Cerebral autosomal-dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is a non-atherosclerotic, non-amyloidogenic inherited cerebral small vessel disease caused by mutations in the NOTCH3 gene, typically manifesting in middle age. The diagnosis can be confirmed through the detection of granular osmiophilic material in skin biopsies and NOTCH3 gene mutations identified by genetic testing. However, the pathogenesis of this disease remains unclear, and treatment options are limited. A major contributing factor is that currently available preclinical animal models fail to adequately recapitulate the characteristic pathological features and clinical phenotypes of the disease. Therefore, a comprehensive review of recent advances in CADASIL animal models was conducted, and the advantages and limitations of existing models were systematically analyzed, aiming to offer guidance for selecting appropriate animal models in fundamental research and to propose future directions for developing experimental models.

Cerebral autosomal-dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is a non-atherosclerotic, non-amyloidogenic inherited cerebral small vessel disease caused by mutations in the NOTCH3 gene, typically manifesting in middle age. The diagnosis can be confirmed through the detection of granular osmiophilic material in skin biopsies and NOTCH3 gene mutations identified by genetic testing. However, the pathogenesis of this disease remains unclear, and treatment options are limited. A major contributing factor is that currently available preclinical animal models fail to adequately recapitulate the characteristic pathological features and clinical phenotypes of the disease. Therefore, a comprehensive review of recent advances in CADASIL animal models was conducted, and the advantages and limitations of existing models were systematically analyzed, aiming to offer guidance for selecting appropriate animal models in fundamental research and to propose future directions for developing experimental models.

Objective:To explore the construction and application of the evaluation system for ideological and political education in clinical medicine courses based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) models.Methods:The evaluation system for ideological and political education in clinical medicine courses was constructed based on AHP and FCE models in the Yaahp software. Ideological and political education checklist teaching that places equal emphasis on medical ethics and skill was implemented in internal medicine course taken by 185 students in The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University. At the end of the course, the evaluation system was used to obtain quantitative comprehensive evaluation results.Results:Based on AHP and FCE models, the evaluation system for ideological and political education in clinical medicine courses was established. The goal was education of students with both medical ethics and skill, the criteria included teachers' ethics, curriculum design, students' experience and development assessment, and thirteen alternatives were used in the system. The implementation effect of ideological and political education in internal medicine course of the first semester in the 2020-2021 academic year was evaluated by the evaluation system. The quantitative comprehensive evaluation score was 4.080 (range 1-5), which showed that the ideological and political education checklist teaching with equal emphasis on medical ethics and skill achieved good educating effect.Conclusion:The evaluation system for the implementation effect of ideological and political education in clinical medicine courses can be constructed based on the AHP and FCE models. The evaluation system is scientific, quantitative, comprehensive, and improvable.