Ideological and political education within the curriculum of higher institutions of traditional Chinese medicine （TCM） not only bears the important responsibility of promoting China's outstanding traditional culture but also serves as a vital domain for upholding integrity and innovation in medical education. These institutions must profoundly comprehend the contemporary significance of curriculum-based ideological and political education， clarify its core role in talent cultivation， leverage the distinctive advantages of TCM culture， and promote the organic integration of ideological education and professional training. By reviewing the current situation and development trends of ideological and political education in the curriculum of higher TCM institutions， this paper has analyzed the challenges in teaching design， teachers' ideological and political literacy and competence， and the integration of ideological content with specialized courses， and has proposed implementation strategies such as using TCM culture as a guiding force， strengthening teachers' teaching capacity in ideological and political education， developing distinctive educational resources， and improving evaluation and incentive mechanisms. These strategies aim to effectively enhance the impact of ideological and political education in the new era， fostering well-rounded TCM talents with both moral integrity and professional competence.

Objective:To screen the risk factors for non-complete procedural success of transvenous lead extraction(TLE),and to establish a prediction model based on the results and evaluate its predictive efficacy.Methods:A total of 1 029 patients who underwent TLE in Peking University People's Hospital from January 2014 to December 2020 were enrolled and divided into training set(n=720)and validation set(n=309)using the random number method.There were no statistically significant differences among the variables in the training set and the validation set.The training set was divided into the complete procedural success(CPS)group(n=664)and the non-CPS group(n=56).Univariate analysis was employed to screen the relevant indicators of non-CPS,followed by binary logistic regression analysis to identify the independent risk factors of non-CPS.Subsequently,a predictive model and nomogram were constructed.The receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve analysis was applied to evaluate the ability of the model to distinguish non-CPS from TLE patients in the training set and validation set.The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was used to assess the consistency between the predicted risk and the actual risk of the model.Results:Univariate analysis showed that the relevant variables with P<0.1 including the age at the first implantation of the lead,the number of leads extracted,the oldest dwell time of lead extracted,the presence of abandoned leads,non-manual traction for lead extracted,the number of extracted leads>3,bilateral lead implantation,and the indications for TLE.The binary logistic regression analysis revealed that the presence of abandoned leads(OR=2.252,95%CI:1.111-4.564,P=0.024),the oldest dwell time of the extracted leads(OR=1.009,95%CI:1.005-1.012,P<0.001),and the number of extracted leads>3(OR=3.177,95%CI:1.306-7.733,P=0.011)were independent risk factors for non-CPS of TLE.ROC curve analysis revealed that the area under the ROC curve(AUC)of the training set was 0.80(95%CI:0.75-0.85,P<0.001).The AUC of the validation set was 0.81(95%CI:0.72-0.90,P<0.001).The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test indicated that the P values of both the training set(P=0.089)and the validation set(P=0.136)were greater than 0.05.Conclusions:The presence of abandoned leads,the oldest dwell time of lead extracted,and the number of extracted leads>3 are independent risk factors for non-CPS in patients undergoing TLE.The nomogram model based on the above factors has satisfactory predictive ability.

Objectives:To analyze the clinical characteristics,strategies,success and complication rates of lead extraction and re-implantation during the upgrade of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices(CIED)in non-infectious patients.Methods:This retrospective study collected and analyzed the baseline clinical data and surgical data of 66 non-infected patients who had their existing CIEDs(including cardiac pacemaker,implantable cardioverter defibrillator[ICD],cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker[CRT-P])upgraded to ICD or CRT-P or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator(CRT-D)or subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator(S-ICD)in Peking University People's Hospital from March 2018 to March 2024.We analyzed the strategies of lead extraction and reimplantation as well as the operation success rate and complication rate.Results:Among the 66 patients,preoperative imaging revealed that 12 patients(18.2%)had severe stenosis/occlusion of the venous access route,with lead wear/perforation in 26 patients(39.4%).32 patients(48.5%)underwent transvenous lead extraction(TLE),of which all leads were removed in 27 patients(84.4%),and only non-functional leads were removed in 5 patients(15.6%).The success rate of the TLE procedure was 100%and no complication occurred.Among the 66 patients,functional leads retained and new leads were implanted on the same side in 28 patients(42.4%),all leads were removed and new leads were reimplanted on the opposite side in 22 patients(33.3%),only non-functional leads were removed and new leads were reimplanted on the same side in 5 patients(7.6%),all leads were removed and new leads were reimplanted on the same side in 5 patients(7.6%),and 6 patients(9.1%)had the leads abandoned and then were re-implanled.The success rate of the upgrade surgery was 100%,no complications were reported.Conclusions:When the existing CIEDs(including cardiac pacemaker,ICD,CRT-P)of non-infected patients are upgraded to ICD,CRT-P,CRT-D or S-ICD,lead extraction and reimplantation are safe and feasible,and reimplantation can be performed on the ipsilateral or contralateral side.

Objectives:To evaluate the performance of AVEIR VR single chamber leadless pacemaker(AVEIR VR)in the real world in China and the predictive factors of pacing threshold to assess the feasibility of AVEIRTM VR implantation in the domestic population.Methods:All patients who underwent AVEIR VR implantation by experienced operators from Peking University People's Hospital in multiple domestic hospitals from June 2024 to October 2024 were consecutively included,and their baseline characteristics,procedural data(including pacemaker electrical measurements at various stages),and follow-up results were observed,recorded,and statistically analyzed.Results:This study included 20 patients who met the indication for pacemaker implantation and underwent AVEIR VR implantation.Their mean age was(71.40±13.37)years,body mass index(BMI)was(23.05±3.71)kg/m2,body surface area(BSA)was(1.70±0.16)m2,all 20 patients were successfully implanted with pacemakers,there were no major complications(newly occurred pericardial effusion during the perioperative period,cardiac tamponade,poor pacemaker function,pacemaker dislocation/perforation,tricuspid valve injury,myocardial infarction,stroke,pulmonary embolism,and clinical death).One patient developed new frequent ventricular premature contractions after pacemaker release.The pacing threshold(PCT)at one week after implantation was correlated with PCT in tether mode(r=0.650,P=0.009)and PCT in release phase(r=0.596,P=0.019),but not with the sensing and impedance in each phase.Conclusions:This preliminary exploration study show that AVEIRTM VR implantation demonstrates satisfactory performance among real world patients in China,especially in elderly and low weight populations,confirming its safety.

Objective:To evaluate the clinical feasibility of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation following transvenous lead extraction (TLE).Methods:This was a retrospective study. Consecutive patients who underwent S-ICD implantation at Peking University People′s Hospital between June 2015 and October 2023 were enrolled. Patients were divided into the TLE group and the newly implanted group based on whether they received TLE prior to S-ICD implantation. Baseline characteristics, S-ICD indication, defibrillation threshold test results, complications, and postoperative follow-up data were collected and compared between the two groups.Results:A total of 27 patients were included, aged (49.2±14.2) years, including 19 males. There were 12 patients in the TLE group and 15 in the newly implanted group. Compared with the TLE group, patients in the newly implanted group were younger ((43.3±13.7) years vs. (55.6±12.0) years, P=0.013). The main S-ICD indication in the TLE group was high infection risk (9/12), whereas in the newly implanted group it was younger age (11/15). All patients underwent successful S-ICD implantation, with 18 patients completing defibrillation threshold testing (all successful). Additionally, the TLE group had longer follow-up duration than the newly implanted group (42 (19, 60) months vs. 12 (3, 28) months, P=0.001). No complications or deaths occurred during follow-up, with normal device function in both groups. A total of 17 ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation events were recorded, of which 7 met defibrillation criteria and all received effective therapy. Conclusion:S-ICD demonstrates safety and efficacy as a therapeutic option for patients after TLE, with comparable device functionality and follow-up outcomes to patients with newly implanted S-ICD.

Objective:To evaluate the incidence and frequency of inappropriate shocks caused by defibrillation lead failure in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD), and to explore methods for reducing the incidence and frequency of such inappropriate shocks.Methods:This was a single-center retrospective study involving patients treated for defibrillation lead failures at Peking University People′s Hospital between March 2015 and May 2024. Patients were divided into an alarm function group and a non-alarm function group based on whether their ICDs were equipped with lead alarm functions. Clinical data, lead data, and the incidence and frequency of inappropriate shocks were collected and compared between the two groups. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyze factors influencing the incidence and frequency of inappropriate ICD shocks. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted to compare the trends in the incidence and frequency of inappropriate shocks over time since ICD implantation between the two groups.Results:A total of 59 patients were enrolled, with a age of (56.7±15.2) years, including 42 males (71%). The lifespan of the failed leads in the entire cohort was 64.0 (36.0, 96.0) months. There were 26 patients in the alarm function group and 33 in the non-alarm function group. The most common manifestations of lead failure were oversensing (85%, 50/59) and abnormal pacing impedance (42%, 25/59). A total of 33 patients (56%, 33/59) experienced inappropriate shock therapy, with an average of 27.3 shocks per patient. The frequency of inappropriate ICD shocks in the non-alarm function group was higher than that in the alarm function group (25.0 (10.0, 60.0) times/year vs. 5.0 (2.8, 7.8) times/year, P=0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that oversensing ( OR=2.057, 95% CI 1.125-6.763, P=0.019) was an influencing factor for incidence of inappropriate shocks, while the lead alert function ( OR=0.062, 95% CI 0.005-0.719, P=0.001) was a factor influencing the frequency of inappropriate shocks. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that the incidence and frequency of inappropriate shocks increased with the duration of ICD implantation in both groups, but the differences were not statistically significant (incidence: log-rank P=0.908; frequency: log-rank P=0.767). Conclusion:The lead alert function can reduce the frequency of inappropriate shocks caused by lead failure.

Objective:To screen the risk factors for non-complete procedural success of transvenous lead extraction(TLE),and to establish a prediction model based on the results and evaluate its predictive efficacy.Methods:A total of 1 029 patients who underwent TLE in Peking University People's Hospital from January 2014 to December 2020 were enrolled and divided into training set(n=720)and validation set(n=309)using the random number method.There were no statistically significant differences among the variables in the training set and the validation set.The training set was divided into the complete procedural success(CPS)group(n=664)and the non-CPS group(n=56).Univariate analysis was employed to screen the relevant indicators of non-CPS,followed by binary logistic regression analysis to identify the independent risk factors of non-CPS.Subsequently,a predictive model and nomogram were constructed.The receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve analysis was applied to evaluate the ability of the model to distinguish non-CPS from TLE patients in the training set and validation set.The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was used to assess the consistency between the predicted risk and the actual risk of the model.Results:Univariate analysis showed that the relevant variables with P<0.1 including the age at the first implantation of the lead,the number of leads extracted,the oldest dwell time of lead extracted,the presence of abandoned leads,non-manual traction for lead extracted,the number of extracted leads>3,bilateral lead implantation,and the indications for TLE.The binary logistic regression analysis revealed that the presence of abandoned leads(OR=2.252,95%CI:1.111-4.564,P=0.024),the oldest dwell time of the extracted leads(OR=1.009,95%CI:1.005-1.012,P<0.001),and the number of extracted leads>3(OR=3.177,95%CI:1.306-7.733,P=0.011)were independent risk factors for non-CPS of TLE.ROC curve analysis revealed that the area under the ROC curve(AUC)of the training set was 0.80(95%CI:0.75-0.85,P<0.001).The AUC of the validation set was 0.81(95%CI:0.72-0.90,P<0.001).The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test indicated that the P values of both the training set(P=0.089)and the validation set(P=0.136)were greater than 0.05.Conclusions:The presence of abandoned leads,the oldest dwell time of lead extracted,and the number of extracted leads>3 are independent risk factors for non-CPS in patients undergoing TLE.The nomogram model based on the above factors has satisfactory predictive ability.

