1.Construction and Validation of Outcome Indicators Set for Hybrid Type 1 Implementation Research: Based on the SMART Study
Lang LINGHU ; Yiyuan CAI ; Dong XU
Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital 2026;17(3):871-882
Using the hybrid type 1 implementation study "The Shared Medical Appointment for diabetes in China: an optimization trial(SMART)" as an example, this study introduces the methods of constructing and validating an outcome indicator set for hybrid type 1 studies. Based on principles such as comprehensiveness and operability, we selected the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance) framework, the Implementation Outcomes Framework (IOF), and the PRECEDE-PROCEED model. After comparison and screening, an outcome evaluation indicator item pool was formed. Two rounds of expert consultation were conducted, and the content validity was evaluated using the item-level content validity index ( This study integrated the RE-AIM framework and three pre-evaluation dimensions from the IOF, forming an initial item pool for shared medical appointments (SMA) that included 8 dimensions (acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance), 14 secondary indicators, and 24 tertiary indicators. The response rate of the two rounds of expert consultation was 100%, with an expert authority coefficient of 0.90. The The outcome indicator set constructed in this study demonstrates good validity and operability, and the construction and validation process can serve as a reference for other researchers. Different implementation outcome frameworks have different applicable scenarios; researchers should select appropriate frameworks or integrate them according to their own needs to comprehensively evaluate outcomes and enhance the systematization and comparability of research.
2.Organizational Readiness for Change and Factors Influencing the Implementation of Shared Medical Appointment for Diabetes in Primary Healthcare Institutions
Wei YANG ; Yiyuan CAI ; Jiajia CHEN ; Run MAO ; Lang LINGHU ; Sensen LYU ; Dong XU
Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital 2025;16(2):479-491
The success of implementation research is closely tied to the institution's pre-implementation readiness. This study aims to explore the organizational readiness for change (ORC) and its influencing factors on primary healthcare settings in the implementation of the "Shared Medical Appointment for Diabetes (SMART) in China: design of an optimization trial" and to enhance ORC and provide insights to support the effective implementation of the program. Qualitative interviews and quantitative surveys were conducted to evaluate the ORC level and its influencing factors in 12 institutions implementing the SMART program. The Scale for Assessing the Institution's Readiness to Implement Evidence-Based Practices was utilized to measure ORC levels. Qualitative interviews were conducted among change implementers to gather information regarding the status of influencing factors. Thematic analysis was applied to extract factors from the interview data, and an assessment questionnaire was developed to measure the perceived impact of these factors. A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) method was employed to identify the influencing factors of ORC and pathways leading to high-level ORC. Seventy implementers from 12 institutions, encompassing administrators, clinicians, and health managers, participated in the interviews and surveys. The median and interquartile of the ORC scores were 105.20 (101.23, 107.33). The fsQCA indicated that a clear understanding of specific tasks and responsibilities, the active engagement of key participants, sufficient preliminary preparation, and the use of audits and feedback mechanisms were critical pathways to a high-level ORC. Conversely, institutions lacking key participants, preliminary preparation, or marginal influence demonstrated a low-level ORC. Before implementing innovation, Coherence and Cognitive Participation were identified as critical factors in influencing ORC. Strong leadership from key participants played pivotal role in enhancing readiness for change and was essential for improving implementation fidelity and overall program success.
3.Localization and Content Validation of the Organizational Readiness of Implementing Evidence-based Practices Scale
Jiajia CHEN ; Yiyuan CAI ; Wei YANG ; Run MAO ; Lang LINGHU ; Dong XU
Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital 2025;16(3):765-776
This study aimed to localize the workplace readiness questionnaire (WRQ) and validate its applicability for assessing readiness for implementation of evidence-based practices (EBP) in primary care settings in China. The localization of the instrument will provide a practical instrument for assessing organizational readiness for change (ORC). The WRQ was translateed into Chinese version using the modified Brislin translation model, and its cross-cultural validity, content validity, and generalizability were evaluated by the Delphi method, and the expert feedback was evaluated using the item-level content validity index (I-CVI), scale-level content validity index (S-CVI), and corrected Kappa value. The index weights were evaluated by the analytic hierarchical process (AHP). The target users of the scale were invited to quantitatively evaluate its item importance score (IIS), and the surface validity was evaluated by combining the qualitative feedback from their cognitive interviews. To clarify the purpose of the scale, we revised its name to the Organizational Readiness of Implementing Evidence-Based Practices (ORIEBP) Scale. The ORIEBP scale contained five dimensions, which were Change Context, Change Valence, Information Evaluation, Change Commitment, Change Efficiency, and 32 items. After two rounds of the Delphi method to refine the construction of three dimensions and expressions of 11 items, the I-CVI were from 0.73 to 1.00, the Kappa value were from 0.70 to 1.00, and the S-CVI was over 0.92. All evaluation matrices of the hierarchical analysis method met the requirement of consistency ratio (CR < 0.1), and the weights of five dimensions were 0.2083, 0.2022, 0.1907, 0.2193, and 0.1795, in sequence. Nine out of eleven experts identified that items were applicable to other readiness assessment scenarios. The IIS scores for the five dimensions and 32 items were ranged from 2.93 to 3.54, and 2.71 to 3.42, presenting good face validity. The cognitive interview results showed that professional expressions were complex to understand. This study validated the ORIEBP scale and has good content validity and generalizability. The scale can be further improved by expanding its scope of use and validating its structure validity and reliability in different settings.
4.Ubiquitin-specific peptidase 21 promotes M2 polarization of endometriotic macrophages by increasing FOXM1 stability.
Min DONG ; Min XU ; Derong FANG ; Yiyuan CHEN ; Mingzhe ZHANG
Chinese Journal of Cellular and Molecular Immunology 2025;41(7):603-610
Objective To explore the mechanism of ubiquitin specific peptidase 21 (USP21) increasing the stability of forkhead box protein M1 (FOXM1) and promoting M2 polarization of macrophages in endometriosis (EM). Methods Eutopic endometrial stromal cells (EESC) collected from patients and normal endometrial stromal cells (NESC) from routine health examiners were cultured in vitro, and the expression levels of USP21 and FOXM1 were detected using RT-qPCR and Western blot. EESCs were co-cultured with macrophages. M1 polarization markers of interleukin 6 (IL-6) and CXC chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10) and M2 polarization markers of CD206 and fibronectin 1 (FN1) were tested using RT-qPCR. M2 marker CD206 was further detected by flow cytometry. IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), IL-10, and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) levels in cell supernatant were detected by ELISA. Co-immunoprecipitation was used to assess the interaction between USP21 and FOXM1, and the ubiquitination level of FOXM1. FOXM1 protein stability was detected through cycloheximide (CHX) assay. Results USP21 and FOXM1 expression levels in the EESC group were significantly increased compared with those in the NESC group; compared with the NESC + M0 group, the EESC + M0 group showed no significant difference in the expression of M1 polarization markers (IL-6 and CXCL10), but increased expression of M2 polarization markers (CD206 and FN1), along with notably increased number of M2 macrophages; there was no significant difference in IL-6 and TNF-α levels, but increased levels of IL-10 and TGF-β in the cell supernatant. The above findings indicated that the deubiquitinase USP21 was highly expressed in EM, promoting M2 polarization of macrophages. Knocking down USP21 or FOXM1 can inhibit M2 polarization of EM macrophages. USP21 interacted with FOXM1 in EESC, leading to a decrease in FOXM1 ubiquitination level and an increase in FOXM1 protein stability. Overexpression of FOXM1 reversed the inhibitory effect of knocking down USP21 on M2 polarization of EM macrophages. Conclusion The deubiquitinase USP21 interacts with FOXM1 to increase the stability of FOXM1 and promote M2 polarization of EM macrophages.
Humans
;
Forkhead Box Protein M1/genetics*
;
Female
;
Macrophages/cytology*
;
Endometriosis/genetics*
;
Ubiquitin Thiolesterase/genetics*
;
Cells, Cultured
;
Endometrium/metabolism*
;
Ubiquitination
;
Adult
;
Interleukin-10/metabolism*
;
Interleukin-6/metabolism*
;
Protein Stability
;
Stromal Cells/metabolism*
5.Stakeholder Preference Assessment in Implementation Research:Application of Best-worst Scaling
Run MAO ; Yiyuan CAI ; Wei YANG ; Zhiguo LIU ; Lang LINGHU ; Jiajia CHEN ; Mengjiao LIANG ; Lieyu HUANG ; Siyuan LIU ; Dong XU
Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital 2025;16(1):224-234
In the field of healthcare service,it is crucial to optimize medical innovation services by combining the preferences of health service providers and demanders(i.e.,stakeholders).The best-worst scaling(BWS)method is a recently developed stated preference method for assessing preferences with distinctive advantages.Nevertheless,there is a lack of a comprehensive introduction to stakeholder preference assessment using BWS,thus constraining its applications and promotion.This paper introduces the process of using BWS to assess service providers'preferences for the Shared Medical Appointment for diabetes(SMART),an integrated healthcare service of medicine and health management,in the hope of providing reference for researchers for promoting the use of BWS in implementation research.
