OBJECTIVE: To investigate the therapeutic effects of Banxia Xiexin Decoction (BXD), a herbal medicine formula, on inflammation and the imbalance of the gut microbiota in a rat model of colorectal cancer (CRC) induced by azoxymethane (AOM) /dextran sulfate sodium (DSS). METHODS: A total of 75 male C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into five groups: normal control group (NC), model group (MODEL), low-dose BXD treatment group (L-BXD), high-dose BXD treatment (H-BXD) group and MS treatment group (MS). BXD and MS were used in CRC mice at the doses of 3.915 g/kg, 15.66 g/kg, 0.6 g/kg for 3 weeks consecutively. Histopathological changes in the colon were observed using hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining. The content of inflammatory factors in serum was detected by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the expression of mRNA and protein of genes related to immunity, apoptosis, inflammation, and inflammatory factors was evaluated. Changes in the intestinal flora of mouse fecal were determined based on high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA microbial gene. RESULTS: Compared to the model group, the low-dose BXD and high-dose BXD groups decreased the number of colon tumors, reversed weight loss, and shortened colon length of mice. The pathological examination showed that BXD alleviated the malignancy of intestinal tumors. It also suppressed signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), and transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) expression, while increasing the expression of the tight junction protein ZO-1 in colon tissues. Additionally, the levels of key pathway proteins involved in inflammation (phosphorylated-STAT3, Bcl-2, COX-2) and cell cycle regulatory molecules (c-Myc and PCNA) were reduced. According to 16S rRNA sequence analysis, BXD enhanced the relative abundance of potentially beneficial bacteria, while that of cancer-related bacteria decreased. CONCLUSION BXD plays a preventive role in developing colorectal cancer; its mechanisms are related to the inhibition of inflammation and tumor proliferation, as well as maintenance of intestinal homeostasis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the current status of pre-hospital and in-hospital emergency medical information connectivity in China and provide evidence for optimizing the emergency medical system. METHODS: A multi-center cross-sectional study was conducted using a multi-level convenience sampling method to select provincial-level administrative regions and their corresponding capital cities, prefectural cities, and county-level emergency medical institutions. The questionnaire included basic information about respondents, the institutions, the current status of pre-hospital and in-hospital emergency information connectivity, and the satisfaction with the connectivity. The questionnaire has undergone reliability testing and split-half reliability testing, supplemented by semi-structured interviews. Data collection was carried out from January to May 2024, with one responsible person from each institution completing the questionnaire. Multiple Logistic regression analysis to investigated the relevant factors of pre-hospital and in-hospital information connectivity. RESULTS: A total of 225 questionnaires were distributed, and 199 valid responses were collected, with a response rate of 88.4%. Participants were from 199 emergency medical institutions across 13 provincial-level administrative regions. Of the institutions, 112 (56.3%) could achieve pre-hospital and in-hospital information connectivity. The proportion of pre-hospital to in-hospital information connection between emergency institutions in different provinces varies (χ² = 39.398, P < 0.001), with Beijing and Zhejiang having the highest proportion of information connection (both at 100%), and Hainan having the lowest (11.8%). The proportion of information integration in county-level emergency institution was lower than that of provincial and municipal level emergency institutions [40.4% (19/47) vs. 61.7% (29/47), 61.0% (64/105), χ² = 6.304, P = 0.043]. Provinces with high per capita disposable income have a higher proportion of information connectivity than provinces with low per capita disposable income [77.3% (34/44) vs. 50.3% (78/155), χ² = 10.122, P = 0.001]. The information connection ratio of independent pre-hospital emergency centers was higher than that of hospital emergency departments/hospital records [74.6% (47/63) vs. 47.8% (65/136), χ² = 12.581, P < 0.001]. The proportion of information integration in advanced provinces with digital development was higher than that in other provinces [77.6% (38/49) vs. 49.3% (74/150), χ² = 11.849, P = 0.001]. Logistic regression analysis showed that the per capita disposable income of residents in the province was an independent risk factor for the information connection between pre-hospital and in-hospital emergency institutions [odds ratio (OR) = 3.21, 95% confidence interval was 1.56-6.62, P < 0.01]. 72.3% institutions used the information connection mode for less than 5 years. Telephone and WeChat were the main communication methods (83.0%), and 17.0% of emergency institutions use dedicated APP for communication. 52.7% of respondents were very or relatively satisfied with the information integration before and after the hospital. The main deficiencies in current information integration were insufficient, untimely, inaccurate communication and delayed feedback between pre-hospital and in-hospital information. Optimizing top-level design and improving network quality are the directions for improving the integration of pre-hospital and in-hospital information in the future. CONCLUSIONS Pre-hospital and in-hospital emergency information connectivity in some provinces in China remains underdeveloped, with significant regional and institutional disparities. Future efforts should focus on integrating digital technologies and strengthening grassroots-level connectivity systems.
Cross-Sectional Studies ; China ; Humans ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Emergency Medical Services ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Hospital Information Systems

Objective To summarize the main research objects, methods and content of research on China's health development assistance, and to provide reference for expanding research directions in this field. Methods Databases including CMKI, Wanfang and VIP were searched in accordance with the determined search strategy to acquire Chinese literatures on development assistance for health. Content analysis was conducted and software NVivo 11 was used to code the contents. CiteSpace 6.2.R2 was used to conduct keyword co-occurrence analysis. Results A total of 180 articles were included, and the number of published articles increased over time. Events including the 50th anniversary of Chinese medical team dispatchment, the launch of Silk Road of Health Cooperation Initiative, and the outburst of COVID-19 pandemic marked a robust growth in the number of articles in this field. The main study objects were countries providing bilateral development assistance for health, especially China. The main study method was a qualitative research method based on literature and policy analysis. The main research contents included the ways and key areas of health development assistance, as well as suggestions for the future development of China's health development assistance. After the launch of Silk Road of Health Cooperation Initiative, the health development assistance had received further attention as an important approach and function of global health governance. Conclusion The existing research on development assistance for health is overly focused and redundant. In the future, more attention should be paid to other participants involved in the health development assistance and the situation of recipient countries. Empirical research methods should be used to conduct more in-depth research on issues such as project implementation and effectiveness of development assistance for health.

The outbreak of COVID-19 has spread quickly across 114 countries/territories/areas in six continents worldwide and has been announced as a pandemic by WHO. This study analyzed global COVID-19 epidemiological trends, examined impact of the pandemic on global health security, diplomacy, and social environment in China, and provided short- and long-term strategic policy recommendations for China’s subsequent preparedness and responses.

The WHO declared the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak as a public health emergency of international concern on January 30, 2020, and then a pandemic on March 11, 2020. COVID-19 affected over 200 countries and territories worldwide, with 25,541,380 confirmed cases and 852,000 deaths associated with COVID-19 globally, as of September 1, 2020. 1While facing such a public health emergency, hospitals were on the front line to deliver health care and psychological services. The early detection, diagnosis, reporting, isolation, and clinical management of patients during a public health emergency required the extensive involvement of hospitals in all aspects. The response capacity of hospitals directly determined the outcomes of the prevention and control of an outbreak. The COVID-19 pandemic has affected almost all nations and territories regardless of their development level or geographic location, although suitable risk mitigation measures differ between developing and developed countries. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), the consequences of the pandemic could be more complicated because incidence and mortality might be associated more with a fragile health care system and shortage of related resources. 2-3 As evidenced by the situation in Bangladesh, India, Kenya, South Africa, and other LMICs, socioeconomic status (SES) disparity was a major factor in the spread of disease, potentially leading to alarmingly insufficient preparedness and responses in dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic. 4 Conversely, the pandemic might also bring more unpredictable socioeconomic and long-term impacts in LMICs, and those with lower SES fare worse in these situations. This review aimed to summarize the responsibilities of and measures taken by hospitals in combatting the COVID-19 outbreak. Our findings are hoped to provide experiences, as well as lessons and potential implications for LMICs.

Like rest of the world, the South Asian region is facing enormous challenges with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The socio-economic context of the eight South Asian countries is averse to any long-term lockdown program, but the region still observed stringent lockdown close to two months. This paper analyzed major measures in public health preparedness and responses in those countries in the pandemic. The research was based on a situation analysis to discuss appropriate plan for epidemic preparedness, strategies for prevention and control measures, and adequate response management mechanism. Based on the data from March 21 to June 26, 2020, it appeared lockdown program along with other control measures were not as effective to arrest the exponential growth of fortnightly COVID-19 cases in Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal and Pakistan. However, Bhutan, Maldives and Sri Lanka have been successfully limiting the spread of the disease. The in-depth analysis of prevention and control measures espoused densely populated context of South Asia needs community-led intervention strategy, such as case containment, in order to reverse the growing trend, and adopt the policy of mitigation instead of suppression to formulate COVID-19 action plan. On the other hand, mechanism for response management encompassed a four-tier approach of governance to weave community-led local bodies with state, national and international governance actors for enhancing the countries' emergency operation system. It is concluded resource-crunch countries in South Asia are unable to cope with the disproportionate demand of capital and skilled health care workforce at the time of the pandemic. Hence, response management needs an approach of governance maximization instead of resource maximization. The epidemiologic management of population coupled with suitable public health prevention and control measures may be a more appropriate strategy to strike a balance between economy and population health during the time of pandemic.

Objective: A resilient health system plays a crucial role in pandemic preparedness and response. Although the World Health Organization (WHO) has required all states parties to strengthen core capacities to respond to public health emergencies under the International Health Regulations (2005), the actions of most countries to combating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has showed that they are not well-prepared. This cross-sectional study aimed to examine the health system resilience of selected countries and analyze their strategies and measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods: This study selected five countries including the Iran, Japan, Republic of Korea (South Korea), the U.K., and the U.S., based on the severity of the national epidemic, the geographical location, and the development level. Cumulative number of death cases derived from WHO COVID-19 dashboard was used to measure the severity of the impact of the pandemic in each country; WHO State Parties Self-Assessment Annual Reporting (SPAR) Scores and Global Health Security (GHS) Index were applied to measure the national health system resilience; and research articles and press materials were summarized to identify the strategies and measures adopted by countries during response to COVID-19. This study applied the resilient health systems framework to analyze health system resilience in the selected countries from five dimensions, including awareness, diversity, self-regulation, integration and adaptation. Results: The SPAR Scores and GHS Index of the four developed countries, Japan, South Korea, the U.K. and the U.S. were above the global and regional averages; the SPAR Scores of Iran were above the global average while the GHI Index lain below the global average. In terms of response strategies, Japan, the U.K. and the U.S. invested more health resources in the treatment of severe patients, while South Korea and Iran had adopted a strategy of extensive testing and identification of suspected patients. In terms of specific measures, all the five countries adopted measures such as restrictions on entry and international travel, closure of schools and industries, lockdown and quarantine. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of implementing these measures varied across countries, based on the response strategies. Conclusion: Although SPAR Scores and GHS Index have evaluated the national core capacities for preparedness and response, the actions to cope with the COVID-19 pandemic has revealed the fact that most countries still do not build resilient health systems in response to public health emergencies. Health system strengthening and health security efforts should be pursued in tandem, as part of the same mutually reinforcing approach to developing resilient health systems.

Objective:This study aims at exploring the impact of the health resources allocation on healthcare seeking behavior of inpatients with different income in China. Methods:Data at individual level were collected from China National Health Service Surveys conducted in 2008 and 2013 , interlinked with the data of health resources in county level. Multilevel zero-inflated negative binomial regression and multilevel multinomial logit model were respec-tively used to examine the impact of the health resources allocation on inpatient visits and the influence of the choice of healthcare providers by inpatients. Results: The results show that the increase of the number of beds in primary health centers ( PHCs) and physicians in county hospitals increased inpatient visits within counties. The investments in health resources in PHCs had greater impact on improving the likelihood of inpatient visits within counties for the low-income populations than that for the high-income populations. Conclusion: Investments in health resources in PHCs are vital to improve the healthcare seeking behaviors of the low-income populations in China.

Recently , the country actively explores the pattern of an integrated healthcare which enables the as-sociation among hospitals of different levels , aimed to achieve maximum utilization of medical resources and lead a reasonable distribution of the patients .By reviewing the practices related to the integration of healthcare in Beijing , Shanghai , Zhenjiang and Wuhan city , this paper sums up in five typical mechanisms , i.e.organization and manage-ment mechanism , human resource management mechanism , interest distribution mechanism , service continuity and resources sharing mechanism .The effects of these practices were analyzed and the faced challenges were discussed . The following points were made clear during analysis and discussion:the sustainability of the collaboration mode and organization structure , human resource supports and incentive methods , health insurance guidance for hospitals and patients , two-way referral system and supporting measures , and building of information system .Then we put forward some suggestions , hoping to offer some references to the establishment of integrated healthcare in other regions .

As a method of financial management and control,the implementation of cost accounting has a significant influence on management of sicentific research projects.The model patterns of cost accounting in the United Kingdom,the United States and European Union,respectively can be served as practical frameworks to guide Chinese scientific research project funds in terms of accounting forms,methods and contents.Based on the understanding of current domestic development and problrms of cost accounting experiences learned from internation practices are signifcant for improving cost accounting system in scientific research projects of China.