Objectives:To evaluate the performance of AVEIR VR single chamber leadless pacemaker(AVEIR VR)in the real world in China and the predictive factors of pacing threshold to assess the feasibility of AVEIRTM VR implantation in the domestic population.Methods:All patients who underwent AVEIR VR implantation by experienced operators from Peking University People's Hospital in multiple domestic hospitals from June 2024 to October 2024 were consecutively included,and their baseline characteristics,procedural data(including pacemaker electrical measurements at various stages),and follow-up results were observed,recorded,and statistically analyzed.Results:This study included 20 patients who met the indication for pacemaker implantation and underwent AVEIR VR implantation.Their mean age was(71.40±13.37)years,body mass index(BMI)was(23.05±3.71)kg/m2,body surface area(BSA)was(1.70±0.16)m2,all 20 patients were successfully implanted with pacemakers,there were no major complications(newly occurred pericardial effusion during the perioperative period,cardiac tamponade,poor pacemaker function,pacemaker dislocation/perforation,tricuspid valve injury,myocardial infarction,stroke,pulmonary embolism,and clinical death).One patient developed new frequent ventricular premature contractions after pacemaker release.The pacing threshold(PCT)at one week after implantation was correlated with PCT in tether mode(r=0.650,P=0.009)and PCT in release phase(r=0.596,P=0.019),but not with the sensing and impedance in each phase.Conclusions:This preliminary exploration study show that AVEIRTM VR implantation demonstrates satisfactory performance among real world patients in China,especially in elderly and low weight populations,confirming its safety.

Objectives:To analyze the clinical characteristics,strategies,success and complication rates of lead extraction and re-implantation during the upgrade of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices(CIED)in non-infectious patients.Methods:This retrospective study collected and analyzed the baseline clinical data and surgical data of 66 non-infected patients who had their existing CIEDs(including cardiac pacemaker,implantable cardioverter defibrillator[ICD],cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker[CRT-P])upgraded to ICD or CRT-P or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator(CRT-D)or subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator(S-ICD)in Peking University People's Hospital from March 2018 to March 2024.We analyzed the strategies of lead extraction and reimplantation as well as the operation success rate and complication rate.Results:Among the 66 patients,preoperative imaging revealed that 12 patients(18.2%)had severe stenosis/occlusion of the venous access route,with lead wear/perforation in 26 patients(39.4%).32 patients(48.5%)underwent transvenous lead extraction(TLE),of which all leads were removed in 27 patients(84.4%),and only non-functional leads were removed in 5 patients(15.6%).The success rate of the TLE procedure was 100%and no complication occurred.Among the 66 patients,functional leads retained and new leads were implanted on the same side in 28 patients(42.4%),all leads were removed and new leads were reimplanted on the opposite side in 22 patients(33.3%),only non-functional leads were removed and new leads were reimplanted on the same side in 5 patients(7.6%),all leads were removed and new leads were reimplanted on the same side in 5 patients(7.6%),and 6 patients(9.1%)had the leads abandoned and then were re-implanled.The success rate of the upgrade surgery was 100%,no complications were reported.Conclusions:When the existing CIEDs(including cardiac pacemaker,ICD,CRT-P)of non-infected patients are upgraded to ICD,CRT-P,CRT-D or S-ICD,lead extraction and reimplantation are safe and feasible,and reimplantation can be performed on the ipsilateral or contralateral side.

Objective:To evaluate the clinical feasibility of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation following transvenous lead extraction (TLE).Methods:This was a retrospective study. Consecutive patients who underwent S-ICD implantation at Peking University People′s Hospital between June 2015 and October 2023 were enrolled. Patients were divided into the TLE group and the newly implanted group based on whether they received TLE prior to S-ICD implantation. Baseline characteristics, S-ICD indication, defibrillation threshold test results, complications, and postoperative follow-up data were collected and compared between the two groups.Results:A total of 27 patients were included, aged (49.2±14.2) years, including 19 males. There were 12 patients in the TLE group and 15 in the newly implanted group. Compared with the TLE group, patients in the newly implanted group were younger ((43.3±13.7) years vs. (55.6±12.0) years, P=0.013). The main S-ICD indication in the TLE group was high infection risk (9/12), whereas in the newly implanted group it was younger age (11/15). All patients underwent successful S-ICD implantation, with 18 patients completing defibrillation threshold testing (all successful). Additionally, the TLE group had longer follow-up duration than the newly implanted group (42 (19, 60) months vs. 12 (3, 28) months, P=0.001). No complications or deaths occurred during follow-up, with normal device function in both groups. A total of 17 ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation events were recorded, of which 7 met defibrillation criteria and all received effective therapy. Conclusion:S-ICD demonstrates safety and efficacy as a therapeutic option for patients after TLE, with comparable device functionality and follow-up outcomes to patients with newly implanted S-ICD.