1.Therapeutic effect of folic acid combined with decitabine in mice with diabetic retinopathy of different methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase(MTHFR)Geno-types
Yanru CHEN ; Nian TAN ; Xiaoxue HAN ; Xifeng LIN ; Yunyun HE ; Xunwen LEI
Recent Advances in Ophthalmology 2025;45(7):533-538
Objective To investigate the therapeutic effect of folic acid combined with decitabine in diabetic retinop-athy(DR)mice with different methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase(MTHFR)genotypes.Methods The DR model mice were created by mating 20 MTHFR-/-mice with 20 wild-type C57 mice.A random number table method was employed to allocate 20 successfully modelled mice into the model group,DAC group,FA group,and FA+DAC group,with five mice assigned to each group.Five untreated MTHFR-/-and wild-type mice served as normal control.After constructing the DR model,the DAC group was injected intraperitoneally with 0.25 mg·kg-1 decitabine once every 5 days;the FA group was given 70 μg·kg-1 folic acid by tube feed once a day;the FA+DAC group was given 0.25 mg·kg-1 decitabine and 70μg·kg-1 folic acid at the same time;and the normal group was given an equal amount of physiological saline.All of the above groups were intervened for 30 days.OCT was employed for the measurement of retinal thickness,OCTA for retinal vascular density,histopathology(HE staining)for pathological changes in the mouse retina,real-time fluorescence quanti-tative PCR for mRNA expression,and Western blot analysis for protein expression levels.Results Compared with the wild-type model group,the degree of increase in retinal thickness and vascular density in the retinal layer was more pro-nounced in the MTHFR-/-mice model group(all P<0.05).In wild-type mice,retinal thickness and retinal layer vessel den-sity were reduced in the DAC,FA and FA+DAC groups compared to the model group,with the FA+DAC group show-ing the greatest degree of reduction.The differences were all statistically significant(all P<0.05);In MTHFR-/-mice,reti-nal thickness and vascular density in the retinal layer were reduced in the DAC group and the FA+DAC group compared to the model group(allP<0.05).HE staining results showed an increased extent of retinal damage in the MTHFR-/-mice model group compared with the wild-type mice model group.Compared with the model group,the DAC group and the FA+DAC group had thinner retinas and more aligned ganglion cell layers in all types of mice,with the FA group having a worse effect and the FA+DAC group having a better treatment effect.The results of the polymerase chain reaction(PCR)revealed that the relative expression of the SAHH,MAT2A and DNMT1 proteins in the retinal tissues of the wildtype and MTHFR-/-mice model groups was elevated in comparison to the control group(all P<0.05).Furthermore,the relative mR-NA expression of the DAC,FA and FA+DAC groups was reduced in comparison to the model group(all P<0.05).In wild-type mice,the relative expression of MTHFR protein mRNA was decreased in the model group compared with the con-trol group,and increased in the DAC group,FA group,and FA+DAC group compared with the model group(all P<0.05).Western blot results showed that the relative expression of DNMT1,MAT2A and SAHH proteins in the retinal tissues of the wild-type and MTHFR-/-mice model groups was higher than that of the control group(all P<0.05),and the relative expression was lower in the DAC,FA,and FA+DAC groups compared with that in the model group(all P<0.05).In wild-type mice,the relative expression of MTHFR protein in the retinal tissue of the model group was lower than that of the control group,and the relative expression of MTHFR protein in the FA group and the FA+DAC group was elevated com-pared with that of the model group(all P<0.05).Conclusion The protective effect of folic acid combined with decit-abine on DR was superior to that of decitabine alone;treatment with folic acid in combination with decitabine may have yielded better efficacy in wild-type DR mice.
2.Evaluation of the evidence-based medicine of traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of dry eye
Juan LING ; Xue HAN ; Mei HU ; Xue YANG ; Jiajin LI ; Mingli DAI ; Jiayuan ZHUANG ; Ying GAO ; Yiming HU ; Rui YANG ; Li KANG ; Xunwen LEI ; Xiangxia LUO
Recent Advances in Ophthalmology 2025;45(11):888-896
Objective This study aims to systematically evaluate the evidence-based medicine of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)in the treatment of dry eye,analyze its efficacy and differences compared with modern Western medicine treatments,and provide a scientific basis for clinical application.Methods By searching Chinese and English databases(including CNKI,Wanfang Data,PubMed,Cochrane Library,etc.),we included meta-analyses and systematic reviews of TCM treatments for dry eye.Literature was screened according to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria,and relevant data were extracted and integrated for analysis.The Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects model was used to calculate the relative risk(RR)and mean difference(WMD),with the effect size expressed as a 95%confidence interval,to analyze the efficacy in-dicators of TCM treatment for dry eye.Results A total of 21 articles were finally included,involving various TCM inter-ventions for dry eye(such as Chinese herbal medicine,acupuncture,and TCM external therapies).The results showed that TCM treatment was superior to Western medicine alone in improving the overall clinical efficacy[RR=1.63,95%CI(1.46,1.81),P<0.05],prolonging tear film break-up time[MD=2.23,95%CI(1.85,2.60),P<0.05],and increasing tear secretion[MD=1.49,95%CI(1.04,1.94),P<0.05].In addition,acupuncture,the combination of Chinese herbal medicine and Western medicine,and TCM external therapies all demonstrated unique advantages in improving dry eye symptoms and tear function.Conclusion TCM treatment for dry eye shows significant efficacy in key indicators such as overall clinical efficacy,tear film break-up time,and tear secretion,with a high level of safety.
3.Therapeutic effect of folic acid combined with decitabine in mice with diabetic retinopathy of different methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase(MTHFR)Geno-types
Yanru CHEN ; Nian TAN ; Xiaoxue HAN ; Xifeng LIN ; Yunyun HE ; Xunwen LEI
Recent Advances in Ophthalmology 2025;45(7):533-538
Objective To investigate the therapeutic effect of folic acid combined with decitabine in diabetic retinop-athy(DR)mice with different methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase(MTHFR)genotypes.Methods The DR model mice were created by mating 20 MTHFR-/-mice with 20 wild-type C57 mice.A random number table method was employed to allocate 20 successfully modelled mice into the model group,DAC group,FA group,and FA+DAC group,with five mice assigned to each group.Five untreated MTHFR-/-and wild-type mice served as normal control.After constructing the DR model,the DAC group was injected intraperitoneally with 0.25 mg·kg-1 decitabine once every 5 days;the FA group was given 70 μg·kg-1 folic acid by tube feed once a day;the FA+DAC group was given 0.25 mg·kg-1 decitabine and 70μg·kg-1 folic acid at the same time;and the normal group was given an equal amount of physiological saline.All of the above groups were intervened for 30 days.OCT was employed for the measurement of retinal thickness,OCTA for retinal vascular density,histopathology(HE staining)for pathological changes in the mouse retina,real-time fluorescence quanti-tative PCR for mRNA expression,and Western blot analysis for protein expression levels.Results Compared with the wild-type model group,the degree of increase in retinal thickness and vascular density in the retinal layer was more pro-nounced in the MTHFR-/-mice model group(all P<0.05).In wild-type mice,retinal thickness and retinal layer vessel den-sity were reduced in the DAC,FA and FA+DAC groups compared to the model group,with the FA+DAC group show-ing the greatest degree of reduction.The differences were all statistically significant(all P<0.05);In MTHFR-/-mice,reti-nal thickness and vascular density in the retinal layer were reduced in the DAC group and the FA+DAC group compared to the model group(allP<0.05).HE staining results showed an increased extent of retinal damage in the MTHFR-/-mice model group compared with the wild-type mice model group.Compared with the model group,the DAC group and the FA+DAC group had thinner retinas and more aligned ganglion cell layers in all types of mice,with the FA group having a worse effect and the FA+DAC group having a better treatment effect.The results of the polymerase chain reaction(PCR)revealed that the relative expression of the SAHH,MAT2A and DNMT1 proteins in the retinal tissues of the wildtype and MTHFR-/-mice model groups was elevated in comparison to the control group(all P<0.05).Furthermore,the relative mR-NA expression of the DAC,FA and FA+DAC groups was reduced in comparison to the model group(all P<0.05).In wild-type mice,the relative expression of MTHFR protein mRNA was decreased in the model group compared with the con-trol group,and increased in the DAC group,FA group,and FA+DAC group compared with the model group(all P<0.05).Western blot results showed that the relative expression of DNMT1,MAT2A and SAHH proteins in the retinal tissues of the wild-type and MTHFR-/-mice model groups was higher than that of the control group(all P<0.05),and the relative expression was lower in the DAC,FA,and FA+DAC groups compared with that in the model group(all P<0.05).In wild-type mice,the relative expression of MTHFR protein in the retinal tissue of the model group was lower than that of the control group,and the relative expression of MTHFR protein in the FA group and the FA+DAC group was elevated com-pared with that of the model group(all P<0.05).Conclusion The protective effect of folic acid combined with decit-abine on DR was superior to that of decitabine alone;treatment with folic acid in combination with decitabine may have yielded better efficacy in wild-type DR mice.
4.Evaluation of the evidence-based medicine of traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of dry eye
Juan LING ; Xue HAN ; Mei HU ; Xue YANG ; Jiajin LI ; Mingli DAI ; Jiayuan ZHUANG ; Ying GAO ; Yiming HU ; Rui YANG ; Li KANG ; Xunwen LEI ; Xiangxia LUO
Recent Advances in Ophthalmology 2025;45(11):888-896
Objective This study aims to systematically evaluate the evidence-based medicine of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)in the treatment of dry eye,analyze its efficacy and differences compared with modern Western medicine treatments,and provide a scientific basis for clinical application.Methods By searching Chinese and English databases(including CNKI,Wanfang Data,PubMed,Cochrane Library,etc.),we included meta-analyses and systematic reviews of TCM treatments for dry eye.Literature was screened according to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria,and relevant data were extracted and integrated for analysis.The Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects model was used to calculate the relative risk(RR)and mean difference(WMD),with the effect size expressed as a 95%confidence interval,to analyze the efficacy in-dicators of TCM treatment for dry eye.Results A total of 21 articles were finally included,involving various TCM inter-ventions for dry eye(such as Chinese herbal medicine,acupuncture,and TCM external therapies).The results showed that TCM treatment was superior to Western medicine alone in improving the overall clinical efficacy[RR=1.63,95%CI(1.46,1.81),P<0.05],prolonging tear film break-up time[MD=2.23,95%CI(1.85,2.60),P<0.05],and increasing tear secretion[MD=1.49,95%CI(1.04,1.94),P<0.05].In addition,acupuncture,the combination of Chinese herbal medicine and Western medicine,and TCM external therapies all demonstrated unique advantages in improving dry eye symptoms and tear function.Conclusion TCM treatment for dry eye shows significant efficacy in key indicators such as overall clinical efficacy,tear film break-up time,and tear secretion,with a high level of safety.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail