Purpose: This study aimed to differentiate well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) from lipoma using the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and improve the preoperative diagnostic accuracy between the two tumors. Although lipoma is a benign tumor that does not necessarily require surgical intervention, WDLPS exhibits local aggressiveness and typically necessitates surgical excision, making its differentiation clinically significant. Materials and Methods: Among 363 patients diagnosed with lipoma or WDLPS at the authors’ institution between January 2013 and April 2022, 45 patients with lipoma and 15 with WDLPS were selected using propensity score matching based on age and sex. The following six MRI features were analyzed: tumor size, shape, septal thickness, tumor depth, fat content ratio, and the presence of nodular non-fatty tissue components. The sensitivity and specificity of each feature were evaluated. Results: Among the MRI features, the fat content ratio (specificity 95%) and the presence of nodular non-fatty tissue components (specificity 98%) were useful for excluding WDLPS, but their sensitivities were relatively low (46% and 27%). The sensitivities of other features, such as tumor size, shape, septal thickness, and depth, ranged from 47% to 67%, suggesting that MRI alone has limitations in reliably distinguishing the two tumors. In addition, fat content ratios below 75% and the presence of nodular non-fatty tissue components were significantly more common in WDLPS than in lipoma. Conclusion The MRI findings can serve as a useful tool for excluding WDLPS when differentiating it from lipoma. Nevertheless, MRI alone has limitations in achieving a definitive diagnosis because of the low sensitivity of individual features. Therefore, additional approaches such as radiomics analysis, artificial intelligence algorithms, and multicenter studies, are needed to improve the diagnostic accuracy and establish personalized treatment strategies.

Purpose: Traditionally, fasting from midnight has been a standard practice in elective surgery for reduce the risk of aspiration. However, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs recommend clear fluid intake until 2 hours before anesthesia. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and patient satisfaction of preoperative carbohydrate drink intake until 2 hours before colorectal cancer surgery. Methods: Sixty patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery between April 2021 and February 2023 at Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center were enrolled. This study included 30 patients who fasted from midnight (nothing by mouth [NPO] group) and 30 patients who consumed a high concentration of complex carbohydrate fluids (New Care NO-NPO) until 2 hours before surgery (No-NPO group). Patient satisfaction was assessed using a visual analog scale. Perioperative and postoperative outcomes were compared. Results: Basic characteristics of patients were similar for the 2 groups. The No-NPO group had a significantly higher patient satisfaction score than the NPO group (3.7 vs. 2.2, P=0.040). Scores of operative difficulty, operation time, blood loss, postoperative recovery parameters, and postoperative complication rates were similar for the 2 groups. Pathological outcomes were also comparable. No mortality occurred in either group. Conclusion High-concentration carbohydrate fluid intake until 2 hours before induction of anesthesia could improve patient satisfaction without increasing postoperative complications, demonstrating its safety and feasibility in colorectal cancer surgery.Trial registration CRIS (cris.nih.go.kr) identifier: KCT0011323.

Purpose: The increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) is a major public health concern worldwide. This pilot study evaluated the effectiveness of lifestyle education in managing T2D in obese AYAs using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and smartwatch-derived lifelog data. Methods: Seven obese AYAs and T2D aged 12–19 years were enrolled in this prospective interventional study. Patients continued to take their previously prescribed T2D medication. CGM data were collected for 10 days, followed by lifestyle education using CGM and smartwatch data. Outcomes, including anthropometrics, glycemic control, dietary intake, physical activity, and self-management skills, were reassessed after an additional 10 days. Results: The median time in range increased from 58.1% (53.2%–75%) to 72% (64%–88%) (p=0.043) and time above range (>250 mg/dL) decreased from 10% (2.9%–18.6%) to 3.0% (1.0%–11.0%) (p=0.028). Median peak total caloric intake decreased from 2,854 (2,465–3,040) kcal/day to 2,091 (1,751–2,283) kcal/day and walking calorie expenditure increased from 163.9 (116.7–321.3) kcal/day to 180.2 (165.3–492.4) kcal/day (p=0.018 for both). The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities score improved from 0.29 (0.05–0.43) to 0.33 (0.32–0.68) (p=0.043). Conclusion This integrated approach combining CGM and smartwatch-based education exhibited short-term effects on glycemic control, dietary habits, physical activity, and self-management skills in obese AYAs and T2D. Further studies are needed to confirm the long-term effectiveness of this strategy in this challenging population.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the wound cosmesis of a single-incision approach on scar assessment after laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer. Methods: This study included 32 patients undergoing single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and 61 patients undergoing multiport laparoscopic surgery (MPLS) for colon cancer at 3 tertiary referral hospitals between September 2011 and December 2019. We modified and applied the Korean version of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) to assess cosmetic outcomes. To assess the interobserver reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient values for the Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS), the surgeons evaluated 5 images of postoperative scars. Results: No significant differences were observed in the time before the return of normal bowel function, time to sips of water and soft diet initiation, length of in-hospital stay, and postoperative complication rate. The SPLS group had a shorter total incision length than the MPLS group. The POSAS favored the SPLS approach, revealing significant differences in the Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS), OSAS, and overall scores. The SPLS approach was an independent factor influencing the POSAS, PSAS, and OSAS scores. Eleven colorectal surgeons had a significantly substantial intraclass coefficient. Conclusion The cosmetic outcomes of SPLS as assessed by the patients and surgeons were superior to those of MPLS in colon cancer. Reducing the number of ports is an independent factor affecting scar assessment by patients and observers.

