Objective:To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS) among patients with dementia in China.Methods:All participants were recruited from a psychiatric hospital, two old people′s homes and three community mental health centers in Huzhou city. Convenience sampling method was used. All participants were tested by the Chinese version of RUDAS and The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Cronbach α coefficient and retest reliability were used for reliability test. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used for validity test. The criterion validity of MMSE and Chinese version of RUDAS was tested by Pearson correlation analysis.Results:EFA extracted 6 factors and factor loadings of each item ranged from 0.594 to 0.960, which contributed to 62.584% variance totally. Six factors were identified, namely, visual-spatial orientation, imitation and judgment, visual structure, delayed recall, linguistic accuracy, and linguistic fluency. Compared with the original scale, the dimension of verbal communication showed reduced dimension. In the CFA, χ 2/ df=1.031, GFI=0.882, AGFI=0.853, CFI=0.996, TLI=0.996, RMSEA=0.014, all the indicators were in adaption standard range. The Cronbach α coefficient was 0.793, and the Cronbach α coefficients for six dimensions ranged from 0.503 to 0. 930.The test-retest reliability for the Chinese version of RUDAS was 0.91. Conclusion:The Chinese version of RUDAS showed satisfactory psychometric properties in dementia screening, which can provide guidance and reference for further diagnostic research and application practice of this scale.

Objective:To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS) among patients with dementia in China.Methods:All participants were recruited from a psychiatric hospital, two old people′s homes and three community mental health centers in Huzhou city. Convenience sampling method was used. All participants were tested by the Chinese version of RUDAS and The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Cronbach α coefficient and retest reliability were used for reliability test. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used for validity test. The criterion validity of MMSE and Chinese version of RUDAS was tested by Pearson correlation analysis.Results:EFA extracted 6 factors and factor loadings of each item ranged from 0.594 to 0.960, which contributed to 62.584% variance totally. Six factors were identified, namely, visual-spatial orientation, imitation and judgment, visual structure, delayed recall, linguistic accuracy, and linguistic fluency. Compared with the original scale, the dimension of verbal communication showed reduced dimension. In the CFA, χ 2/ df=1.031, GFI=0.882, AGFI=0.853, CFI=0.996, TLI=0.996, RMSEA=0.014, all the indicators were in adaption standard range. The Cronbach α coefficient was 0.793, and the Cronbach α coefficients for six dimensions ranged from 0.503 to 0. 930.The test-retest reliability for the Chinese version of RUDAS was 0.91. Conclusion:The Chinese version of RUDAS showed satisfactory psychometric properties in dementia screening, which can provide guidance and reference for further diagnostic research and application practice of this scale.