1.Construction of prediction model for gastric cancer mismatch repair based on preoperative inflammatory indicators and clinicopathological features in gastric cancer patients
Xiuzhen WEI ; Yaling DONG ; Zhibo ZHU ; Zhengjie ZHANG ; Yuanjun TAN ; Jie BAI ; Xiayi SU ; Baihong ZHANG
Journal of Jilin University(Medicine Edition) 2025;51(1):172-181
Objective:To discuss the associations of mismatch repair(MMR)in gastric cancer with preoperative inflammatory indicators and clinicopathological features in the gastric cancer patients,and to construct a gastric cancer MMR predictive model based on preoperative inflammatory indicators and clinicopathological features of the gastric cancer patients,and to provide new ideas for evaluation of MMR status in gastric cancer.Methods:The data of 254 gastric cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment from September 2020 to October 2023 were included.According to the expression of MMR protein,the patients were divided into MMR normal(proficiout MMR,pMMR)group and MMR deficient(dMMR)group.The preoperative inflammatory indicators and clinicopathological features data of the gastric cancer patients in two groups were collected.The associations between inflammatory indicators,clinicopathological features,and MMR in dMMR group and pMMR group were analyzed using Chi-square test.The independent predictive factors for dMMR were selected to construct the nomogram.Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve and calibration curve were used to evaluate the predictive efficacy,and decision curve was used to evaluate the practicality of the predication model.Results:A total of 254 gastric cancer patients were included in the study,with 221 patients(87%)in pMMR group and 33 patients(13%)in dMMR group.There were statistically significant differences(P<0.05)in age,tumor location,tumor differentiation degree,maximum tumor diameter,platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio(PLR),alkaline phosphatase(AKP),alkaline phosphatase-to-albumin ratio(AAR),fibrinogen(FB)-to-lymphocyte(FLR),FB-to-albumin(AL)(FAR),D-dimer(D-D),and FB of the gastric cancer patients between dMMR group and pMMR group.Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analysis revealed maximum tumor diameter[odd ratio(OR)=2.958,95%confidence interval(CI):1.196-7.314,P=0.019],tumor location(OR=4.013,95%CI:1.596-10.089,P=0.003),tumor differentiation(OR=3.006,95%CI:1.250-7.230,P=0.014),FAR(OR=2.793,95%CI:1.179-6.616,P=0.020),and carbohydrate antigen 199(CA199)(OR=0.279,95%CI:0.084-0.929,P-0.038)were the independent predictors of dMMR.The area under the ROC curve(AUC)value of the gastric cancer MMR prediction model constructed based on inflammatory indicators and clinical pathological characteristics was 0.800 with the sensitivity of 0.851 and the specificity of 0.606.The calibration curve of the nomogram was found to fit the ideal curve well,and in Hosmer-Lemeshow test P=0.412,the clinical decision curve showed a better net benefit.Conclusion:The preoperative inflammatory indicators and clinicopathological features are associated with MMR in gastric cancer;maximum tumor diameter,tumor location,tumor differentiation,CA199,and FAR are the independent predictors of dMMR.The prediction model based on the above predictors could predict the MMR status of the dMMR gastric cancer patients.
2.The role of m6 A modification in tumor autophagy
Bai JIE ; Su XIAYI ; Wei XIUZHEN ; Dong YALING ; Zhu ZHIBO ; Zhang BAIHONG
Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology 2024;51(15):795-800
Autophagy is a cellular self-degradation process essential for maintaining metabolic functions in cells and organisms.Dysfunc-tional autophagy has been linked to various diseases,including cancer.The m6A modification,a major RNA modification in eukaryotes,plays a crucial role in regulating autophagy in tumor cells by regulating the expression of autophagy-associated genes(ATGs)or interfering with autophagy-related signaling pathways.Aberrant m6A modification can lead to dysregulated autophagy and impact tumor progression.However,the specific role of m6A in regulating tumor autophagy remains to be explored.Therefore,in this review,we discuss the role of m6A modification in tumor cell autophagy and examine its relationship with tumor progression and drug resistance,aiming to provide a the-oretical foundation for developing new therapeutic strategies.
3.Levels of phthalate internal exposure levels in pregnant women and influencing factors.
Yue YANG ; Mingming SHI ; Biqin CHEN ; Jianfeng LIN ; Songjing YANG ; Baoping ZHU ; Baoling ZHUANG ; Yuzhu JIA ; Zhenxiang HUANG ; Jing CHEN ; Huifen LIU ; Jianghui CHEN ; Yanhua SU ; Xiayi KE ; Benhua ZHAO
Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine 2015;49(11):998-1004
OBJECTIVETo investigate the levels and influencing factors of phthalate internal exposure in pregnant women (gestation age ≤ 16 weeks).
METHODSDuring April to June in 2013, 1 020 pregnant women (gestation age ≤ 16 weeks) who had established the maternal care manual were recruited in maternal and child health hospital of Siming District, Xiamen city. Participators were asked to complete a questionnaire to obtain information on socio-demographic characteristics, lifestyle behaviors, and antenatal examination and to provide a urine sample. Finally, 998 pregnant women who provided a urine sample and completed the questionnaire were enrolled. Adopting systematic sampling method, 100 ones were selected randomly among 998 pregnant women. High performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandern mass was used to determine the concentration of five phthalate monoesters in each urine, including mono-n-methyl phthalate (MMP), mono-ethyl phthalate (MEP), mono-butyl phthalate (MBP), mono-benzyl phthalate (MBzP), mono-ethylhexyl phthalate (MEHP). Based on the measurements and questionnaire data, multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the association between the phthalate monoester levels and potential influential factors.
RESULTSThe detection rates of MMP, MEP, MBP, MBzP and MEHP in 100 pregnant urine samples were 94%, 93%, 87%, 83%, 99%, respectively. And the urinary median uncorrected concentrations of MMP, MEP, MBP, MBzP and MEHP in 100 urine samples were 20.56, 17.62, 10.15, 2.03, and 5.12 ng/ml, respectively. Specific gravity-corrected concentration were 20.81, 20.36, 12.88, 2.58, 5.00 ng/ml, respectively. The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that: education degree was negatively associated with urinary concentration of MMP, MEP, MBP, MBzP and MEHP, OR (95% CI) were 0.495 (0.253-0.966), 0.380 (0.191-0.755), 0.379 (0.186-0.774), 0.401 (0.196-0.819), 0.373(0.183-0.762), respectively. Participants who had hair permed and dyed during pregnancy had higher urinary level of MBP and MBzP, OR (95% CI) were 12.867 (1.240-133.525), 15.982 (1.367-186.911), respectively; Participants who use cosmetics during pregnancy had higher urinary level of MEP and MBP, OR (95% CI) were 2.977 (1.012-8.757), 4.440 (1.485-13.272), respectively; plastic bottled water consumption was positively associated with urinary concentrations of MEP and MEHP, OR (95% CI) were 3.780 (1.417-10.083), 2.699 (1.039-7.010), respectively; annual household income was negatively associated with urinary concentration of MMP, OR (95% CI) was 0.597 (0.372-0.959); individuals who took medications during pregnancy had higher urinary level of MEHP than non-takers, OR (95% CI) was 4.853 (1.084-21.732).
CONCLUSIONPregnant women whose gestation age was less than 16 weeks are generally exposed to phthalate. Phthalate internal exposure levels are significantly associated with most measured factors and the influencing factors with different phthalates internal exposure levels are different.
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid ; Dibutyl Phthalate ; urine ; Female ; Humans ; Life Style ; Maternal Exposure ; Phthalic Acids ; urine ; Pregnancy ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail