Malignant melanoma represents a highly aggressive form of skin cancer.At present,surgical resection remains the primary treatment modality for the majority of patients diagnosed with this condition.However,the five-year disease-free survival rate for high-risk melanoma patients undergoing surgery alone ranges from 40％to 60％.The implementation of preoperative and postoper-ative(neo)adjuvant therapies has been demon-strated to diminish recurrence rates and improve survival outcomes for high-risk surgical patients.Consequently,various(neo)adjuvant treatments for melanoma-including radiotherapy,biochemo-therapy,immunotherapy,and targeted therapy-have been the subject of extensive research in re-cent years.This review aims to summarize the lat-est advancements in(neo)adjuvant therapies for resectable high-risk melanoma patients,with the objective of providing an effective(neo)adjuvant therapy strategy that may improve patient survival and overall prognosis.

Objective A Social Care Needs Assessment Tool for Terminal Patients at Home is constructed and tested for its reliability and validity.Methods In view of the Social Ecosystem Theoiy,based on the semi-structured interviews,participatory observation and literature analysis of the social care needs of terminal patients at home,a questionnaire item pool was formed.Through 3 rounds of Delphi expert consultations,the initial version of the tool was formed.From April to December 2023,a convenient sampling method was used to select 504 terminal patients from 22 hospitals in 5 provinces as the research subjects.The reliability and validity of the tool were tested.Result The constructed tool in this study contained 3 dimensions:micro,meso,macro,with a total of 34 items.Cronbach's α of the tool was 0.966 and split-half reliability was 0.877;I-CVI at the item level was 0.875～1.000 and S-CVI/Ave was 0.989;the exploratory factor analysis results showed that the factors load of each dimension were greater than 0.4;the results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the tool had good fitting degree.Conclusion The reliability and validity of the nursing-based social care needs assessment tool for terminal patients at home constructed in this study are good,and it can provide a valid tool for healthcare professionals to assess the home-based social care needs of terminal patients.

Objective:To analyze the differences in clinicopathological features between non-elderly and elderly patients with melanoma, and to identify risk factors for prognosis in elderly patients with melanoma.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical and pathological data collected from non-elderly (aged < 60 years) and elderly (aged ≥ 60 years) patients with melanoma, who were confirmedly diagnosed according to clinical manifestations and histopathological findings at the People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from January 2008 to December 2023. The differences in clinical and pathological characteristics between the two groups were analyzed using the chi-square test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. The relationship between clinicopathological variables and overall survival was analyzed using a Cox regression model.Results:A total of 233 patients with cutaneous melanoma were included, with the age being 60.3 ± 14.7 years, and the number of patients was highest in the age group of 60 - 69 years. There were 102 cases (43.8%) in the < 60 years old group and 131 cases (56.2%) in the ≥ 60 years old group. Compared with the < 60 years old group, the ≥ 60 years old group showed a significant increase in the proportion of patients with active tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes ( P = 0.040), proportion of those with Ki-67 index ≥ 30% ( P = 0.010), and Charlson comorbidity index ( P = 0.002), but a significant decrease in the proportion of patients with BRAF/KIT/NRAS mutations ( P = 0.003), proportion of those receiving surgical treatment ( P = 0.034), and proportion of those receiving adjuvant therapy ( P = 0.042). There was a significant difference in the overall survival between the two groups (log-rank test, χ2 = 6.10, P = 0.014). The gender, metastasis status, presence or absence of ulceration, distant metastasis status, American Joint Committee on Cancer staging, Charlson comorbidity index, and Breslow thickness were important prognostic indicators affecting the overall survival in the elderly patients with melanoma. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that males ( P = 0.015, HR = 4.622, 95% CI: 1.352 - 15.798), presence of distant metastasis ( P = 0.013, HR = 9.844, 95% CI: 4.621 - 59.763), and Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 3 ( P = 0.038, HR = 3.149, 95% CI: 1.067 - 9.294) were independent risk factors affecting the overall survival in the elderly patients with melanoma. Conclusions:Compared with the non-elderly patients with melanoma, a higher Ki-67 index, a higher Charlson comorbidity index, less surgical treatment, and less adjuvant therapy were more common in the elderly patients with melanoma. Males, the presence of distant metastasis, and Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 3 appeared to be independent risk factors affecting the overall survival in the elderly patients with melanoma.

