Objective:To compare the efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resection with grasping forceps (EMR-G) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the resection of rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NET)≤10 mm.Methods:Data of 74 patients with ≤10 mm rectal NET admitted to Shantou Central Hospital from August 2020 to June 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into the ESD group and the EMR-G group according to the surgical method. Outcomes included R0 resection rate, margin-to-base distance, operative time, cost, and hospital stay.Results:The EMR-G group demonstrated significantly higher R0 resection rates [100.0% (37/37) VS 81.1% (30/37), χ2=7.731, P=0.006], greater margin-to-base distance (median 330 μm VS 110 μm, Z=-5.890, P<0.001), shorter operative time (15.22±2.94 min VS 27.95±6.50 min, t=-10.854, P<0.001), lower cost (2 409.51±205.00 yuan VS 7 899.19±420.14 yuan, t=-71.430, P=0.001), and reduced hospital stay (1.08±0.27 days VS 2.76±0.80 days, t=-12.095, P<0.001). Conclusion:EMR-G outperforms ESD for ≤10 mm rectal NETs by improving R0 resection, shortening procedure duration and hospitalization, and reducing costs, which is worth promotion.

Objective:To compare the efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resection with grasping forceps (EMR-G) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the resection of rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NET)≤10 mm.Methods:Data of 74 patients with ≤10 mm rectal NET admitted to Shantou Central Hospital from August 2020 to June 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into the ESD group and the EMR-G group according to the surgical method. Outcomes included R0 resection rate, margin-to-base distance, operative time, cost, and hospital stay.Results:The EMR-G group demonstrated significantly higher R0 resection rates [100.0% (37/37) VS 81.1% (30/37), χ2=7.731, P=0.006], greater margin-to-base distance (median 330 μm VS 110 μm, Z=-5.890, P<0.001), shorter operative time (15.22±2.94 min VS 27.95±6.50 min, t=-10.854, P<0.001), lower cost (2 409.51±205.00 yuan VS 7 899.19±420.14 yuan, t=-71.430, P=0.001), and reduced hospital stay (1.08±0.27 days VS 2.76±0.80 days, t=-12.095, P<0.001). Conclusion:EMR-G outperforms ESD for ≤10 mm rectal NETs by improving R0 resection, shortening procedure duration and hospitalization, and reducing costs, which is worth promotion.

Objective:To explore the validity and safety of flat-tipped injection needle and conical catheter these 2 instruments in the hydrodynamic releasing treatment of fecal calculus incarceration in the colonic diverticulum.Methods:From 1 May 2022 to 31 July 2023, 77 patients with fecal calculus incarceration in colonic diverticulum detected by colonscopy at the Endoscope Center of Shantou Central Hospital were prospectively selected. According to the random number table method, 77 patients were randomly divided into the flat-tipped injection needle group (39 cases, 51 fecal stone embedded) and the conical catheter group (38 cases, 49 fecal stone embedded). The successful rate of fecal stone releasing, operation time and complications of 2 groups were observed. Independent samples t test and chi-square test were used for statistical analysis. Results:The successful rate of fecalith releasing of flat-tipped injection needle group was higher than that of the conical catheter group (100.0%, 51/51 vs. 83.7%, 41/49), and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=9.05, P=0.002). There was no significant difference in the operation time of successful cases between the flat-tipped injection needle group and the conical catheter group ((5.7±1.2) s vs. (5.9±0.8) s, P>0.05). There were no cases of intraoperative or postoperative bleeding or perforation in the process of fecal stone releasing in both groups. Missed submucosal injection occurred in 4 cases of the flat-tipped injection needle group and occurred in three cases of the conical catheter group, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the 2 groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion:Both instruments are effective and safe in the hydrodynamic releasing treatment of fecal calculus incarceration in the colonic diverticulum, and the success rate of flat-tipped injection needle is higher than that of conical catheter.

Objective:To evaluate the clinical value of endoscopic release therapy for fecal impaction in the colorectal diverticulum.Methods:Data of patients with fecal impaction in the colorectal diverticulum who received endoscopy in Shantou Central Hospital from January 2018 to September 2020 were included in this study. Among them, 85 patients treated with endoscopic release therapy were assigned to the observation group (2 patients were excluded from the observation group due to acute appendicitis), and 43 patients receiving no treatment were assigned to the control group. The relief of abdominal symptoms was used as an index to evaluate the clinical value of endoscopic release therapy for fecal impaction in the colorectal diverticulum.Results:In the observation group, 42.2% (35/83) were successfully released at one time. The successful comprehensive measures accounted for 25.0% (12/48) of the first release failure, and the total success rate was 56.6% (47/83). There were no complications related to endoscopy in the observation group. One week after the treatment, patients in the observation group were followed up by telephone. Among the 45 patients who were successfully released, positive symptoms of 30 patients disappeared or significantly improved with the effective rate of 90.9% (30/33). Among the 38 patients who failed to release the fecal impaction, 19 had positive symptoms and 16 improved in varying degrees with the effective rate of 55.2% (16/29). The overall effective rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group [55.4% (46/83) VS 7.0% (3/43)], showing significant difference( χ2=23.354, P<0.01). The effective rate were significant differences in the successful release group [65.2% (30/46)], unsuccessful release group [29.7% (11/37)] and the control group [7.0% (3/43), χ2=33.792, P<0.01]. By pairwise comparison, the effective rate of the successful release group was the highest, followed by the unsuccessful release group, and that of the control group was the lowest with significant difference ( P<0.017). Conclusion:The endoscopic release therapy for fecal impaction in the colorectal diverticulum is relatively simple, which can relieve and reduce related symptoms, avoid complications, missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis, and show definite curative effects. When colorectal diverticulum with fecal impaction is found in the process of endoscopy, it is of great practical significance to release the incarcerated feces by means of different methods.