Purpose: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is performed using various approaches, including posterior, lateral, and direct anterior approaches.The most beneficial method is controversial. Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages. This study compared patient satisfaction after bilateral THA using the direct anterior and lateral approaches on the same patient, considering the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Materials and Methods: This study examined 30 patients who underwent bilateral THA: two with femoral neck fractures, 18 with osteonecrosis of the femoral head, six with borderline dysplasia-induced hip osteoarthritis, and four with degenerative hip osteoarthritis.Without distinguishing between the left and right sides, THA was performed randomly using the direct anterior approach on one side and the lateral approach on the other. The results of THA were compared using different approaches on the same patient, and patient satisfaction was evaluated. Results: Surgery using the direct anterior approach for THA showed favorable results in terms of the initial postoperative pain compared to surgery using the lateral approach. On the other hand, there was no significant difference observed after one month post-surgery. Among the participants, three preferred the direct anterior approach; four preferred the lateral approach, and 23 reported no preference. Conclusion In THA, the direct anterior approach may offer advantages in terms of initial postoperative pain and rehabilitation compared to the lateral approach. Nevertheless, the pain and joint function one month after surgery were similar between the two approaches.Therefore, the choice of approach should be determined by the surgeon's preference or experience, as both methods appear rational.

Purpose: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is performed using various approaches, including posterior, lateral, and direct anterior approaches.The most beneficial method is controversial. Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages. This study compared patient satisfaction after bilateral THA using the direct anterior and lateral approaches on the same patient, considering the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Materials and Methods: This study examined 30 patients who underwent bilateral THA: two with femoral neck fractures, 18 with osteonecrosis of the femoral head, six with borderline dysplasia-induced hip osteoarthritis, and four with degenerative hip osteoarthritis.Without distinguishing between the left and right sides, THA was performed randomly using the direct anterior approach on one side and the lateral approach on the other. The results of THA were compared using different approaches on the same patient, and patient satisfaction was evaluated. Results: Surgery using the direct anterior approach for THA showed favorable results in terms of the initial postoperative pain compared to surgery using the lateral approach. On the other hand, there was no significant difference observed after one month post-surgery. Among the participants, three preferred the direct anterior approach; four preferred the lateral approach, and 23 reported no preference. Conclusion In THA, the direct anterior approach may offer advantages in terms of initial postoperative pain and rehabilitation compared to the lateral approach. Nevertheless, the pain and joint function one month after surgery were similar between the two approaches.Therefore, the choice of approach should be determined by the surgeon's preference or experience, as both methods appear rational.

Purpose: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is performed using various approaches, including posterior, lateral, and direct anterior approaches.The most beneficial method is controversial. Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages. This study compared patient satisfaction after bilateral THA using the direct anterior and lateral approaches on the same patient, considering the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Materials and Methods: This study examined 30 patients who underwent bilateral THA: two with femoral neck fractures, 18 with osteonecrosis of the femoral head, six with borderline dysplasia-induced hip osteoarthritis, and four with degenerative hip osteoarthritis.Without distinguishing between the left and right sides, THA was performed randomly using the direct anterior approach on one side and the lateral approach on the other. The results of THA were compared using different approaches on the same patient, and patient satisfaction was evaluated. Results: Surgery using the direct anterior approach for THA showed favorable results in terms of the initial postoperative pain compared to surgery using the lateral approach. On the other hand, there was no significant difference observed after one month post-surgery. Among the participants, three preferred the direct anterior approach; four preferred the lateral approach, and 23 reported no preference. Conclusion In THA, the direct anterior approach may offer advantages in terms of initial postoperative pain and rehabilitation compared to the lateral approach. Nevertheless, the pain and joint function one month after surgery were similar between the two approaches.Therefore, the choice of approach should be determined by the surgeon's preference or experience, as both methods appear rational.

Gout is the most common form of arthritis, with the prevalence increasing worldwide. The present treatment guidelines provide recommendations for the appropriate treatment of acute gout, management during the inter-critical period, and prevention of chronic complications. The guidelines were developed based on evidence-based medicine and draft recommendations finalized after expert consensus. These guidelines are designed to provide clinicians with clinical evidence to enable efficient treatment of gout.

Gout is the most common form of arthritis, with the prevalence increasing worldwide. The present treatment guidelines provide recommendations for the appropriate treatment of acute gout, management during the inter-critical period, and prevention of chronic complications. The guidelines were developed based on evidence-based medicine and draft recommendations finalized after expert consensus. These guidelines are designed to provide clinicians with clinical evidence to enable efficient treatment of gout.

Purpose: This study examined the patient-reported outcome scores at mid-term follow-up after arthroscopic labral preservation in patients with borderline hip dysplasia. Materials and Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from patients who underwent arthroscopic labral preservation. Among the 61 patients classified with hip dysplasia, patients with arthritis beyond Tönnis grade II were excluded, Patients with subchondral bony exposure were excluded even if they had arthritis of Tönnis grade I. Forty-two patients with borderline hip dysplasia were enrolled among patients whose lateral center edge angle (LCEA) was between 18° and 25°. The PRO scores including the modified Harris hip score (mHHS), hip outcome score activities of daily living (HOS-ADL), hip outcome score sport-specific subscale (HOS-SSS) and visual analog scale (VAS), were collected and compared preoperatively, and then at one year and a minimum of five years after surgery. Results: The mean preoperative LCEA and Tönnis angle were 20.9° (range, 18° to 25°) and 6.3° (range, 0° to 18°), respectively. The mean follow-up was 64.8 (range, 60 to 84) months. The mean mHHS increased from 73.5 before surgery to 86.2 in the fifth year after surgery (p<0.01), the mean HOS-ADL from 70.5% before surgery to 84.9% in the fifth year after surgery (p<0.01), and the mean HOS-SSS from 51.4 before surgery to 69.4 in the fifth year after surgery (p<0.01). The mean VAS score improved from 6.3 before surgery to 1.5 in the fifth year after surgery (p<0.01). Conclusion Arthroscopic labral preservation performed in appropriately selected patients with borderline dysplasia showed good results at mid-term follow-up. In borderline hip dysplasia without the progress of osteoarthritis and subchondral bone exposure, arthroscopic labral preservation may be considered a good and less invasive option.

Background/Aims: Omalizumab is the first biologic known to be effective in patients with severe allergic asthma. Methods: This study was conducted as a multicenter, single-group, open trial to evaluate the improvement in the quality of life with the additional administration of omalizumab for 24 weeks in Korean patients with severe persistent allergic asthma. Results: Of the 44 patients, 31.8% were men and the mean age was 49.8 ± 11.8 years. A score improvement of 0.5 points or more in the Quality of Life Questionnaire for Korean Asthmatics (KAQLQ) was noted in 50.0% (22/44) of the patinets. In the improved group, the baseline total immunoglobulin E (IgE) level and the amount of omalizumab used were higher, and the day and night asthma symptoms were more severe, compared to those in the non-improved group. According to the Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness, favorable outcomes were found in 78.6% of patients. The Korean asthma control test (p < 0.005) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second % predicted (FEV1%; p < 0.01) improved significantly in patients who received omalizumab treatment, compared to that at week 0, and the total dose of rescue systemic corticosteroids significantly decreased (p < 0.05). The improved group on KAQLQ showed a significant improvement in FEV1% (p < 0.001). Conclusions Omalizumab can be considered a biological treatment for Korean patients with severe allergic asthma. It is recommended to consider omalizumab as add-on therapy in patients with high baseline total IgE levels and severe asthma symptoms.

Purpose: The clinical outcomes were investigated to determine if arthroscopic management is a useful method for 19 hips with iliopsoas tendon impingement (IPI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Materials and Methods: Eighteen patients (19 hips), who complained of groin pain and flexion pain that persisted after THA from September 2013 to December 2019, were the subjects of this investigation. The mean time to manifestation after THA was four months (range, 1–9 months) in patients of an average age of 60 years (range, 50–69 years). Thirteen out of 18 patients underwent THA using the direct anterior approach and five by the lateral approach. IPI was diagnosed by the medical history, physical examination, blood test, radiographic examination using X-ray and computed tomography, and topical injection therapy. All patients underwent arthroscopic treatment and a dynamic arthroscopic physical examination after exposure to the iliopsoas tendon revealed impingement. Tenotomy was then performed on the muscle portion through the total tendon portion. Symptoms and pain levels of preoperative, postoperative and follow-up period were investigated and compared. Results: The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score decreased from an average of 58.4 (range, 40–88) before surgery to an average of 35.0 (range, 15–76) after surgery. Similarly, the visual analogue scale decreased from an average of 4.0 (range, 2–6) before surgery to an average of 1.4 (range, 0–4) after surgery. Sixteen patients (88.9%) showed pain relief and improvement in the straight leg raise test, and two patients showed postoperative muscle weakness and sustained pain. In the follow-up period, muscle weakness improved. One patient underwent arthroscopic iliopsoas tenotomy at the lesser trochanteric level but the symptoms persisted.The clinical symptoms were improved after one more tenotomy at the joint level. Conclusion Arthroscopic iliopsoas tenotomy performed in patients with IPI after THA showed good clinical results.

Background/Aims: Omalizumab is the first biologic known to be effective in patients with severe allergic asthma. Methods: This study was conducted as a multicenter, single-group, open trial to evaluate the improvement in the quality of life with the additional administration of omalizumab for 24 weeks in Korean patients with severe persistent allergic asthma. Results: Of the 44 patients, 31.8% were men and the mean age was 49.8 ± 11.8 years. A score improvement of 0.5 points or more in the Quality of Life Questionnaire for Korean Asthmatics (KAQLQ) was noted in 50.0% (22/44) of the patinets. In the improved group, the baseline total immunoglobulin E (IgE) level and the amount of omalizumab used were higher, and the day and night asthma symptoms were more severe, compared to those in the non-improved group. According to the Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness, favorable outcomes were found in 78.6% of patients. The Korean asthma control test (p < 0.005) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second % predicted (FEV1%; p < 0.01) improved significantly in patients who received omalizumab treatment, compared to that at week 0, and the total dose of rescue systemic corticosteroids significantly decreased (p < 0.05). The improved group on KAQLQ showed a significant improvement in FEV1% (p < 0.001). Conclusions Omalizumab can be considered a biological treatment for Korean patients with severe allergic asthma. It is recommended to consider omalizumab as add-on therapy in patients with high baseline total IgE levels and severe asthma symptoms.