OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical efficacy of Qihuang needle therapy for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) children with sleep disorder. METHODS: A total of 60 ASD children with sleep disorder were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, 30 cases in each group. Both groups were treated with structured education intervention, 60 min each time, once a day, 6 times a week. Qihuang needle therapy was applied at Yintang (GV24⁺), Baihui (GV20) and bilateral Jueyinshu (BL14), Xinshu (BL15) in the observation group, multi-direction needling was delivered and without needle retaining. The treatment was given 2 times a week, each treatment was delivered at interval of 2 days at least. Behavioral intervention was adopted in the control group. Treatment for consecutive 12 weeks was required in both groups. Before and after treatment, the scores of children's sleep habits questionnaire (CSHQ), the autism behavior checklist (ABC), the childhood autism rating scale (CARS), and the childhood autism behavior scale (CABS) were observed in the two groups. RESULTS: After treatment, the scores of CSHQ, ABC, CARS and CABS were decreased compared with those before treatment (P<0.01), and the above scores in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION Qihuang needle therapy can effectively treat ASD with sleep disorder, improve the core symptoms of ASD and the sleep quality.
Humans ; Autism Spectrum Disorder/physiopathology* ; Male ; Female ; Child ; Sleep Wake Disorders/physiopathology* ; Child, Preschool ; Acupuncture Therapy ; Acupuncture Points ; Treatment Outcome ; Sleep ; Needles

Resistance training promotes protein synthesis and hypertrophy, enhancing strength of skeletal muscle through the activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and the subsequent increases of ribosome biogenesis and translation capacity. Recent studies indicate that resistance training has positive effects on physical fitness and illness treatment, yet the mechanisms underlying hypertrophic adaptation remain insufficiently understood. Human studies focused on the correlation between mTOR signals and hypertrophy-related protein production, while animal research demonstrated that mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) is the main regulator of resistance training induced-hypertrophy. A number of upstream factors of mTORC1 have been identified, while the downstream mechanisms involved in the resistance training induced-hypertrophy are rarely studied. mTORC1 regulates the activation of satellite cells, which fuse with pre-existing fibers and contribute to hypertrophic response to resistance training. This article reviews the research progress on the mechanism of skeletal muscle hypertrophy caused by resistance training, analyzes the role of mTOR-related signals in the adaptation of skeletal muscle hypertrophy, and aims to provide a basis for basic research on muscle improvements through resistance training.
TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases/physiology* ; Resistance Training ; Humans ; Signal Transduction/physiology* ; Muscle, Skeletal/physiology* ; Hypertrophy ; Animals ; Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1

Since the promulgation of the first Drug Administration Law of the People's Republic of China 40 years ago in 1984, China has undergone four main stages in the traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) regulation: the initial establishment of TCM regulation rules(1984-1997), the formation of a modern TCM regulatory system(1998-2014), the reform of the review and approval system for new TCM drugs(2015-2018), and the construction of a scientific regulation system for TCM(2019-2024). Over the past five years, a series of milestone achievements of TCM regulation in China have been achieved in the six aspects, including its strategic objectives and the establishment of a science-based regulatory system, the reform of the review and approval system for new TCM drugs, the optimization and improvement of the TCM standard system and its formation mechanism, comprehensive enhancement of regulatory capabilities for TCM safety, international harmonization of TCM regulation and its role in promoting innovation. Looking ahead, centered on advancing TCMRS to establish a sound regulatory framework tailored to the unique characteristics of TCM, TCM regulation will evolve into new reform patterns, advancing and extending across eight critical fronts, including the legal framework and policy architecture, the review and approval system for new TCM drugs, the quality standard and management system of TCM, the comprehensive quality & safety regulation and traceability system, the research and transformation system for TCMRS, AI-driven innovations in TCM regulation, the coordination between high-quality industrial development and high-level regulation, and the leadership in international cooperation and regulatory harmonization. In this way, a unique path for the development of modern TCM regulation with Chinese characteristics will be pioneered.
Humans ; China ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal/standards* ; History, 20th Century ; History, 21st Century ; Medicine, Chinese Traditional/trends*

Traditional development of small protein scaffolds has relied on display technologies and mutation-based engineering, which limit sequence and functional diversity, thereby constraining their therapeutic and application potential. Protein design tools have significantly advanced the creation of novel protein sequences, structures, and functions. However, further improvements in design strategies are still needed to more efficiently optimize the functional performance of protein-based drugs and enhance their druggability. Here, we extended an evolution-based design protocol to create a novel minibinder, BindHer, against the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). It not only exhibits super stability and binding selectivity but also demonstrates remarkable properties in tissue specificity. Radiolabeling experiments with ^99mTc, ⁶⁸Ga, and ¹⁸F revealed that BindHer efficiently targets tumors in HER2-positive breast cancer mouse models, with minimal nonspecific liver absorption, outperforming scaffolds designed through traditional engineering. These findings highlight a new rational approach to automated protein design, offering significant potential for large-scale applications in therapeutic mini-protein development.

