1.Effects of a Simultaneous Dual-Task Intervention on Cognitive Function in Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Ye-Eun SHIN ; Myeong-Il HAN ; Mal-Rye CHOI ; Kyoung-hwan PARK ; Nam-ju SUNG ; Sol-yi KIM ; Se-yeon KIM ; Tae-woo KANG
Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association 2025;64(4):324-330
Objectives:
Previous studies have shown that combined interventions involving cognitive training and physical activity are effective in enhancing brain function. This study examined the effects of a dual-task intervention—simultaneously combining cognitive and physical tasks—on the cognitive and physical function of community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years and older.
Methods:
From July to December 2023, cognitively normal adults aged 65 years or older were recruited through the Jeollabuk-do Regional Dementia Center. Participants completed an eightsession group-based program (60 minutes per session) that combined cognitive training and physical activity. The cognitive functions were evaluated using a neuropsychological test battery, and the physical functions were assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), before and after the intervention.
Results:
Of 79 participants, 73 completed the intervention. After the program, significant improvements in orientation, memory, visuoconstruction, naming, total cognitive scores, and performance were observed on the Trail Making Test-Part A and Trail Making Test-Part B (p<0.05 to p<0.001).Physical performance also significantly improved the balance, gait speed, chair-stand ability, and total SPPB scores (p<0.001). Multiple regression analysis showed that lower educational attainment and cohabitation with children were associated with greater cognitive improvements, while antihypertensive medication use was negatively associated, and diabetes medication use was positively associated with cognitive outcomes.
Conclusion
Simultaneous dual-task–based combined intervention may be an effective strategy for enhancing the cognitive and physical functions in cognitively preserved older adults. Nevertheless, further studies will be needed to explore its long-term effects and underlying neurobiological mechanisms.
2.Erratum to: Corrigendum: 2023 Korean Society of Menopause -Osteoporosis Guidelines Part I
Dong Ock LEE ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Moon Kyoung CHO ; Young Sik CHOI ; Sungwook CHUN ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; Seung Hwa HONG ; Kyu Ri HWANG ; Jinju KIM ; Hoon KIM ; Dong-Yun LEE ; Sa Ra LEE ; Hyun-Tae PARK ; Seok Kyo SEO ; Jung-Ho SHIN ; Jae Yen SONG ; Kyong Wook YI ; Haerin PAIK ; Ji Young LEE
Journal of Menopausal Medicine 2024;30(3):179-179
3.Survival rate and death risk for associated pulmonary arterial hypertension: A retrospective population-based study
Sujin KIM ; Shin Yi JANG ; Soo Yeon LEE ; Su Ra SEO ; Seonju YI ; Chang-Kwan LEE ; Eun Jeong CHO ; Kyeongsug KIM
Precision and Future Medicine 2024;8(1):2-9
Purpose:
This study aimed to assess the survival rate (SR) and death risk for associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (aPAH; 10th revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases [ICD-10], I27.2) in Koreans.
Methods:
The data were collected from the Korean National Health Insurance Service from 2006 through 2017 (n= 15,448). We analyzed the SR using the Kaplan-Meier method and carried out Cox proportional hazards analyses.
Results:
Patients’ mean age upon aPAH diagnosis was 60.1±24.0 years, and 60.7% of the patients were female. The 10-year SR of aPAH was 46.3% (95% confidence interval, 45.0 to 47.6). The factors associated with an increase in the adjusted death risk included age of 0 to 9 years, advancing age, male sex, lower income level, and comorbidities including diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarction, heart failure, hemorrhagic stroke, chronic kidney disease, malignant neoplasm, hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia, and systemic lupus erythematosus.
Conclusion
The 10-year SR of aPAH was over 46%. The risk of death from aPAH was significantly higher with advancing age, sex, lower income level, and comorbidities.
4.Erratum to: Corrigendum: 2023 Korean Society of Menopause -Osteoporosis Guidelines Part I
Dong Ock LEE ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Moon Kyoung CHO ; Young Sik CHOI ; Sungwook CHUN ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; Seung Hwa HONG ; Kyu Ri HWANG ; Jinju KIM ; Hoon KIM ; Dong-Yun LEE ; Sa Ra LEE ; Hyun-Tae PARK ; Seok Kyo SEO ; Jung-Ho SHIN ; Jae Yen SONG ; Kyong Wook YI ; Haerin PAIK ; Ji Young LEE
Journal of Menopausal Medicine 2024;30(3):179-179
5.The 2024 Guidelines for Osteoporosis - Korean Society of Menopause
Dong Ock LEE ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Moon Kyoung CHO ; Young Sik CHOI ; Sungwook CHUN ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; Seung Hwa HONG ; Kyu Ri HWANG ; Jinju KIM ; Hoon KIM ; Dong- Yun LEE ; Sa Ra LEE ; Hyun-Tae PARK ; Seok Kyo SEO ; Jung-Ho SHIN ; Jae Yen SONG ; Kyong Wook YI ; Haerin PAIK ; Ji Young LEE
Journal of Menopausal Medicine 2024;30(1):1-23
6.The 2024 Guidelines for Osteoporosis - Korean Society of Menopause: Part II
Dong Ock LEE ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Moon Kyoung CHO ; Young Sik CHOI ; Sungwook CHUN ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; Seung Hwa HONG ; Kyu Ri HWANG ; Jinju KIM ; Hoon KIM ; Dong-Yun LEE ; Sa Ra LEE ; Hyun-Tae PARK ; Seok Kyo SEO ; Jung-Ho SHIN ; Jae Yen SONG ; Kyong Wook YI ; Haerin PAIK ; Ji Young LEE
Journal of Menopausal Medicine 2024;30(2):55-77
7.Corrigendum: 2023 Korean Society of Menopause - Osteoporosis Guidelines Part I
Dong Ock LEE ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Moon Kyoung CHO ; Young Sik CHOI ; Sungwook CHUN ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; Seung Hwa HONG ; Kyu Ri HWANG ; Jinju KIM ; Hoon KIM ; Dong-Yun LEE ; Sa Ra LEE ; Hyun-Tae PARK ; Seok Kyo SEO ; Jung-Ho SHIN ; Jae Yen SONG ; Kyong Wook YI ; Haerin PAIK ; Ji Young LEE
Journal of Menopausal Medicine 2024;30(2):126-126
8.Erratum to: Corrigendum: 2023 Korean Society of Menopause -Osteoporosis Guidelines Part I
Dong Ock LEE ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Moon Kyoung CHO ; Young Sik CHOI ; Sungwook CHUN ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; Seung Hwa HONG ; Kyu Ri HWANG ; Jinju KIM ; Hoon KIM ; Dong-Yun LEE ; Sa Ra LEE ; Hyun-Tae PARK ; Seok Kyo SEO ; Jung-Ho SHIN ; Jae Yen SONG ; Kyong Wook YI ; Haerin PAIK ; Ji Young LEE
Journal of Menopausal Medicine 2024;30(3):179-179
9.Assessment of the Suitability of the Fleischner Society Imaging Guidelines in Evaluating Chest Radiographs of COVID-19 Patients
Hyo Ju SHIN ; Jin Young KIM ; Jung Hee HONG ; Mu Sook LEE ; Jaehyuck YI ; Yong Shik KWON ; Ji Yeon LEE
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2023;38(26):e199-
Background:
The Fleischner Society established consensus guidelines for imaging in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We investigated the prevalence of pneumonia and the adverse outcomes by dividing groups according to the symptoms and risk factors of patients and assessed the suitability of the Fleischner society imaging guidelines in evaluating chest radiographs of COVID-19 patients.
Methods:
From February 2020 to May 2020, 685 patients (204 males, mean 58 ± 17.9 years) who were diagnosed with COVID-19 and hospitalized were included. We divided patients into four groups according to the severity of symptoms and presence of risk factors (age > 65 years and presence of comorbidities). The patient groups were defined as follows: group 1 (asymptomatic patients), group 2 (patients with mild symptoms without risk factors), group 3 (patients with mild symptoms and risk factors), and group 4 (patients with moderate to severe symptoms). According to the Fleischner society, chest imaging is not indicated for groups 1–2 but is indicated for groups 3–4. We compared the prevalence and score of pneumonia on chest radiographs and compare the adverse outcomes (progress to severe pneumonia, intensive care unit admission, and death) between groups.
Results:
Among the 685 COVID-19 patients, 138 (20.1%), 396 (57.8%), 102 (14.9%), and 49 (7.1%) patients corresponded to groups 1 to 4, respectively. Patients in groups 3–4 were significantly older and showed significantly higher prevalence rates of pneumonia (group 1–4: 37.7%, 51.3%, 71.6%, and 98%, respectively, P < 0.001) than those in groups 1-2. Adverse outcomes were also higher in groups 3–4 than in groups 1–2 (group 1–4: 8.0%, 3.5%, 6.9%, and 51%, respectively, P < 0.001). Patients with adverse outcomes in group 1 were initially asymptomatic but symptoms developed during follow-up. They were older (mean age, 80 years) and most of them had comorbidities (81.8%). Consistently asymptomatic patients had no adverse events.
Conclusion
The prevalence of pneumonia and adverse outcomes were different according to the symptoms and risk factors in COVID-19 patients. Therefore, as the Fleischner Society recommended, evaluation and monitoring of COVID-19 pneumonia using chest radiographs is necessary for old symptomatic patients with comorbidities.
10.The Extent of Late Gadolinium Enhancement Can Predict Adverse Cardiac Outcomes in Patients with Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Prospective Observational Study
Eun Kyoung KIM ; Ga Yeon LEE ; Shin Yi JANG ; Sung-A CHANG ; Sung Mok KIM ; Sung-Ji PARK ; Jin-Oh CHOI ; Seung Woo PARK ; Yeon Hyeon CHOE ; Sang-Chol LEE ; Jae K. OH
Korean Journal of Radiology 2021;22(3):324-333
Objective:
The clinical course of an individual patient with heart failure is unpredictable with left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) only. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived myocardial fibrosis extent and to determine the cutoff value for event-free survival in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) who had severely reduced LVEF.
Materials and Methods:
Our prospective cohort study included 78 NICM patients with significantly reduced LV systolic function (LVEF < 35%). CMR images were analyzed for the presence and extent of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as a composite of cardiac death, heart transplantation, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharge for major arrhythmia, and hospitalization for congestive heart failure within 5 years after enrollment.
Results:
A total of 80.8% (n = 63) of enrolled patients had LGE, with the median LVEF of 25.4% (19.8–32.4%). The extent of myocardial scarring was significantly higher in patients who experienced MACE than in those without any cardiac events (22.0 [5.5–46.1] %LV vs. 6.7 [0–17.1] %LV, respectively, p = 0.008). During follow-up, 51.4% of patients with LGE ≥ 12.0 %LV experienced MACE, along with 20.9% of those with LGE ≤ 12.0 %LV (log-rank p = 0.001). According to multivariate analysis, LGE extent more than 12.0 %LV was independently associated with MACE (adjusted hazard ratio, 6.71; 95% confidence interval, 2.54–17.74; p < 0.001).
Conclusion
In NICM patients with significantly reduced LV systolic function, the extent of LGE is a strong predictor for longterm adverse cardiac outcomes. Event-free survival was well discriminated with an LGE cutoff value of 12.0 %LV in these patients.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail