1.Risk signal mining of adverse events related to baloxavir marboxil based on the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System
Xiangrong BAI ; Yangai WANG ; Bing CHEN
Adverse Drug Reactions Journal 2023;25(12):712-716
Objective:To mine the risk signals of baloxavir marboxil-related adverse events (AEs) and provide reference for rational use in clinical practice.Methods:The report odds ratio (ROR) and proportional reporting ratio (PRR) methods were used to mine the risk signals of baloxavir marboxil-related AEs in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from the 1st quarter of 2018 to the 4th quarter of 2022. The AE with reports ≥3 and 95% confidence interval ( CI) lower limit of ROR or PRR>1 was defined as a risk signal. AEs were classified according to the system organ class (SOC) and preferred term (PT) of Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) 25.1 for statistical analysis. Results:A total of 1 102 AE reports were retrieved, involving 1 102 patients, and 498 were serious AE. A total of 45 AE risk signals were obtained by ROR and PRR methods. The top 10 PTs in signal intensity were febrile seizures, ischemic colitis, bacterial pneumonitis, anaphylaxis, hemorrhagic cystitis, erythema multiforme, melena, anaphylactic shock, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and anaphylactic reaction. Of them, 26 PTs were not recorded in the labels, in which the top 10 PTs were febrile seizures, ischemic colitis, bacterial pneumonia, hemorrhagic cystitis, disseminated intravascular coagulation, altered mental status, fever, rhabdomyolysis, cyanosis, and facial paralysis. The top 5 SOCs that involved more PTs were nervous system disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, respiratory system diseases, psychiatric disorders, and blood and lymphatic system disorders. Among the 498 serious AEs, a total of 5 risk signals were mined, including infectious pneumonia, diarrhea, rhabdomyolysis, allergic reactions, and abnormal behavior.Conclusion:The attention should be paid to AEs not mentioned in the drug label in clinical application of baloxavir marboxil, such as febrile seizures, bacterial pneumonia, ischemic colitis, and hemorrhagic cystitis.
2.Risk signal mining of adverse events related to baloxavir marboxil based on the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System
Xiangrong BAI ; Yangai WANG ; Bing CHEN
Adverse Drug Reactions Journal 2023;25(12):712-716
Objective:To mine the risk signals of baloxavir marboxil-related adverse events (AEs) and provide reference for rational use in clinical practice.Methods:The report odds ratio (ROR) and proportional reporting ratio (PRR) methods were used to mine the risk signals of baloxavir marboxil-related AEs in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from the 1st quarter of 2018 to the 4th quarter of 2022. The AE with reports ≥3 and 95% confidence interval ( CI) lower limit of ROR or PRR>1 was defined as a risk signal. AEs were classified according to the system organ class (SOC) and preferred term (PT) of Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) 25.1 for statistical analysis. Results:A total of 1 102 AE reports were retrieved, involving 1 102 patients, and 498 were serious AE. A total of 45 AE risk signals were obtained by ROR and PRR methods. The top 10 PTs in signal intensity were febrile seizures, ischemic colitis, bacterial pneumonitis, anaphylaxis, hemorrhagic cystitis, erythema multiforme, melena, anaphylactic shock, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and anaphylactic reaction. Of them, 26 PTs were not recorded in the labels, in which the top 10 PTs were febrile seizures, ischemic colitis, bacterial pneumonia, hemorrhagic cystitis, disseminated intravascular coagulation, altered mental status, fever, rhabdomyolysis, cyanosis, and facial paralysis. The top 5 SOCs that involved more PTs were nervous system disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, respiratory system diseases, psychiatric disorders, and blood and lymphatic system disorders. Among the 498 serious AEs, a total of 5 risk signals were mined, including infectious pneumonia, diarrhea, rhabdomyolysis, allergic reactions, and abnormal behavior.Conclusion:The attention should be paid to AEs not mentioned in the drug label in clinical application of baloxavir marboxil, such as febrile seizures, bacterial pneumonia, ischemic colitis, and hemorrhagic cystitis.
3.Determination of Donepezil and Rivastigmine in Human Serum by High-performance Liquid Chromatogra-phy Combined with Mass Spectrum
Su SU ; Qian SHEN ; Yangai WANG ; Xuemei WANG ; Cuibai WEI ; Suying YAN
China Pharmacist 2018;21(10):1725-1731
Objective: To develop an LC-MS/MS method for the determination of donepezil and rivastigmine in human serum. Methods: After protein precipitation with 600μl acetonitrile, the serum samples were analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Using loratadine as the internal standard, a Waters Xselect CSH C18(150 mm×3 mm, 2. 5 μm) column was used with the mobile phase consisting of water (containing 10 mmol·L-1ammonium acetate)-acetonitrile(20 ∶ 80)at a flow rate of 0. 4 ml·min-1with the column temperature at 40 ℃. The ion transitions were performed in a positive electrospray ionization multiple reaction-monitoring mode regarding [M+H] +as the molecular ion peak of donepezil and rivastigmine monitored with m/z 380. 1→m/z 91. 1 and m/z 251→m/z 206. 5, respectively. The internal standard was monitored with m/z 383. 1→m/z 337. 1. Results: The linear range of donepezil and rivastigmine was 0. 5-400 ng·ml-1(r>0. 99) and the lowest quantification limit was 0. 5 ng·ml-1. For donepezil, the intra-day and inter-day RSD was 2. 06% to 12. 51% , the relative error was -6. 60% to 4. 20% , and the relative recovery was ranged from 80. 76% to 96. 17% (RSD<15% ). For rivastigmine, the intra-day and inter-day RSD was 1. 69% to 9. 31% , the relative error was -5. 58% to 5. 20% , and the mean relative recovery was ranged from 96. 69% to 100. 15% (RSD<15% ). For the two compounds, the serum samples were stable at -40℃ for 75 d and kept stable after three repeated freeze-thaw cycles. The prepared samples were stable in the automatic sample injector (4℃) for 5 h (RSD<15% ). Conclusion: The developed assay method can be applied in the therapeutic monitoring and pharmacokinetic study of donepezil and rivastigmine in human serum.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail