Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is highly prevalent among elderly patients, and as the global population ages, the number of elderly patients with CKD is increasing. Elderly patients require additional considerations beyond those required for their younger counterparts, such as comorbidities, frailty, and geriatric syndromes. In this review, we primarily focus on these additional considerations specific to elderly patients and discuss the assessment of CKD and its management strategies, including blood pressure and glycemic control; dyslipidemia, anemia, and electrolyte and metabolic acidosis management; and medication dosage, among others, as well as polypharmacy and nonpharmacological management. Furthermore, the concept of conservative kidney management and the practical recommendations of the Korean Society of Geriatric Nephrology for elderly patients with end-stage kidney disease requiring dialysis therapy are discussed. In particular, the aging rate in Korea is exceptionally high; therefore, it is crucial to pay more attention to the increase in elderly patients with CKD. A more palliative approach, rather than intensive treatment strategies, may be necessary for these patients. In a world with an abundance of information, shared decision-making with patients is of great importance, and it is essential to keep in mind that this holds true for elderly patients as well.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is highly prevalent among elderly patients, and as the global population ages, the number of elderly patients with CKD is increasing. Elderly patients require additional considerations beyond those required for their younger counterparts, such as comorbidities, frailty, and geriatric syndromes. In this review, we primarily focus on these additional considerations specific to elderly patients and discuss the assessment of CKD and its management strategies, including blood pressure and glycemic control; dyslipidemia, anemia, and electrolyte and metabolic acidosis management; and medication dosage, among others, as well as polypharmacy and nonpharmacological management. Furthermore, the concept of conservative kidney management and the practical recommendations of the Korean Society of Geriatric Nephrology for elderly patients with end-stage kidney disease requiring dialysis therapy are discussed. In particular, the aging rate in Korea is exceptionally high; therefore, it is crucial to pay more attention to the increase in elderly patients with CKD. A more palliative approach, rather than intensive treatment strategies, may be necessary for these patients. In a world with an abundance of information, shared decision-making with patients is of great importance, and it is essential to keep in mind that this holds true for elderly patients as well.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is highly prevalent among elderly patients, and as the global population ages, the number of elderly patients with CKD is increasing. Elderly patients require additional considerations beyond those required for their younger counterparts, such as comorbidities, frailty, and geriatric syndromes. In this review, we primarily focus on these additional considerations specific to elderly patients and discuss the assessment of CKD and its management strategies, including blood pressure and glycemic control; dyslipidemia, anemia, and electrolyte and metabolic acidosis management; and medication dosage, among others, as well as polypharmacy and nonpharmacological management. Furthermore, the concept of conservative kidney management and the practical recommendations of the Korean Society of Geriatric Nephrology for elderly patients with end-stage kidney disease requiring dialysis therapy are discussed. In particular, the aging rate in Korea is exceptionally high; therefore, it is crucial to pay more attention to the increase in elderly patients with CKD. A more palliative approach, rather than intensive treatment strategies, may be necessary for these patients. In a world with an abundance of information, shared decision-making with patients is of great importance, and it is essential to keep in mind that this holds true for elderly patients as well.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is highly prevalent among elderly patients, and as the global population ages, the number of elderly patients with CKD is increasing. Elderly patients require additional considerations beyond those required for their younger counterparts, such as comorbidities, frailty, and geriatric syndromes. In this review, we primarily focus on these additional considerations specific to elderly patients and discuss the assessment of CKD and its management strategies, including blood pressure and glycemic control; dyslipidemia, anemia, and electrolyte and metabolic acidosis management; and medication dosage, among others, as well as polypharmacy and nonpharmacological management. Furthermore, the concept of conservative kidney management and the practical recommendations of the Korean Society of Geriatric Nephrology for elderly patients with end-stage kidney disease requiring dialysis therapy are discussed. In particular, the aging rate in Korea is exceptionally high; therefore, it is crucial to pay more attention to the increase in elderly patients with CKD. A more palliative approach, rather than intensive treatment strategies, may be necessary for these patients. In a world with an abundance of information, shared decision-making with patients is of great importance, and it is essential to keep in mind that this holds true for elderly patients as well.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is highly prevalent among elderly patients, and as the global population ages, the number of elderly patients with CKD is increasing. Elderly patients require additional considerations beyond those required for their younger counterparts, such as comorbidities, frailty, and geriatric syndromes. In this review, we primarily focus on these additional considerations specific to elderly patients and discuss the assessment of CKD and its management strategies, including blood pressure and glycemic control; dyslipidemia, anemia, and electrolyte and metabolic acidosis management; and medication dosage, among others, as well as polypharmacy and nonpharmacological management. Furthermore, the concept of conservative kidney management and the practical recommendations of the Korean Society of Geriatric Nephrology for elderly patients with end-stage kidney disease requiring dialysis therapy are discussed. In particular, the aging rate in Korea is exceptionally high; therefore, it is crucial to pay more attention to the increase in elderly patients with CKD. A more palliative approach, rather than intensive treatment strategies, may be necessary for these patients. In a world with an abundance of information, shared decision-making with patients is of great importance, and it is essential to keep in mind that this holds true for elderly patients as well.

Colonoscopy is a key procedure for the early detection of colorectal cancer. Despite its importance, the discomfort associated with colonoscopy often requires sedation, and the ideal sedation regimen remains to be determined. In this prospective randomized controlled trial, patients scheduled for colonoscopy were randomly assigned to two different sedation protocols. Group A received a combination of midazolam and propofol, while group B was given midazolam and pethidine. The study analyzed data from 51 patients, with 23 in group A and 28 in group B. The incidence of adverse events was similar across both groups. Additionally, no significant differences were observed in cecal intubation times or total procedure durations. Notably, group A had a lower frequency of required postural changes (1.0±0.7 vs. 1.5±0.7, p=0.02) and a reduced rate of manual compression (52.2% vs. 82.1%, p=0.02). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding subjective pain or overall satisfaction. Both sedation regimens were found to be safe and effective. The midazolam and propofol combination was associated with a smoother procedure, evidenced by fewer postural adjustments and less manual compression needed during colonoscopy.

Objectives: This study was conducted to systematically summarize trends in research concerning patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as reported in Korean medical journals. Methods: We performed a literature search of KoreaMed from January 2020 to September 2022. We included only primary studies of patients with COVID-19. Two reviewers screened titles and abstracts, then performed full-text screening, both independently and in duplicate. We first identified the 5 journals with the greatest numbers of eligible publications, then extracted data pertaining to the general characteristics, study population attributes, and research features of papers published in these journals. Results: Our analysis encompassed 142 primary studies. Of these, approximately 41.0% reported a funding source, while 3.5% disclosed a conflict of interest. In 2020, 42.9% of studies included fewer than 10 participants; however, by 2022, the proportion of studies with over 200 participants had increased to 40.6%. The most common design was the cohort study (48.6%), followed by case reports/series (35.2%). Only 3 randomized controlled trials were identified. Studies most frequently focused on prognosis (58.5%), followed by therapy/intervention (20.4%). Regarding the type of intervention/exposure, therapeutic clinical interventions comprised 26.1%, while studies of morbidity accounted for 13.4%. As for the outcomes measured, 50.7% of studies assessed symptoms/clinical status/improvement, and 14.1% evaluated mortality. Conclusions Employing a systematic approach, we examined the characteristics of research involving patients with COVID-19 that was published in Korean medical journals from 2020 onward. Subsequent research should assess not only publication trends over a longer timeframe but also the quality of evidence provided.

Optic neuritis is a rare extraintestinal manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease. Antitumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF-α) agents are essential treatment options in inflammatory bowel diseases. However, anti-TNF-α agents can implicate optic neuritis and other demyelinating diseases as complications of these agents. We report a patient of infliximab-induced optic neuritis in a patient with ulcerative colitis who was treated with high-dose steroids after discontinuation of infliximab.

The reliability of presepsin as a biomarker of sepsis may be reduced in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT). This study analyzed the utility of plasma presepsin values in predicting mortality in patients with AKI requiring CKRT, particularly those with sepsis-associated AKI. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 57 patients who underwent CKRT, with plasma presepsin measurements, from April 2022 to March 2023; 35 had sepsis-associated AKI. The predictive values of plasma presepsin, as well as Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, for 28-day mortality were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic curves. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for 28-day mortality in the sepsis-associated AKI subgroup. Results: Overall, plasma presepsin showed a lower area under the curve value (0.636; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.491–0.781) than the APACHE II (0.663; 95% CI, 0.521–0.804) and SOFA (0.731; 95% CI, 0.599–0.863) scores did. However, in sepsis-associated AKI, the area under the curve increased to 0.799 (95% CI, 0.653–0.946), which was higher than that of the APACHE II (0.638; 95% CI, 0.450–0.826) and SOFA (0.697; 95% CI, 0.519–0.875) scores. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, a high presepsin level was an independent risk factor for 28-day mortality in sepsis-associated AKI (hazard ratio, 3.437; p = 0.03). Conclusion: Presepsin is a potential prognostic marker in patients with sepsis-associated AKI requiring CKRT.

Background: Exercise capacity is known to be an independent predictor of cardiovascular events and mortality. However, most previous studies were based on Western populations.Further study is warranted for Asian patients according to ethnic or national standards. We aimed to compare prognostic values of Korean and Western nomograms for exercise capacity in Korean patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we enrolled 1,178 patients (62 ± 11 years;78% male) between June 2015 and May 2020, who were referred for cardiopulmonary exercise testing in our cardiac rehabilitation program. The median follow-up period was 1.6 years. Exercise capacity was measured in metabolic equivalents by direct gas exchange method during the treadmill test. The nomogram for exercise capacity from healthy Korean individuals and a previous landmark Western study was used to determine the percentage of predicted exercise capacity. The primary endpoint was the composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; all-cause death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, stroke and hospitalization for heart failure). Results: A multivariate analysis showed that the risk of primary endpoint was more than double (hazard ratio [HR], 2.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10–4.40) in the patients with lower exercise capacity (< 85% of predicted) by Korean nomogram. The lower exercise capacity was one of the strong independent predictors along with left ventricular ejection fraction, age, and level of hemoglobin. However, the lower exercise capacity by Western nomogram could not predict the primary endpoint (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.85–2.10). Conclusion Korean patients with CVD with lower exercise capacity have higher risk of MACE.Considering inter-ethnic differences in cardiorespiratory fitness, the Korean nomogram provides more suitable reference values than the Western nomogram to determine lower exercise capacity and predict cardiovascular events in Korean patients with CVD.