OBJECTIVE:To systematically evaluate the clinical effectiveness of rehabilitation robots in treating lower limb motor dysfunction in patients with cerebral palsy,and to compare the differences in therapeutic effects among different robots.METHODS:PubMed,Web of Science,Embase,Cochrane Library,CNKI,CBM,VIP and WanFang databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials on rehabilitation robotics for the treatment of motor dysfunction in patients with cerebral palsy,published from database inception to April 10,2024.The main outcome indicators included muscle strength,muscle tension,balance function,step speed,step frequency,step length,walking endurance,lower limb motor function,and activities of daily living.The above indicators were coded according to the International Classification of Functioning,Disability and Health.Meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and compare the therapeutic efficacy of different rehabilitation robots.Literature search and screening were performed by two researchers,and the quality of the included literature was evaluated using the Cochrane 5.1.0 risk of bias assessment tool.Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software and Stata 16.0 software.RESULTS:(1)Fifteen articles were finally included,involving 512 patients with 260 in the experimental group and 252 in the control group.(2)The Meta-analysis results showed that rehabilitation robots could improve body structure and function[standardized mean difference=0.41,95%confidence interval(CI):0.24-0.58,P<0.05],activities(standardized mean difference=0.53,95%CI:0.41-0.65,P<0.05)and participation ability(mean difference=7.86,95%CI:1.54-14.18,P<0.05).In particular,the rehabilitation robot improved lower limb muscle strength,balance function,step speed,walking endurance,lower limb gross motor function,and activities of daily living in patients with cerebral palsy,but showed insignificant effects on step frequency,step length,and muscle tension.(3)The network Meta-analysis results showed that:step speed:Innowalkpro>Gait Trainer>Lokomat>3DCalt;6-minute walk test score:Gait Trainer>Lokomat>Lokohelp>Innowalkro;Gross Motor Function Measure-88D score:Lokohelp>Lokomat>KidGo>Innowalkpro>3DCalt;Gross Motor Function Measure-88E score:Lokomat>Lokohelp>KidGo>3DCalt>Innowalkpro.CONCLUSION:Based on the International Classification of Functioning,Disability,and Health,rehabilitation robot training can improve the lower limb motor function and activities of daily living in patients with cerebral palsy.The Innowalkpro robot was more effective in improving step speed;the Gait trainer robot was more effective in improving 6-minute walk test scores;the Lokohelp robot was more effective in improving Gross Motor Function Measure-88D zone scores;and the Lokomat robot was more effective in improving Gross Motor Function Measure-88E zone scores.

OBJECTIVE:To systematically evaluate the clinical effectiveness of rehabilitation robots in treating lower limb motor dysfunction in patients with cerebral palsy,and to compare the differences in therapeutic effects among different robots.METHODS:PubMed,Web of Science,Embase,Cochrane Library,CNKI,CBM,VIP and WanFang databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials on rehabilitation robotics for the treatment of motor dysfunction in patients with cerebral palsy,published from database inception to April 10,2024.The main outcome indicators included muscle strength,muscle tension,balance function,step speed,step frequency,step length,walking endurance,lower limb motor function,and activities of daily living.The above indicators were coded according to the International Classification of Functioning,Disability and Health.Meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and compare the therapeutic efficacy of different rehabilitation robots.Literature search and screening were performed by two researchers,and the quality of the included literature was evaluated using the Cochrane 5.1.0 risk of bias assessment tool.Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software and Stata 16.0 software.RESULTS:(1)Fifteen articles were finally included,involving 512 patients with 260 in the experimental group and 252 in the control group.(2)The Meta-analysis results showed that rehabilitation robots could improve body structure and function[standardized mean difference=0.41,95%confidence interval(CI):0.24-0.58,P<0.05],activities(standardized mean difference=0.53,95%CI:0.41-0.65,P<0.05)and participation ability(mean difference=7.86,95%CI:1.54-14.18,P<0.05).In particular,the rehabilitation robot improved lower limb muscle strength,balance function,step speed,walking endurance,lower limb gross motor function,and activities of daily living in patients with cerebral palsy,but showed insignificant effects on step frequency,step length,and muscle tension.(3)The network Meta-analysis results showed that:step speed:Innowalkpro>Gait Trainer>Lokomat>3DCalt;6-minute walk test score:Gait Trainer>Lokomat>Lokohelp>Innowalkro;Gross Motor Function Measure-88D score:Lokohelp>Lokomat>KidGo>Innowalkpro>3DCalt;Gross Motor Function Measure-88E score:Lokomat>Lokohelp>KidGo>3DCalt>Innowalkpro.CONCLUSION:Based on the International Classification of Functioning,Disability,and Health,rehabilitation robot training can improve the lower limb motor function and activities of daily living in patients with cerebral palsy.The Innowalkpro robot was more effective in improving step speed;the Gait trainer robot was more effective in improving 6-minute walk test scores;the Lokohelp robot was more effective in improving Gross Motor Function Measure-88D zone scores;and the Lokomat robot was more effective in improving Gross Motor Function Measure-88E zone scores.

Objective To propose a method for correcting the attenuation of positron emission tomography (PET) data in PET/magnetic resonance (MR) based on transmission scan, and to improve image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and lesion location accuracy. Methods In this study, the head phantom in the national standard GB/T 18988.1—2013 was used as the experimental model. The head phantom contained three 50 mm diameter cylindrical inserts filled with air, water, and solid teflon. The attenuation correction coefficients were calculated and analyzed based on transmission scan. Results With slice = 33 and theta = 0, the attenuation correction coefficient was the largest (about 7.5) when the coincidence line passed through the axis of the phantom. The spatial distribution of the attenuation correction coefficients clearly showed the positions of air insert and teflon insert, indicating that the attenuation correction coefficients calculated from transmission scan data were accurate. In the clinical verification experiment, the attenuation correction method based on transmission scan significantly improved the image quality and showed efficient attenuation correction. Conclusion This paper studied the attenuation correction method for PET data in PET/MR based on transmission scan. This method can improve the image quality. In the future work, the attenuation correction method of PET/MR will be further studied and optimized to facilitate clinical applications.

Objective To propose a method for correcting the attenuation of positron emission tomography (PET) data in PET/magnetic resonance (MR) based on transmission scan, and to improve image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and lesion location accuracy. Methods In this study, the head phantom in the national standard GB/T 18988.1—2013 was used as the experimental model. The head phantom contained three 50 mm diameter cylindrical inserts filled with air, water, and solid teflon. The attenuation correction coefficients were calculated and analyzed based on transmission scan. Results With slice = 33 and theta = 0, the attenuation correction coefficient was the largest (about 7.5) when the coincidence line passed through the axis of the phantom. The spatial distribution of the attenuation correction coefficients clearly showed the positions of air insert and teflon insert, indicating that the attenuation correction coefficients calculated from transmission scan data were accurate. In the clinical verification experiment, the attenuation correction method based on transmission scan significantly improved the image quality and showed efficient attenuation correction. Conclusion This paper studied the attenuation correction method for PET data in PET/MR based on transmission scan. This method can improve the image quality. In the future work, the attenuation correction method of PET/MR will be further studied and optimized to facilitate clinical applications.

Objective To compare the dosimetric differences of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with flattening filter(FF) and flattening filter-free(FFF) modes in hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiotherapy. Methods We included 15 patients with hippocampal-sparing whole brain radiotherapy, and designed two radiotherapy plans of FF-VMAT and FFF-VMAT for each patient. On the premise of meeting clinical dose requirements, the two plans’ dosimetry, total number of monitor units, and beam-on time were compared. Results There were no significant differences in the target coverage, conformity index, and dose gradient of the FF-VMAT and FFF-VMAT plans (P > 0.05). The D_max, D_100%, and D_mean to the hippocampal tissue were significantly lower with FFF-VMAT [(15.13 ± 0.38) Gy, (7.12 ± 0.34) Gy, and (9.76 ± 0.43) Gy, respectively)] than with FF-VMAT (16.46 ± 0.56) Gy, (7.72 ± 0.28) Gy, and (10.54 ± 0.48) Gy, respectively)] (P < 0.05). The D_max to the left and right lenses and the D_mean to the left and right eyeballs with FFF-VMAT were (7.26 ± 0.43) Gy, (6.29 ± 1.13) Gy, (11.01 ± 0.94) Gy, and (9.78 ± 1.13) Gy, respectively, which were significantly lower than FF-VMAT’s corresponding doses of (8.09 ± 0.66) Gy, (7.80 ± 0.74) Gy, (11.38 ± 1.09) Gy, and (11.05 ± 0.90) Gy, respectively (P < 0.05). The doses to other organs at risk including the optic nerve and optic chiasm were all controlled within the safe dosage ranges, with no significant differences between the two plans (P > 0.05). The FFF-VMAT plan had a significantly greater number of monitor units and a significantly shorter beam-on time than the FF-VMAT plan (P < 0.05). Conclusion Both FF-VMAT and FFF-VMAT can meet the clinical requirements, with FFF-VMAT having better hippocampus and lens protection, shorter beam-on time, and higher treatment efficiency.