Objective:To explore the effect of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) placed in the uterine cavity after transcervical preparation for the treatment of adenomyosis (AM).Methods:A retrospective study analyzed 219 cases of AM patients treated at Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University from March 2022 to February 2023. Among them, 112 cases were treated with LNG-IUS after hysteroscopy due to abnormal uterine bleeding or abnormal uterine echo suggested by gynecological ultrasound, and were recorded as the hysteroscopy+LNG-IUS group; 107 cases without the above manifestations were treated with LNG-IUS alone, and were recorded as the LNG-IUS group. The two groups were observed for dysmenorrhea severity, menstrual volume, endometrial thickness, anemia, serum CA125 levels, uterine volume, and adverse reactions such as abnormal vaginal bleeding and intrauterine contraceptive device displacement or shedding before and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment.Results:1) Postoperative pathology of hysteroscopy+LNG-IUS group after hysteroscopy included endometrial polyps [39.3% (44/112)], proliferative endometrium [16.1% (18/112)], uterine leiomyoma [11.6% (13/112)], secretory endometrium [8.9% (10/112)], irregular endometrial hyperplasia [6.2% (7/112)], simple hyperplasia [5.4% (6/112)], AM lesions [4.5% (5/112)], and others [8.0% (9/112)]. 2) The degree of dysmenorrhea and menstrual volume, as well as other indicators, improved after treatment in both groups (all P<0.001). 3) When comparing the two groups, the degree of dysmenorrhea, menstrual volume, endometrial thickness, anemia, and serum CA125 at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment, the hysteroscopy+LNG-IUS group was significantly better than those in the LNG-IUS group (all P<0.05), the difference of uterine volume at 12 months of treatment between the hysteroscopy+LNG-IUS group [(109.76±32.90) cm 3] and the LNG-IUS group [(120.84±31.30) cm 3] was statistically significant ( P=0.011). 4) The cumulative incidence of adverse reactions of the two groups was statistically significant ( P=0.001) between the hysteroscopy+LNG-IUS group [24.1% (27/112)] and the LNG-IUS group [52.3% (56/107), P=0.001]. The hysteroscopy+LNG-IUS group had lower rates of vaginal irregular bleeding [8.0% (9/112)] and ring displacement or shedding [3.6% (4/112)] than those in the LNG-IUS group [23.4% (25/107), P=0.002; 11.2% (12/107), P=0.030]. Conclusion:After treatment with hysteroscopy, the placement of LNG-IUS and the simple intrauterine placement of LNG-IUS both significantly improve the severity of dysmenorrhea, endometrial thickness, anemia, menstrual volume, CA125, and uterine volume. The treatment effect of the LNG-IUS group after hysteroscopy is better and adverse reactions are milder, and it is expected to become the preferred option for the long-term management of conservative treatment of AM.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery has been a common practice for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, but the response rate varies among patients. This study aimed to develop a ResNet-Vision Transformer based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-endoscopy fusion model to precisely predict treatment response and provide personalized treatment. METHODS: In this multicenter study, 366 eligible patients who had undergone neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery at eight Chinese tertiary hospitals between January 2017 and June 2024 were recruited, with 2928 pretreatment colonic endoscopic images and 366 pelvic MRI images. An MRI-endoscopy fusion model was constructed based on the ResNet backbone and Transformer network using pretreatment MRI and endoscopic images. Treatment response was defined as good response or non-good response based on the tumor regression grade. The Delong test and the Hanley-McNeil test were utilized to compare prediction performance among different models and different subgroups, respectively. The predictive performance of the MRI-endoscopy fusion model was comprehensively validated in the test sets and was further compared to that of the single-modal MRI model and single-modal endoscopy model. RESULTS: The MRI-endoscopy fusion model demonstrated favorable prediction performance. In the internal validation set, the area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy were 0.852 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.744-0.940) and 0.737 (95% CI: 0.712-0.844), respectively. Moreover, the AUC and accuracy reached 0.769 (95% CI: 0.678-0.861) and 0.729 (95% CI: 0.628-0.821), respectively, in the external test set. In addition, the MRI-endoscopy fusion model outperformed the single-modal MRI model (AUC: 0.692 [95% CI: 0.609-0.783], accuracy: 0.659 [95% CI: 0.565-0.775]) and the single-modal endoscopy model (AUC: 0.720 [95% CI: 0.617-0.823], accuracy: 0.713 [95% CI: 0.612-0.809]) in the external test set. CONCLUSION The MRI-endoscopy fusion model based on ResNet-Vision Transformer achieved favorable performance in predicting treatment response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and holds tremendous potential for enabling personalized treatment regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer patients.
Humans ; Rectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging* ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods* ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods* ; Aged ; Adult ; Chemoradiotherapy/methods* ; Endoscopy/methods* ; Treatment Outcome

Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of bronchial arterial chemoembolization(BACE)combined with tislelizumab for advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Methods A total of 30 patients in First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University with stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ NSCLC from December 2021 to August 2022 were enrolled in this study.All the patients received BACE,which was followed by 200 mg tislelizumab once every 3 weeks until the disease progressed,or the patient developed intolerable adverse effects,or the investigator decided to terminate this drug treatment.The primary study endpoint was progression-free survival(PFS),and the secondary study endpoints included overall survival(OS),objective response rate(ORR),disease control rate(DCR),safety,and quality of life(QoL).Results The median follow-up time was 12 months(range of 1.5-12 months),the median PFS was 10.5 months(95％CI:7.8-13.2 months),and the median OS was not available.The 3-month,6-month,and 12-month ORRs were 63.3％(95％CI:43.9％-80.1％),56.7％(95％CI:37.4％-74.5％),and 30.4％(95％CI:13.2％-52.9％)respectively.The 3-month,6-month,and 12-month DCRs were 80％(95％CI:61.4％-92.3％),76.7％(95％CI:57.7％-90.1％),and 47.8％(95％CI:26.8％-69.4％)respectively.The expression ratio of PD-L1 ≥50％(HR=0.29,P=0.039),tumor having a single feeding artery(HR=0.35,P=0.028),and completion of＞10 cycles of tislelizumab therapy(HR=0.42,P=0.064)were the protective factors for PFS.No ≥grade Ⅲ treatment-related adverse events(TRAEs)occurred.The common below grade Ⅱ TRAEs were nausea,fever,and cough.After one cycle of treatment,the patient's QoL,including overall quality of life,physical functioning,and emotional functioning,was significantly improved.Conclusion For the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC,BACE plus tislelizumab has satisfactory clinical efficacy and safety.

Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of bronchial artery chemoembolization (BACE) combined with anlotinib (BACE+A) versus BACE alone in patients with stage III-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods:A total of 94 patients with advanced NSCLC treated at six interventional centers between November 2020 and November 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were divided into the BACE+A group ( n=46) and the BACE alone group ( n=48) based on treatment regimen. Baseline and perioperative clinical data were collected and compared between the two groups. Treatment response was evaluated using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) at 1, 6, and 12 months after the first BACE procedure. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted to compare median OS and PFS between groups. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to identify factors influencing OS and PFS. Results:The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the median OS was significantly longer in the BACE+A group (18.8 months, 95% CI 16.3-21.3) than in the BACE group (13.4 months, 95% CI 11.6-15.2) ( P=0.001). The median PFS was also significantly longer in the BACE+A group (9.0 months, 95% CI 7.3-10.7) compared to the BACE group (6.1 months, 95% CI 4.9-7.3) ( P=0.001). At 6 and 12 months post-first BACE, the ORR (43.5%, 40.0%) and DCR (89.1%, 83.3%) were significantly higher in the BACE+A group than in the BACE group (ORR: 20.8%, 14.8%; DCR: 66.7%, 59.3%) (all P<0.05). Multivariate Cox regression identified treatment with BACE+A ( HR=0.42, 95% CI 0.27-0.72, P=0.002), tumor stage ( HR=1.80, 95% CI 1.05-3.07, P=0.031), presence of pre-existing complications requiring intervention ( HR=2.72, 95% CI 1.65-4.50, P<0.001), and >2 BACE procedures ( HR=0.32, 95% CI 0.15-0.68, P=0.003) as independent factors influencing OS. Treatment with BACE+A ( HR=0.49, 95% CI 0.32-0.76, P=0.001), tumor stage ( HR=1.72, 95% CI 1.07-2.77, P=0.025), multi-arterial tumor blood supply ( HR=2.76, 95% CI 1.76-4.31, P<0.001), and>2 BACE procedures ( HR=0.40, 95% CI 0.22-0.71, P=0.002) were independent factors influencing PFS. There was no significant difference in BACE-related adverse events between the two groups (all P>0.05). Hypertension, fatigue, hand-foot syndrome, and anorexia were common anlotinib-specific adverse reactions in the combination group, but no grade 4 or higher adverse reactions were observed. Conclusions:BACE combined with anlotinib demonstrates superior efficacy compared to BACE alone in treating advanced NSCLC, significantly prolonging OS and PFS. The safety profile is manageable, with adverse events remaining within tolerable limits.

Objective:To compare the safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with donafenib and programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors and TACE combined with donafenib in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).Methods:Clinical data of 148 patients with uHCC treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from December 2021 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, including 127 males and 21 females, aged (56.6±9.9) years. Patients were divided into two groups: the TACE combined with donafenib and PD-1 inhibitors group (TACE+ DP, n=73) and TACE combined with single donafenib (TACE+ D, n=75). The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and the occurrence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of the two groups of patients were observed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for survival assessment, and the log-rank test was used for comparison. The related factors affecting the prognosis of patients were indentified and analyzed. Results:The median PFS of patients in the TACE+ D group and the TACE+ DP group were 7.2 months (95% CI: 5.7-8.3 months) and 10.5months (95% CI: 8.9-11.3 months), respectively. The median OS was 13.2 months (95% CI: 12.3-13.7 months) and 16.9 months (95% CI: 15.1-19.8 months), respectively. All these differences were statistically significant ( χ2=17.81, 26.92, respectively, both P<0.001). The ORR and DCR of TACE+ DP group were both higher than those in TACE+ D group [53.4% (39/73) vs 36.0% (27/75), χ2=4.55, P=0.031; and 90.4% (66/73) vs 77.3% (58/75), χ2=4.66, P=0.044]. No grade 4 or above adverse events occurred in either the TACE+ DP or the TACE+ D group. The most common treatment-related adverse events in TACE+ D and TACE+ DP group were hand-foot syndrome [46.7% (35/75) vs 49.3% (36/73)], hypertension [26.7% (20/75) vs 30.1% (22/73)], fatigue [22.7% (17/75) vs 24.7% (18/73)], diarrhea [26.7% (20/75) vs 28.8% (21/73)], and thrombocytopenia [25.3% (19/75) vs 28.8% (21/73)]. There was no significant difference in the incidence and severity of TRAEs between the groups ( χ2=0.08, P=0.774). TACE+ DP treatment was a favorable prognostic factor for PFS ( HR=0.33, 95% CI: 0.22-0.49, P<0.001) and OS ( HR=0.19, 95% CI: 0.11-0.33, P<0.001) of patients. Conclusion:Compared to TACE combined with donafenib, TACE combined with donafenib and PD-1 inhibitors, with good efficacy and safety, significantly improved the treatment response and survival in patients with uHCC.

Objective:To study the safety and feasibility of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with apatinib in the treatment of advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma.Methods:Clinical data of 41 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from November 2019 to October 2020 were prospectively collected, including 21 males and 20 females, aged (65.1±12.5) years. The drugs used for TACE were albumin paclitaxel and gemcitabine, which were performed once every four to six weeks for no more than six times. Apatinib were adminstered two days after each TACE. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events. Patients were followed-up by outpatient, inpatient or telephone review. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.Results:Hilar cholangiocarcinoma were confirmed in all 41 patients by pathology. All patients were treated with TACE for at least twice. Twenty-three patients achieved complete remission, 14 stable disease, and four partial remission, with an ORR of 56.1% and a disease control rate of 90.2%. The follow-up duration was (13.3±5.4) months without lost to follow-up. The median PFS was 9.0 months, the median OS was 14.0 months, the 1-year cumulative recurrence-free survival rate was 31.7%, and the 1-year cumulative survival rate was 65.9%. Treatment-related adverse events in this study were predominantly Clavien-Dindo grade 1 or 2, without grade 4 to 5.Conclusion:TACE combined with apatinib treatment could be safe and feasible for advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Objective:To explore the effect of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) placed in the uterine cavity after transcervical preparation for the treatment of adenomyosis (AM).Methods:A retrospective study analyzed 219 cases of AM patients treated at Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University from March 2022 to February 2023. Among them, 112 cases were treated with LNG-IUS after hysteroscopy due to abnormal uterine bleeding or abnormal uterine echo suggested by gynecological ultrasound, and were recorded as the hysteroscopy+LNG-IUS group; 107 cases without the above manifestations were treated with LNG-IUS alone, and were recorded as the LNG-IUS group. The two groups were observed for dysmenorrhea severity, menstrual volume, endometrial thickness, anemia, serum CA125 levels, uterine volume, and adverse reactions such as abnormal vaginal bleeding and intrauterine contraceptive device displacement or shedding before and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment.Results:1) Postoperative pathology of hysteroscopy+LNG-IUS group after hysteroscopy included endometrial polyps [39.3% (44/112)], proliferative endometrium [16.1% (18/112)], uterine leiomyoma [11.6% (13/112)], secretory endometrium [8.9% (10/112)], irregular endometrial hyperplasia [6.2% (7/112)], simple hyperplasia [5.4% (6/112)], AM lesions [4.5% (5/112)], and others [8.0% (9/112)]. 2) The degree of dysmenorrhea and menstrual volume, as well as other indicators, improved after treatment in both groups (all P<0.001). 3) When comparing the two groups, the degree of dysmenorrhea, menstrual volume, endometrial thickness, anemia, and serum CA125 at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment, the hysteroscopy+LNG-IUS group was significantly better than those in the LNG-IUS group (all P<0.05), the difference of uterine volume at 12 months of treatment between the hysteroscopy+LNG-IUS group [(109.76±32.90) cm 3] and the LNG-IUS group [(120.84±31.30) cm 3] was statistically significant ( P=0.011). 4) The cumulative incidence of adverse reactions of the two groups was statistically significant ( P=0.001) between the hysteroscopy+LNG-IUS group [24.1% (27/112)] and the LNG-IUS group [52.3% (56/107), P=0.001]. The hysteroscopy+LNG-IUS group had lower rates of vaginal irregular bleeding [8.0% (9/112)] and ring displacement or shedding [3.6% (4/112)] than those in the LNG-IUS group [23.4% (25/107), P=0.002; 11.2% (12/107), P=0.030]. Conclusion:After treatment with hysteroscopy, the placement of LNG-IUS and the simple intrauterine placement of LNG-IUS both significantly improve the severity of dysmenorrhea, endometrial thickness, anemia, menstrual volume, CA125, and uterine volume. The treatment effect of the LNG-IUS group after hysteroscopy is better and adverse reactions are milder, and it is expected to become the preferred option for the long-term management of conservative treatment of AM.

Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of bronchial artery chemoembolization (BACE) combined with anlotinib (BACE+A) versus BACE alone in patients with stage III-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods:A total of 94 patients with advanced NSCLC treated at six interventional centers between November 2020 and November 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were divided into the BACE+A group ( n=46) and the BACE alone group ( n=48) based on treatment regimen. Baseline and perioperative clinical data were collected and compared between the two groups. Treatment response was evaluated using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) at 1, 6, and 12 months after the first BACE procedure. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted to compare median OS and PFS between groups. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to identify factors influencing OS and PFS. Results:The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the median OS was significantly longer in the BACE+A group (18.8 months, 95% CI 16.3-21.3) than in the BACE group (13.4 months, 95% CI 11.6-15.2) ( P=0.001). The median PFS was also significantly longer in the BACE+A group (9.0 months, 95% CI 7.3-10.7) compared to the BACE group (6.1 months, 95% CI 4.9-7.3) ( P=0.001). At 6 and 12 months post-first BACE, the ORR (43.5%, 40.0%) and DCR (89.1%, 83.3%) were significantly higher in the BACE+A group than in the BACE group (ORR: 20.8%, 14.8%; DCR: 66.7%, 59.3%) (all P<0.05). Multivariate Cox regression identified treatment with BACE+A ( HR=0.42, 95% CI 0.27-0.72, P=0.002), tumor stage ( HR=1.80, 95% CI 1.05-3.07, P=0.031), presence of pre-existing complications requiring intervention ( HR=2.72, 95% CI 1.65-4.50, P<0.001), and >2 BACE procedures ( HR=0.32, 95% CI 0.15-0.68, P=0.003) as independent factors influencing OS. Treatment with BACE+A ( HR=0.49, 95% CI 0.32-0.76, P=0.001), tumor stage ( HR=1.72, 95% CI 1.07-2.77, P=0.025), multi-arterial tumor blood supply ( HR=2.76, 95% CI 1.76-4.31, P<0.001), and>2 BACE procedures ( HR=0.40, 95% CI 0.22-0.71, P=0.002) were independent factors influencing PFS. There was no significant difference in BACE-related adverse events between the two groups (all P>0.05). Hypertension, fatigue, hand-foot syndrome, and anorexia were common anlotinib-specific adverse reactions in the combination group, but no grade 4 or higher adverse reactions were observed. Conclusions:BACE combined with anlotinib demonstrates superior efficacy compared to BACE alone in treating advanced NSCLC, significantly prolonging OS and PFS. The safety profile is manageable, with adverse events remaining within tolerable limits.

Objective:To compare the safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with donafenib and programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors and TACE combined with donafenib in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).Methods:Clinical data of 148 patients with uHCC treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from December 2021 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, including 127 males and 21 females, aged (56.6±9.9) years. Patients were divided into two groups: the TACE combined with donafenib and PD-1 inhibitors group (TACE+ DP, n=73) and TACE combined with single donafenib (TACE+ D, n=75). The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and the occurrence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of the two groups of patients were observed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for survival assessment, and the log-rank test was used for comparison. The related factors affecting the prognosis of patients were indentified and analyzed. Results:The median PFS of patients in the TACE+ D group and the TACE+ DP group were 7.2 months (95% CI: 5.7-8.3 months) and 10.5months (95% CI: 8.9-11.3 months), respectively. The median OS was 13.2 months (95% CI: 12.3-13.7 months) and 16.9 months (95% CI: 15.1-19.8 months), respectively. All these differences were statistically significant ( χ2=17.81, 26.92, respectively, both P<0.001). The ORR and DCR of TACE+ DP group were both higher than those in TACE+ D group [53.4% (39/73) vs 36.0% (27/75), χ2=4.55, P=0.031; and 90.4% (66/73) vs 77.3% (58/75), χ2=4.66, P=0.044]. No grade 4 or above adverse events occurred in either the TACE+ DP or the TACE+ D group. The most common treatment-related adverse events in TACE+ D and TACE+ DP group were hand-foot syndrome [46.7% (35/75) vs 49.3% (36/73)], hypertension [26.7% (20/75) vs 30.1% (22/73)], fatigue [22.7% (17/75) vs 24.7% (18/73)], diarrhea [26.7% (20/75) vs 28.8% (21/73)], and thrombocytopenia [25.3% (19/75) vs 28.8% (21/73)]. There was no significant difference in the incidence and severity of TRAEs between the groups ( χ2=0.08, P=0.774). TACE+ DP treatment was a favorable prognostic factor for PFS ( HR=0.33, 95% CI: 0.22-0.49, P<0.001) and OS ( HR=0.19, 95% CI: 0.11-0.33, P<0.001) of patients. Conclusion:Compared to TACE combined with donafenib, TACE combined with donafenib and PD-1 inhibitors, with good efficacy and safety, significantly improved the treatment response and survival in patients with uHCC.

Objective:To study the safety and feasibility of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with apatinib in the treatment of advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma.Methods:Clinical data of 41 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from November 2019 to October 2020 were prospectively collected, including 21 males and 20 females, aged (65.1±12.5) years. The drugs used for TACE were albumin paclitaxel and gemcitabine, which were performed once every four to six weeks for no more than six times. Apatinib were adminstered two days after each TACE. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events. Patients were followed-up by outpatient, inpatient or telephone review. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.Results:Hilar cholangiocarcinoma were confirmed in all 41 patients by pathology. All patients were treated with TACE for at least twice. Twenty-three patients achieved complete remission, 14 stable disease, and four partial remission, with an ORR of 56.1% and a disease control rate of 90.2%. The follow-up duration was (13.3±5.4) months without lost to follow-up. The median PFS was 9.0 months, the median OS was 14.0 months, the 1-year cumulative recurrence-free survival rate was 31.7%, and the 1-year cumulative survival rate was 65.9%. Treatment-related adverse events in this study were predominantly Clavien-Dindo grade 1 or 2, without grade 4 to 5.Conclusion:TACE combined with apatinib treatment could be safe and feasible for advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma.