Environmental damage affects many aspects of healthcare, from extreme weather events to evolving population disease. Singapore's healthcare sector has the world's second highest healthcare emissions per capita, hampering the nation's pledge to reduce emissions by 2030 and achieve net zero emissions by 2050. In this review, we provide an overview of the impact environmental damage has on healthcare, including facilities, supply chain and human health, and examine measures to address healthcare's impact on the environment. Utilising the 'R's of sustainability - rethinking, reducing/refusing, reusing/repurposing/reprocessing, repairing, recycling and research - we have summarised the opportunities and challenges across medical disciplines. Awareness and advocacy to adopt strategies at institutional and individual levels is needed to revolutionise our environmental footprint and improve healthcare sustainability. By leveraging evidence from ongoing trials and integrating sustainable practices, our healthcare system can remain resilient against environment-driven challenges and evolving healthcare demands while minimising further impacts of environmental destruction.
Humans ; Climate Change ; Delivery of Health Care ; Singapore ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Sustainable Development ; Environment

INTRODUCTIONIn end-stage heart failure (HF) that is not eligible for mechanical assist device or heart transplant, palliative care serves to maximise symptom control and quality of life. We sought to evaluate the impact of home-based advance care programme (ACP) on healthcare utilisation in end-stage HF patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODSProspectively collected registry data on all end-stage HF recruited into ACP between July 2008 and July 2010 were analysed. Chart reviews were conducted on HF database and hospital electronic records. Phone interview and home visit details by ACP team were extracted to complete data entry. HF and all-cause hospitalisations 1 year before, and any time after ACP inception were defined as events. For the latter analysis, follow-up duration adjustment to event episodes was performed to account for death less than a year.

RESULTSForty-four patients (mean age 79 years, 39% men) were followed up for 15±8 months. Fifty-seven percent had diabetes, 80% ischaemic heart disease, and 60% chronic kidney disease. All reported functional class III/IV at enrolment. Mean serum sodium was 136±6 mmol/L, and creatinine 186±126 mmol/L. Thirty (68%) died within the programme. Mean time to death was 5.5 months. Mean all-cause and HF hospitalisations were 3.6 and 2.0 per patient before enrolment, but improved to 1.0 and 0.6 respectively after ACP. Thirty-six (71%) patients had fewer HF hospitalisations. When only those who survived more than a year were considered (n = 14), 10 (71%) and 9 (64%) experienced reduced HF (mean: 1.4 episodes per patient) and all-cause hospitalisations (mean: 2.2 episodes per patient) respectively.

CONCLUSIONHome-based advance care programme is potentially effective in reducing healthcare utilisation of end-stage HF patients, primarily by reducing HF rehospitalisations, and in probably saving costs as well.

Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Female ; Health Care Costs ; Health Services ; economics ; utilization ; Heart Failure ; complications ; economics ; therapy ; Home Care Services, Hospital-Based ; economics ; Hospitalization ; economics ; statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Male ; Myocardial Ischemia ; complications ; Palliative Care ; economics ; methods ; Prospective Studies ; Registries ; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic ; complications ; Tertiary Care Centers