Rectal cancer, which accounts for approximately 40% of colorectal cancers, remains a major clinical concern. Recent advances in diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment have steadily improved rectal cancer outcomes. Considering this, the Korean Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary (KRCM) Committee has aimed to provide clinicians and policymakers with up-to-date, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to support optimal decision-making, reflecting current evidence, the Korean healthcare context, and patient values and preferences. The Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rectal Cancer version 2.0 were developed through multidisciplinary collaboration with related academic societies, building upon and updating the KRCM Clinical Practice Guidelines version 1.0 (titled “Multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of rectal cancer”). These consensus guidelines of the KRCM were established based on a comprehensive literature review, evidence synthesis, with recommendation development guided by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology, and consideration of applicability in real-world clinical practice under the national health insurance system. Each recommendation has been presented with its strength and level of evidence.

Purpose: Declines in masticatory function have been reported to be closely associated with cognitive impairment and reduced brain activity in older adults. This study aimed to investigate the effects of intraoral vibratory stimulation on masticatory function, cognitive performance, and brain activity in elderly individuals and to evaluate its potential efficacy. Materials and Methods: Participants were divided into a vibration-stimulation group (n=9) and a non-vibration control group (n=7). Baseline assessments were conducted at the first visit. Participants then received either vibratory stimulation or a wash-out (control) condition for two weeks, followed by the same assessments at the final visit. Evaluation measures were dental assessments (maximum bite force, masticatory performance, and salivary flow rate), cognitive tests (CANTAB, paper-based and computerized tests), quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during a short-term memory task. Results: No significant long-term effects or statistically meaningful differences were observed between the two groups in cognitive performance or brain activity. Similarly, no pre- to post-intervention differences were found between groups in dental measures related to masticatory function (maximum bite force, masticatory performance, and salivary flow rate). Due to the limited sample size, this study functioned as a pilot study focusing on descriptive rather than inferential statistical analysis. Conclusion Intraoral vibratory stimulation did not demonstrate immediate or clear effects on cognitive function or brain activity in older adults, suggesting the need for optimization of stimulation parameters such as location and intensity. Future studies with larger sample sizes and improved stimulation methods replicating masticatory function are warranted to further explore the potential cognitive benefits.

Background: Spinal cord stimulators (SCSs) are used to reduce pain and improve quality of life in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). However, many patients opt for device removal after SCS implantation due to diminished effect or complications. There is limited research on the actual duration of SCS use in CRPS patients, and no nationwide population-based studies exist. This study aimed to estimate the real-world duration of SCS use in CRPS patients and examine the influencing factors on the duration of SCS use by analyzing the National Healthcare Insurance Database. Methods: Adult patients (age ≥ 18) with CRPS who underwent permanent SCS implantation between 2014 and2021 were included. The authors analyzed the median duration of SCS implantation and evaluated the impacts of age, sex, hospital type, and insurance type. Results: Of 408 potential patients, 373 patients were included. The median duration of SCS use was 4.4 (95%confidence interval [CI]: 4.0–4.8) years. Male patients retained SCSs longer than female patients (4.7 vs. 4.0 years, P = 0.014), and veterans’ healthcare beneficiaries showed the longest duration of SCS use (median 6.9 [95% CI: 4.6–7.8] years). Age and hospital type did not affect the duration of SCS use (P = 0.381 and P = 0.122, respectively). Conclusions The median SCS use duration in CRPS patients was 4.4 years. Considering the high cost and invasiveness of SCS, patients should be informed about the expected duration of SCS use, alongside potential risks and benefits.

Background: Spinal cord stimulators (SCSs) are used to reduce pain and improve quality of life in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). However, many patients opt for device removal after SCS implantation due to diminished effect or complications. There is limited research on the actual duration of SCS use in CRPS patients, and no nationwide population-based studies exist. This study aimed to estimate the real-world duration of SCS use in CRPS patients and examine the influencing factors on the duration of SCS use by analyzing the National Healthcare Insurance Database. Methods: Adult patients (age ≥ 18) with CRPS who underwent permanent SCS implantation between 2014 and2021 were included. The authors analyzed the median duration of SCS implantation and evaluated the impacts of age, sex, hospital type, and insurance type. Results: Of 408 potential patients, 373 patients were included. The median duration of SCS use was 4.4 (95%confidence interval [CI]: 4.0–4.8) years. Male patients retained SCSs longer than female patients (4.7 vs. 4.0 years, P = 0.014), and veterans’ healthcare beneficiaries showed the longest duration of SCS use (median 6.9 [95% CI: 4.6–7.8] years). Age and hospital type did not affect the duration of SCS use (P = 0.381 and P = 0.122, respectively). Conclusions The median SCS use duration in CRPS patients was 4.4 years. Considering the high cost and invasiveness of SCS, patients should be informed about the expected duration of SCS use, alongside potential risks and benefits.

Background: Spinal cord stimulators (SCSs) are used to reduce pain and improve quality of life in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). However, many patients opt for device removal after SCS implantation due to diminished effect or complications. There is limited research on the actual duration of SCS use in CRPS patients, and no nationwide population-based studies exist. This study aimed to estimate the real-world duration of SCS use in CRPS patients and examine the influencing factors on the duration of SCS use by analyzing the National Healthcare Insurance Database. Methods: Adult patients (age ≥ 18) with CRPS who underwent permanent SCS implantation between 2014 and2021 were included. The authors analyzed the median duration of SCS implantation and evaluated the impacts of age, sex, hospital type, and insurance type. Results: Of 408 potential patients, 373 patients were included. The median duration of SCS use was 4.4 (95%confidence interval [CI]: 4.0–4.8) years. Male patients retained SCSs longer than female patients (4.7 vs. 4.0 years, P = 0.014), and veterans’ healthcare beneficiaries showed the longest duration of SCS use (median 6.9 [95% CI: 4.6–7.8] years). Age and hospital type did not affect the duration of SCS use (P = 0.381 and P = 0.122, respectively). Conclusions The median SCS use duration in CRPS patients was 4.4 years. Considering the high cost and invasiveness of SCS, patients should be informed about the expected duration of SCS use, alongside potential risks and benefits.

Background: Spinal cord stimulators (SCSs) are used to reduce pain and improve quality of life in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). However, many patients opt for device removal after SCS implantation due to diminished effect or complications. There is limited research on the actual duration of SCS use in CRPS patients, and no nationwide population-based studies exist. This study aimed to estimate the real-world duration of SCS use in CRPS patients and examine the influencing factors on the duration of SCS use by analyzing the National Healthcare Insurance Database. Methods: Adult patients (age ≥ 18) with CRPS who underwent permanent SCS implantation between 2014 and2021 were included. The authors analyzed the median duration of SCS implantation and evaluated the impacts of age, sex, hospital type, and insurance type. Results: Of 408 potential patients, 373 patients were included. The median duration of SCS use was 4.4 (95%confidence interval [CI]: 4.0–4.8) years. Male patients retained SCSs longer than female patients (4.7 vs. 4.0 years, P = 0.014), and veterans’ healthcare beneficiaries showed the longest duration of SCS use (median 6.9 [95% CI: 4.6–7.8] years). Age and hospital type did not affect the duration of SCS use (P = 0.381 and P = 0.122, respectively). Conclusions The median SCS use duration in CRPS patients was 4.4 years. Considering the high cost and invasiveness of SCS, patients should be informed about the expected duration of SCS use, alongside potential risks and benefits.

Background: Spinal cord stimulators (SCSs) are used to reduce pain and improve quality of life in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). However, many patients opt for device removal after SCS implantation due to diminished effect or complications. There is limited research on the actual duration of SCS use in CRPS patients, and no nationwide population-based studies exist. This study aimed to estimate the real-world duration of SCS use in CRPS patients and examine the influencing factors on the duration of SCS use by analyzing the National Healthcare Insurance Database. Methods: Adult patients (age ≥ 18) with CRPS who underwent permanent SCS implantation between 2014 and2021 were included. The authors analyzed the median duration of SCS implantation and evaluated the impacts of age, sex, hospital type, and insurance type. Results: Of 408 potential patients, 373 patients were included. The median duration of SCS use was 4.4 (95%confidence interval [CI]: 4.0–4.8) years. Male patients retained SCSs longer than female patients (4.7 vs. 4.0 years, P = 0.014), and veterans’ healthcare beneficiaries showed the longest duration of SCS use (median 6.9 [95% CI: 4.6–7.8] years). Age and hospital type did not affect the duration of SCS use (P = 0.381 and P = 0.122, respectively). Conclusions The median SCS use duration in CRPS patients was 4.4 years. Considering the high cost and invasiveness of SCS, patients should be informed about the expected duration of SCS use, alongside potential risks and benefits.

Objective: To address the gap in timely diagnosis of dementia due to limited screening tools, we investigated the validity and reliability of the Hellocog, computerized neuropsychological test based on tablets for screening dementia. The higher the probability score on the Hellocog, the higher the likelihood of dementia. Methods: This study included 100 patients with dementia and 100 individuals with normal cognition who were aged 60 years or older and free of other major psychiatric, neurological, or medical conditions. They administered the Hellocog on a tablet under the supervision of a neuropsychologist. To determine test-retest reliability, 20 took the Hellocog again after 4 weeks. Diagnostic performance was assessed using the receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis. Results: The Hellocog showed adequate internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha=0.69) and good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.86, p<0.001). Participants with dementia scored higher on the Hellocog than those with normal cognition (p<0.001), confirming its high criterion validity. Strong correlations with the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) score and the total score of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (CERAD-TS) highlight the concurrent validity of the Hellocog. The area under the ROC curve for dementia of the Hellocog was excellent (0.971) and comparable to that of the MMSE and CERAD-TS. The sensitivity and specificity for dementia were 0.945 and 0.872%, respectively, which were slightly better than those of the MMSE and CERAD-TS. Conclusion Hellocog stands out as a valid and reliable tool for self-administered dementia screening, with promise for improving early detection of dementia.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between blood levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) and cognitive impairments among elderly individuals. Methods: Peripheral concentration of TNF-α and IL-6 were measured in all subjects. To assess individual cognitive function, the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (CERAD-NP) was used, and standardized scores (z-scores) were calculated for each test. Cytokine levels were compared between the diagnostic groups, and correlations between blood inflammatory factor levels and z-scores were analyzed. Results: The 37 participants included 8 patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), 15 subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 14 cognitively healthy controls. TNF-α and IL-6 levels were higher in patients with AD than in healthy controls. TNF-α levels were higher in the AD group than in the MCI group. However, after adjusting for age, the associations between diagnosis and TNF-α and IL-6 were not significant. The higher the plasma IL-6 level, the lower the z-scores on the Boston Naming Test, Word List Learning, Word List Recognition, and Constructional Recall. The higher the serum TNF-α level, the lower the z-scores on the Word List Learning and Constructional Recall. Negative correlation between serum TNF-α level and the z-score on Word List Learning remained significant when age was adjusted. Conclusion The difference in the blood levels of TNF-α and IL-6 between the diagnostic groups may be associated with aging. However, elevated TNF-α levels were associated with worse immediate memory performance, even after adjusting for age.

Objective: Semantic verbal fluency (SVF) engages cognitive functions such as executive function, mental flexibility, and semantic memory. Left frontal and temporal lobes, particularly the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), are crucial for SVF. This study investigates SVF and associated neural processing in older adults with mild SVF impairment and the relationship between structural abnormalities in the left IFG and functional activation during SVF in those individuals. Methods: Fifty-four elderly individuals with modest level of mild cognitive impairment whose global cognition were preserved to normal but exhibited mild SVF impairment were participated. Prefrontal oxyhemoglobin (HbO2) activation and frontal cortical thickness were collected from the participants using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and brain MRI, respectively. We calculated the β coefficient of HbO2 activation induced by tasks, and performed correlation analysis between SVF induced HbO2 activation and cortical thickness in frontal areas. Results: We observed increased prefrontal activation during SVF task compared to the resting and control task. The activation distinct to SVF was identified in the midline superior and left superior prefrontal regions (p<0.05). Correlation analysis revealed an inverse relationship between SVF-specific activation and cortical thickness in the left IFG, particularly in pars triangularis (r(54)=-0.304, p=0.025). Conclusion The study contributes to understanding the relationship between reduced cortical thickness in left IFG and increased functional activity in cognitively normal individuals with mild SVF impairment, providing implications on potential compensatory mechanisms for cognitive preservation.