Objective: An association between increased erythrocyte mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and treatment response in patients with inflammatory arthritis receiving methotrexate (MTX) has been reported. We investigated the frequency of red blood cell (RBC) macrocytosis and its clinical implications regarding the initiation of biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in patients starting MTX for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: RBC macrocytosis (MCV >100 fL) and clinical characteristics were retrospectively examined in 1,156 patients starting MTX for RA. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the independent predictors of RBC macrocytosis. The initiation of b/tsDMARDs was assessed using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results: RBC macrocytosis was observed in 21.6% of RA patients over 35 [8, 89] months following MTX initiation and was persistent in 63.6% of the patients during MTX treatment. Anemia coexisted in only 20.0% of the patients with RBC macrocytosis.The occurrence of RBC macrocytosis was independently associated with age, MTX dose, and concomitant use of sulfasalazine or leflunomide (all p<0.001). A higher dose of MTX and double- or triple-DMARDs therapy were more frequently used in the group with RBC macrocytosis than in the group with normal MCV. Patients experiencing RBC macrocytosis were more likely to use b/ tsDMARDs (hazard ratio: 1.45 [95% confidence interval: 1.13, 1.87], p=0.003). Conclusion RBC macrocytosis was possibly associated with the use of b/tsDMARD and could be a supplementary marker for assessing MTX resistance.

Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Objective: An association between increased erythrocyte mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and treatment response in patients with inflammatory arthritis receiving methotrexate (MTX) has been reported. We investigated the frequency of red blood cell (RBC) macrocytosis and its clinical implications regarding the initiation of biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in patients starting MTX for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: RBC macrocytosis (MCV >100 fL) and clinical characteristics were retrospectively examined in 1,156 patients starting MTX for RA. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the independent predictors of RBC macrocytosis. The initiation of b/tsDMARDs was assessed using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results: RBC macrocytosis was observed in 21.6% of RA patients over 35 [8, 89] months following MTX initiation and was persistent in 63.6% of the patients during MTX treatment. Anemia coexisted in only 20.0% of the patients with RBC macrocytosis.The occurrence of RBC macrocytosis was independently associated with age, MTX dose, and concomitant use of sulfasalazine or leflunomide (all p<0.001). A higher dose of MTX and double- or triple-DMARDs therapy were more frequently used in the group with RBC macrocytosis than in the group with normal MCV. Patients experiencing RBC macrocytosis were more likely to use b/ tsDMARDs (hazard ratio: 1.45 [95% confidence interval: 1.13, 1.87], p=0.003). Conclusion RBC macrocytosis was possibly associated with the use of b/tsDMARD and could be a supplementary marker for assessing MTX resistance.

Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Objective: An association between increased erythrocyte mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and treatment response in patients with inflammatory arthritis receiving methotrexate (MTX) has been reported. We investigated the frequency of red blood cell (RBC) macrocytosis and its clinical implications regarding the initiation of biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in patients starting MTX for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: RBC macrocytosis (MCV >100 fL) and clinical characteristics were retrospectively examined in 1,156 patients starting MTX for RA. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the independent predictors of RBC macrocytosis. The initiation of b/tsDMARDs was assessed using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results: RBC macrocytosis was observed in 21.6% of RA patients over 35 [8, 89] months following MTX initiation and was persistent in 63.6% of the patients during MTX treatment. Anemia coexisted in only 20.0% of the patients with RBC macrocytosis.The occurrence of RBC macrocytosis was independently associated with age, MTX dose, and concomitant use of sulfasalazine or leflunomide (all p<0.001). A higher dose of MTX and double- or triple-DMARDs therapy were more frequently used in the group with RBC macrocytosis than in the group with normal MCV. Patients experiencing RBC macrocytosis were more likely to use b/ tsDMARDs (hazard ratio: 1.45 [95% confidence interval: 1.13, 1.87], p=0.003). Conclusion RBC macrocytosis was possibly associated with the use of b/tsDMARD and could be a supplementary marker for assessing MTX resistance.

Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Purpose: The use of two adjacent radiation beams to treat a lesion that is larger than the maximum field of a machine may lead to higher or lower dose distribution at the junction than expected. Therefore, evaluation of the junction dose is crucial for radiotherapy. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) can effectively protect surrounding normal tissues by implementing a complex dose distribution; therefore, two adjacent VMAT fields can effectively treat large lesions. However, VMAT can lead to significant errors in the junction dose between fields if setup errors occur due to its highly complex dose distributions. Methods: In this study, setup errors of ±1, ±3, and ±5 mm were assumed during radiotherapy for treating large lesions in the lower abdomen, and their effects on the treatment dose distribution and target coverage were analyzed using gamma pass rate (GP) and homogeneity index (HI). All studies were performed using a computational simulation method based on our radiation treatment planning software. Results: Consequently, when the setup error was more than ±3 mm, most GP values using a 3%/3-mm criterion decreased by <90%. GP was independent of the direction of the field gap (FG), whereas HI values were relatively more affected by negative values for FG. Conclusions Therefore, the size and direction of setup errors should be carefully managed when performing dual-isocentric VMATs for large targets.

Purpose: The use of two adjacent radiation beams to treat a lesion that is larger than the maximum field of a machine may lead to higher or lower dose distribution at the junction than expected. Therefore, evaluation of the junction dose is crucial for radiotherapy. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) can effectively protect surrounding normal tissues by implementing a complex dose distribution; therefore, two adjacent VMAT fields can effectively treat large lesions. However, VMAT can lead to significant errors in the junction dose between fields if setup errors occur due to its highly complex dose distributions. Methods: In this study, setup errors of ±1, ±3, and ±5 mm were assumed during radiotherapy for treating large lesions in the lower abdomen, and their effects on the treatment dose distribution and target coverage were analyzed using gamma pass rate (GP) and homogeneity index (HI). All studies were performed using a computational simulation method based on our radiation treatment planning software. Results: Consequently, when the setup error was more than ±3 mm, most GP values using a 3%/3-mm criterion decreased by <90%. GP was independent of the direction of the field gap (FG), whereas HI values were relatively more affected by negative values for FG. Conclusions Therefore, the size and direction of setup errors should be carefully managed when performing dual-isocentric VMATs for large targets.

Background: The benefits of transradial access (TRA) over transfemoral access (TFA) for bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are uncertain because of the limited availability of device selection. This study aimed to compare the procedural differences and the in-hospital and long-term outcomes of TRA and TFA for bifurcation PCI using secondgeneration drug-eluting stents (DESs). Methods: Based on data from the Coronary Bifurcation Stenting Registry III, a retrospective registry of 2,648 patients undergoing bifurcation PCI with second-generation DES from 21 centers in South Korea, patients were categorized into the TRA group (n = 1,507) or the TFA group (n = 1,141). After propensity score matching (PSM), procedural differences, in-hospital outcomes, and device-oriented composite outcomes (DOCOs; a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization) were compared between the two groups (772 matched patients each group). Results: Despite well-balanced baseline clinical and lesion characteristics after PSM, the use of the two-stent strategy (14.2% vs. 23.7%, P = 0.001) and the incidence of in-hospital adverse outcomes, primarily driven by access site complications (2.2% vs. 4.4%, P = 0.015), were significantly lower in the TRA group than in the TFA group. At the 5-year follow-up, the incidence of DOCOs was similar between the groups (6.3% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.639). Conclusion The findings suggested that TRA may be safer than TFA for bifurcation PCI using second-generation DESs. Despite differences in treatment strategy, TRA was associated with similar long-term clinical outcomes as those of TFA. Therefore, TRA might be the preferred access for bifurcation PCI using second-generation DES.