Objective:To carry out differential study for clinical application of the domestic and imported electrode of plasma surgery by using real world data,so as to provide data support for clinical selection of electrode products in plasma surgery.Methods:An observational study was adopted,and a total of 384 patients who underwent adenoidectomy by using domestic electrode of plasma surgery(domestic electrode)or imported electrode of plasma surgery(imported electrode)at Children's Hospital,Zhejiang University School of Medicine between March and October 2024 were selected.The data of patients who received domestic or imported electrode were recorded,respectively.The indicators of safety and effectiveness,and economic indicator of surgeries adopted respectively two kinds of electrodes for patients were compared,and the differences of clinical application of the two kinds of electrodes were analyzed.Results:The average hospitalization cost of patients who adopted imported electrode was(11,300±2,500)CNY,which was higher than(7,600±1700)CNY,and the difference was statistically significant(t=-17.546,P<0.05).The surgical duration,postoperative heart rate,postoperative hypotension and hypertension of patients who adopted domestic electrode to conduct adenoidectomy were higher than those of patients who adopted imported electrode,while there were not significant differences between them(P>0.05).The incidences of damage and infection of eustachian cushion of patients who adopted domestic electrode to conduct adenoidectomy were higher than those of patients who adopted imported electrode,and the incidence of bleeding was lower than that of patients who adopted imported electrode,while the differences were not significant(P>0.05).Conclusion:Domestically plasma surgical electrode can effectively save patients'medical costs,which is safe and reliable in clinical use,and it can be mutually replaceable with the imported plasma surgical electrode..

Objective:To carry out differential study for clinical application of the domestic and imported electrode of plasma surgery by using real world data,so as to provide data support for clinical selection of electrode products in plasma surgery.Methods:An observational study was adopted,and a total of 384 patients who underwent adenoidectomy by using domestic electrode of plasma surgery(domestic electrode)or imported electrode of plasma surgery(imported electrode)at Children's Hospital,Zhejiang University School of Medicine between March and October 2024 were selected.The data of patients who received domestic or imported electrode were recorded,respectively.The indicators of safety and effectiveness,and economic indicator of surgeries adopted respectively two kinds of electrodes for patients were compared,and the differences of clinical application of the two kinds of electrodes were analyzed.Results:The average hospitalization cost of patients who adopted imported electrode was(11,300±2,500)CNY,which was higher than(7,600±1700)CNY,and the difference was statistically significant(t=-17.546,P<0.05).The surgical duration,postoperative heart rate,postoperative hypotension and hypertension of patients who adopted domestic electrode to conduct adenoidectomy were higher than those of patients who adopted imported electrode,while there were not significant differences between them(P>0.05).The incidences of damage and infection of eustachian cushion of patients who adopted domestic electrode to conduct adenoidectomy were higher than those of patients who adopted imported electrode,and the incidence of bleeding was lower than that of patients who adopted imported electrode,while the differences were not significant(P>0.05).Conclusion:Domestically plasma surgical electrode can effectively save patients'medical costs,which is safe and reliable in clinical use,and it can be mutually replaceable with the imported plasma surgical electrode..