Cervical spinal cord injury without fracture-dislocation (CSCIWFD) is referred to as a special type of cervical spinal cord injury characterized by traumatic spinal cord dysfunction and no significant bony structural abnormalities on imagines. Duo to the high risk of missed diagnosis during the initial consultation, CSCIWFD may lead to progressive neurological deterioration or even complete paralysis, severely impacting patients′ prognosis. Currently, there are no established consensuses over the diagnosis and treatment of CSCIWFD, such as the lack of evidence-based standards for indications of non-surgical treatment and risk of secondary neurological injury, as well as debates over the optimal timing for surgical intervention and indications for different surgical approaches. To address these issues, the Spine Trauma Group of the Orthopedic Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association organized experts in the relevant fields to formulate Diagnosis and treatment guideline for acute cervical spinal cord injury without fracture- dislocation in adults ( version 2025) . Based on evidence-based medicine and the principles of scientific rigor and clinical applicability, the guidelines proposed 11 recommendations covering terminology, diagnosis, evaluation treatment, and rehabilitation, etc., aiming to standardize the management of CSCIWFD.

Objective:To construct an artificial intelligence (AI)-based automatic grading model for neurological severity at acute phase of patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (TCSCI) and evaluate its efficacy.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 315 patients with TCSCI admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University from January 2019 to December 2023, including 243 males and 72 females, aged 30-75 years [(57.6±7.0)years]. Injured segments involved C 1-C 4 in 143 patients and C 5-C 8 in 172. According to the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scale, the injuries were classified as Grade A in 15 patients, Grade B in 53, Grade C in 74, and Grade D in 173. The patients were randomly divided into training group ( n=252) and test group ( n=63) with a ratio of 8∶2. The patients′ sensory and motor functions were assessed according to the ASIA scale within 48 hours after injury. The cervical spine MRI instance segmentation model was used to extract injury severity features of TCSCI patients in sagittal T2-weighted images. The grading model consisted of a two-layer cascade network. The first layer involved gradient boosting, Gaussian naive bayes, K-nearest neighbors, decision tree, random forest and support vector machine classifier. In the training group, the 6 machine learning models were trained separately. In the second layer, the performance of the six models was optimized to obtain the corresponding optimal grading models, so as to match the models with the best grading performance for each feature. In the test group, the performance of each model was evaluated by calculating accuracy, recall, precision, average precision, and F1 score. Results:A total of 138 clinical and imaging features were included to construct an automatic grading model for neurological severity of TCSCI patients at acute phase, comprising 132 clinical neurological features (including 56 light touch sensory scores, 56 pinprick sensory scores, and 20 key muscle scores) and 6 MRI imaging features. In the test group, the accuracy, recall, precision, average precision and F1 score of the six models, including gradient boosting, Gaussian naive bayes, K-nearest neighbors, decision tree, random forest and support vector machine classifier in the first layer of the automatic grading model for neurological severity at acute phase of TCSCI patients, in the overall grading of light touch, pinprick sensory and key muscle motor function were all above 0.86. In terms of the overall light touch function grading performance, the models with the highest accuracy, recall, precision, average precision, and F1 score were K-nearest neighbors (0.90), gradient boosting (0.99), Gaussian naive bayes (0.98), random forest (0.96), and gradient boosting (0.96), respectively. In terms of the overall pinprick sensory function grading performance, the models with the highest accuracy, recall, precision, average precision, and F1 score were gradient boosting (0.98), Gaussian naive bayes (0.98), gradient boosting (0.99), decision tree (0.99), and gradient boosting (0.95), respectively. In terms of the overall key muscle motor function grading performance, the models with the highest accuracy, recall, precision, average precision, and F1 score were K-nearest neighbors (0.97), gradient boosting and support vector machine classifier (0.97), decision tree (0.95), random forest (0.95), and support vector machine classifier (0.96), respectively. In terms of sensory function, gradient boosting had the highest number of superior performances in the overall light touch and pinprick sensory function grading. In terms of motor function, the support vector machine classifier had the highest number of superior performances in the overall key muscle motor function grading.Conclusion:The automatic grading model for neurological severity at acute phase of patients with TCSCI that is constructed based on machine learning models and two-layer cascade networks can achieve the optimization of the grading performance of each feature and exhibit a strong grading ability for the sensory and motor function severity.

Vertebral refracture following percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) is commonly seen in elderly patients with osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fractures (OTLCF). It can lead to recurrent pain, loss of vertebral height, progression of kyphosis, and even neurological dysfunction, significantly impairing patients′ quality of life. Current diagnosis and treatment face multiple challenges, including high misdiagnosis rate, difficulty in choosing between surgical and non-surgical treatment options, lack of standardized surgical protocols, interference from intralesional bone cement during procedures, inadequate stability of internal fixation in osteoporotic bone, and suboptimal compliance of anti-osteoporotic therapy. Establishing a standardized diagnostic and therapeutic framework is urgently needed. To standardize the management process and improve outcomes for vertebral refractures after PVA in elderly OTLCF patients, Spinal Trauma Group of the Orthopedic Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association organized experts in the field to develop Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of vertebral refracture after percutaneous vertebral augmentation in elderly patients with osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fractures ( version 2025), based on current literature and clinical experience, and adhering to principles of scientific rigor and clinical applicability. A total of 11 recommendations were proposed, encompassing diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of vertebral refracture after PVA in elderly patients with OTLCF, aiming to provide a foundation for a standardized management.

The diagnosis of osteoporosis is mainly characterized by reduced bone mineral density(BMD).Commonly used BMD examination methods are dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative CT,but their distribution is not enough.Routine clinical CT can also be used for BMD assessment,which mainly includes vertebral body CT values and BMD values obtained based on asynchronous calibration and internal calibration technology,which is expected to achieve opportunistic osteoporosis screening and fracture risk prediction.This paper reviews the application of routine clinical CT in assessing BMD of osteoporosis patients,in order to help clinicians and scholars understand the current status and future research directions of opportunistic osteoporosis screening.

Thoracolumbar spine fracture often leads to severe pain, functional impairments, and neurological deficits, for which open reduction and internal fixation can effectively restore the spinal structural stability. Open decompression and reduction with internal fixation can help relieve spinal cord compression and improve spinal function in cases of concomitant cord injury. Although spinal stability can be restored through surgery, patients often face chronic pain and functional impairments postoperatively. A postoperative rehabilitation program is critical in optimizing therapeutic outcomes, reducing complications, and minimizing the risk of secondary injuries. However, current rehabilitation methods, such as physical therapy, functional training, and pain management, are confronted with problems in clinical practice, including significant variation in efficacy, poor patient adherence, and prolonged rehabilitation period. There is an urgent need for a unified rehabilitation strategy to address these problems. To this end, the Spinal Trauma Group of the Orthopedic Physicians Branch of the Chinese Medical Association and the Spine Health Professional Committee of the Chinese Human Health Technology Promotion Association organized experts from relevant fields to formulate Evidence-based guidelines for rehabilitation treatment after internal fixation of thoracolumbar spine fracture in adults ( version 2025) by integrating evidences from clinical researches and advanced rehabilitation concepts at home and abroad. A total number of 14 recommendations concerning the rehabilitation treatment with multimodal analgesia, psychological intervention, deep vein thrombosis prevention, core muscle and extremity exercise, appropriate use of braces, early weight-bearing, device-aided rehabilitation exercise, neuroregulatory therapy, rehabilitation team were put forward, aiming to standardize the post-operative rehabilitation process following internal fixation, promote the functional recovery, and enhance patients′ quality of life.

Acute symptomatic osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fracture (ASOTLF) can lead to chronic low back pain, kyphosis deformity, pulmonary dysfunction, loss of mobility, and even life-threatening complications. Vertebral augmentation is currently the mainstream treatment method for this condition. In 2019, the Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Trauma and the Spinal Trauma Group of Orthopedic Surgeons Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association collaboratively led the development of Clinical guideline for vertebral augmentation for acute symptomatic osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fractures. Six years later, with advances in clinical diagnosis and treatment techniques as well as accumulating evidence in related fields, the 2019 guideline requires updating. To this end, the Spinal Trauma Group of Orthopedic Surgeons Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, the Spinal Health Professional Committee of China Human Health Science and Technology Promotion Association, and the Minimally Invasive Orthopedics Professional Committee of Shaanxi Medical Doctor Association have organized experts in the field to develop the Clinical guideline for vertebral augmentation of acute symptomatic osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fractures ( version 2025) , based on the latest evidence-based medical researches. This guideline incorporates 3 recommendations retained from the 2019 version with updated strength of evidence, along with 12 new recommendations. It provides recommendations from six aspects of diagnosis, pain management, treatment option selection, prevention of postoperative complications, anti-osteoporosis therapy, and postoperative rehabilitation, aiming to provide a reference for standard treatment of vertebral augmentation for ASOTLF in hospitals at all levels.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery has been a common practice for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, but the response rate varies among patients. This study aimed to develop a ResNet-Vision Transformer based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-endoscopy fusion model to precisely predict treatment response and provide personalized treatment. METHODS: In this multicenter study, 366 eligible patients who had undergone neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery at eight Chinese tertiary hospitals between January 2017 and June 2024 were recruited, with 2928 pretreatment colonic endoscopic images and 366 pelvic MRI images. An MRI-endoscopy fusion model was constructed based on the ResNet backbone and Transformer network using pretreatment MRI and endoscopic images. Treatment response was defined as good response or non-good response based on the tumor regression grade. The Delong test and the Hanley-McNeil test were utilized to compare prediction performance among different models and different subgroups, respectively. The predictive performance of the MRI-endoscopy fusion model was comprehensively validated in the test sets and was further compared to that of the single-modal MRI model and single-modal endoscopy model. RESULTS: The MRI-endoscopy fusion model demonstrated favorable prediction performance. In the internal validation set, the area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy were 0.852 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.744-0.940) and 0.737 (95% CI: 0.712-0.844), respectively. Moreover, the AUC and accuracy reached 0.769 (95% CI: 0.678-0.861) and 0.729 (95% CI: 0.628-0.821), respectively, in the external test set. In addition, the MRI-endoscopy fusion model outperformed the single-modal MRI model (AUC: 0.692 [95% CI: 0.609-0.783], accuracy: 0.659 [95% CI: 0.565-0.775]) and the single-modal endoscopy model (AUC: 0.720 [95% CI: 0.617-0.823], accuracy: 0.713 [95% CI: 0.612-0.809]) in the external test set. CONCLUSION The MRI-endoscopy fusion model based on ResNet-Vision Transformer achieved favorable performance in predicting treatment response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and holds tremendous potential for enabling personalized treatment regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer patients.
Humans ; Rectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging* ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods* ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods* ; Aged ; Adult ; Chemoradiotherapy/methods* ; Endoscopy/methods* ; Treatment Outcome

Objective To study the influence of laser diffraction ultrasound parameters on the determination of particle size and particle size distribution of budesonide suspension for inhalation,and explore the rationality of ultrasound parameter settings of the laser diffraction method.Methods The Mastersizer 3000 was set to measure the particle size and particle size distribution of budesonide suspension for inhalation from 6 companies at different ultrasonic times,and the FlowCam was used to test the samples simultaneously.Results The ultrasound parameters have a significant impact on the particle size and particle size distribution of budesonide suspension for inhalation in some companies,and the FlowCam test results show that particles in some samples exhibit aggregation,which can be dispersed by ultrasound and affect the results.Conclusion It is necessary to optimize the ultrasound parameters of laser diffraction to determine the particle size and particle size distribution of suspension for inhalation,and verify the rationality of the ultrasound parameter settings through microscopic techniques.

Objective To study the influence of laser diffraction ultrasound parameters on the determination of particle size and particle size distribution of budesonide suspension for inhalation,and explore the rationality of ultrasound parameter settings of the laser diffraction method.Methods The Mastersizer 3000 was set to measure the particle size and particle size distribution of budesonide suspension for inhalation from 6 companies at different ultrasonic times,and the FlowCam was used to test the samples simultaneously.Results The ultrasound parameters have a significant impact on the particle size and particle size distribution of budesonide suspension for inhalation in some companies,and the FlowCam test results show that particles in some samples exhibit aggregation,which can be dispersed by ultrasound and affect the results.Conclusion It is necessary to optimize the ultrasound parameters of laser diffraction to determine the particle size and particle size distribution of suspension for inhalation,and verify the rationality of the ultrasound parameter settings through microscopic techniques.

Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of bronchial artery chemoembolization (BACE) combined with anlotinib (BACE+A) versus BACE alone in patients with stage III-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods:A total of 94 patients with advanced NSCLC treated at six interventional centers between November 2020 and November 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were divided into the BACE+A group ( n=46) and the BACE alone group ( n=48) based on treatment regimen. Baseline and perioperative clinical data were collected and compared between the two groups. Treatment response was evaluated using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) at 1, 6, and 12 months after the first BACE procedure. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted to compare median OS and PFS between groups. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to identify factors influencing OS and PFS. Results:The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the median OS was significantly longer in the BACE+A group (18.8 months, 95% CI 16.3-21.3) than in the BACE group (13.4 months, 95% CI 11.6-15.2) ( P=0.001). The median PFS was also significantly longer in the BACE+A group (9.0 months, 95% CI 7.3-10.7) compared to the BACE group (6.1 months, 95% CI 4.9-7.3) ( P=0.001). At 6 and 12 months post-first BACE, the ORR (43.5%, 40.0%) and DCR (89.1%, 83.3%) were significantly higher in the BACE+A group than in the BACE group (ORR: 20.8%, 14.8%; DCR: 66.7%, 59.3%) (all P<0.05). Multivariate Cox regression identified treatment with BACE+A ( HR=0.42, 95% CI 0.27-0.72, P=0.002), tumor stage ( HR=1.80, 95% CI 1.05-3.07, P=0.031), presence of pre-existing complications requiring intervention ( HR=2.72, 95% CI 1.65-4.50, P<0.001), and >2 BACE procedures ( HR=0.32, 95% CI 0.15-0.68, P=0.003) as independent factors influencing OS. Treatment with BACE+A ( HR=0.49, 95% CI 0.32-0.76, P=0.001), tumor stage ( HR=1.72, 95% CI 1.07-2.77, P=0.025), multi-arterial tumor blood supply ( HR=2.76, 95% CI 1.76-4.31, P<0.001), and>2 BACE procedures ( HR=0.40, 95% CI 0.22-0.71, P=0.002) were independent factors influencing PFS. There was no significant difference in BACE-related adverse events between the two groups (all P>0.05). Hypertension, fatigue, hand-foot syndrome, and anorexia were common anlotinib-specific adverse reactions in the combination group, but no grade 4 or higher adverse reactions were observed. Conclusions:BACE combined with anlotinib demonstrates superior efficacy compared to BACE alone in treating advanced NSCLC, significantly prolonging OS and PFS. The safety profile is manageable, with adverse events remaining within tolerable limits.