ObjectiveTo investigate the demand and the application outcomes of case-based learning (CBL) combined with teaching case library in continuing education courses for rehabilitation therapists. MethodsA convergent mixed-methods research design was adopted, involving 51 rehabilitation therapists and 31 instructors who participated in the advanced training program at the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital between October, 2022 and October, 2024. Self-developed questionnaires were used to collect data on the perceived needs of teachers and students regarding CBL and teaching case library. Differences between CBL + teaching case library and traditional lecturing in student evaluations, classroom participation and interaction were compared using Student Evaluation of Teaching in Medical Lectures, Classroom Participation Scale and Flanders Interaction Analysis System. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to obtain evaluations and attitudes towards this method from both instructors and students' perspectives. ResultsThe survey showed that 91.4% of participating teachers and students supported the use of CBL in the courses, and 82.7% advocated that the teaching case library should include typical cases. Significant differences were observed in teaching preference between teachers and students (χ² = 17.597, P < 0.01). Application effects demonstrated that CBL+teaching library significantly outperformed traditional teaching methods in student previewing behaviors, classroom interaction and learning outcomes (|Z| ≥ 2.646, P < 0.01). Flanders Interaction Analysis indicated that CBL+teaching library was superior to traditional teaching in terms of students' motivation to speak and autonomous learning. Qualitative Research generated four positive themes including cultivating clinical reasoning, being close to clinical practice, deepening knowledge understanding and improving teaching quality; and three negative themes including increasing teaching burden, high software and hardware requirements and posing great challenges to students were generated. ConclusionCompared with traditional teaching methods, CBL combined with teaching case library is closely linked to clinical practice, facilitating students' clinical reasoning, enhancing teaching effectiveness and satisfaction, and therefore aligning with the goals and needs of continuing education for rehabilitation therapists, which is highly recognized by both instructors and students.

ObjectiveTo investigate the demand and the application outcomes of case-based learning (CBL) combined with teaching case library in continuing education courses for rehabilitation therapists. MethodsA convergent mixed-methods research design was adopted, involving 51 rehabilitation therapists and 31 instructors who participated in the advanced training program at the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital between October, 2022 and October, 2024. Self-developed questionnaires were used to collect data on the perceived needs of teachers and students regarding CBL and teaching case library. Differences between CBL + teaching case library and traditional lecturing in student evaluations, classroom participation and interaction were compared using Student Evaluation of Teaching in Medical Lectures, Classroom Participation Scale and Flanders Interaction Analysis System. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to obtain evaluations and attitudes towards this method from both instructors and students' perspectives. ResultsThe survey showed that 91.4% of participating teachers and students supported the use of CBL in the courses, and 82.7% advocated that the teaching case library should include typical cases. Significant differences were observed in teaching preference between teachers and students (χ² = 17.597, P < 0.01). Application effects demonstrated that CBL+teaching library significantly outperformed traditional teaching methods in student previewing behaviors, classroom interaction and learning outcomes (|Z| ≥ 2.646, P < 0.01). Flanders Interaction Analysis indicated that CBL+teaching library was superior to traditional teaching in terms of students' motivation to speak and autonomous learning. Qualitative Research generated four positive themes including cultivating clinical reasoning, being close to clinical practice, deepening knowledge understanding and improving teaching quality; and three negative themes including increasing teaching burden, high software and hardware requirements and posing great challenges to students were generated. ConclusionCompared with traditional teaching methods, CBL combined with teaching case library is closely linked to clinical practice, facilitating students' clinical reasoning, enhancing teaching effectiveness and satisfaction, and therefore aligning with the goals and needs of continuing education for rehabilitation therapists, which is highly recognized by both instructors and students.

