Objective:To search and evaluate the literatures on the application of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation technique (MI-E) in patients with invasive mechanical ventilation in China and abroad, and to summarize the best evidence to provide evidence-based basis for clinical practice.Methods:The literatures related to the use of MI-E technique in invasive mechanical ventilation patients were searched from the establishment of the database to April 1, 2022 in BMJ Best Practice, UpToDate Clinical Advisor, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), Guidelines International Network (GIN), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario (RNAO), medlive, Cochrane Library, Joana Briggs Instiute, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and Website of American Association for Respiratory Care, including guideline, expert consensus, clinical decision, evidence summary, systematic review and randomized controlled trial. The JBI Center for Evidence-Based Health Care Expert Consensus Evaluation Criteria (2016) was used to evaluate the quality of the included systematic reviews; the JBI Center for Evidence-Based Health Care Evaluation Criteria for Randomized Controlled Trials was used to evaluate the quality of the included randomized controlled trial. Two researchers independently evaluated the quality of literature, and extracted and summarized the evidence based on professional judgment.Results:A total of 7 literatures were enrolled, including 3 systematic reviews and 4 randomized controlled trials. After quality evaluation, 7 articles were all enrolled. Thirteen best evidences were formed from four aspects of indications, contraindications, parameter settings, and attention.Conclusions:The study summarizes the best evidence for the application of MI-E technique in invasive mechanical ventilation patients. It is recommended that medical staff undergo professional training, combined with their professional judgment as well as the patient's clinical specific conditions and willingness, and accurately apply MI-E technology to invasive mechanical ventilation patients.

Objective:To explore the influencing factors of the secondary sex ratio (SSR) of singleton babies born following assisted reproductive technology.Methods:A total of 7020 single babies delivered by assisted reproductive technology at the Reproductive Medicine Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC (Anhui Provincial Hospital) from January 2000 to December 2018 were collected in a retrospective cohort study. The effect of influencing factors, such as maternal age, fertilization method, embryo transfer type and embryo transfer period on the sex of singleton babies were analyzed.Results:Among 7020 babies, 3730 were boys and 3290 were girls. The total SSR was 113∶100. The SSR of in vitro fertilization (IVF) was significantly higher than that of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) fertilization (121∶100 vs. 95∶100, P<0.001), while other factors had no significant effect on the SSR of infants born. In the stratified analysis, there was no difference in SSR between IVF and ICSI in the blastocyst embryo transfer group with mother's age 35 years or older ( P<0.05), while the SSR of IVF in the other groups was higher than that of ICSI (<35 years old group: P<0.001; fresh embryo group: P=0.001; frozen-thawed embryo group: P=0.003; cleavage embryo transfer group: P<0.001). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that the fertilization method in singleton pregnancy had a statistically significant effect on baby SSR ( OR=0.792, 95% CI=0.712-0.881, P<0.001). After removing confounding factors, logistic regression analysis showed that the fertilization method in singleton pregnancy had a statistically significant effect on neonatal SSR (a OR=0.793, 95% CI=0.713-0.883, P<0.001). Conclusion:The fertilization method of assisted reproductive technology can affect the SSR of singleton newborns. The SSR of IVF is significantly higher than that of ICSI and the difference was significant.

Objective:To explore the influencing factors of the secondary sex ratio (SSR) of singleton babies born following assisted reproductive technology.Methods:A total of 7020 single babies delivered by assisted reproductive technology at the Reproductive Medicine Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC (Anhui Provincial Hospital) from January 2000 to December 2018 were collected in a retrospective cohort study. The effect of influencing factors, such as maternal age, fertilization method, embryo transfer type and embryo transfer period on the sex of singleton babies were analyzed.Results:Among 7020 babies, 3730 were boys and 3290 were girls. The total SSR was 113∶100. The SSR of in vitro fertilization (IVF) was significantly higher than that of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) fertilization (121∶100 vs. 95∶100, P<0.001), while other factors had no significant effect on the SSR of infants born. In the stratified analysis, there was no difference in SSR between IVF and ICSI in the blastocyst embryo transfer group with mother's age 35 years or older ( P<0.05), while the SSR of IVF in the other groups was higher than that of ICSI (<35 years old group: P<0.001; fresh embryo group: P=0.001; frozen-thawed embryo group: P=0.003; cleavage embryo transfer group: P<0.001). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that the fertilization method in singleton pregnancy had a statistically significant effect on baby SSR ( OR=0.792, 95% CI=0.712-0.881, P<0.001). After removing confounding factors, logistic regression analysis showed that the fertilization method in singleton pregnancy had a statistically significant effect on neonatal SSR (a OR=0.793, 95% CI=0.713-0.883, P<0.001). Conclusion:The fertilization method of assisted reproductive technology can affect the SSR of singleton newborns. The SSR of IVF is significantly higher than that of ICSI and the difference was significant.