Objective: An association between increased erythrocyte mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and treatment response in patients with inflammatory arthritis receiving methotrexate (MTX) has been reported. We investigated the frequency of red blood cell (RBC) macrocytosis and its clinical implications regarding the initiation of biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in patients starting MTX for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: RBC macrocytosis (MCV >100 fL) and clinical characteristics were retrospectively examined in 1,156 patients starting MTX for RA. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the independent predictors of RBC macrocytosis. The initiation of b/tsDMARDs was assessed using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results: RBC macrocytosis was observed in 21.6% of RA patients over 35 [8, 89] months following MTX initiation and was persistent in 63.6% of the patients during MTX treatment. Anemia coexisted in only 20.0% of the patients with RBC macrocytosis.The occurrence of RBC macrocytosis was independently associated with age, MTX dose, and concomitant use of sulfasalazine or leflunomide (all p<0.001). A higher dose of MTX and double- or triple-DMARDs therapy were more frequently used in the group with RBC macrocytosis than in the group with normal MCV. Patients experiencing RBC macrocytosis were more likely to use b/ tsDMARDs (hazard ratio: 1.45 [95% confidence interval: 1.13, 1.87], p=0.003). Conclusion RBC macrocytosis was possibly associated with the use of b/tsDMARD and could be a supplementary marker for assessing MTX resistance.

Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the wound cosmesis of a single-incision approach on scar assessment after laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer. Methods: This study included 32 patients undergoing single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and 61 patients undergoing multiport laparoscopic surgery (MPLS) for colon cancer at 3 tertiary referral hospitals between September 2011 and December 2019. We modified and applied the Korean version of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) to assess cosmetic outcomes. To assess the interobserver reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient values for the Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS), the surgeons evaluated 5 images of postoperative scars. Results: No significant differences were observed in the time before the return of normal bowel function, time to sips of water and soft diet initiation, length of in-hospital stay, and postoperative complication rate. The SPLS group had a shorter total incision length than the MPLS group. The POSAS favored the SPLS approach, revealing significant differences in the Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS), OSAS, and overall scores. The SPLS approach was an independent factor influencing the POSAS, PSAS, and OSAS scores. Eleven colorectal surgeons had a significantly substantial intraclass coefficient. Conclusion The cosmetic outcomes of SPLS as assessed by the patients and surgeons were superior to those of MPLS in colon cancer. Reducing the number of ports is an independent factor affecting scar assessment by patients and observers.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the wound cosmesis of a single-incision approach on scar assessment after laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer. Methods: This study included 32 patients undergoing single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and 61 patients undergoing multiport laparoscopic surgery (MPLS) for colon cancer at 3 tertiary referral hospitals between September 2011 and December 2019. We modified and applied the Korean version of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) to assess cosmetic outcomes. To assess the interobserver reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient values for the Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS), the surgeons evaluated 5 images of postoperative scars. Results: No significant differences were observed in the time before the return of normal bowel function, time to sips of water and soft diet initiation, length of in-hospital stay, and postoperative complication rate. The SPLS group had a shorter total incision length than the MPLS group. The POSAS favored the SPLS approach, revealing significant differences in the Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS), OSAS, and overall scores. The SPLS approach was an independent factor influencing the POSAS, PSAS, and OSAS scores. Eleven colorectal surgeons had a significantly substantial intraclass coefficient. Conclusion The cosmetic outcomes of SPLS as assessed by the patients and surgeons were superior to those of MPLS in colon cancer. Reducing the number of ports is an independent factor affecting scar assessment by patients and observers.

Objective: An association between increased erythrocyte mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and treatment response in patients with inflammatory arthritis receiving methotrexate (MTX) has been reported. We investigated the frequency of red blood cell (RBC) macrocytosis and its clinical implications regarding the initiation of biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in patients starting MTX for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: RBC macrocytosis (MCV >100 fL) and clinical characteristics were retrospectively examined in 1,156 patients starting MTX for RA. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the independent predictors of RBC macrocytosis. The initiation of b/tsDMARDs was assessed using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results: RBC macrocytosis was observed in 21.6% of RA patients over 35 [8, 89] months following MTX initiation and was persistent in 63.6% of the patients during MTX treatment. Anemia coexisted in only 20.0% of the patients with RBC macrocytosis.The occurrence of RBC macrocytosis was independently associated with age, MTX dose, and concomitant use of sulfasalazine or leflunomide (all p<0.001). A higher dose of MTX and double- or triple-DMARDs therapy were more frequently used in the group with RBC macrocytosis than in the group with normal MCV. Patients experiencing RBC macrocytosis were more likely to use b/ tsDMARDs (hazard ratio: 1.45 [95% confidence interval: 1.13, 1.87], p=0.003). Conclusion RBC macrocytosis was possibly associated with the use of b/tsDMARD and could be a supplementary marker for assessing MTX resistance.