Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of proximal femoral reconstruction osteotomy (PFRO) in hip revision arthroplasty.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted of the 92 patients (93 hips) who had undergone PFRO in hip revision arthroplasty at Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital, University of Science and Technology of China from January 2019 to December 2023. The cohort included 50 males (51 hips) and 42 females (42 hips), with an age of (64.5±11.7) years and a body mass index of (23.7±2.9) kg/m 2. Surgical procedures were performed under general anesthesia via a posterolateral approach. Biologic prostheses were used in femoral reconstruction, and PFRO fragments repositioned and fixed using cerclage wires. The data collected were operative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of osteotomy fragments, healing at the osteotomy site, intraoperative and follow-up complications, as well as Harris hip score (HHS) and leg length discrepancy (LLD) at the last follow-up. Results:For this cohort, operative time was (174.9±45.6) minutes, intraoperative blood loss (594.6±206.6) mL, and length of osteotomy fragments (12.3±2.3) mm. The 92 patients were followed up for (35.8±12.3) months. For them, HHS improved from preoperative (38.3±8.5) points to (80.5±12.8) points at the last follow-up, and LLD decreased from preoperative (21.2±13.0) mm to 2.0(0.0, 5.0) mm at the last follow-up, showing significant differences ( P<0.05). The osteotomy sites healed in 89 cases (90 hips), with a displacement of the greater trochanter <5 mm; 3 cases (3 hips) experienced nonunion with wire loosening and a displacement of the greater trochanter >10 mm. The osteotomy fragment of the greater trochanter got fractured in 2 patients (2 hips) and a fracture of the medial cortex of the proximal femur occurred in 11 patients (11 hips), but follow-ups observed healing of all the fractures. One patient (1 hip) developed postoperative posterior dislocation of the hip which was treated conservatively. One patient (1 hip) developed postoperative periprosthetic infection which did not recur after twice of debridement followed by prosthetic revision of the proximal femoral tumor. Conclusion:In hip revision arthroplasty, as PFRO demonstrates a low incidence of fragment fractures of the greater trochanter and a high rate of healing at the osteotomy site, its short-term clinical outcomes are satisfactory.

Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of proximal femoral reconstruction osteotomy (PFRO) in hip revision arthroplasty.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted of the 92 patients (93 hips) who had undergone PFRO in hip revision arthroplasty at Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital, University of Science and Technology of China from January 2019 to December 2023. The cohort included 50 males (51 hips) and 42 females (42 hips), with an age of (64.5±11.7) years and a body mass index of (23.7±2.9) kg/m 2. Surgical procedures were performed under general anesthesia via a posterolateral approach. Biologic prostheses were used in femoral reconstruction, and PFRO fragments repositioned and fixed using cerclage wires. The data collected were operative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of osteotomy fragments, healing at the osteotomy site, intraoperative and follow-up complications, as well as Harris hip score (HHS) and leg length discrepancy (LLD) at the last follow-up. Results:For this cohort, operative time was (174.9±45.6) minutes, intraoperative blood loss (594.6±206.6) mL, and length of osteotomy fragments (12.3±2.3) mm. The 92 patients were followed up for (35.8±12.3) months. For them, HHS improved from preoperative (38.3±8.5) points to (80.5±12.8) points at the last follow-up, and LLD decreased from preoperative (21.2±13.0) mm to 2.0(0.0, 5.0) mm at the last follow-up, showing significant differences ( P<0.05). The osteotomy sites healed in 89 cases (90 hips), with a displacement of the greater trochanter <5 mm; 3 cases (3 hips) experienced nonunion with wire loosening and a displacement of the greater trochanter >10 mm. The osteotomy fragment of the greater trochanter got fractured in 2 patients (2 hips) and a fracture of the medial cortex of the proximal femur occurred in 11 patients (11 hips), but follow-ups observed healing of all the fractures. One patient (1 hip) developed postoperative posterior dislocation of the hip which was treated conservatively. One patient (1 hip) developed postoperative periprosthetic infection which did not recur after twice of debridement followed by prosthetic revision of the proximal femoral tumor. Conclusion:In hip revision arthroplasty, as PFRO demonstrates a low incidence of fragment fractures of the greater trochanter and a high rate of healing at the osteotomy site, its short-term clinical outcomes are satisfactory.

Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of the anterior approach versus the posterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) in treating residual high dislocation secondary to pyogenic hip arthritis, and to investigate the benefits of proximal femoral reconstruction osteotomy.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted on 45 patients who underwent THA combined with proximal femoral reconstruction osteotomy for high dislocation secondary to pyogenic hip arthritis at the First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China from January 2017 to September 2022. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the surgical approach: 14 in the anterior approach group and 31 in the posterolateral approach group. We analyzed surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for lateral knee pain after knee extension, postoperative limb lengthening, Harris hip scores, and complications. Radiographic assessments included anteversion and abduction angles of the acetabular cup, hip abductor muscle lever arm, hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle of the affected side, osteotomy site bone healing rate, and prosthesis loosening.Results:The average follow-up period was 3.6±1.8 years (range, 1.0-6.7 years). The anterior approach group had a significantly longer surgical duration (141.4±21.0 min) compared to the posterolateral approach group (121.3±23.1 min). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the anterior approach group (425.2±80.2 ml) compared to the posterolateral approach group (535.1±96.3 ml). The difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05). The VAS score for lateral knee pain after knee extension was significantly lower in the anterior approach group (3.2±0.8) than in the posterolateral approach group (5.7±1.1), the difference was statistically significant ( t=7.300, P<0.001). Postoperative limb lengthening was 5.0±1.5 cm in the anterior approach group and 4.5±1.4 cm in the posterolateral approach group, with no significant difference ( t=1.075, P=0.289). At the final follow-up, the Harris hip score was 86.2±5.0 in the anterior approach group and 82.5±6.8 in the posterolateral approach group, with no significant difference ( t=1.839, P=0.073). The acetabular anteversion angle, abduction angle, and HKA angle in the anterior approach group were 12.9°±5.8°, 42.6°±6.2°, and 179.8°±1.4°, respectively, while in the posterolateral approach group they were 14.5°±7.0°, 44.2°±3.1°, and 178.8°±2.1°, respectively. The differences between the groups were not statistically significant ( P>0.05). The hip abductor muscle lever arm was 5.6±0.7 cm on the surgical side compared to 5.9±0.6 cm on the healthy side, with no significant difference ( t=1.916, P=0.059). All patients achieved bone healing at the osteotomy site by the final follow-up. One patient in the anterior approach group experienced femoral prosthesis subsidence but did not require femoral revision. Two patients in the posterolateral approach group experienced hip dislocation, both of which were managed with intravenous anesthesia and closed reduction. Conclusion:The anterior approach for THA combined with proximal femoral reconstruction osteotomy yields better clinical outcomes compared to the posterolateral approach, including reduced intraoperative blood loss, decreased lateral knee pain, and a lower rate of dislocation. Proximal femoral reconstruction osteotomy effectively restores the hip abductor muscle lever arm with a high rate of osteotomy site healing.

The number of hip revision surgeries is expected to increase in recent years, and reconstruction of acetabular defects is a challenge for joint surgeons. The principle of reconstruction of acetabular defects is to achieve initial and long-term stability between the prosthesis and the host bone. With the development of surgical techniques, prosthetic materials, and revision concepts, there is an urgent need for new acetabular bone defect evaluation systems to meet clinical needs. The uncemented porous hemispherical cup has become the main prosthesis in clinical application, and metal augments are gradually replacing the structural allograft. Modular reconstruction combined cups and augments has shown favorable clinical results, which can be used for large acetabular defects with acetabular distraction technique, such as pelvic discontinuity. The advantages and disadvantages of impaction bone grafting, jumbo cups, metal augments, acetabular reinforcement rings, custom components (including custom triflanged acetabular components), and acetabular distraction technique still need to be observed in long-term follow-up.

Objective:To evaluate the clinical effect of bispherical augment in acetabular defects reconstruction in hip revision.Methods:This is a retrospective case series study. A retrospective analysis of 119 patients (124 hips) patients who underwent hip revision surgery and reconstructed with bispherical augment for acetabular bone defects from January 2019 to December 2023 was performed. There were 57 males (58 hips) and 62 females (66 hips), aged (65.0±11.8) years (range:40 to 102 years). The body mass index was (23.9±3.5) kg/m 2 (range:16.1 to 32.2 kg/m 2). Acetabular bone defects were typed as follows: 2 hips in Paprosky type ⅡA, 29 hips in type ⅡB, 34 hips in type ⅡC, 31 hips in type ⅢA, and 28 hips in type ⅢB, of which 9 patients (9 hips) were combined with pelvic discontinuity. Differences in Harris hip score (HHS) and lower limb discrepancy (LLD) were compared between preoperatively and final follow-up. The height of the hip center of rotation and the horizontal distance from the center of rotation to the teardrop were measured by radiographs before and after surgery, and prothesis stability and the occurrence of postoperative complications were evaluated. Data were compared using the paired sample t test. Results:All patients successfully completed the operation. The operation time was (167.0±53.4) minutes (range:90 to 380 minutes) and the intraoperative bleeding was (345.3±124.2) ml (range:100 to 1 200 ml). The height of the hip center of rotation decreased from (39.7±13.0) mm preoperatively to (21.8±7.1) mm postoperatively and the horizontal distance from the center of rotation to the teardrop increased from (34.0±10.1) mm preoperatively to (38.5±5.9) mm postoperatively, and the differences were statistically significant ( t=15.859, P<0.01; t=5.266, P<0.01). All the patients were followed up for (26.1±15.4) months (range:6 to 60 months). At the last follow-up, HHS improved from (35.2±10.0) points preoperatively to (85.5±9.5) points, and the difference was statistically significant ( t=50.723, P<0.01). LLD decreased from (2.1±1.1) cm preoperatively to (0.5±0.5) cm, and the difference was statistically significant ( t=13.767, P<0.01). All acetabular components were stable and free of displacement on imaging during follow-up. Three patients suffered dislocation and received closed reduction, all prosthesis were in good position during follow-up. No dislocation, loosening, fracture, recurrence of infection and vascular nerve injury occurred in other patients. Conclusion:Bispherical augment can effectively reconstruct acetabular bone defects, restore the hip center of rotation, and improve hip joint function scores at short and mid-term follow-up.

The number of hip revision surgeries is expected to increase in recent years, and reconstruction of acetabular defects is a challenge for joint surgeons. The principle of reconstruction of acetabular defects is to achieve initial and long-term stability between the prosthesis and the host bone. With the development of surgical techniques, prosthetic materials, and revision concepts, there is an urgent need for new acetabular bone defect evaluation systems to meet clinical needs. The uncemented porous hemispherical cup has become the main prosthesis in clinical application, and metal augments are gradually replacing the structural allograft. Modular reconstruction combined cups and augments has shown favorable clinical results, which can be used for large acetabular defects with acetabular distraction technique, such as pelvic discontinuity. The advantages and disadvantages of impaction bone grafting, jumbo cups, metal augments, acetabular reinforcement rings, custom components (including custom triflanged acetabular components), and acetabular distraction technique still need to be observed in long-term follow-up.

Objective:To evaluate the clinical effect of bispherical augment in acetabular defects reconstruction in hip revision.Methods:This is a retrospective case series study. A retrospective analysis of 119 patients (124 hips) patients who underwent hip revision surgery and reconstructed with bispherical augment for acetabular bone defects from January 2019 to December 2023 was performed. There were 57 males (58 hips) and 62 females (66 hips), aged (65.0±11.8) years (range:40 to 102 years). The body mass index was (23.9±3.5) kg/m 2 (range:16.1 to 32.2 kg/m 2). Acetabular bone defects were typed as follows: 2 hips in Paprosky type ⅡA, 29 hips in type ⅡB, 34 hips in type ⅡC, 31 hips in type ⅢA, and 28 hips in type ⅢB, of which 9 patients (9 hips) were combined with pelvic discontinuity. Differences in Harris hip score (HHS) and lower limb discrepancy (LLD) were compared between preoperatively and final follow-up. The height of the hip center of rotation and the horizontal distance from the center of rotation to the teardrop were measured by radiographs before and after surgery, and prothesis stability and the occurrence of postoperative complications were evaluated. Data were compared using the paired sample t test. Results:All patients successfully completed the operation. The operation time was (167.0±53.4) minutes (range:90 to 380 minutes) and the intraoperative bleeding was (345.3±124.2) ml (range:100 to 1 200 ml). The height of the hip center of rotation decreased from (39.7±13.0) mm preoperatively to (21.8±7.1) mm postoperatively and the horizontal distance from the center of rotation to the teardrop increased from (34.0±10.1) mm preoperatively to (38.5±5.9) mm postoperatively, and the differences were statistically significant ( t=15.859, P<0.01; t=5.266, P<0.01). All the patients were followed up for (26.1±15.4) months (range:6 to 60 months). At the last follow-up, HHS improved from (35.2±10.0) points preoperatively to (85.5±9.5) points, and the difference was statistically significant ( t=50.723, P<0.01). LLD decreased from (2.1±1.1) cm preoperatively to (0.5±0.5) cm, and the difference was statistically significant ( t=13.767, P<0.01). All acetabular components were stable and free of displacement on imaging during follow-up. Three patients suffered dislocation and received closed reduction, all prosthesis were in good position during follow-up. No dislocation, loosening, fracture, recurrence of infection and vascular nerve injury occurred in other patients. Conclusion:Bispherical augment can effectively reconstruct acetabular bone defects, restore the hip center of rotation, and improve hip joint function scores at short and mid-term follow-up.

The direct anterior approach is an ideal minimally invasive surgical procedure, which exposes the hip joint through an intermuscular and internervous interval. Compared with other approaches, the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty has several advantages, including less postoperative pain, faster functional recovery and higher patient satisfaction. However, the direct anterior approach could be associated with longer learning curve and higher rate of perioperative complications. We converted the operative position from the classic supine to the lateral decubitus position, aiming to inherit the advantages of the direct anterior approach and to overcome the difficulty of exposing the femoral side in the supine position. The degree of extension, external rotation and adduction of the hip joint was significantly increased in the lateral decubitus position compared to those in the supine position, which provided safe reaming of the femoral medullary cavity and precise implantation of the femoral stem. Therefore, the surgeons do not need to change the operating habits of the acetabular side. The reason is that the exposure of acetabulum in the lateral decubitus position is the same as that in familiar posterior approach. Familiarity with the surgical anatomy and understanding the limitations of the anterior hip approach are the key factors for successful execution.

Objective To explore the effect of luteolin on the proliferation of osteosarcoma stem cells.Methods CD133 +osteosarcoma stem cells were separated from MG63 cells by flow cytometer.MTT was used to investigate the effects of luteolin(0,0.01,0.02,0.04 mg/mL)on the proliferation of osteosarcoma stem cells.Western blot was used to detect the levels of Ki67 protein and components of JAK2/STAT3 signal pathway in osteosarcoma stem cells induced.Results After sorting,the content of the CD133 +fraction was enriched up to(87.60 ±5.06)%.MTT assay showed that,compared with the control group,luteolin(0.01,0.02,0.04 mg/mL)inhibited proliferation of CD133 + osteosarcoma stem cells(P <0.05).Western blot also showed that luteolin significantly decreased the level of Ki67 compared with the control group(P<0.05).In addition,the luteolin inhibited the expression of p-JAK2 and p-STAT3 in JAK2/STAT3 signal pathway of CD133 + osteosarcoma stem cells compared with the control group ( P <0.05 ) . Conclusion Luteolin might be a suppressor of osteosarcoma stem cells.

Objective To compare the efficacy of fixed bearing(FB) and rotating bearing(RB) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for knee valgus. Methods Data of 203 cases with valgus knee deformity who had undergone TKA procedure from January 2007 to December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. 181 cases were primary joint replacement. They were divided into FB group and RB group. 168 patients (168 knees) were followed?up for more than 2 years. 83 cases (83 knees) were in FB group, and 85 cases (85knees) were in RB group. There were 57 males and 111 females, aged from 40 to 79 years, with an average age of 59.3 ± 7.2 years. Among them, 153 cases were osteoarthritis and 15 cases were rheumatoid arthritis. Activities of the knee , tibio?femoral angle on X?ray, Hospital for Special Surgery (Hospital for Special Surgery, HSS) knee score and the SF?36 scale scores were recorded before surgery and at the final follow?up. Results All patients were followed up for 24 to 84 months (average, 37.4 months). The average knee activities of the fixed bearing and rotating mobile bearing were from 72.8°±13.1°and 71.2°±12.8° be?fore surgery to 106.5°±9.8°and 115.4°±7.9° at final follow?up. The average tibiofemoral angle on X?ray decreased from 16.8°±5.3° and 15.2° ± 4.7° preoperatively to 5.6° ± 2.3 and 5.2° ± 2.1° at the final follow?up. The HSS knee score improved from 47.5 ± 7.1 points and 49.6±8.9 points to 89.1±4.6 points and 90.2±5.3 points at final follow?up. The SF?36 scale scores improved from 52.3± 15.4 points and 50.1±17.9 points to 81.6±12.3 points and 82.2±14.5 points at the final follow?up. At the latest follow?up, except the Range of motion, there were no statistically significant in any other indicator between two groups. Two cases appeared postoper?ative deep venous thrombosis symptoms. One case had joint stiffness early, and the symptoms improved after strengthen functional exercise. No infections, delayed knee instability, implant loosening or subsidence was found during the follow?up. Conclusion For patients with mild to moderate knee valgus, both fixed and rotating bearing with same soft tissue balance technique can improve the knee function and correct the valgus deformity, and the recent results are satisfactory.