Objective To investigate the value of multimodal model integrating digital mammography(MG)and MRI radiomics features for preoperative prediction of lymphovascular invasion(LVI)status in breast cancer.Methods The clinical and imaging data from 336 patients with pathologically confirmed invasive breast cancer were retrospectively analyzed and randomly divided into a training group(235 cases)and a test group(101 cases)according to the ratio of 7∶3.Feature dimensionality reduction was carried out by Pearson correlation analysis followed by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator(LASSO)regression.Radiomics models were constructed based on MG craniocaudal(CC),dynamic contrast enhancement(DCE),T2 WI,and integrated MRI sequences;a multimodal model was further developed by incorporating clinical high-risk factors.The predictive efficiency of each model was evaluated by plotting receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve.Results The ROC curve analysis showed that the multimodal model performed the best predictive efficiency,with area under the curve(AUC)of 0.989 and 0.861,accuracy of 0.949 and 0.782,sensitivity of 0.923 and 0.828,and specificity of 0.962 and 0.764 in the training group and test group respectively.Conclusion The multimodal model,integrating MG and MRI radiomics features,show optimal performance and can be served as a preoperative prediction of LVI status in breast cancer.

Objective: Accurate evaluation of inflammation severity in ulcerative colitis (UC) can guide treatment strategy selection. The potential value of the pericolic fat attenuation index (FAI) on CT as an indicator of disease severity remains unknown.This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of pericolic FAI in predicting UC severity. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 148 patients (mean age 48 years; 87 males). The fat attenuation on CT was measured in four different locations: the mesocolic vascular side (MS) and opposite side of MS (OMS) around the most severe bowel lesion, the retroperitoneal space (RS), and the subcutaneous area. The fat attenuation indices (FAI MS, FAI OMS, and FAI RS) were calculated as the fat attenuation measured in MS, OMS, and RS, respectively, minus that of the subcutaneous area, and were obtained in the non-enhanced, arterial, and delayed phases. Correlations between the FAI and UC Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) were assessed using Spearman’s correlation. Predictors of severe UC (UCEIS ≥7) were selected by univariable analysis. The performance of FAI in predicting severe UC was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: The FAIMS and FAI OMS scores were significantly higher than FAI RS in three phases (all P < 0.001). The FAIMS and FAI OMS scores moderately correlated with the UCEIS score (r = 0.474–0.649 among the three phases). Additionally, FAI MS and FAI OMS identified severe UC, with AUC varying from 0.77 to 0.85. Conclusion Increased CT attenuation of pericolic adipose tissue could serve as a noninvasive marker for evaluating UC severity. FAI MS and FAI OMS of three phases showed similar prediction accuracies for severe UC identification.

Objective:To explore the predictive value of models based on clinical parameters, deep learning radiomics (DLR) from CT images, and traditional handcrafted radiomics (HCR) in assessing pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant radiotherapy combined with medical therapy in patients with esophageal cancer.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted on 130 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant radiotherapy combined with medical therapy followed by surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China from August 1, 2018, to August 31, 2024. Patients were randomly divided into a training set ( n=91) and a validation set ( n=39) at a ratio of 7:3. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify clinical independent risk factors associated with pCR. DLR and HCR features were extracted from the tumor and the 5 mm peritumoral region on planning CT images. Features for modeling were selected using t-test, Mann-Whitney U test or Fisher exact probability method, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to calculate the radiomics score (Rad-score). A nomogram was then constructed by integrating the clinical risk factors. The predictive performance of each model was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and decision curve analysis (DCA) to assess clinical benefits. Results:Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified body weight ( OR=1.101, 95% CI: 1.029-1.177, P=0.005) and lymph node positivity ( OR=0.100, 95% CI: 0.014-0.727, P=0.023) as independent predictors of pCR. The peritumoral DLR-HCR model showed superior predictive performance, with AUCs of 0.870 (95% CI: 0.799-0.942) in the training set and 0.866 (95% CI: 0.750-0.982) in the validation set. The combined model incorporating clinical parameters achieved the best performance, with AUCs of 0.903 (95% CI: 0.845-0.962) and 0.888 (95% CI: 0.782-0.994) in the training and validation sets, respectively. Conclusions:The combined model integrating peritumoral DLR-HCR features with clinical parameters provides excellent predictive value for pCR after neoadjuvant radiotherapy combined with medical therapy in esophageal cancer and offers valuable guidance for personalized treatment strategies.

Objective:To explore the predictive value of models based on clinical parameters, deep learning radiomics (DLR) from CT images, and traditional handcrafted radiomics (HCR) in assessing pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant radiotherapy combined with medical therapy in patients with esophageal cancer.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted on 130 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant radiotherapy combined with medical therapy followed by surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China from August 1, 2018, to August 31, 2024. Patients were randomly divided into a training set ( n=91) and a validation set ( n=39) at a ratio of 7:3. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify clinical independent risk factors associated with pCR. DLR and HCR features were extracted from the tumor and the 5 mm peritumoral region on planning CT images. Features for modeling were selected using t-test, Mann-Whitney U test or Fisher exact probability method, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to calculate the radiomics score (Rad-score). A nomogram was then constructed by integrating the clinical risk factors. The predictive performance of each model was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and decision curve analysis (DCA) to assess clinical benefits. Results:Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified body weight ( OR=1.101, 95% CI: 1.029-1.177, P=0.005) and lymph node positivity ( OR=0.100, 95% CI: 0.014-0.727, P=0.023) as independent predictors of pCR. The peritumoral DLR-HCR model showed superior predictive performance, with AUCs of 0.870 (95% CI: 0.799-0.942) in the training set and 0.866 (95% CI: 0.750-0.982) in the validation set. The combined model incorporating clinical parameters achieved the best performance, with AUCs of 0.903 (95% CI: 0.845-0.962) and 0.888 (95% CI: 0.782-0.994) in the training and validation sets, respectively. Conclusions:The combined model integrating peritumoral DLR-HCR features with clinical parameters provides excellent predictive value for pCR after neoadjuvant radiotherapy combined with medical therapy in esophageal cancer and offers valuable guidance for personalized treatment strategies.

Objective: Accurate evaluation of inflammation severity in ulcerative colitis (UC) can guide treatment strategy selection. The potential value of the pericolic fat attenuation index (FAI) on CT as an indicator of disease severity remains unknown.This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of pericolic FAI in predicting UC severity. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 148 patients (mean age 48 years; 87 males). The fat attenuation on CT was measured in four different locations: the mesocolic vascular side (MS) and opposite side of MS (OMS) around the most severe bowel lesion, the retroperitoneal space (RS), and the subcutaneous area. The fat attenuation indices (FAI MS, FAI OMS, and FAI RS) were calculated as the fat attenuation measured in MS, OMS, and RS, respectively, minus that of the subcutaneous area, and were obtained in the non-enhanced, arterial, and delayed phases. Correlations between the FAI and UC Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) were assessed using Spearman’s correlation. Predictors of severe UC (UCEIS ≥7) were selected by univariable analysis. The performance of FAI in predicting severe UC was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: The FAIMS and FAI OMS scores were significantly higher than FAI RS in three phases (all P < 0.001). The FAIMS and FAI OMS scores moderately correlated with the UCEIS score (r = 0.474–0.649 among the three phases). Additionally, FAI MS and FAI OMS identified severe UC, with AUC varying from 0.77 to 0.85. Conclusion Increased CT attenuation of pericolic adipose tissue could serve as a noninvasive marker for evaluating UC severity. FAI MS and FAI OMS of three phases showed similar prediction accuracies for severe UC identification.

Objective: Accurate evaluation of inflammation severity in ulcerative colitis (UC) can guide treatment strategy selection. The potential value of the pericolic fat attenuation index (FAI) on CT as an indicator of disease severity remains unknown.This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of pericolic FAI in predicting UC severity. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 148 patients (mean age 48 years; 87 males). The fat attenuation on CT was measured in four different locations: the mesocolic vascular side (MS) and opposite side of MS (OMS) around the most severe bowel lesion, the retroperitoneal space (RS), and the subcutaneous area. The fat attenuation indices (FAI MS, FAI OMS, and FAI RS) were calculated as the fat attenuation measured in MS, OMS, and RS, respectively, minus that of the subcutaneous area, and were obtained in the non-enhanced, arterial, and delayed phases. Correlations between the FAI and UC Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) were assessed using Spearman’s correlation. Predictors of severe UC (UCEIS ≥7) were selected by univariable analysis. The performance of FAI in predicting severe UC was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: The FAIMS and FAI OMS scores were significantly higher than FAI RS in three phases (all P < 0.001). The FAIMS and FAI OMS scores moderately correlated with the UCEIS score (r = 0.474–0.649 among the three phases). Additionally, FAI MS and FAI OMS identified severe UC, with AUC varying from 0.77 to 0.85. Conclusion Increased CT attenuation of pericolic adipose tissue could serve as a noninvasive marker for evaluating UC severity. FAI MS and FAI OMS of three phases showed similar prediction accuracies for severe UC identification.

Objective: Accurate evaluation of inflammation severity in ulcerative colitis (UC) can guide treatment strategy selection. The potential value of the pericolic fat attenuation index (FAI) on CT as an indicator of disease severity remains unknown.This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of pericolic FAI in predicting UC severity. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 148 patients (mean age 48 years; 87 males). The fat attenuation on CT was measured in four different locations: the mesocolic vascular side (MS) and opposite side of MS (OMS) around the most severe bowel lesion, the retroperitoneal space (RS), and the subcutaneous area. The fat attenuation indices (FAI MS, FAI OMS, and FAI RS) were calculated as the fat attenuation measured in MS, OMS, and RS, respectively, minus that of the subcutaneous area, and were obtained in the non-enhanced, arterial, and delayed phases. Correlations between the FAI and UC Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) were assessed using Spearman’s correlation. Predictors of severe UC (UCEIS ≥7) were selected by univariable analysis. The performance of FAI in predicting severe UC was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: The FAIMS and FAI OMS scores were significantly higher than FAI RS in three phases (all P < 0.001). The FAIMS and FAI OMS scores moderately correlated with the UCEIS score (r = 0.474–0.649 among the three phases). Additionally, FAI MS and FAI OMS identified severe UC, with AUC varying from 0.77 to 0.85. Conclusion Increased CT attenuation of pericolic adipose tissue could serve as a noninvasive marker for evaluating UC severity. FAI MS and FAI OMS of three phases showed similar prediction accuracies for severe UC identification.

Objective: Accurate evaluation of inflammation severity in ulcerative colitis (UC) can guide treatment strategy selection. The potential value of the pericolic fat attenuation index (FAI) on CT as an indicator of disease severity remains unknown.This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of pericolic FAI in predicting UC severity. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 148 patients (mean age 48 years; 87 males). The fat attenuation on CT was measured in four different locations: the mesocolic vascular side (MS) and opposite side of MS (OMS) around the most severe bowel lesion, the retroperitoneal space (RS), and the subcutaneous area. The fat attenuation indices (FAI MS, FAI OMS, and FAI RS) were calculated as the fat attenuation measured in MS, OMS, and RS, respectively, minus that of the subcutaneous area, and were obtained in the non-enhanced, arterial, and delayed phases. Correlations between the FAI and UC Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) were assessed using Spearman’s correlation. Predictors of severe UC (UCEIS ≥7) were selected by univariable analysis. The performance of FAI in predicting severe UC was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: The FAIMS and FAI OMS scores were significantly higher than FAI RS in three phases (all P < 0.001). The FAIMS and FAI OMS scores moderately correlated with the UCEIS score (r = 0.474–0.649 among the three phases). Additionally, FAI MS and FAI OMS identified severe UC, with AUC varying from 0.77 to 0.85. Conclusion Increased CT attenuation of pericolic adipose tissue could serve as a noninvasive marker for evaluating UC severity. FAI MS and FAI OMS of three phases showed similar prediction accuracies for severe UC identification.

