Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in differentiating tumor deposits (TDs) from metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) in rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 70 patients with rectal cancer, including 168 lesions (70 TDs and 98 MLNs confirmed by histopathology), who underwent pretreatment MRI and subsequent surgery between March 2019 and December 2022. The morphological characteristics of TDs and MLNs, along with quantitative parameters derived from DCE-MRI (K trans , kep, and v e) and DWI (ADCmin, ADCmax, and ADCmean), were analyzed and compared between the two groups.Multivariable binary logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to assess the diagnostic performance of significant individual quantitative parameters and combined parameters in distinguishing TDs from MLNs. Results: All morphological features, including size, shape, border, and signal intensity, as well as all DCE-MRI parameters showed significant differences between TDs and MLNs (all P < 0.05). However, ADC values did not demonstrate significant differences (all P > 0.05). Among the single quantitative parameters, v e had the highest diagnostic accuracy, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.772 for distinguishing TDs from MLNs. A multivariable logistic regression model incorporating short axis, border, v e, and ADC mean improved diagnostic performance, achieving an AUC of 0.833 (P = 0.027). Conclusion The combination of morphological features, DCE-MRI parameters, and ADC values can effectively aid in the preoperative differentiation of TDs from MLNs in rectal cancer.

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in differentiating tumor deposits (TDs) from metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) in rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 70 patients with rectal cancer, including 168 lesions (70 TDs and 98 MLNs confirmed by histopathology), who underwent pretreatment MRI and subsequent surgery between March 2019 and December 2022. The morphological characteristics of TDs and MLNs, along with quantitative parameters derived from DCE-MRI (K trans , kep, and v e) and DWI (ADCmin, ADCmax, and ADCmean), were analyzed and compared between the two groups.Multivariable binary logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to assess the diagnostic performance of significant individual quantitative parameters and combined parameters in distinguishing TDs from MLNs. Results: All morphological features, including size, shape, border, and signal intensity, as well as all DCE-MRI parameters showed significant differences between TDs and MLNs (all P < 0.05). However, ADC values did not demonstrate significant differences (all P > 0.05). Among the single quantitative parameters, v e had the highest diagnostic accuracy, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.772 for distinguishing TDs from MLNs. A multivariable logistic regression model incorporating short axis, border, v e, and ADC mean improved diagnostic performance, achieving an AUC of 0.833 (P = 0.027). Conclusion The combination of morphological features, DCE-MRI parameters, and ADC values can effectively aid in the preoperative differentiation of TDs from MLNs in rectal cancer.

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in differentiating tumor deposits (TDs) from metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) in rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 70 patients with rectal cancer, including 168 lesions (70 TDs and 98 MLNs confirmed by histopathology), who underwent pretreatment MRI and subsequent surgery between March 2019 and December 2022. The morphological characteristics of TDs and MLNs, along with quantitative parameters derived from DCE-MRI (K trans , kep, and v e) and DWI (ADCmin, ADCmax, and ADCmean), were analyzed and compared between the two groups.Multivariable binary logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to assess the diagnostic performance of significant individual quantitative parameters and combined parameters in distinguishing TDs from MLNs. Results: All morphological features, including size, shape, border, and signal intensity, as well as all DCE-MRI parameters showed significant differences between TDs and MLNs (all P < 0.05). However, ADC values did not demonstrate significant differences (all P > 0.05). Among the single quantitative parameters, v e had the highest diagnostic accuracy, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.772 for distinguishing TDs from MLNs. A multivariable logistic regression model incorporating short axis, border, v e, and ADC mean improved diagnostic performance, achieving an AUC of 0.833 (P = 0.027). Conclusion The combination of morphological features, DCE-MRI parameters, and ADC values can effectively aid in the preoperative differentiation of TDs from MLNs in rectal cancer.

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in differentiating tumor deposits (TDs) from metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) in rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 70 patients with rectal cancer, including 168 lesions (70 TDs and 98 MLNs confirmed by histopathology), who underwent pretreatment MRI and subsequent surgery between March 2019 and December 2022. The morphological characteristics of TDs and MLNs, along with quantitative parameters derived from DCE-MRI (K trans , kep, and v e) and DWI (ADCmin, ADCmax, and ADCmean), were analyzed and compared between the two groups.Multivariable binary logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to assess the diagnostic performance of significant individual quantitative parameters and combined parameters in distinguishing TDs from MLNs. Results: All morphological features, including size, shape, border, and signal intensity, as well as all DCE-MRI parameters showed significant differences between TDs and MLNs (all P < 0.05). However, ADC values did not demonstrate significant differences (all P > 0.05). Among the single quantitative parameters, v e had the highest diagnostic accuracy, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.772 for distinguishing TDs from MLNs. A multivariable logistic regression model incorporating short axis, border, v e, and ADC mean improved diagnostic performance, achieving an AUC of 0.833 (P = 0.027). Conclusion The combination of morphological features, DCE-MRI parameters, and ADC values can effectively aid in the preoperative differentiation of TDs from MLNs in rectal cancer.

Apical microsurgery is accurate and minimally invasive, produces few complications, and has a success rate of more than 90%. However, due to the lack of awareness and understanding of apical microsurgery by dental general practitioners and even endodontists, many clinical problems remain to be overcome. The consensus has gathered well-known domestic experts to hold a series of special discussions and reached the consensus. This document specifies the indications, contraindications, preoperative preparations, operational procedures, complication prevention measures, and efficacy evaluation of apical microsurgery and is applicable to dentists who perform apical microsurgery after systematic training.
Microsurgery/standards* ; Humans ; Apicoectomy ; Contraindications, Procedure ; Tooth Apex/diagnostic imaging* ; Postoperative Complications/prevention & control* ; Consensus ; Treatment Outcome

Instrument separation is a critical complication during root canal therapy, impacting treatment success and long-term tooth preservation. The etiology of instrument separation is multifactorial, involving the intricate anatomy of the root canal system, instrument-related factors, and instrumentation techniques. Instrument separation can hinder thorough cleaning, shaping, and obturation of the root canal, posing challenges to successful treatment outcomes. Although retrieval of separated instrument is often feasible, it carries risks including perforation, excessive removal of tooth structure and root fractures. Effective management of separated instruments requires a comprehensive understanding of the contributing factors, meticulous preoperative assessment, and precise evaluation of the retrieval difficulty. The application of appropriate retrieval techniques is essential to minimize complications and optimize clinical outcomes. The current manuscript provides a framework for understanding the causes, risk factors, and clinical management principles of instrument separation. By integrating effective strategies, endodontists can enhance decision-making, improve endodontic treatment success and ensure the preservation of natural dentition.
Humans ; Root Canal Therapy/adverse effects* ; Consensus ; Root Canal Preparation/adverse effects*

Glutamine provides carbon and nitrogen to support the proliferation of cancer cells. However, the precise reason why cancer cells are particularly dependent on glutamine remains unclear. In this study, we report that glutamine modulates the tumor suppressor F-box and WD repeat domain-containing 7 (FBW7) to promote cancer cell proliferation and survival. Specifically, lysine 604 (K604) in the sixth of the 7 substrate-recruiting WD repeats of FBW7 undergoes glutaminylation (Gln-K604) by glutaminyl tRNA synthetase. Gln-K604 inhibits SCFFBW7-mediated degradation of c-Myc and Mcl-1, enhances glutamine utilization, and stimulates nucleotide and DNA biosynthesis through the activation of c-Myc. Additionally, Gln-K604 promotes resistance to apoptosis by activating Mcl-1. In contrast, SIRT1 deglutaminylates Gln-K604, thereby reversing its effects. Cancer cells lacking Gln-K604 exhibit overexpression of c-Myc and Mcl-1 and display resistance to chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. Silencing both c-MYC and MCL-1 in these cells sensitizes them to chemotherapy. These findings indicate that the glutamine-mediated signal via Gln-K604 is a key driver of cancer progression and suggest potential strategies for targeted cancer therapies based on varying Gln-K604 status.
Glutamine/metabolism* ; Myeloid Cell Leukemia Sequence 1 Protein/genetics* ; Humans ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc/genetics* ; Cell Proliferation ; Signal Transduction ; Neoplasms/pathology* ; F-Box-WD Repeat-Containing Protein 7/genetics* ; Cell Survival ; Cell Line, Tumor ; Apoptosis

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in differentiating tumor deposits (TDs) from metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) in rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 70 patients with rectal cancer, including 168 lesions (70 TDs and 98 MLNs confirmed by histopathology), who underwent pretreatment MRI and subsequent surgery between March 2019 and December 2022. The morphological characteristics of TDs and MLNs, along with quantitative parameters derived from DCE-MRI (K trans , kep, and v e) and DWI (ADCmin, ADCmax, and ADCmean), were analyzed and compared between the two groups.Multivariable binary logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to assess the diagnostic performance of significant individual quantitative parameters and combined parameters in distinguishing TDs from MLNs. Results: All morphological features, including size, shape, border, and signal intensity, as well as all DCE-MRI parameters showed significant differences between TDs and MLNs (all P < 0.05). However, ADC values did not demonstrate significant differences (all P > 0.05). Among the single quantitative parameters, v e had the highest diagnostic accuracy, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.772 for distinguishing TDs from MLNs. A multivariable logistic regression model incorporating short axis, border, v e, and ADC mean improved diagnostic performance, achieving an AUC of 0.833 (P = 0.027). Conclusion The combination of morphological features, DCE-MRI parameters, and ADC values can effectively aid in the preoperative differentiation of TDs from MLNs in rectal cancer.

Objective:To explore the effect of ezetimibe combined with atorvastatin on the efficacy,blood lipids,ca-rotid ultrasound indicators in patients with coronary heart disease(CHD)and its safety.Methods:This randomized controlled study enrolled 98 CHD patients admitted to 945th Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistic Support Force be-tween June 2021 and June 2023.Patients were divided into intervention group and control group with 49 cases in each group.Patients in the control group was treated with atorvastatin-bascd routine medication comparing to those in intervention group receiving additional ezetimibe,both groups were treated for 90 d.Clinical efficacy,blood lipids,carotid ultrasound indicators,endothelial function indicators,and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between two groups.Results:Compared with patients in the control group,those in the intervention group had significant higher total effective rate(91.83％vs.73.47％,P=0.016).Compared with patients in the control group after treatment,those in intervention group had significant lower levels of low density lipoprotein cho-lesterol(LDL-C)[(2.74±0.61)mmol/L vs.(3.42±0.66)mmol/L],total cholesterol(TC)[(3.80±0.89)mmol/L vs.(4.69±1.02)mmol/L],triglyceride(TG)[(1.79±0.53)mmol/L vs.(2.35±0.62)mmol/L],re-sistance index(RI)[(52.02±6.32)％vs.(57.95±6.02)％],carotid intima-media thickness(IMT)[(0.91±0.17)mm vs.(1.08±0.24)mm],von Willebrand factor(vWF)[(19.03±3.76)mg/L vs.(23.41±4.42)mg/L],angiotensin Ⅱ(Ang Ⅱ)[(45.83±5.87)ng/L vs.(52.87±6.01)ng/L](P＜0.001 all);and significant high-er high density lipoprotein cholesterol(HDL-C)[(1.63±0.32)mmol/L vs.(1.35±0.27)mmol/L],peak systol-ic velocity(PSV)[(47.93±5.26)cm/s vs.(41.32±4.98)cm/s],end-diastolic velocity(EDV)[(36.14±5.10)cm/s vs.(30.73±4.48)cm/s],pulse index(PI)[(85.98±9.03)％vs.(78.42±8.82)％],vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1(VEGFR1)[(289.14±32.98)ng/L vs.(258.34±29.32)ng/L](P＜0.001 all).There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups(P=0.538).Conclusion:Ezetimibe combined with atorvastatin possesses significant therapeutic effect on CHD patients,which could signifi-cantly reduce blood lipids,improve the carotid blood flow velocity and vascular endothelial function with good safety.

Objective:To explore the effect of ezetimibe combined with atorvastatin on the efficacy,blood lipids,ca-rotid ultrasound indicators in patients with coronary heart disease(CHD)and its safety.Methods:This randomized controlled study enrolled 98 CHD patients admitted to 945th Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistic Support Force be-tween June 2021 and June 2023.Patients were divided into intervention group and control group with 49 cases in each group.Patients in the control group was treated with atorvastatin-bascd routine medication comparing to those in intervention group receiving additional ezetimibe,both groups were treated for 90 d.Clinical efficacy,blood lipids,carotid ultrasound indicators,endothelial function indicators,and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between two groups.Results:Compared with patients in the control group,those in the intervention group had significant higher total effective rate(91.83％vs.73.47％,P=0.016).Compared with patients in the control group after treatment,those in intervention group had significant lower levels of low density lipoprotein cho-lesterol(LDL-C)[(2.74±0.61)mmol/L vs.(3.42±0.66)mmol/L],total cholesterol(TC)[(3.80±0.89)mmol/L vs.(4.69±1.02)mmol/L],triglyceride(TG)[(1.79±0.53)mmol/L vs.(2.35±0.62)mmol/L],re-sistance index(RI)[(52.02±6.32)％vs.(57.95±6.02)％],carotid intima-media thickness(IMT)[(0.91±0.17)mm vs.(1.08±0.24)mm],von Willebrand factor(vWF)[(19.03±3.76)mg/L vs.(23.41±4.42)mg/L],angiotensin Ⅱ(Ang Ⅱ)[(45.83±5.87)ng/L vs.(52.87±6.01)ng/L](P＜0.001 all);and significant high-er high density lipoprotein cholesterol(HDL-C)[(1.63±0.32)mmol/L vs.(1.35±0.27)mmol/L],peak systol-ic velocity(PSV)[(47.93±5.26)cm/s vs.(41.32±4.98)cm/s],end-diastolic velocity(EDV)[(36.14±5.10)cm/s vs.(30.73±4.48)cm/s],pulse index(PI)[(85.98±9.03)％vs.(78.42±8.82)％],vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1(VEGFR1)[(289.14±32.98)ng/L vs.(258.34±29.32)ng/L](P＜0.001 all).There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups(P=0.538).Conclusion:Ezetimibe combined with atorvastatin possesses significant therapeutic effect on CHD patients,which could signifi-cantly reduce blood lipids,improve the carotid blood flow velocity and vascular endothelial function with good safety.