Objective:To compare the clinical characteristics and laboratory findings between elderly rheumatoid arthritis(ERA)with those of non-elderly rheumatoid arthritis(NERA)patients.Methods:A cross-sectional study was conducted.The study collected laboratory indicators of 1, 286 ERA and 3, 211 NERA patients admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University between January 2015 and December 2022, including inflammatory indicators, complete blood count, liver/kidney function tests, blood lipid, and glycated hemoglobin(HbA 1c), etc. Results:Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and rheumatoid factor in ERA patients were higher than those in NERA patients( t=13.940, 8.453, 3.400, all P<0.001). Hemoglobin, red blood cell count, red blood cell distribution width, albumin and total protein in ERA patients were lower than those in NERA patients( t=2.380, 6.546, 1.954, 12.800, 10.490, all P<0.05). The levels of aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, γ-glutamyl transferase, total bile acid, globulin, lactate dehydrogenase, creatinine and urea nitrogen in ERA patients were higher than those in NERA patients( t=3.366, 3.422, 2.760, 4.520, 3.676, Z=8.678, t=10.630, 17.640, all P<0.05). The levels of uric acid, alanine aminotransferase, total cholesterol, triglyceride, blood glucose and HbA 1c in female ERA patients were higher than those in NERA group( t=6.009, 1.100, 2.111, 3.954, 4.262, 2.667, all P<0.05). Decreased RBC, ALB, TP, GLB( OR=0.279, 95% CI: 0.133-0.582; OR=0.867, 95% CI: 0.809-0.930; OR=0.948, 95% CI: 0.903-0.996; OR=0.817, 95% CI: 0.798-0.833), and increased ALT, AST, Scr, BUN, LDL-C and TC( OR=1.013, 95% CI: 0.997-1.018; OR=1.046, 95% CI: 1.015-1.079; OR=1.026, 95% CI: 1.005-1.047; OR=1.034, 95% CI: 1.019-1.051; OR=1.373, 95% CI: 1.088-1.733; OR=1.266, 95% CI: 1.022-1.569)were independent influencing factors of ERA. Conclusions:ERA patients exhibit elevated inflammatory markers and are more prone to anemia, liver and kidney function damage, and malnutrition.Furthermore, female ERA patients are more likely to have abnormal uric acid, alanine aminotransferase, blood lipids, and blood glucose.

Objective:To investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with high-myopia macular hole retinal detachment (MHRD) combined with choroidal detachment and to preliminarily analyze factors associated with postoperative hole closure.Methods:A retrospective clinical case series study. A total of 68 patients with high myopia (68 eyes) with MHRD diagnosed by Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University People’s Hospital from January 2019 to April 2024 were included in this study. Among them, there were 14 males (14 eyes) and 54 females (54 eyes). The mean age was (61.10±9.66) years. All eyes were treated with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with silicone oil or gas filling. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, and B-mode ultrasonography were performed. The BCVA test was performed using the Snellen visual acuity chart, which was statistically converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity. The range of choroidal detachment was defined according to the number of involved quadrants observed in B-mode ultrasound or surgery, which was divided into 1 to 4 quadrants. Axial length (AL) was measured under retinal reattachment. In 68 eyes, there were 17 eyes with choroidal detachment and 51 eyes without choroidal detachment, respectively. There were 17 eyes with choroidal detachment, and the detachment range involved 1, 2, 2 and 12 eyes in 1, 2, 3 and 4 quadrants, respectively. During operation, 13% C 3F 8 was filled in 2 eyes, all of which were not complicated with choroidal detachment. 66 eyes were filled with silicone oil. According to whether the patients were complicated with choroidal detachment, the patients were divided into the group without choroidal detachment and the group with choroidal detachment. Independent sample t test, Welch two-sample t test or Mann-Whitney U test were used for comparison between groups. Generalized linear regression and logistic regression were used to analyze the relationship between the aperture size of postoperative unclosed holes and the closed hole after surgery and clinical factors. Results:At 3 months after surgery, the logMAR BCVA of the affected eye was 1.29±0.43, with a preoperative to postoperative difference ranging from -1.60 to 0.70 (-0.51±0.51) logMAR units. The AL ranged from 26.6 to 34.3 (29.60±2.12) mm. Among 68 eyes, macular hole of 37 (54.4%, 37/68) eyes were open and 31 (45.6%, 31/68) eyes were closed, respectively. The hole diameter of the open eye was (753±424) μm. There was no significant difference in age, course of disease and AL between the two groups ( W=412.0, 477.5, 427.0; P>0.05). Before operation, BCVA in patients with choroidal detachment was worse ( W=257.5) and intraocular pressure was lower ( t=4.051) in patients with choroidal detachment compared with those without choroidal detachment, with statistical significance ( P<0.05). At 3 months after surgery, BCVA in patients with choroidal detachment was significantly worse than that in patients without choroidal detachment, with statistical significance ( W=284.0, P<0.05). There were no significant differences in logMAR BCVA difference ( t=0.616) and macular hole closure rate ( χ 2=0.000) before and after surgery ( P>0.05). The reoperation rate of retinal detachment due to persistent or recurrent retinal detachment was significantly higher in the group with choroid detachment than in the group without choroid detachment, and the difference was statistically significant (odds ratio=6.424, P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that young age was significantly correlated with macular hole closure failure after surgery ( β=0.077, P=0.015). There was no correlation between AL, duration of disease, BCVA before surgery, intraocular pressure, wether combined with choroid detachment range and postoperative hole closure ( β=-0.072, 0.000, 0.672, -0.085, -0.391; P>0.05). Conclusions:Concomitant choroidal detachment adversely affected on both pre-operative and post-operative visual acuity in high myopia MHRD. It is closely associated with the risk of recurrent retinal detachment and the needs of multiple operations, but has no significant effect on hole closure rate. Lower age of onset may be a risk factor for macular hole closure.

