Objective:To evaluate the effectiveness of a mobile extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) team in treating cardiac arrest (CA) in the mountainous regions of southwest Zhejiang Province, and to provide clinical insights for ECPR in patients with prolonged low blood flow time in such areas.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 55 CA patients treated with ECPR at Lishui People's Hospital from June 2020 to June 2024. These patients were compared with 55 CA patients treated with ECPR in urban areas during the same period. The mobile team from our center established ECMO support at county-level hospitals before transferring patients to our hospital's ECMO treatment center for further care. General patient data and blood gas analysis results before and 2 hours after ECPR were collected. Clinical data differences between the two groups were compared, and factors influencing patient prognosis were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses.Results:The average age of the patients was (52.45 ± 15.66) years, with an average low blood flow time of 151.42 ± 49.31 minutes. The 30-day survival rate was 23.64%, and the rate of good neurological recovery was 18.18%. Although the survival rate and good neurological function rate were lower than those of ECPR patients in urban areas, the differences were not statistically significant ( P > 0.05). Univariate Cox analysis revealed that defibrillation rhythm, low blood flow time, pH before and after ECMO, blood lactate levels before and after ECMO, and hemoglobin significantly influenced the prognosis of ECPR patients ( P < 0.05). Multivariate Cox analysis identified post-ECMO pH ( HR = 0.037) and post-ECMO blood lactate levels ( HR = 1.078) as independent prognostic factors for ECPR patients ( P < 0.05). Conclusions:Despite the longer low blood flow time in CA patients from mountainous areas, the mobile ECPR team can effectively enhance the treatment success rate of these patients through ECPR.

Objective:To explore the relationship between carotid atherosclerosis (CAS) and bone metabolism marker osteocalcin (OC) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).Methods:A total of 100 patients with T2DM admitted to Shaoxing People's Hospital (Shaoxing Hospital, Zhejiang University) from January 2018 to August 2018 were selected as study subjects, and the carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) was detected.The patients were divided into CAS group and normal carotid IMT group (NC group), with 50 cases in each group.The levels of OC, fasting plasma glucose(FPG), fasting insulin(FINS), glycosylated hemoglobin(HbA1c), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high density lipoprotein(HDL-C), low density lipoprotein (LDL-C), insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) were compared between the two groups.Results:The OC level of the CAS group[(11.86±4.46)ng/mL] was significantly lower than that of the NC group[(23.94±4.52)ng/mL] ( t=-9.640, P=0.001). The LDL-C level of the CAS group[(2.89±0.82)mmol/L] was significantly higher than that of the NC group[(2.55±1.16)mmol/L]( t=2.03, P=0.049). Pearson correlation analysis showed that IMT was positively correlated with age, LDL-C, HbA1c ( r=0.285, 0.190, 0.173; P=0.000, 0.020, 0.035), and negatively correlated with OC ( r=-0.603, P=0.000). Conclusion:CAS in patients with T2DM is closely related to OC, and the reduction of OC levels may be a risk factor for CAS in T2DM patients.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical manifestations of heart, liver and kidney damages in the early stage of COVID-19 to identify the indicators for these damages. METHODS: We analyzed the clinical features, underlying diseases, and indicators of infection in 12 patients with COVID-19 on the second day after their admission to our hospital between January 20 and February 20, 2020.The data including CK-MB, aTnI, BNP, heart rate, changes in ECG, LVEF (%), left ventricular general longitudinal strain (GLS, measured by color Doppler ultrasound) were collected.The changes of liver function biochemical indicators were dynamically reviewed.BUN, UCR, eGFR, Ccr, and UACR and the levels of MA, A1M, IGU, and TRU were recorded. RESULTS: The 12 patients included 2 severe cases, 8 common type cases, and 2 mild cases.Four of the patients presented with sinus tachycardia, ECG changes and abnormal GLS in spite of normal aTNI and LVEF; 1 patient had abnormal CKMB and BNP.On the first and third days following admission, the patients had normal ALT, AST and GGT levels.On day 7, hepatic function damage occurred in the severe cases, manifested by elevated ALT and AST levels.Abnormalities of eGFR, Ccr and UACR occurred in 8, 5 and 5 of the patients, respectively.Abnormal elevations of MA, A1M, IGU and TRU in urine protein were observed in 4, 4, 5, and 2 of the patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In patients with COVID-19, heart damage can be identified early by observing the GLS and new abnormalities on ECG in spite of normal aTNI and LVEF.Early liver injury is not obvious in these patients, but dynamic monitoring of the indicators of should be emplemented, especially in severe cases. In cases with normal CR and BUN, kidney damage can be detected early by calculating eGFR, Ccr and UACR and urine protein tests.
Betacoronavirus ; COVID-19 ; Coronavirus Infections ; Humans ; Pandemics ; Pneumonia, Viral ; SARS-CoV-2

Objective To discuss the safety and the application of the self-designed multifunctional inflatable pelvis and hip-joint fixator (MIPHF) in damage control in pelvic fracture patients.Methods The MIPHF was subjected to pressure test and quality inspection.From September 2016 to June 2017,61 pelvic-fracture patients were treated with our self-designed MIPHF as pre-hospital first-aid care according to the concept of damage control orthopedics (DCO) (MIPHF group).The control group consisted of 69 pelvic-fracture patients who had not received pre-hospital first-aid care with the self-designed MIPHF from December 2015 to August 2016.There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in gender,age,types of pelvic fracture,and preoperative injure severity score (ISS).The study compared the two groups for the case fatality rate,volume of blood transfused during surgeries,early complication rates,fracture reduction (Matta standards),and long-term efficacy (Cole scores).Results The pressure test showed that the MIPHF had a good fixation effect on the pelvis.And the quality inspection showed that the material used for the MIPHF was in line with national standards and the safety was guaranteed.The MIPHF group had 1 death (1.6％) and the control group had 8 deaths (11.6％),which was a significant difference (x2=4.979,P=0.026).All survival patients in both groups were followed up.The MIPHF group (61 cases) received 3.0 to 18.0 months follow-up,with an average of 9.0 months.And the control group (69 cases) had 18.0 to 30.0 months follow-up,with an average of 21.9 months.In the MIPHF group,23 cases were treated conservatively,and 37 cases were treated with surgery.Among them,3 cases were fixed with external fixator,20 cases with anterior open reduction and internal fixation,9 cases with posterior open reduction and internal fixation,and 5 cases with combined anterior and posterior fixation.The timing of surgery was 1 to 20 days after injury,with an average of 4.1 days.The volume of blood transfused in the MIPHF group during surgery was 200 to 1500 ml,with an average of 628.6 ml.In the control group,27 patients were treated conservatively,and 42 patients were treated with surgery.Among them,2 cases were fixed with external fixator,24 cases with anterior open reduction and internal fixation,10 cases with posterior open reduction and internal fixation,and 6 cases with combined anterior and posterior fixation.The timing of surgery was 1 to 15 days after injury,with an average of 3.l days.The volume of blood transfused in the control group during surgery was 200 to 4000 ml,with an average of 1 707.1 ml.There was a significant difference between the two groups in intraoperative blood transfusion(Z=-2.330,P=0.020).The MIPHF group had 10 (16.4％) cases of early serious complications and the control group had 22 (31.9％) cases,which had a significant difference (x2=4.187,P=0.041).According to the criteria proposed by Matta et al.,the good rate of results for treating fractures was 82.0％ in the MIPHF group and 60.9％ in the control group,which got a significant difference (x2=6.967,P=0.008).The MIPHF group and the control group also differed significantly in their mean long-term Cole scores (27.2±4.0 versus 25.1 ±5.6,t=2.457,P=0.015).Conclusion MIPHF,which reflects the DCO concept,may be recommended as pre-hospital first-aid care for patients with pelvic fracture because it can lessen bleeding and prevent secondary pelvic injury,thus reduce case fatality rate and the incidence of complications.It can also improve the success rate of treating pelvic fracture,which will positively affect long-term outcomes.