Objective:To compare the efficacy of biplanar fixation combined with bone grafting and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in the treatment of critically complicated osteoporotic intertrochanteric femoral fracture .Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 28 patients with critically complicated osteoporotic intertrochanteric femoral fracture, admitted to Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology from January 2020 and December 2022, including 3 males and 25 females, aged 70-91 years [(79.4±6.3)years]. T score for bone mineral density was -2.5~-4.1 SD［（-3.3±0.6）SD］. All the patients were found with type A2.2-A3.3 fracture based on AO classification, and were complicated with trochanteric lateral wall fracture. Among them, 16 patients underwent biplanar fixation combined with bone grafting (biplanar fixation group), while 12 underwent PFNA internal fixation (PFNA group). All the patients received anti-osteoporosis therapy after surgery. The two groups were compared in terms of the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, hemoglobin levels at 3 days postoperatively, and time to weight-bearing. The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and Harris hip scores at 1, 3, 6 months postoperatively, and at the last follow-up and the incidence of complications were also detected in the two groups.Results:All the patients were followed up for 12-16 months [(14.1±1.4)months]. In the biplanar fixation group, the operative time was (75.1±15.3)minutes, significantly longer than (45.6±14.2)minutes in the PFNA group ( P<0.01); the intraoperative blood loss was (234.1±11.8)ml, significantly more than (170.0±13.4)ml in the PFNA group ( P<0.01); the hemoglobin level at 3 days postoperatively was (82.6±9.3)g/L in the biplanar fixation group, higher than (64.8±6.8)g/L in the PFNA group ( P<0.01). The time to weight-bearing was (1.1±0.7)weeks in the biplanar fixation group, significantly shorter than (3.2±1.2)weeks in the PFNA group ( P<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in VAS scores and Harris hip scores at 1, 3, 6 months postoperatively, and at the last follow-up ( P>0.05). The VAS scores and Harris hip scores in the two groups were gradually improved with the prolongation of postoperative time ( P<0.05 or 0.01). No complications such as neurovascular injuries were observed in either group. One patient in the biplanar fixation group developed lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT), with a complication rate of 6.3%, while 2 patients in the PFNA group developed lower extremity DVT and 4 hypostatic pneumonia, with a complication rate of 50.0% ( P<0.05). Conclusion:Compared with PFNA internal fixation, biplanar fixation with bone grafting has the advantages of less postoperative blood loss, earlier weight-bearing exercises and lower incidence of complications in the treatment of critically complicated osteoporotic intertrochanteric femoral fracture, despite longer operative time and more intraoperative blood loss.

For middle-aged and elderly patients with conditions such as spinal fractures and degenerative spinal diseases, spinal internal fixation is a core surgical procedure for reconstructing spinal stability, heavily relying on the biomechanical stability provided by pedicle screw systems. Whereas, these patients are often complicated by osteoporosis that can significantly compromise the stability of the bone-pedicle screw interface, leading to a marked increase in pedicle screw loosening and surgical failure rates. The bone cement-augmented pedicle screw technique, which involves injecting bone cement into the vertebral body or screw trajectory to optimize the mechanical properties of the bone-pedicle screw composite, has been proven to significantly enhance fixation strength and effectively prevent screw-related failures, thereby reducing the incidence of internal fixation failure in high-risk populations undergoing spinal fusion. However, the widespread clinical application of this technique has faced challenges such as inaccurate clinical decision-making (indication and contraindication selection), non-standardized operative practices, and insufficient awareness of complication prevention, resulting in considerable variability in clinical outcomes and even severe complications. To address this, Prof. Luo Fei from First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University initiated the project and the Chinese Association Orthopaedic Surgeons organized relevant experts to develop the Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for bone cement-augmented pedicle screw technique ( version 2025), based on current evidence. The guidelines put forward 8 recommendations regarding the clinical value, scope of application, and operational standards of the technique, aiming to provide evidence-based medical support and technical standardization for clinical decision-making.

Objective:To compare the efficacy of biplanar fixation combined with bone grafting and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in the treatment of critically complicated osteoporotic intertrochanteric femoral fracture .Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 28 patients with critically complicated osteoporotic intertrochanteric femoral fracture, admitted to Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology from January 2020 and December 2022, including 3 males and 25 females, aged 70-91 years [(79.4±6.3)years]. T score for bone mineral density was -2.5~-4.1 SD［（-3.3±0.6）SD］. All the patients were found with type A2.2-A3.3 fracture based on AO classification, and were complicated with trochanteric lateral wall fracture. Among them, 16 patients underwent biplanar fixation combined with bone grafting (biplanar fixation group), while 12 underwent PFNA internal fixation (PFNA group). All the patients received anti-osteoporosis therapy after surgery. The two groups were compared in terms of the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, hemoglobin levels at 3 days postoperatively, and time to weight-bearing. The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and Harris hip scores at 1, 3, 6 months postoperatively, and at the last follow-up and the incidence of complications were also detected in the two groups.Results:All the patients were followed up for 12-16 months [(14.1±1.4)months]. In the biplanar fixation group, the operative time was (75.1±15.3)minutes, significantly longer than (45.6±14.2)minutes in the PFNA group ( P<0.01); the intraoperative blood loss was (234.1±11.8)ml, significantly more than (170.0±13.4)ml in the PFNA group ( P<0.01); the hemoglobin level at 3 days postoperatively was (82.6±9.3)g/L in the biplanar fixation group, higher than (64.8±6.8)g/L in the PFNA group ( P<0.01). The time to weight-bearing was (1.1±0.7)weeks in the biplanar fixation group, significantly shorter than (3.2±1.2)weeks in the PFNA group ( P<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in VAS scores and Harris hip scores at 1, 3, 6 months postoperatively, and at the last follow-up ( P>0.05). The VAS scores and Harris hip scores in the two groups were gradually improved with the prolongation of postoperative time ( P<0.05 or 0.01). No complications such as neurovascular injuries were observed in either group. One patient in the biplanar fixation group developed lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT), with a complication rate of 6.3%, while 2 patients in the PFNA group developed lower extremity DVT and 4 hypostatic pneumonia, with a complication rate of 50.0% ( P<0.05). Conclusion:Compared with PFNA internal fixation, biplanar fixation with bone grafting has the advantages of less postoperative blood loss, earlier weight-bearing exercises and lower incidence of complications in the treatment of critically complicated osteoporotic intertrochanteric femoral fracture, despite longer operative time and more intraoperative blood loss.

For middle-aged and elderly patients with conditions such as spinal fractures and degenerative spinal diseases, spinal internal fixation is a core surgical procedure for reconstructing spinal stability, heavily relying on the biomechanical stability provided by pedicle screw systems. Whereas, these patients are often complicated by osteoporosis that can significantly compromise the stability of the bone-pedicle screw interface, leading to a marked increase in pedicle screw loosening and surgical failure rates. The bone cement-augmented pedicle screw technique, which involves injecting bone cement into the vertebral body or screw trajectory to optimize the mechanical properties of the bone-pedicle screw composite, has been proven to significantly enhance fixation strength and effectively prevent screw-related failures, thereby reducing the incidence of internal fixation failure in high-risk populations undergoing spinal fusion. However, the widespread clinical application of this technique has faced challenges such as inaccurate clinical decision-making (indication and contraindication selection), non-standardized operative practices, and insufficient awareness of complication prevention, resulting in considerable variability in clinical outcomes and even severe complications. To address this, Prof. Luo Fei from First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University initiated the project and the Chinese Association Orthopaedic Surgeons organized relevant experts to develop the Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for bone cement-augmented pedicle screw technique ( version 2025), based on current evidence. The guidelines put forward 8 recommendations regarding the clinical value, scope of application, and operational standards of the technique, aiming to provide evidence-based medical support and technical standardization for clinical decision-making.

OBJECTIVE: To review the biomechanical research progress of internal fixation of tibial plateau fracture in recent years and provide a reference for the selection of internal fixation in clinic. METHODS: The literature related to the biomechanical research of internal fixation of tibial plateau fracture at home and abroad was extensively reviewed, and the biomechanical characteristics of the internal fixation mode and position as well as the biomechanical characteristics of different internal fixators, such as screws, plates, and intramedullary nails were summarized and analyzed. RESULTS: Tibial plateau fracture is one of the common types of knee fractures. The conventional surgical treatment for tibial plateau fracture is open or closed reduction and internal fixation, which requires anatomical reduction and strong fixation. Anatomical reduction can restore the normal shape of the knee joint; strong fixation provides good biomechanical stability, so that the patient can have early functional exercise, restore knee mobility as early as possible, and avoid knee stiffness. Different internal fixators have their own biomechanical strengths and characteristics. The screw fixation has the advantage of being minimally invasive, but the fixation strength is limited, and it is mostly applied to Schatzker typeⅠfracture. For Schatzker Ⅰ-Ⅳ fracture, unilateral plate fixation can be used; for Schatzker Ⅴand Ⅵ fracture, bilateral plates fixation can be used to provide stronger fixation strength and avoid the stress concentration. The intramedullary nails fixation has the advantages of less trauma and less influence on the blood flow of the fracture end, but the fixation strength of the medial and lateral plateau is limited; so it is more suitable for tibial plateau fracture that involves only the metaphysis. Choosing the most appropriate internal fixation according to the patient's condition is still a major difficulty in the surgical treatment of tibial plateau fractures. CONCLUSION Each internal fixator has good fixation effect on tibial plateau fracture within the applicable range, and it is an important research direction to improve and innovate the existing internal fixator from various aspects, such as manufacturing process, material, and morphology.
Humans ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Bone Plates ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary ; Tibial Fractures/surgery* ; Tibial Plateau Fractures

Objective:To compare the short-term efficacy between proximal femoral bionic nails (PFBN) and 3G Gamma nails in the fixation intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the data of 78 elderly patients with intertrochanteric femoral fracture who had been admitted to Department of Trauma Surgery, The Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University from October 2021 to December 2022. There were 35 males and 43 females with an age of (76.0±7.9) years. By Evans classification: 6 cases of type Ⅰ, 21 cases of type Ⅱ, 24 cases of type Ⅲ, 23 cases of type Ⅳ, and 4 cases of type Ⅴ. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to their internal fixation methods: a PFBN group of 35 patients fixed by PFBN and a Gamma group of 43 cases fixed with 3D Gamma nails. The time from injury to operation, hospital stay, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, weight-bearing time, fracture healing time, and Harris hip score, visual analogue scale (VAS) and incidence of complications at 6 months after operation were compared between the 2 groups.Results:There was no significant difference in the preoperative general data between the 2 groups, showing comparability ( P>0.05). All patients were followed up for (14.0±4.0) months. There were no significant differences between the PFBN and Gamma groups in operation time [(58.9±8.2) min versus (58.1±6.8) min], intraoperative blood loss [(138.0±24.9) mL versus(126.8±25.7) mL], hospital stay [(10.9±2.9) d versus (10.3±4.0) d],fracture healing time [(5.0±1.3) months versus (5.1±1.3) months], or good and excellent rate by the Harris hip score [82.9% (29/35) versus 76.7% (33/43)], VAS score [0(0, 1) points versus 1(0, 1) points], or incidence of complications at 6 months after operation [2.9% (1/35) versus 4.7% (2/43)] (all P>0.05). However, the complete weight-bearing time for the PFBN group was (5.3±1.2) weeks, significantly earlier than that for the Gamma group [(6.9±1.4) weeks] ( P<0.05). Conclusion:In the fixation of intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly patients, both PFBN and 3D Gamma nails can achieve satisfactory short-term efficacy, but PFBN is more beneficial to the functional recovery of the hip joint because it leads to earlier complete weight-bearing time than 3D Gamma nails.

Accurate classification of the acetabular injuries and appropriate treatment plan are great challenges for orthopedic surgeons because of the irregular anatomical structure of the acetabulum and aggregation of important vessels and nerves around it. Letournel-Judet classification system has been widely applied to classify acetabular fractures. However, there are several limitations, including incomplete inclusion of fracture types, difficulty in understanding and insufficient guidance for surgical treatment, etc. Serious complications such as traumatic arthritis are common due to wrong classification and diagnosis and improper selection of surgical strategy, which brings a heavy burden to the society and families. Three-column classification, based on anatomic characteristics, has advantages of containing more fracture types and being easy to understand, etc. To solve the problems existing in the diagnosis and treatment process based on Letournel-Judet classification, achieve accurate diagnosis and treatment of patients with acetabular fractures, and obtain satisfactory prognosis, the Orthopedic Trauma Emergency Center of Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University and the Trauma Orthopedic Branch of the Chinese Orthopedic Association organized experts from relevant fields to formulate the Expert consensus on the accurate diagnosis and treatment of acetabular fractures based on three-column classification ( version 2023) in terms of principles of evidence-based medicine. Based on the three-column classification, 15 recommendations were proposed, covering the diagnosis, treatment, complication prevention and management, etc, so as to provide reference for accurate diagnosis and treatment of acetabular fractures.

Bone defects caused by different causes such as trauma, severe bone infection and other factors are common in clinic and difficult to treat. Usually, bone substitutes are required for repair. Current bone grafting materials used clinically include autologous bones, allogeneic bones, xenografts, and synthetic materials, etc. Other than autologous bones, the major hurdles of rest bone grafts have various degrees of poor biological activity and lack of active ingredients to provide osteogenic impetus. Bone marrow contains various components such as stem cells and bioactive factors, which are contributive to osteogenesis. In response, the technique of bone marrow enrichment, based on the efficient utilization of components within bone marrow, has been risen, aiming to extract osteogenic cells and factors from bone marrow of patients and incorporate them into 3D scaffolds for fabricating bone grafts with high osteoinductivity. However, the scientific guidance and application specification are lacked with regard to the clinical scope, approach, safety and effectiveness. In this context, under the organization of Chinese Orthopedic Association, the Expert consensus for the clinical application of autologous bone marrow enrichment technique for bone repair ( version 2023) is formulated based on the evidence-based medicine. The consensus covers the topics of the characteristics, range of application, safety and application notes of the technique of autologous bone marrow enrichment and proposes corresponding recommendations, hoping to provide better guidance for clinical practice of the technique.

Infectious bone defect is bone defect with infection or as a result of treatment of bone infection. It requires surgical intervention, and the treatment processes are complex and long, which include bone infection control,bone defect repair and even complex soft tissue reconstructions in some cases. Failure to achieve the goals in any step may lead to the failure of the overall treatment. Therefore, infectious bone defect has been a worldwide challenge in the field of orthopedics. Conventionally, sequestrectomy, bone grafting, bone transport, and systemic/local antibiotic treatment are standard therapies. Radical debridement remains one of the cornerstones for the management of bone infection. However, the scale of debridement and the timing and method of bone defect reconstruction remain controversial. With the clinical application of induced membrane technique, effective infection control and rapid bone reconstruction have been achieved in the management of infectious bone defect. The induced membrane technique has attracted more interests and attention, but the lack of understanding the basic principles of infection control and technical details may hamper the clinical outcomes of induced membrane technique and complications can possibly occur. Therefore, the Chinese Orthopedic Association organized domestic orthopedic experts to formulate An evidence-based clinical guideline for the treatment of infectious bone defect with induced membrane technique ( version 2023) according to the evidence-based method and put forward recommendations on infectious bone defect from the aspects of precise diagnosis, preoperative evaluation, operation procedure, postoperative management and rehabilitation, so as to provide useful references for the treatment of infectious bone defect with induced membrane technique.

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) combined with spinal fractures with thoracic and lumbar fracture as the most common type shows characteristics of unstable fracture, high incidence of nerve injury, high mortality and high disability rate. The diagnosis may be missed because it is mostly caused by low-energy injury, when spinal rigidity and osteoporosis have a great impact on the accuracy of imaging examination. At the same time, the treatment choices are controversial, with no relevant specifications. Non-operative treatments can easily lead to bone nonunion, pseudoarthrosis and delayed nerve injury, while surgeries may be failed due to internal fixation failure. At present, there are no evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of AS combined with thoracic and lumbar fracture. In this context, the Spinal Trauma Academic Group of Orthopedics Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association organized experts to formulate the Clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of adult ankylosing spondylitis combined with thoracolumbar fracture ( version 2023) by following the principles of evidence-based medicine and systematically review related literatures. Ten recommendations on the diagnosis, imaging evaluation, classification and treatment of AS combined with thoracic and lumbar fracture were put forward, aiming to standardize the clinical diagnosis and treatment of such disorder.