Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is a heterogeneous primary immunodeficiency characterized by reduced levels of immunoglobulin (Ig)G, with or without IgA and/or IgM deficiency, and hypogammaglobulinemia. Clinical manifestations are diverse, ranging from recurrent infections to autoimmune and allergic diseases. While CVID has been rarely reported in the Korean population, particularly in adults, we report 2 adult cases of CVID comorbid with asthma and Behcet’s disease. The first case of a 53-year-old with severe allergic asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis experienced recurrent respiratory infections, stomatitis, and cystitis requiring frequent antibiotic treatment. Laboratory findings indicated a T2-high asthma phenotype, with elevated serum total IgE specific IgE to dog hair and fractional exhaled nitric oxide. Immunological evaluation revealed decreased serum IgG (including IgG1 and IgG2), along with hypogammaglobulinemia. She had been treated with regular anti-IgE antibody therapy and intravenous immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IVIGRT). The second case of a 38-year-old with Behçet’s disease and uveitis had bronchial asthma and rhinitis that were exacerbated by recurrent infections despite standard asthma therapy. Laboratory findings revealed a T2-low phenotype and a marked reduction in serum IgG (including IgG1, IgG2, and IgG4), and hypogammaglobulinemia, consistent with CVID.IVIGRT effectively reduced asthma exacerbations and infection episodes in both cases. These cases highlight the clinical heterogeneity of CVID and its potential overlap with allergic and autoimmune diseases. Immunological evaluation of underlying immunodeficiency should be considered in adult patients with asthma who present with frequent exacerbations and recurrent infections. Early diagnosis and IVIGRT can prevent complications and improve outcomes.

Background: Rapid pathogen identification and antibiotic-susceptibility tests (ASTs) are important for treating bloodstream infections. We compared the performance of the QMAC-dRAST and BD Phoenix M50 direct AST (dPhoenix) systems using bacterial pellets prepared from positive blood culture broth and evaluated their impact on treatment modification. Methods: Direct AST results for 106 Enterobacterales isolates were retrospectively reviewed. Conventional broth microdilution was used to calculate categorical agreement (CA), very major error (VME), major error (ME), and minor error (mE). For isolates showing high VMEs in both methods, supplementary tests were performed. Clinical impact was evaluated by calculating the time required to obtain AST results (time-to-result) and observing changes in antibiotics prescribed after performing ASTs. Results: Both systems showed acceptable overall CA, VME, ME, and mE values (QMACdRAST: 93.6%, 1.6%, 0.9%, and 5.3%, respectively; dPhoenix: 93.1%, 0.9%, 0.6%, and 6.2%, respectively). Piperacillin–tazobactam showed high VMEs with QMAC-dRAST (4/20, 20.0%) and dPhoenix (3/20, 15.0%). Colony AST on 13 isolates revealed that QMACdRAST testing yielded lower minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for piperacillin–tazobactam with three isolates, whereas dPhoenix testing yielded higher MICs with two isolates and lower MICs with two isolates. The average time-to-result was 20.8 hr and 30.1 hr for QMAC-dRAST and dPhoenix, respectively (P < 0.001). After AST, the number of optimal treatments increased from 43 (46.7%) to 72 (78.3%) (P < 0.001). Conclusions The QMAC-dRAST and dPhoenix systems provided reliable AST results with a short time-to-result. However, we recommend performing complementary tests, such as the disk diffusion test, for piperacillin–tazobactam.

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is one of the most effective scaffold manufacturing techniques which might revolutionize the realm of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. The scaffolds, one of the major elements of tissue engineering, along with growth factors and cells, are still one of the most promising approaches for developing organ regeneration. However, the applications of 3D-printed hard scaffolds might have limitations due to their poor surface properties, which play a crucial role in cell recruitment and infiltration, tissue-scaffold integration, and anti-inflammatory properties. Various prerequisites have been suggested for clinical applications of 3D-printed substitute for human body. Consequently, continuous amendment has been made to modify the surface properties, porosities and mechanical properties of these scaffolds. The techniques that modify the surfaces through chemical and material modifications can also be applied to facilitate the efficacy of these scaffolds. In this review, we summarized the characteristics of 3D printing technology and discuss the development direction of the latest 3D printing technology toward meeting the unmet needs in the clinic.

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is one of the most effective scaffold manufacturing techniques which might revolutionize the realm of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. The scaffolds, one of the major elements of tissue engineering, along with growth factors and cells, are still one of the most promising approaches for developing organ regeneration. However, the applications of 3D-printed hard scaffolds might have limitations due to their poor surface properties, which play a crucial role in cell recruitment and infiltration, tissue-scaffold integration, and anti-inflammatory properties. Various prerequisites have been suggested for clinical applications of 3D-printed substitute for human body. Consequently, continuous amendment has been made to modify the surface properties, porosities and mechanical properties of these scaffolds. The techniques that modify the surfaces through chemical and material modifications can also be applied to facilitate the efficacy of these scaffolds. In this review, we summarized the characteristics of 3D printing technology and discuss the development direction of the latest 3D printing technology toward meeting the unmet needs in the clinic.

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is one of the most effective scaffold manufacturing techniques which might revolutionize the realm of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. The scaffolds, one of the major elements of tissue engineering, along with growth factors and cells, are still one of the most promising approaches for developing organ regeneration. However, the applications of 3D-printed hard scaffolds might have limitations due to their poor surface properties, which play a crucial role in cell recruitment and infiltration, tissue-scaffold integration, and anti-inflammatory properties. Various prerequisites have been suggested for clinical applications of 3D-printed substitute for human body. Consequently, continuous amendment has been made to modify the surface properties, porosities and mechanical properties of these scaffolds. The techniques that modify the surfaces through chemical and material modifications can also be applied to facilitate the efficacy of these scaffolds. In this review, we summarized the characteristics of 3D printing technology and discuss the development direction of the latest 3D printing technology toward meeting the unmet needs in the clinic.

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is one of the most effective scaffold manufacturing techniques which might revolutionize the realm of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. The scaffolds, one of the major elements of tissue engineering, along with growth factors and cells, are still one of the most promising approaches for developing organ regeneration. However, the applications of 3D-printed hard scaffolds might have limitations due to their poor surface properties, which play a crucial role in cell recruitment and infiltration, tissue-scaffold integration, and anti-inflammatory properties. Various prerequisites have been suggested for clinical applications of 3D-printed substitute for human body. Consequently, continuous amendment has been made to modify the surface properties, porosities and mechanical properties of these scaffolds. The techniques that modify the surfaces through chemical and material modifications can also be applied to facilitate the efficacy of these scaffolds. In this review, we summarized the characteristics of 3D printing technology and discuss the development direction of the latest 3D printing technology toward meeting the unmet needs in the clinic.

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is one of the most effective scaffold manufacturing techniques which might revolutionize the realm of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. The scaffolds, one of the major elements of tissue engineering, along with growth factors and cells, are still one of the most promising approaches for developing organ regeneration. However, the applications of 3D-printed hard scaffolds might have limitations due to their poor surface properties, which play a crucial role in cell recruitment and infiltration, tissue-scaffold integration, and anti-inflammatory properties. Various prerequisites have been suggested for clinical applications of 3D-printed substitute for human body. Consequently, continuous amendment has been made to modify the surface properties, porosities and mechanical properties of these scaffolds. The techniques that modify the surfaces through chemical and material modifications can also be applied to facilitate the efficacy of these scaffolds. In this review, we summarized the characteristics of 3D printing technology and discuss the development direction of the latest 3D printing technology toward meeting the unmet needs in the clinic.

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) has been used for over a century and has been demonstrated to be effective in treating patients with various allergic diseases. AIT allergens can be administered through various routes, including subcutaneous, sublingual, intralymphatic, oral, or epicutaneous routes. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has recently gained clinical interest, and it is considered an alternative treatment for allergic rhinitis (AR) and asthma. This review provides an overview of the current evidence-based studies that address the use of SLIT for treating AR, including (1) mechanisms of action, (2) appropriate patient selection for SLIT, (3) the current available SLIT products in Korea, and (4) updated information on its efficacy and safety. Finally, this guideline aims to provide the clinician with practical considerations for SLIT.

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is a causative treatment of allergic diseases in which allergen extracts are regularly administered in a gradually escalated doses, leading to immune tolerance and consequent alleviation of allergic diseases. The need for uniform practice guidelines in AIT is continuously growing as the number of potential candidates for AIT increases and new therapeutic approaches are tried. This updated version of the Korean Academy of Asthma Allergy and Clinical Immunology recommendations for AIT, published in 2010, proposes an expert opinion by specialists in allergy, pediatrics, and otorhinolaryngology. This guideline deals with the basic knowledge of AIT, including mechanisms, clinical efficacy, allergen standardization, important allergens in Korea, and special consideration in pediatrics. The article also covers the methodological aspects of AIT, including patient selection, allergen selection, schedule and doses, follow-up care, efficacy measurements, and management of adverse reactions. Although this guideline suggests the optimal dosing schedule, an individualized approach and modifications are recommended considering the situation for each patient and clinic.

Fexuprazan (DWP14012), a potassium-competitive acid blocker, is a medical formulation prescribed to inhibit the secretion of gastric acid. The present study encompasses a comparative evaluation of pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis between the previous (reference) and size-reduced (test) formulation of fexuprazan 20 mg in healthy subjects. The study employed a randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-sequence, 2-period, crossover design with a 7-day wash-out between periods. A total of 24 subjects were enrolled in this randomized study. During each period, the 21 subjects received either the test or reference formulation. Blood samples were collected at multiple time point ranging from 0 (pre-dose) to 48 hours post-dosing for PK analysis. The calculated PK parameters were considered bioequivalent when the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) were within the bioequivalence limit of 0.8–1.25. Safety and tolerability were included in the evaluation. A total of 20 subjects completed the study. Point estimates (90% CIs) of the GMRs were 1.1014 (0.9892–1.2265) for the maximum plasma concentration and 1.0530 (0.9611–1.1536) for the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration, between the test and reference formulations.The reference and size-reduced test formulations of fexuprazan were well tolerated with no reports of serious adverse events. In conclusion, size-reduced and previous formulations of fexuprazan 20 mg were bioequivalent with regard to PKs, safety and tolerability.