Objective To analyze the dosimetric differences between Monaco Monte Carlo(MC)algorithm and Pinnacle collapse cone convolution(CCC)algorithm for the same machine model using the 6 MV flatten-filter free(FFF)mode,thus providing a reference for the clinical application of these two treatment planning systems.Methods According to the MPPG5 and TRS430 reports,the acceptance and commissioning of Monaco MC algorithm model and Pinnacle CCC algorithm model in Department of Radiation Oncology,Shenzhen Hospital,Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences were performed.A retrospectively analysis was conducted on 30 cases,including 10 cases of nasopharyngeal cancer,6 cases of lung cancer,4 cases of esophageal cancer,and 10 cases of cervical cancer.For each case,a 6 MV FFF plan was designed in Pinnacle using CCC algorithm.A 2.5 mm dose grid was selected for plan optimization and dose calculation.The plan was then exported to Monaco,where dose to medium was calculated using MC algorithm and a 2.5 mm dose grid with a 1%uncertainty for each control point.Both calculations in Pinnacle and Monaco took into account the impact of the treatment couch and immobilization devices on dose attenuation.The dose differences to the target volumes and major organs at risk between Pinnacle and Monaco for 3 different body parts including the head,chest and abdomen were compared.Results(1)For nasopharyngeal cancer,compared with Pinnacle CCC algorithm,Monaco MC algorithm lowered the Vpd of PTVp,PTVn,PTVrpn,PTV1 and PTV2 by 9.98%,2.64%,15.0%,1.93%and 8.01%,elevated the Dmax of PTVp,PTVn and PTVrpn by 2.98%,5.62%and 2.39%,increased the Dmean of PTVn and PTV1 by 1.87%and 0.72%,respectively;and the Dmax of the brainstem,the Dmax of the optic chiasm,and the Dmean of the right parotid gland were 3.83%lower,7.03%higher and 1.32%higher in Monaco MC algorithm as compared with Pinnacle CCC algorithm,respectively.(2)For lung cancer and esophageal cancer,Monaco MC algorithm showed increases of 2.37%,4.18%,15.30%,6.36%and 1.04%in the Dmax of PGTV,the V20,V5 and Dmean of lungs,and the V30 of heart as compared with Pinnacle CCC algorithm,respectively.(3)For cervical cancer,the Vpd of PTV_LR,Dmax of PTV_LR,the V40 of the rectum,the Dmax of the small intestine,and the Dmean of humeral head were 7.70%lower,3.70%higher,4.31%lower,3.05%higher and 2.07%higher in Monaco MC algorithm than in Pinnacle CCC algorithm,respectively.These differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion For the above 3 treatment sites,significant differences are found in dose calculations for target areas and organs at risk between Monaco MC algorithm and Pinnacle CCC algorithm for the same treatment plan.Attention should be paid to the differences in dose algorithms for different treatment planning systems in clinical applications,which may have impacts on patient survival rates and organ toxicity.

Objective To analyze the dosimetric differences between Monaco Monte Carlo(MC)algorithm and Pinnacle collapse cone convolution(CCC)algorithm for the same machine model using the 6 MV flatten-filter free(FFF)mode,thus providing a reference for the clinical application of these two treatment planning systems.Methods According to the MPPG5 and TRS430 reports,the acceptance and commissioning of Monaco MC algorithm model and Pinnacle CCC algorithm model in Department of Radiation Oncology,Shenzhen Hospital,Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences were performed.A retrospectively analysis was conducted on 30 cases,including 10 cases of nasopharyngeal cancer,6 cases of lung cancer,4 cases of esophageal cancer,and 10 cases of cervical cancer.For each case,a 6 MV FFF plan was designed in Pinnacle using CCC algorithm.A 2.5 mm dose grid was selected for plan optimization and dose calculation.The plan was then exported to Monaco,where dose to medium was calculated using MC algorithm and a 2.5 mm dose grid with a 1%uncertainty for each control point.Both calculations in Pinnacle and Monaco took into account the impact of the treatment couch and immobilization devices on dose attenuation.The dose differences to the target volumes and major organs at risk between Pinnacle and Monaco for 3 different body parts including the head,chest and abdomen were compared.Results(1)For nasopharyngeal cancer,compared with Pinnacle CCC algorithm,Monaco MC algorithm lowered the Vpd of PTVp,PTVn,PTVrpn,PTV1 and PTV2 by 9.98%,2.64%,15.0%,1.93%and 8.01%,elevated the Dmax of PTVp,PTVn and PTVrpn by 2.98%,5.62%and 2.39%,increased the Dmean of PTVn and PTV1 by 1.87%and 0.72%,respectively;and the Dmax of the brainstem,the Dmax of the optic chiasm,and the Dmean of the right parotid gland were 3.83%lower,7.03%higher and 1.32%higher in Monaco MC algorithm as compared with Pinnacle CCC algorithm,respectively.(2)For lung cancer and esophageal cancer,Monaco MC algorithm showed increases of 2.37%,4.18%,15.30%,6.36%and 1.04%in the Dmax of PGTV,the V20,V5 and Dmean of lungs,and the V30 of heart as compared with Pinnacle CCC algorithm,respectively.(3)For cervical cancer,the Vpd of PTV_LR,Dmax of PTV_LR,the V40 of the rectum,the Dmax of the small intestine,and the Dmean of humeral head were 7.70%lower,3.70%higher,4.31%lower,3.05%higher and 2.07%higher in Monaco MC algorithm than in Pinnacle CCC algorithm,respectively.These differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion For the above 3 treatment sites,significant differences are found in dose calculations for target areas and organs at risk between Monaco MC algorithm and Pinnacle CCC algorithm for the same treatment plan.Attention should be paid to the differences in dose algorithms for different treatment planning systems in clinical applications,which may have impacts on patient survival rates and organ toxicity.

Objective:To compare the clinical characteristics and laboratory findings between elderly rheumatoid arthritis(ERA)with those of non-elderly rheumatoid arthritis(NERA)patients.Methods:A cross-sectional study was conducted.The study collected laboratory indicators of 1, 286 ERA and 3, 211 NERA patients admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University between January 2015 and December 2022, including inflammatory indicators, complete blood count, liver/kidney function tests, blood lipid, and glycated hemoglobin(HbA 1c), etc. Results:Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and rheumatoid factor in ERA patients were higher than those in NERA patients( t=13.940, 8.453, 3.400, all P<0.001). Hemoglobin, red blood cell count, red blood cell distribution width, albumin and total protein in ERA patients were lower than those in NERA patients( t=2.380, 6.546, 1.954, 12.800, 10.490, all P<0.05). The levels of aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, γ-glutamyl transferase, total bile acid, globulin, lactate dehydrogenase, creatinine and urea nitrogen in ERA patients were higher than those in NERA patients( t=3.366, 3.422, 2.760, 4.520, 3.676, Z=8.678, t=10.630, 17.640, all P<0.05). The levels of uric acid, alanine aminotransferase, total cholesterol, triglyceride, blood glucose and HbA 1c in female ERA patients were higher than those in NERA group( t=6.009, 1.100, 2.111, 3.954, 4.262, 2.667, all P<0.05). Decreased RBC, ALB, TP, GLB( OR=0.279, 95% CI: 0.133-0.582; OR=0.867, 95% CI: 0.809-0.930; OR=0.948, 95% CI: 0.903-0.996; OR=0.817, 95% CI: 0.798-0.833), and increased ALT, AST, Scr, BUN, LDL-C and TC( OR=1.013, 95% CI: 0.997-1.018; OR=1.046, 95% CI: 1.015-1.079; OR=1.026, 95% CI: 1.005-1.047; OR=1.034, 95% CI: 1.019-1.051; OR=1.373, 95% CI: 1.088-1.733; OR=1.266, 95% CI: 1.022-1.569)were independent influencing factors of ERA. Conclusions:ERA patients exhibit elevated inflammatory markers and are more prone to anemia, liver and kidney function damage, and malnutrition.Furthermore, female ERA patients are more likely to have abnormal uric acid, alanine aminotransferase, blood lipids, and blood glucose.