ObjectiveTo investigate the demand and the application outcomes of case-based learning (CBL) combined with teaching case library in continuing education courses for rehabilitation therapists. MethodsA convergent mixed-methods research design was adopted, involving 51 rehabilitation therapists and 31 instructors who participated in the advanced training program at the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital between October, 2022 and October, 2024. Self-developed questionnaires were used to collect data on the perceived needs of teachers and students regarding CBL and teaching case library. Differences between CBL + teaching case library and traditional lecturing in student evaluations, classroom participation and interaction were compared using Student Evaluation of Teaching in Medical Lectures, Classroom Participation Scale and Flanders Interaction Analysis System. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to obtain evaluations and attitudes towards this method from both instructors and students' perspectives. ResultsThe survey showed that 91.4% of participating teachers and students supported the use of CBL in the courses, and 82.7% advocated that the teaching case library should include typical cases. Significant differences were observed in teaching preference between teachers and students (χ² = 17.597, P < 0.01). Application effects demonstrated that CBL+teaching library significantly outperformed traditional teaching methods in student previewing behaviors, classroom interaction and learning outcomes (|Z| ≥ 2.646, P < 0.01). Flanders Interaction Analysis indicated that CBL+teaching library was superior to traditional teaching in terms of students' motivation to speak and autonomous learning. Qualitative Research generated four positive themes including cultivating clinical reasoning, being close to clinical practice, deepening knowledge understanding and improving teaching quality; and three negative themes including increasing teaching burden, high software and hardware requirements and posing great challenges to students were generated. ConclusionCompared with traditional teaching methods, CBL combined with teaching case library is closely linked to clinical practice, facilitating students' clinical reasoning, enhancing teaching effectiveness and satisfaction, and therefore aligning with the goals and needs of continuing education for rehabilitation therapists, which is highly recognized by both instructors and students.

Objective To search,evaluate and summarise the best evidence on non-drug intervention for nipple pain or injury in breastfeeding mothers.Methods Based on the"6S pyramid"evidence model,desktop searches were conducted on databases of UpToDate,Joanna Briggs Institute evidence-based practice database(JBI),National Guideline Clearinghouse(NGC),National Institute for health and Care Excellence(NICE),Guidelines International Network(GIN),Registered Nurses'Association of Ontario(RNAO),American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists(ACOG),Medlive,Chinese Medical Association(CMA)website,Breastfeeding Medical Association(BMA),CNKI,Wanfang Data,SinoMed,Cochrance Library,PubMed,Embase,Web of Science,and CINAHL for literature in non-drug interventions for nipple pain or injury in breastfeeding women.The literature included clinical guidelines,decisions,recommended practices,evidence summaries,expert consensus,systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials(RCTs).The searched databases spanned from 1st January,2013 to 30th April,2024.Two researchers who were trained in evidence-based nursing independently evaluated the methodological quality,extracted and integrated evidence from eligible literature.Results A total of 15 documents were included,consisting of 5 clinical guidelines,2 clinical decisions,1 expert consensus,6 systematic evaluations and 1 RCT.Thirty-one pieces of evidence were summarised across 4 categories:accurate perinatal assessment,feeding guidance,non-drug intervention and health education.Conclusion The summarised best evidence on non-drug intervention for nipple pain or injury in breastfeeding women provides an evidence-based basis for clinical healthcare professionals.