Objective To translate Evidence-Informed Decision-Making Competence Measure for Chinese nurses and test its validity and reliability.Methods A research group was set up to use the Brislin translation model to translate the original scale into Chinese,and the back translation,cross-cultural adaptation,pre-experiment and cognitive interview were conducted to finally form the Chinese version of the Evidence-Informed Decision-Making Competence Measure for nurses.A total of 1 247 nurses from 7 tertiary A hospitals in Beijing,Hubei,Hunan and Xinjiang were selected by convenience sampling method in April 2024 to test its reliability and validity.Results 1 026 effective question-naires were collected,with an effective recovery rate of 82.28％.The Chinese version of the Evidence-Informed Decision-Making Competence Measure included 25 items,including knowledge/skill,attitude and behavior.A total of 3 common factors were extracted from exploratory factor analysis,and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 91.725％.The content validity index at the item level was 0.83-1.00;the content validity index at the scale level was 0.988;the calibration association validity was 0.496.The Cronbach's α coefficient of the whole scale was 0.992;the half-point reliability was 0.930;the retest reliability was 0.927.Conclusion The Chinese version of Evidence-Informed Decision-Making Competence Measure for nurses has good reliability and validity,and it can be used to evaluate the evidence-informed decision-making competence of Chinese nurses,provide references for promoting evidence-based nursing practice and evidence-informed decision-making.

Objective:To analyze the differences in clinicopathological features between non-elderly and elderly patients with melanoma, and to identify risk factors for prognosis in elderly patients with melanoma.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical and pathological data collected from non-elderly (aged < 60 years) and elderly (aged ≥ 60 years) patients with melanoma, who were confirmedly diagnosed according to clinical manifestations and histopathological findings at the People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from January 2008 to December 2023. The differences in clinical and pathological characteristics between the two groups were analyzed using the chi-square test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. The relationship between clinicopathological variables and overall survival was analyzed using a Cox regression model.Results:A total of 233 patients with cutaneous melanoma were included, with the age being 60.3 ± 14.7 years, and the number of patients was highest in the age group of 60 - 69 years. There were 102 cases (43.8%) in the < 60 years old group and 131 cases (56.2%) in the ≥ 60 years old group. Compared with the < 60 years old group, the ≥ 60 years old group showed a significant increase in the proportion of patients with active tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes ( P = 0.040), proportion of those with Ki-67 index ≥ 30% ( P = 0.010), and Charlson comorbidity index ( P = 0.002), but a significant decrease in the proportion of patients with BRAF/KIT/NRAS mutations ( P = 0.003), proportion of those receiving surgical treatment ( P = 0.034), and proportion of those receiving adjuvant therapy ( P = 0.042). There was a significant difference in the overall survival between the two groups (log-rank test, χ2 = 6.10, P = 0.014). The gender, metastasis status, presence or absence of ulceration, distant metastasis status, American Joint Committee on Cancer staging, Charlson comorbidity index, and Breslow thickness were important prognostic indicators affecting the overall survival in the elderly patients with melanoma. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that males ( P = 0.015, HR = 4.622, 95% CI: 1.352 - 15.798), presence of distant metastasis ( P = 0.013, HR = 9.844, 95% CI: 4.621 - 59.763), and Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 3 ( P = 0.038, HR = 3.149, 95% CI: 1.067 - 9.294) were independent risk factors affecting the overall survival in the elderly patients with melanoma. Conclusions:Compared with the non-elderly patients with melanoma, a higher Ki-67 index, a higher Charlson comorbidity index, less surgical treatment, and less adjuvant therapy were more common in the elderly patients with melanoma. Males, the presence of distant metastasis, and Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 3 appeared to be independent risk factors affecting the overall survival in the elderly patients with melanoma.

Objective To translate Evidence-Informed Decision-Making Competence Measure for Chinese nurses and test its validity and reliability.Methods A research group was set up to use the Brislin translation model to translate the original scale into Chinese,and the back translation,cross-cultural adaptation,pre-experiment and cognitive interview were conducted to finally form the Chinese version of the Evidence-Informed Decision-Making Competence Measure for nurses.A total of 1 247 nurses from 7 tertiary A hospitals in Beijing,Hubei,Hunan and Xinjiang were selected by convenience sampling method in April 2024 to test its reliability and validity.Results 1 026 effective question-naires were collected,with an effective recovery rate of 82.28％.The Chinese version of the Evidence-Informed Decision-Making Competence Measure included 25 items,including knowledge/skill,attitude and behavior.A total of 3 common factors were extracted from exploratory factor analysis,and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 91.725％.The content validity index at the item level was 0.83-1.00;the content validity index at the scale level was 0.988;the calibration association validity was 0.496.The Cronbach's α coefficient of the whole scale was 0.992;the half-point reliability was 0.930;the retest reliability was 0.927.Conclusion The Chinese version of Evidence-Informed Decision-Making Competence Measure for nurses has good reliability and validity,and it can be used to evaluate the evidence-informed decision-making competence of Chinese nurses,provide references for promoting evidence-based nursing practice and evidence-informed decision-making.

Malignant melanoma represents a highly aggressive form of skin cancer.At present,surgical resection remains the primary treatment modality for the majority of patients diagnosed with this condition.However,the five-year disease-free survival rate for high-risk melanoma patients undergoing surgery alone ranges from 40％to 60％.The implementation of preoperative and postoper-ative(neo)adjuvant therapies has been demon-strated to diminish recurrence rates and improve survival outcomes for high-risk surgical patients.Consequently,various(neo)adjuvant treatments for melanoma-including radiotherapy,biochemo-therapy,immunotherapy,and targeted therapy-have been the subject of extensive research in re-cent years.This review aims to summarize the lat-est advancements in(neo)adjuvant therapies for resectable high-risk melanoma patients,with the objective of providing an effective(neo)adjuvant therapy strategy that may improve patient survival and overall prognosis.

Objective A Social Care Needs Assessment Tool for Terminal Patients at Home is constructed and tested for its reliability and validity.Methods In view of the Social Ecosystem Theoiy,based on the semi-structured interviews,participatory observation and literature analysis of the social care needs of terminal patients at home,a questionnaire item pool was formed.Through 3 rounds of Delphi expert consultations,the initial version of the tool was formed.From April to December 2023,a convenient sampling method was used to select 504 terminal patients from 22 hospitals in 5 provinces as the research subjects.The reliability and validity of the tool were tested.Result The constructed tool in this study contained 3 dimensions:micro,meso,macro,with a total of 34 items.Cronbach's α of the tool was 0.966 and split-half reliability was 0.877;I-CVI at the item level was 0.875～1.000 and S-CVI/Ave was 0.989;the exploratory factor analysis results showed that the factors load of each dimension were greater than 0.4;the results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the tool had good fitting degree.Conclusion The reliability and validity of the nursing-based social care needs assessment tool for terminal patients at home constructed in this study are good,and it can provide a valid tool for healthcare professionals to assess the home-based social care needs of terminal patients.

Objective To build a comprehensive evaluation system for the operating benefit of clinical departments in cancer hospitals,so as to provide data support for the fine operation management of hospitals.Methods Literature review and semi-structured interview were used to form the index pool.Two rounds of Delphi expert consultation were used to determine the index of the evaluation system,and the analytic hierarchy process was used to determine the index weight.Finally,the weighted TOPSIS was used for empirical case analysis.Results The positive coefficient in the two rounds of Delphi expert consultation were 82.6％and 100％,the authority coefficient was 0.808,and the coordination coefficient was between 0 and 1.All indexes at all levels passed the consistency test.Finally,a comprehensive evaluation system consisting of 4 dimensions,19 indexes in surgery,16 indicators in radiotherapy and 16 indicators in internal medicine was constructed.Indicators at all levels were tested for consistency,resulting in the construction of a comprehensive evaluation system consisting of 4 dimensions,19 indicators for surgery and 16 indicators each for radiotherapy and internal medicine departments.Conclusion The comprehensive evaluation system of operating benefit of clinical departments in cancer hospitals can help hospitals and departments to find out the shortcomings of operation,build the path of operating benefit improvement,and realize the connotation improvement and high-quality development of hospitals.

Objective Based on the technology acceptance model,to explore the influence mechanism of technical support,perceived interactivity,perceived usefulness,perceived ease of use and perceived risk on medical staff's report intention on adverse events,and to provide path suggestions for improving medical staff's report intention adverse events.Methods The multi-stage sampling method was used to select 637 medical staffs of tertiary public hospitals in Hangzhou who used the information-based platform to report adverse events as the research respondents,and the self-developed scale of report intention on adverse events was used as the research tool,monofactor analysis were conducted by Wilcoxon rank-sum test,and the structural equation model was used to analyze the influence path of their report intention on adverse events.Results Perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness have positive effects on medical staff's report intention on adverse events(β=0.264,0.658;P＜0.001);Perceived risk negatively affected the medical staff's report intention on adverse events(β=-0.143,P＜0.001).The indirect effects of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on medical staff's report intention on adverse events are 0.538 and 0.205,respectively.Conclusion Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use plays a mediating role in perceived interactivity and medical staff's report intention on adverse events.