Pancreatic portal hypertension （PPH） is a type of regional portal hypertension secondary to pancreatic diseases and their complications. Unlike portal hypertension caused by liver cirrhosis， PPH is confined to the splenic venous system， and most patients tend to have normal liver function. Splenic vein obstruction and impaired blood return are the core mechanisms underlying the development of PPH， and isolated gastric fundal varices represent a characteristic manifestation of PPH. For patients with pancreatic diseases， it is necessary to establish early warning and risk stratification strategies， and high-quality studies are needed to further confirm the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation， surgical approaches， and interventional therapies in patients with PPH. This article systematically reviews the pathogenesis， etiological classification， clinical features， and key diagnostic points of PPH and discusses the current status of PPH treatment and existing challenges.

Objective Explore the impact of payment by DRG on rehabilitation cases,evaluate the effect of DRG policy reform for rehabilitation cases and make relevant recommendations.Methods Rehabilitation cases admitted to designated medical institutions in Sichuan Province in 2020-2021 were extracted,and regression analyses were per-formed after Propensity Score Matching using the Difference in Differences method to evaluate the impact of DRG payment on the inpatient costs and the hospitalization days of rehabilitation cases,then analyze the net effect of the policy.Results After the implementation of DRG payment,the total hospitalization cost,drug cost,treatment cost,and examination cost of rehabilitation cases decreased to different degrees,and only the bed cost increased,in which the total hospitalization cost decreased by 21.8％(P＜0.05),and the cost structure of the cases changed to a certain extent compared with that before the implementation of DRG payment.In addition,the number of hospi-talization days for rehabilitation cases has not been effectively reduced under the DRG policy,but rather increased by 13.4％(P＜0.05).Conclusion DRG payment can effectively reduce the financial burden of rehabilitation cases,but it does not optimize the operational efficiency of hospitals.Whether payment by DRG is applicable to rehabilita-tion cases is open to further discussion,the health insurance department and hospitals should be in close contact to actively explore new modes of health insurance payment for rehabilitation cases.

Objective:Based on multi-subject coordination perspective,it aimed to define the stakeholders in the active health management model,analyze the functional positioning and interests of each party,and put forward relevant governance strategies,so as to provide the participating subjects with governance ideas for the subsequent exploration of the implementation path of active health.Methods:Stakeholders are identified,categorized and managed using Delphi expert consultation and Mitchell scoring method.Results:After two rounds of expert consultation,a total of 17 stakeholders were identified and categorized into three types:deterministic,anticipatory,and marginal stakeholders.In addition,taking into account the opinions from the expert interviews,the functional positioning and interests of each party were further identified,and corresponding management strategies were proposed.Conclusion:Active health management should adopt the strategy of"holistic coordination and categorization",adopting different governance strategies according to the priority of the demands of each type of stakeholder,and at the same time establishing a sound mechanism for sharing responsibilities and preventing conflicts of interest,so as to coordinate and balance the interests of all parties.

Objective Explore the impact of payment by DRG on rehabilitation cases,evaluate the effect of DRG policy reform for rehabilitation cases and make relevant recommendations.Methods Rehabilitation cases admitted to designated medical institutions in Sichuan Province in 2020-2021 were extracted,and regression analyses were per-formed after Propensity Score Matching using the Difference in Differences method to evaluate the impact of DRG payment on the inpatient costs and the hospitalization days of rehabilitation cases,then analyze the net effect of the policy.Results After the implementation of DRG payment,the total hospitalization cost,drug cost,treatment cost,and examination cost of rehabilitation cases decreased to different degrees,and only the bed cost increased,in which the total hospitalization cost decreased by 21.8％(P＜0.05),and the cost structure of the cases changed to a certain extent compared with that before the implementation of DRG payment.In addition,the number of hospi-talization days for rehabilitation cases has not been effectively reduced under the DRG policy,but rather increased by 13.4％(P＜0.05).Conclusion DRG payment can effectively reduce the financial burden of rehabilitation cases,but it does not optimize the operational efficiency of hospitals.Whether payment by DRG is applicable to rehabilita-tion cases is open to further discussion,the health insurance department and hospitals should be in close contact to actively explore new modes of health insurance payment for rehabilitation cases.

Objective:Based on multi-subject coordination perspective,it aimed to define the stakeholders in the active health management model,analyze the functional positioning and interests of each party,and put forward relevant governance strategies,so as to provide the participating subjects with governance ideas for the subsequent exploration of the implementation path of active health.Methods:Stakeholders are identified,categorized and managed using Delphi expert consultation and Mitchell scoring method.Results:After two rounds of expert consultation,a total of 17 stakeholders were identified and categorized into three types:deterministic,anticipatory,and marginal stakeholders.In addition,taking into account the opinions from the expert interviews,the functional positioning and interests of each party were further identified,and corresponding management strategies were proposed.Conclusion:Active health management should adopt the strategy of"holistic coordination and categorization",adopting different governance strategies according to the priority of the demands of each type of stakeholder,and at the same time establishing a sound mechanism for sharing responsibilities and preventing conflicts of interest,so as to coordinate and balance the interests of all parties.

Objective:Based on multi-subject coordination perspective,it aimed to define the stakeholders in the active health management model,analyze the functional positioning and interests of each party,and put forward relevant governance strategies,so as to provide the participating subjects with governance ideas for the subsequent exploration of the implementation path of active health.Methods:Stakeholders are identified,categorized and managed using Delphi expert consultation and Mitchell scoring method.Results:After two rounds of expert consultation,a total of 17 stakeholders were identified and categorized into three types:deterministic,anticipatory,and marginal stakeholders.In addition,taking into account the opinions from the expert interviews,the functional positioning and interests of each party were further identified,and corresponding management strategies were proposed.Conclusion:Active health management should adopt the strategy of"holistic coordination and categorization",adopting different governance strategies according to the priority of the demands of each type of stakeholder,and at the same time establishing a sound mechanism for sharing responsibilities and preventing conflicts of interest,so as to coordinate and balance the interests of all parties.

Objective Explore the impact of payment by DRG on rehabilitation cases,evaluate the effect of DRG policy reform for rehabilitation cases and make relevant recommendations.Methods Rehabilitation cases admitted to designated medical institutions in Sichuan Province in 2020-2021 were extracted,and regression analyses were per-formed after Propensity Score Matching using the Difference in Differences method to evaluate the impact of DRG payment on the inpatient costs and the hospitalization days of rehabilitation cases,then analyze the net effect of the policy.Results After the implementation of DRG payment,the total hospitalization cost,drug cost,treatment cost,and examination cost of rehabilitation cases decreased to different degrees,and only the bed cost increased,in which the total hospitalization cost decreased by 21.8％(P＜0.05),and the cost structure of the cases changed to a certain extent compared with that before the implementation of DRG payment.In addition,the number of hospi-talization days for rehabilitation cases has not been effectively reduced under the DRG policy,but rather increased by 13.4％(P＜0.05).Conclusion DRG payment can effectively reduce the financial burden of rehabilitation cases,but it does not optimize the operational efficiency of hospitals.Whether payment by DRG is applicable to rehabilita-tion cases is open to further discussion,the health insurance department and hospitals should be in close contact to actively explore new modes of health insurance payment for rehabilitation cases.

Objective:Based on multi-subject coordination perspective,it aimed to define the stakeholders in the active health management model,analyze the functional positioning and interests of each party,and put forward relevant governance strategies,so as to provide the participating subjects with governance ideas for the subsequent exploration of the implementation path of active health.Methods:Stakeholders are identified,categorized and managed using Delphi expert consultation and Mitchell scoring method.Results:After two rounds of expert consultation,a total of 17 stakeholders were identified and categorized into three types:deterministic,anticipatory,and marginal stakeholders.In addition,taking into account the opinions from the expert interviews,the functional positioning and interests of each party were further identified,and corresponding management strategies were proposed.Conclusion:Active health management should adopt the strategy of"holistic coordination and categorization",adopting different governance strategies according to the priority of the demands of each type of stakeholder,and at the same time establishing a sound mechanism for sharing responsibilities and preventing conflicts of interest,so as to coordinate and balance the interests of all parties.

Objective Explore the impact of payment by DRG on rehabilitation cases,evaluate the effect of DRG policy reform for rehabilitation cases and make relevant recommendations.Methods Rehabilitation cases admitted to designated medical institutions in Sichuan Province in 2020-2021 were extracted,and regression analyses were per-formed after Propensity Score Matching using the Difference in Differences method to evaluate the impact of DRG payment on the inpatient costs and the hospitalization days of rehabilitation cases,then analyze the net effect of the policy.Results After the implementation of DRG payment,the total hospitalization cost,drug cost,treatment cost,and examination cost of rehabilitation cases decreased to different degrees,and only the bed cost increased,in which the total hospitalization cost decreased by 21.8％(P＜0.05),and the cost structure of the cases changed to a certain extent compared with that before the implementation of DRG payment.In addition,the number of hospi-talization days for rehabilitation cases has not been effectively reduced under the DRG policy,but rather increased by 13.4％(P＜0.05).Conclusion DRG payment can effectively reduce the financial burden of rehabilitation cases,but it does not optimize the operational efficiency of hospitals.Whether payment by DRG is applicable to rehabilita-tion cases is open to further discussion,the health insurance department and hospitals should be in close contact to actively explore new modes of health insurance payment for rehabilitation cases.

Objective:Based on multi-subject coordination perspective,it aimed to define the stakeholders in the active health management model,analyze the functional positioning and interests of each party,and put forward relevant governance strategies,so as to provide the participating subjects with governance ideas for the subsequent exploration of the implementation path of active health.Methods:Stakeholders are identified,categorized and managed using Delphi expert consultation and Mitchell scoring method.Results:After two rounds of expert consultation,a total of 17 stakeholders were identified and categorized into three types:deterministic,anticipatory,and marginal stakeholders.In addition,taking into account the opinions from the expert interviews,the functional positioning and interests of each party were further identified,and corresponding management strategies were proposed.Conclusion:Active health management should adopt the strategy of"holistic coordination and categorization",adopting different governance strategies according to the priority of the demands of each type of stakeholder,and at the same time establishing a sound mechanism for sharing responsibilities and preventing conflicts of interest,so as to coordinate and balance the interests of all parties.