Objective Using network pharmacology research methods and animal pharmacology experiments,explore the mechanism of antidepressant effects of traditional Chinese medicine Citron and Bergamot.Methods Using the Traditional Chinese Medicine System Pharmacology Database and Analysis Platform(TCMSP),ETCM,Symmap,Swiss Target Prediction,and Uniprot data platforms,screen the active ingredients and corresponding gene targets of Citron and Bergamot.Obtain depression gene targets using OMIM,TTD,and Cenecards data platforms.Using Venny 2.1 online software,draw Venn diagrams of the intersection of active ingredients and gene targets.Draw network diagrams between drugs,active ingredients,targets,and diseases using Cytoscape 3.7.2 software.Construct a protein-protein interaction(PPI)network diagram using the STRING data platform for intersecting genes.Using the Metascape data platform,perform gene ontology(GO)function and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genesand and Genomes(KEGG)pathway enrichment analysis.A rat depression model was established using chronic unpredictable mild stress(CUMS)combined with solitary care,and animal experiments were conducted to verify the BDNF/TrkB/CREB signaling pathway obtained from network pharmacology research.Results The research results of network pharmacology methods show that there are 57 antidepressant active ingredients in Citron,65 antidepressant active ingredients in Bergamot,and important active ingredients include Acetic acid,3,4,7-trimethoxycoumarin and Citric acid,etc.Through the data platform,2717 depression targets and 430 intersection targets were identified.Through PPI network analysis,key gene targets for antidepressant effects in Citron and Bergamot were identified,including TP53,Protein kinase B1,CREB-binding protein,Brain derived neurotrophic factor,etc.Through KEGG analysis,it was found that important signaling pathways include pathways in cancer,PI3K-Akt signaling pathway,Neurotrophin signaling pathway,etc.By observing the neurotrophic factor BDNF/TrkB/CREB signaling pathway in depressed rats,the results showed that the medium dose groups of Citron and Bergamot could significantly increase serum BDNF content(P<0.05),and each treatment group could improve the damage of hippocampal neurons in rats.The high and medium dose groups of Citron and Bergamot significantly increased the expression of BDNF protein in the hippocampal CA1 region(P<0.05,P<0.01).Except for the low-dose group,which showed no difference in TrkB mRNA gene expression,all other treatment groups significantly increased the mRNA gene expression levels of hippocampal BDNF,TrkB and CREB(P<0.01).The medium dose group of Citron and Bergamot increased the expression of BDNF protein in the hippocampus(P<0.01),while the medium and low dose groups significantly increased the relative expression of TrkB protein in the hippocampus(P<0.05).The medium dose group showed an increasing trend in the relative expression of CREB protein.Conclusion Traditional Chinese medicine Citron and Bergamot have therapeutic effects on depression models in rats,and the mechanism of action may be related to the BDNF/TrkB/CREB signaling pathway.

Objective:To conduct a scoping review on the current status and influencing factors of adherence to lymphedema prevention behaviors among postoperative breast cancer patients, with the aim of providing a scientific basis for developing targeted interventions.Methods:A comprehensive search was conducted in both Chinese and English databases, including China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, SinoMed, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science, for literature published up to August 31, 2024, related to adherence to lymphedema prevention behaviors in breast cancer survivors. Eligible articles were screened, and data were extracted to analyze adherence levels. Influencing factors were mapped to the domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify and analyze key behavioral determinants.Results:A total of 15 articles were included: nine quantitative and six qualitative. Overall, adherence to lymphedema prevention behaviors among postoperative breast cancer patients was found to be suboptimal. A total of 25 influencing factors were identified and categorized into eight theoretical domains: knowledge (lymphedema awareness) ; skills (coping strategies, time since surgery) ; beliefs about capabilities (self-efficacy, illness perception, unawareness of tumor stage, surgical type, symptom distress) ; beliefs about consequences (outcome expectations, attitudes) ; emotions (negative emotions, fatigue, age) ; behavior regulation (self-regulation, exercise habits, behavioral control) ; social influences (social support, family support, marital status, behavioral cues) ; environmental context and resources (healthcare access, ethnicity, professional supervision, financial status, employment situation) .Conclusions:Adherence to lymphedema prevention behaviors in postoperative breast cancer patients remains unsatisfactory, with influencing factors being multifaceted, diverse, and overlapping. Future efforts should focus on uncovering the potential interrelationships among these factors to enhance adherence and support long-term self-management in this population.

Body weight abnormalities, including overweight, obesity, and underweight, have become a dual public health challenge in Chinese adults: overweight and obesity lead to a variety of chronic complications, while underweight increases the risks of malnutrition, sarcopenia, and organ dysfunction. To systematically address these issues, multidisciplinary experts in endocrinology, sports science, nutrition, and psychiatry from various regions have held multiple weight management seminars. Based on the latest epidemiological data and clinical evidence, they expanded the guideline to include assessment and intervention strategies for underweight, in addition to the core content of obesity management. This guideline outlines the etiological mechanisms, evaluation methods, and multidimensional management strategies for overweight and obesity, covering key areas such as diagnosis and assessment, medical nutrition therapy, exercise prescription, pharmacological intervention, and psychological support. It is intended to provide a scientific and standardized approach to weight management across the adult population, aiming to curb the rising prevalence of obesity, mitigate complications associated with abnormal body weight, and improve nutritional status and overall quality of life.

Objective:To conduct a scoping review on the current status and influencing factors of adherence to lymphedema prevention behaviors among postoperative breast cancer patients, with the aim of providing a scientific basis for developing targeted interventions.Methods:A comprehensive search was conducted in both Chinese and English databases, including China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, SinoMed, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science, for literature published up to August 31, 2024, related to adherence to lymphedema prevention behaviors in breast cancer survivors. Eligible articles were screened, and data were extracted to analyze adherence levels. Influencing factors were mapped to the domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify and analyze key behavioral determinants.Results:A total of 15 articles were included: nine quantitative and six qualitative. Overall, adherence to lymphedema prevention behaviors among postoperative breast cancer patients was found to be suboptimal. A total of 25 influencing factors were identified and categorized into eight theoretical domains: knowledge (lymphedema awareness) ; skills (coping strategies, time since surgery) ; beliefs about capabilities (self-efficacy, illness perception, unawareness of tumor stage, surgical type, symptom distress) ; beliefs about consequences (outcome expectations, attitudes) ; emotions (negative emotions, fatigue, age) ; behavior regulation (self-regulation, exercise habits, behavioral control) ; social influences (social support, family support, marital status, behavioral cues) ; environmental context and resources (healthcare access, ethnicity, professional supervision, financial status, employment situation) .Conclusions:Adherence to lymphedema prevention behaviors in postoperative breast cancer patients remains unsatisfactory, with influencing factors being multifaceted, diverse, and overlapping. Future efforts should focus on uncovering the potential interrelationships among these factors to enhance adherence and support long-term self-management in this population.

Objective:To investigate the current status of treatment delay and analyze its influencing factors in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema.Methods:Using convenience sampling, 218 patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema from The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between April 2024 and January 2025 were enrolled. The General Information Questionnaire, Lymphedema Self-Management Support Scale for Breast Cancer Survivors (LSMS-BCs), Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire for Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema (BIPQ-BCRL), Perceived Barriers to Health Care-Seeking Decision-Chinese (PBHSD-C), and Health Literacy Scale for Chronic Patients (HLSCP) were used to conduct a cross-sectional survey. Logistic regression identified predictors of treatment delay, with model fit assessed by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Discriminative ability was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.Results:The study included 218 female BCRL patients, aged (58.31 ± 10.54) years. Among 218 patients, 76 experienced treatment delay, the incidence of treatment delay was 34.8% (76/218). Independent risk factors included junior high school education or below, no regular arm circumference measurement, low self-management support scores, low illness perception scores, high perceived barriers to healthcare-seeking scores, and low health literacy scores (Wald χ2 values were 7.75-15.15, all P<0.05). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated good model fit ( χ2=6.21, P>0.05). The combined predictive model demonstrated significantly better discrimination than individual factors, the area under the curve of ROC was 0.846 ( P<0.01). Conclusions:The incidence of treatment delay is relatively high among breast cancer-related lymphedema patients. Nursing staff should pay special attention to patients with a junior high school education or below, no regular arm circumference measurement, low LSMS-BCs scores, low BIPQ-BCRL scores, high PBHSD-C scores and low HLSCP scores, implement timely interventions to reduce treatment delay in lymphedema patients.

This paper provides a review on the concept, current status, assessment tools, influencing factors, and intervention strategies regarding the compliance of lymphedema prevention behaviors in postoperative breast cancer patients. The aim is to improve the compliance of lymphedema prevention behaviors in these patients, reduce the incidence of lymphedema, and provide a reference for future clinical intervention studies in this field.