Objective:To investigate the effects of pulsed electric field (PEF) combined with gemcitabine (GEM) on the viability and stemness of HCCC-9810 cholangiocarcinoma stem cells.Methods:HCCC-9810 cholangiocarcinoma stem cells were established in serum-free, cytokine-rich medium and divided into four groups: the control group, GEM group, PEF group, and the pulsed electric field combined with gemcitabine (PEF+ GEM) group. Cell proliferation was detected using the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8) assay. Cell viability and apoptosis rate were measured by flow cytometry. Cell invasion ability was assessed using the Transwell assay. The expression of stemness marker proteins CD133 and Octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (OCT4), as well as the expression of β-catenin, was detected by Western blotting.Results:Regarding cell viability, the GEM, PEF, and PEF+ GEM groups showed significantly lower cell viability and higher apoptosis rate than the control group at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h (all P<0.05). At 48 h and 72 h, the PEF+ GEM group showed significantly lower cell viability (7.2%±0.3% and 5.9%±0.8%, respectively) than the GEM group (50.7%±0.6% and 31.0%±1.2%, respectively) and the PEF group (12.2%±0.2% and 12.8%±0.2%, respectively) (all P<0.05). Regarding stemness inhibition, the PEF+ GEM groups showed significantly lower expression levels of CD133 and OCT4 at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h compared with the control group (all P<0.05). Notably, at 48 h, the PEF+ GEM group showed a significantly lower expression level of the OCT4 (0.61±0.02) than the GEM group (0.87±0.08) and the PEF group (1.00±0.10) ( P<0.01). Furthermore, at 24 h and 48 h, the GEM, PEF, and PEF+ GEM groups showed significantly lower expression levels of β-catenin compared with the control group (all P<0.05). Conclusion:Pulsed electric field combined with gemcitabine therapy demonstrated more effective anti-proliferation and cancer stemness inhibition effects on HCCC-9810 cholangiocarcinoma stem cells compared with either monotherapy.

Objective:To investigate the effects of pulsed electric field (PEF) combined with gemcitabine (GEM) on the viability and stemness of HCCC-9810 cholangiocarcinoma stem cells.Methods:HCCC-9810 cholangiocarcinoma stem cells were established in serum-free, cytokine-rich medium and divided into four groups: the control group, GEM group, PEF group, and the pulsed electric field combined with gemcitabine (PEF+ GEM) group. Cell proliferation was detected using the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8) assay. Cell viability and apoptosis rate were measured by flow cytometry. Cell invasion ability was assessed using the Transwell assay. The expression of stemness marker proteins CD133 and Octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (OCT4), as well as the expression of β-catenin, was detected by Western blotting.Results:Regarding cell viability, the GEM, PEF, and PEF+ GEM groups showed significantly lower cell viability and higher apoptosis rate than the control group at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h (all P<0.05). At 48 h and 72 h, the PEF+ GEM group showed significantly lower cell viability (7.2%±0.3% and 5.9%±0.8%, respectively) than the GEM group (50.7%±0.6% and 31.0%±1.2%, respectively) and the PEF group (12.2%±0.2% and 12.8%±0.2%, respectively) (all P<0.05). Regarding stemness inhibition, the PEF+ GEM groups showed significantly lower expression levels of CD133 and OCT4 at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h compared with the control group (all P<0.05). Notably, at 48 h, the PEF+ GEM group showed a significantly lower expression level of the OCT4 (0.61±0.02) than the GEM group (0.87±0.08) and the PEF group (1.00±0.10) ( P<0.01). Furthermore, at 24 h and 48 h, the GEM, PEF, and PEF+ GEM groups showed significantly lower expression levels of β-catenin compared with the control group (all P<0.05). Conclusion:Pulsed electric field combined with gemcitabine therapy demonstrated more effective anti-proliferation and cancer stemness inhibition effects on HCCC-9810 cholangiocarcinoma stem cells compared with either monotherapy.

Objective: To explore the network structure characteristics and core items of rural middle school students suffering from campus bullying and anxiety symptoms, so as to provide a reference basis for the precise prevention and intervention of the comorbidity of campus bullying and anxiety symptoms. Methods: From September 2021 to March 2022, a multi stage random cluster sampling method was used to select 1 920 rural middle school students from Xuzhou. The Chinese version of the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire was used to investigate the situation of campus bullying, and the Chinese version of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) was used to assess anxiety symptoms. The network analysis method was used to construct the network between suffering from campus bullying and anxiety symptoms of rural middle school students to evaluate the centrality, bridge strength, stability and accuracy of each item. Results: The total score of suffering from campus bullying symptoms of rural middle school students was (10.42±3.26) points, and the total score of anxiety symptoms was (11.47±4.93) points. The symptom with the highest strength and expected influence was "unable to stop or control one s worry emotions", and the node strength and expected influence value was 1.041 7. The nodes "feel nervous, anxious or irritable" and "unable to stop or control one s worry emotions" were most closely related. The symptoms with the highest bridge strength were "others give me ugly nicknames to scold me or make fun of and satirize me" and "unable to stop or control one s worry emotions". Conclusions Rural middle school students suffering from campus bullying is related to anxiety symptoms. Accurate intervention according to the intervention targets may minimize the negative impact of suffering from campus bullying and anxiety symptoms on rural middle school students.

DRG has been applied in most hospitals.The quality management of the first page of medical records,which is directly related to DRG grouping,has become an important part of hospital management.To some extent,the quality of the first page of medical records affects the inclusion of DRG,the payment of medical treatment,and the performance assessment and evaluation of hospital.Through examples,it focuses on the quality problems of the first page of medical records and its impact on DRG payment,analyzes the reasons leading to the cases of DRG not entered in the group or in the wrong group,and puts forward countermeasures to strengthen the quality manage-ment of the first page of medical records,in order to provide theoretical support and practical reference for hospital management and DRG payment management.

DRG has been applied in most hospitals.The quality management of the first page of medical records,which is directly related to DRG grouping,has become an important part of hospital management.To some extent,the quality of the first page of medical records affects the inclusion of DRG,the payment of medical treatment,and the performance assessment and evaluation of hospital.Through examples,it focuses on the quality problems of the first page of medical records and its impact on DRG payment,analyzes the reasons leading to the cases of DRG not entered in the group or in the wrong group,and puts forward countermeasures to strengthen the quality manage-ment of the first page of medical records,in order to provide theoretical support and practical reference for hospital management and DRG payment management.

DRG has been applied in most hospitals.The quality management of the first page of medical records,which is directly related to DRG grouping,has become an important part of hospital management.To some extent,the quality of the first page of medical records affects the inclusion of DRG,the payment of medical treatment,and the performance assessment and evaluation of hospital.Through examples,it focuses on the quality problems of the first page of medical records and its impact on DRG payment,analyzes the reasons leading to the cases of DRG not entered in the group or in the wrong group,and puts forward countermeasures to strengthen the quality manage-ment of the first page of medical records,in order to provide theoretical support and practical reference for hospital management and DRG payment management.

DRG has been applied in most hospitals.The quality management of the first page of medical records,which is directly related to DRG grouping,has become an important part of hospital management.To some extent,the quality of the first page of medical records affects the inclusion of DRG,the payment of medical treatment,and the performance assessment and evaluation of hospital.Through examples,it focuses on the quality problems of the first page of medical records and its impact on DRG payment,analyzes the reasons leading to the cases of DRG not entered in the group or in the wrong group,and puts forward countermeasures to strengthen the quality manage-ment of the first page of medical records,in order to provide theoretical support and practical reference for hospital management and DRG payment management.

DRG has been applied in most hospitals.The quality management of the first page of medical records,which is directly related to DRG grouping,has become an important part of hospital management.To some extent,the quality of the first page of medical records affects the inclusion of DRG,the payment of medical treatment,and the performance assessment and evaluation of hospital.Through examples,it focuses on the quality problems of the first page of medical records and its impact on DRG payment,analyzes the reasons leading to the cases of DRG not entered in the group or in the wrong group,and puts forward countermeasures to strengthen the quality manage-ment of the first page of medical records,in order to provide theoretical support and practical reference for hospital management and DRG payment management.

DRG has been applied in most hospitals.The quality management of the first page of medical records,which is directly related to DRG grouping,has become an important part of hospital management.To some extent,the quality of the first page of medical records affects the inclusion of DRG,the payment of medical treatment,and the performance assessment and evaluation of hospital.Through examples,it focuses on the quality problems of the first page of medical records and its impact on DRG payment,analyzes the reasons leading to the cases of DRG not entered in the group or in the wrong group,and puts forward countermeasures to strengthen the quality manage-ment of the first page of medical records,in order to provide theoretical support and practical reference for hospital management and DRG payment management.

DRG has been applied in most hospitals.The quality management of the first page of medical records,which is directly related to DRG grouping,has become an important part of hospital management.To some extent,the quality of the first page of medical records affects the inclusion of DRG,the payment of medical treatment,and the performance assessment and evaluation of hospital.Through examples,it focuses on the quality problems of the first page of medical records and its impact on DRG payment,analyzes the reasons leading to the cases of DRG not entered in the group or in the wrong group,and puts forward countermeasures to strengthen the quality manage-ment of the first page of medical records,in order to provide theoretical support and practical reference for hospital management and DRG payment management.