Objective: To explore the correlation between allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) during the perioperative period. Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort of 1,170 patients undergoing isolated CABG was analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression and restricted cubic splines (RCS) were employed to explore the nonlinear association between perioperative RBC transfusion (from intraoperative period to 72 hours postoperatively) and HAIs. Results: Among the 1,170 CABG patients, 109 patients (9.2%) received RBC transfusion during the operation or within 3 days after the operation. The risk of HAIs in those who received ≥4 units of RBCs during and within 3 days after the operation was 6.89 times higher than that in the non-transfusion group (95% CI: 3.65-17.20). Furthermore, there was a nonlinear threshold effect between the blood transfusion volume and postoperative HAIs (inflection point: 7.8 units). When the transfusion volume was ≤7.8 units, the risk of HAIs increased by 61% for each additional unit transfused (OR=1.61, 95% CI: 1.21-2.15). Beyond this threshold, no statistically significant association was observed (P=0.289). Conclusion: Perioperative RBC transfusion in CABG patients is associated with an increased incidence of HAIs. The perioperative blood transfusion volume has a curvilinear relationship with the risk of postoperative HAIs. When the blood transfusion volume is ≤7.8 units, the blood transfusion volume has a dose-dependent relationship with postoperative infection, with higher blood transfusion volumes correlating with greater postoperative infection risk. When the blood transfusion volume is >7.8 units, the relationship between the two is not statistically significant. The preventive effect of reducing RBC transfusion on HAIs requires further validation in the future.

Objective:To construct an index system for evaluating the development of research-oriented disciplines in medical institutions, and to provide a basis for guiding the superior disciplines towards international high-level disciplines.Methods:Through literature research and expert discussions, the basic framework of the research-oriented disciplines development evaluation system was established. The final version of the index system was determined using the Delphi method and expert interviews, and the weights of each index were established using the hierarchical analysis method.Results:After consultation, the framework of 5 first-class indexes, 16 second-class indexes, and 51 third-class indexes was finally constructed for the evaluation system of research-oriented discipline development, and the weights of indexes at different classes were calculated. The high-frequency terms " research mechanism construction" , " research team construction" and " representative research results" extracted from the expert interviews echoed the results of the weighting calculation.Conclusions:The evaluation system for research-oriented disciplines constructed in this study is relatively reasonable, scientific, reliable, and operable. The construction of the index system adapts to the characteristics of the development of research-oriented disciplines, with guiding significance for enhancing the development of research-oriented disciplines.