ medicine curriculum in 2021. The curriculum aims to prepare future physicians to provide equitable and respectful care to LGBTQ+ patients and to promote improvements in LGBTQ+ health through an affirming clinical approach. The program consists of both required and elective components. A required one-hour session for second-year medical students covers essential terminology, the historical process of depathologizing LGBTQ+ identities, and core principles of non-discriminatory and inclusive clinical care. Students seeking more advanced training may enroll in a four-week elective course, which provides in-depth learning through direct engagement with LGBTQ+ community members and site visits to LGBTQ+-affirming clinical settings. In addition, a ten-week research course is available to interested second-year students. Highly motivated senior-year students may further participate in a five-week advanced clinical placement focused on clinical observation and seminar-based learning. Participants reported high satisfaction with the program and perceived meaningful improvements in their competence in providing LGBTQ+-affirming health care. Broader national implementation of similar curricula will require coordinated collaboration among medical schools and relevant professional and expert organizations to establish shared core educational content and regionally structured clinical clerkship programs. The experience at SNUCM demonstrates both the necessity and the practical feasibility of integrating DEI-focused education, including LGBTQ+ medicine. Such efforts are expected to support the development of physicians who are committed to health equity and capable of delivering high quality, person-centered care free from prejudice.

Background: A systematic evaluation of potential living liver donors is essential to ensure donor safety and optimize recipient outcomes in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). This study aimed to assess donor acceptance rates and reasons for disqualification among individuals evaluated for LDLT at a high-volume transplant center over a one-year period. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1,087 potential living liver donors who presented for LDLT evaluation in 2023. Of these, 991 candidates advanced beyond the initial screening (Stage 1) and underwent comprehensive clinical, imaging, and pathological assessments (Stages 2 and 3). Candidates who discontinued after Stage 1 were excluded due to the absence of documented reasons for non-progression. Results: Among the 991 candidates who proceeded beyond initial screening, 473 (47.7%) completed the full donor evaluation, of whom 466 were judged to be suitable donors. Among suitable donors, 384 (82.4%) proceeded to donor hepatectomy, whereas 82 did not, primarily due to recipient-related factors such as clinical deterioration or withdrawal of consent. Donor ineligibility was determined in 422 candidates (42.6%), most commonly due to inadequate remnant liver volume (52.8%), hepatic steatosis (20.6%), and insufficient graft size (10.2%). Among candidates undergoing Stage 2 evaluation, 162 (16.3%) failed to meet steatosis criteria; 126 were excluded solely for steatosis and advised weight reduction, and 39 subsequently became eligible and successfully donated. Conclusion In this high-volume LDLT center, donor disqualification was primarily driven by remnant liver volume and hepatic steatosis. Targeted interventions such as weight reduction enabled successful donation in a subset of initially ineligible candidates, underscoring the importance of individualized donor evaluation and pre-donation optimization.

Background: Warm ischemia is a major contributor to ischemic cholangiopathy and non-anastomotic biliary strictures (NAS) after liver transplantation, particularly in donation-after-circulatory-death grafts. However, the isolated impact of warm ischemia on peribiliary fibrosis is difficult to delineate because clinical settings involve overlapping effects of cold ischemia, reperfusion injury, and alloimmunity. This study aimed to establish a non-transplant rat model that isolates warm ischemic biliary injury and to compare the antifibrotic effects of rapamycin and tacrolimus. Methods: Warm ischemia was induced in Sprague–Dawley rats by ligating both ends of the peribiliary vascular plexus and the hepatic artery, followed by 30 minutes of portal vein clamping. Rats were randomly assigned to control, tacrolimus (1 mg/kg/day), or rapamycin (1 mg/kg/day) groups (n=15 per group). Serum alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, and total bilirubin were measured serially. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Sirius red staining were performed at 1, 3, and 6 weeks. Peribiliary fibrosis was quantified using digital image analysis of collagen area fraction. Results: Warm ischemia induced acute hepatobiliary injury with transient enzyme elevations, but no significant intergroup differences were observed. Histologically, biliary epithelial proliferation and collagen deposition increased progressively and became prominent at 6 weeks. At this time point, fibrosis ratios differed significantly (overall p=0.002): controls showed the highest fibrosis (4.8%), followed by tacrolimus (2.4%) and rapamycin (1.7%). Both immunosuppressants significantly reduced fibrosis compared with controls (p<0.05), whereas the difference between tacrolimus and rapamycin was not significant. Conclusion This warm ischemia model demonstrates that isolated ischemic injury alone can induce progressive peribiliary fibrosis. Rapamycin and tacrolimus attenuated fibrosis, with rapamycin producing the lowest collagen deposition. These findings provide mechanistic insight into ischemic cholangiopathy after liver transplantation—particularly in donation after circulatory death grafts—and underscore the need for further studies using models that incorporate cold ischemia, reperfusion, and alloimmune factors.

Purpose: Due to its rarity, treatment guidelines for appendiceal cancer have traditionally followed those established for colorectal cancer, despite showing distinct histologic and clinical features. This study aimed to compare the clinicopathologic characteristics and long-term oncologic outcomes of appendiceal cancer with those of right-sided colon cancers. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with stage I–III appendiceal, cecal, or ascending colon cancer who underwent curative resection between 2010 and 2020 at our center. A 1:3:3 exact matching for age, sex, TNM stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy was performed. Survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods. Results: Overall, 245 patients with appendiceal cancer (n = 35), ascending colon cancer (n = 105), and cecal cancer (n = 105) were analyzed. Appendiceal cancer exhibited a higher proportion of T4 tumors and fewer harvested lymph nodes compared with ascending or cecal cancers. The mean follow-up duration was 9.5 years. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were lower in appendiceal cancer (66.2% and 52.9%) than in ascending (91.2% and 78.4%) or cecal cancer (88.5% and 78.3%). Similarly, the 10-year disease-free survival rate was lower in appendiceal cancer (59.2%) compared with ascending (83.1%) and cecal cancers (78.4%). Cox regression analysis identified age (≥65 years), perforation, nodal metastasis, and lymphovascular invasion as independent predictors of poor prognosis. Conclusion Appendiceal cancer exhibited significantly worse long-term survival compared to cecal or ascending colon cancer. Tumor perforation, nodal metastasis, and lymphovascular invasion were adverse prognostic factors for overall and disease-free survival.

Purpose: Weight reduction (WR) can reduce liver volume, affecting the graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR). This study aimed to evaluate the decrease in liver volume after WR and analyze risk factors affecting liver volume reduction in potential liver donors with steatosis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data of 147 potential liver donors with steatosis who participated in a WR program prior to liver transplantation between January 2016 and December 2021. Total liver volume (TLV) was measured using CT and MRI. Risk factors for large liver volume reduction (≥10%) were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Results: Ninety-seven donors (66.0%) underwent donor hepatectomy after WR. Liver volumes showed a statistically significant decrease (from 1,399.6 ± 315.4 mL to 1,283.6 ± 271.2 mL, P < 0.05). Thirty-eight donors (42.7%) showed large liver volume reduction. There was a more significant reduction in weight, AST, and ALT in the large liver volume reduction group than in the small liver volume reduction group (all P < 0.05). WR percentage and ALT abnormalities were independent risk factors for large liver volume reduction (odds ratio, 1.184 [95% confidence interval, 1.054–1.329] and odds ratio, 5.502 [95% confidence interval, 1.660–18.229], respectively; all P < 0.05). Conclusion Potential liver donors with 7% or more WR or ALT abnormality require liver volume/GRWR remeasurement after WR to ensure adequate graft size and prevent small-for-size syndrome.