Objective To investigate the value of multimodal model integrating digital mammography(MG)and MRI radiomics features for preoperative prediction of lymphovascular invasion(LVI)status in breast cancer.Methods The clinical and imaging data from 336 patients with pathologically confirmed invasive breast cancer were retrospectively analyzed and randomly divided into a training group(235 cases)and a test group(101 cases)according to the ratio of 7∶3.Feature dimensionality reduction was carried out by Pearson correlation analysis followed by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator(LASSO)regression.Radiomics models were constructed based on MG craniocaudal(CC),dynamic contrast enhancement(DCE),T2 WI,and integrated MRI sequences;a multimodal model was further developed by incorporating clinical high-risk factors.The predictive efficiency of each model was evaluated by plotting receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve.Results The ROC curve analysis showed that the multimodal model performed the best predictive efficiency,with area under the curve(AUC)of 0.989 and 0.861,accuracy of 0.949 and 0.782,sensitivity of 0.923 and 0.828,and specificity of 0.962 and 0.764 in the training group and test group respectively.Conclusion The multimodal model,integrating MG and MRI radiomics features,show optimal performance and can be served as a preoperative prediction of LVI status in breast cancer.

Objective:To compare the awakening effects of enriched environmental quantitative stimulation and conventional rehabilitation on patients with consciousness disorder after traumatic brain injury (TBI).Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 60 patients with consciousness disorder after TBI admitted to Hospital of Zhejiang Provincial Armed Police Corps from October 2021 to October 2022, including 38 males and 22 females, aged 26-72 years [(41.6±13.2)years]. The injury was located at the frontal and temporal lobe in 37 patients, at the brain stem in 9, and at the thalamus in 14. The types of injury included cerebral contusion and laceration in 36 patients and intracerebral hematomas in 24 patients. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score on admission was 5-8 points in 11 patients, 9-12 in 34, and 13-15 in 15. Disease course was (19.2±5.4)days. A total of 30 patients received conventional rehabilitation treatment (conventional rehabilitation group) and 30 patients received enriched environmental quantitative stimulation on the basis of conventional rehabilitation treatment, which lasted 4 cycles in 28 days (quantitative stimulation group). The Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) score, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) score, and brainwave α/δ ratio (ADR) before treatment and at the second and fourth treatment cycles were compared between the two groups. The incidence of complications at the end of the fourth treatment cycle and the rate of favorable outcome of Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at the last follow-up were compared between the two groups.Results:All the patients were followed up for 6-12 months [(8.3±2.5)months]. There were no significant differences in CRS-R score, ADL score, or brainwave ADR between the two groups before treatment ( P>0.05). At the second treatment cycle, they were (13.03±0.73)points, (14.83±0.95)points and 0.35±0.11 respectively in the quantitative stimulation group, which were all higher than those in the conventional rehabilitation group [(11.18±0.14)points, (8.74±0.43)points and 0.29±0.09 respectively] ( P<0.05). At the fourth treatment cycle, they were (17.83±0.23)points, (52.93±10.75)points and 0.44±0.11 respectively in the quantitative stimulation group, which were all higher than those in the conventional rehabilitation group [(13.67±0.35)points, (40.56±7.15)points and 0.37±0.07 respectively] ( P<0.05). The CRS-R score, ADL score, and brainwave ADR at the second treatment cycle were significantly higher than those before treatment, and they were even higher at the fourth treatment cycle than those at the second treatment cycle ( P<0.05). At the end of the fourth treatment cycle, the incidence of complications in the quantitative stimulation group was 13.3% (4/30), which was lower than that of the conventional rehabilitation group [36.7% (11/30)] ( P<0.05). At the last follow-up, the favorable outcome rate of GOS was 80.0% (24/30) in the quantitative stimulation group, which was superior to 66.7% (20/30) in the conventional rehabilitation group ( P<0.05). Conclusion:Compared with the conventional rehabilitation treatment, enriched environmental quantitative stimulation for patients with consciousness disorder after TBI achieves enhanced consciousness level, activity of daily life and electroencephal reactivity, together with decreased incidence of complications and improved prognosis.