6.Association between modelling cycle and antioxidant pathways in rat models of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
Guoguo ZHI ; Bingjie SHAO ; Yiyuan FENG ; Sha ZHU ; Jie MU ; Dong WANG
Chinese Journal of Immunology 2025;41(2):257-262
Objective:To construct a rat model of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD)by choline-deficient high fat diet(CDHFD),and to observe the association between feeding cycle and antioxidant pathway.Methods:The study lasted 16 weeks and was divided into 4 cycles.Detection of pathological changes and expression of antioxidant enzymes in rats liver in different cycles.Results:The early stage of liver steatosis and inflammation in model rats was 2~4 weeks,non-alcoholic steatohepatitis(NASH)stage was 4~8 weeks,and liver fibrosis progression was 8~16 weeks.Mechanistic studies had shown that the expressions of antioxidant enzymes Nrf2,SOD and GSH-Px in the liver of NAFLD rats gradually decreased with the extension of the feeding cycle.Conclusion:Different modeling cycles can successfully induce the pathological changes of steatosis,inflammation and liver fibrosis in rat liver,and the pathological changes are time-dependent with the expressions of antioxidant enzymes.
7.Association between modelling cycle and antioxidant pathways in rat models of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
Guoguo ZHI ; Bingjie SHAO ; Yiyuan FENG ; Sha ZHU ; Jie MU ; Dong WANG
Chinese Journal of Immunology 2025;41(2):257-262
Objective:To construct a rat model of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD)by choline-deficient high fat diet(CDHFD),and to observe the association between feeding cycle and antioxidant pathway.Methods:The study lasted 16 weeks and was divided into 4 cycles.Detection of pathological changes and expression of antioxidant enzymes in rats liver in different cycles.Results:The early stage of liver steatosis and inflammation in model rats was 2~4 weeks,non-alcoholic steatohepatitis(NASH)stage was 4~8 weeks,and liver fibrosis progression was 8~16 weeks.Mechanistic studies had shown that the expressions of antioxidant enzymes Nrf2,SOD and GSH-Px in the liver of NAFLD rats gradually decreased with the extension of the feeding cycle.Conclusion:Different modeling cycles can successfully induce the pathological changes of steatosis,inflammation and liver fibrosis in rat liver,and the pathological changes are time-dependent with the expressions of antioxidant enzymes.
8.Stakeholder Preference Assessment in Implementation Research
Run MAO ; Yiyuan CAI ; Chengming YANG ; Jinglan PENG ; Zhiqing NING ; Siyuan LIU ; Dong XU
Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital 2024;15(6):1447-1455
In the process of conducting implementation research on health service issues, stakeholders' preference for contents related to evidence-based practice (EBP) and implementation strategies is closely related to whether EBP can be effectively implemented.However, multiple preference assessment methods exist, each with their own strengths, weaknesses, and application scenarios, which makes it challenging for researchers to select appropriate and effective preference assessment methods. This paper aims to review the origins, characteristics, and application scenarios of commonly used preference assessment methods, with the hope of providing valuable reference and lessons for domestic scholars to select and apply appropriate preference assessment methods in implementation research.
9.Stakeholder Preference Assessment in Implementation Research
Run MAO ; Yiyuan CAI ; Chengming YANG ; Jinglan PENG ; Zhiqing NING ; Siyuan LIU ; Dong XU
Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital 2024;15(6):1447-1455
In the process of conducting implementation research on health service issues, stakeholders' preference for contents related to evidence-based practice (EBP) and implementation strategies is closely related to whether EBP can be effectively implemented.However, multiple preference assessment methods exist, each with their own strengths, weaknesses, and application scenarios, which makes it challenging for researchers to select appropriate and effective preference assessment methods. This paper aims to review the origins, characteristics, and application scenarios of commonly used preference assessment methods, with the hope of providing valuable reference and lessons for domestic scholars to select and apply appropriate preference assessment methods in implementation research.
10.Stakeholder Preference Assessment in Implementation Research: Application of Best-worst Scaling
Run MAO ; Yiyuan CAI ; Wei YANG ; Zhiguo LIU ; Lang LINGHU ; Jiajia CHEN ; Mengjiao LIANG ; Lieyu HUANG ; Siyuan LIU ; Dong XU
Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital 2024;16(1):224-234
In the field of healthcare service, it is crucial to optimize medical innovation services by combining the preferences of health service providers and demanders (i.e., stakeholders). The best-worst scaling (BWS) method is a recently developed stated preference method for assessing preferences with distinctive advantages. Nevertheless, there is a lack of a comprehensive introduction to stakeholder preference assessment using BWS, thus constraining its applications and promotion. This paper introduces the process of using BWS to assess service providers' preferences for the Shared Medical Appointment for diabetes (SMART), an integrated healthcare service of medicine and health management, in the hope of providing reference for researchers for promoting the use of BWS in implementation research.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail