Objective: Evidence remains limited regarding whether Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) or modified RECIST (mRECIST) more reliably assesses treatment response in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo/Bev). This study aimed to evaluate response patterns based on RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST, analyze inter-reader agreement, and assess their prognostic value for overall survival (OS) in patients with HCC receiving first-line Atezo/Bev. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients with HCC treated with first-line Atezo/Bev between June 2020 and December 2022 at a tertiary center. Patients with at least one hypervascular hepatic target lesion were eligible. Two radiologists independently assessed treatment responses using RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST. Inter-reader agreement was evaluated using Cohen’s kappa coefficient. Time-dependent Cox regression analysis was performed, with radiologic response and progression treated as time-varying covariates. Prognostic discrimination was evaluated using Harrell’s concordance index (C-index). Results: A total of 207 patients were included (171 men; median age, 63 years; median follow-up, 10.7 months [range, 0.8– 46.4 months]; median OS, 10.7 months [95% confidence interval, 9.2–12.8 months]). mRECIST identified more responders than RECIST 1.1 (54.6% vs. 16.9%). RECIST 1.1 demonstrated excellent inter-reader agreement, whereas mRECIST showed substantial agreement (weighted kappa, 0.89 vs. 0.79). A significantly higher rate of dissociated responses was observed with mRECIST than with RECIST 1.1 (14.0% vs. 4.3%, P < 0.001). Both RECIST 1.1- and mRECIST-based responses and progression were independently associated with OS. Models incorporating RECIST 1.1 demonstrated slightly higher C-index values than those incorporating mRECIST (RECIST 1.1: 0.68 for response and 0.75 for progression; mRECIST: 0.65 and 0.70, respectively). Conclusion RECIST 1.1 is more reproducible and prognostically valuable for guiding treatment decisions in patients with HCC receiving first-line Atezo/Bev. However, this does not invalidate the use of mRECIST as a biological tumor response marker.

Background: s/Aims: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a malignant cancer with an increasing incidence worldwide. Although numerous efforts have been made to identify effective therapies for HCC, current strategies have limitations. We present a new approach for targeting L-arginine and argininosuccinate synthetase 1 (ASS1). Methods: ASS1 expression in HCC cell lines and primary hepatocytes was detected using polymerase chain reaction and western blotting. Proliferation, migration, signaling pathways, and nitric oxide production in HCC cell lines were measured using MTS, colony formation, wound healing, Western blot, and Griess assays. Results: ASS1 expression varied among the HCC cell lines, and cisplatin cytotoxicity was ASS1-dependent. L-arginine alone induced apoptosis in HCC cell lines, regardless of ASS1 expression; however, its effect was enhanced in ASS1-expressing HCC cell lines. Cisplatin cytotoxicity also increased, suggesting that L-arginine acts as a sensitizer to cisplatin in HCC cell lines. ASS1 and L-arginine produced nitric oxide and inhibited key proliferation- and survival-related signaling pathways such as PI3K/Akt and MAPK. Additionally, ASS1 and L-arginine reduced the expression of PKM1 and PKM2 in the glycolysis pathway. Conclusions Our study revealed that ASS1 and L-arginine exhibited anticancer effects in HCC and sensitized cisplatin-resistant HCC cells to chemotherapy. The combination of ASS1 and L-arginine significantly enhanced the anticancer effects, even in HCC cell lines with low or absent ASS1 expression. These findings highlight the critical roles of arginine and ASS1 in HCC and suggest that increasing arginine availability could be a promising therapeutic strategy.

Background: s/Aims: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a malignant cancer with an increasing incidence worldwide. Although numerous efforts have been made to identify effective therapies for HCC, current strategies have limitations. We present a new approach for targeting L-arginine and argininosuccinate synthetase 1 (ASS1). Methods: ASS1 expression in HCC cell lines and primary hepatocytes was detected using polymerase chain reaction and western blotting. Proliferation, migration, signaling pathways, and nitric oxide production in HCC cell lines were measured using MTS, colony formation, wound healing, Western blot, and Griess assays. Results: ASS1 expression varied among the HCC cell lines, and cisplatin cytotoxicity was ASS1-dependent. L-arginine alone induced apoptosis in HCC cell lines, regardless of ASS1 expression; however, its effect was enhanced in ASS1-expressing HCC cell lines. Cisplatin cytotoxicity also increased, suggesting that L-arginine acts as a sensitizer to cisplatin in HCC cell lines. ASS1 and L-arginine produced nitric oxide and inhibited key proliferation- and survival-related signaling pathways such as PI3K/Akt and MAPK. Additionally, ASS1 and L-arginine reduced the expression of PKM1 and PKM2 in the glycolysis pathway. Conclusions Our study revealed that ASS1 and L-arginine exhibited anticancer effects in HCC and sensitized cisplatin-resistant HCC cells to chemotherapy. The combination of ASS1 and L-arginine significantly enhanced the anticancer effects, even in HCC cell lines with low or absent ASS1 expression. These findings highlight the critical roles of arginine and ASS1 in HCC and suggest that increasing arginine availability could be a promising therapeutic strategy.

Background: s/Aims: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a malignant cancer with an increasing incidence worldwide. Although numerous efforts have been made to identify effective therapies for HCC, current strategies have limitations. We present a new approach for targeting L-arginine and argininosuccinate synthetase 1 (ASS1). Methods: ASS1 expression in HCC cell lines and primary hepatocytes was detected using polymerase chain reaction and western blotting. Proliferation, migration, signaling pathways, and nitric oxide production in HCC cell lines were measured using MTS, colony formation, wound healing, Western blot, and Griess assays. Results: ASS1 expression varied among the HCC cell lines, and cisplatin cytotoxicity was ASS1-dependent. L-arginine alone induced apoptosis in HCC cell lines, regardless of ASS1 expression; however, its effect was enhanced in ASS1-expressing HCC cell lines. Cisplatin cytotoxicity also increased, suggesting that L-arginine acts as a sensitizer to cisplatin in HCC cell lines. ASS1 and L-arginine produced nitric oxide and inhibited key proliferation- and survival-related signaling pathways such as PI3K/Akt and MAPK. Additionally, ASS1 and L-arginine reduced the expression of PKM1 and PKM2 in the glycolysis pathway. Conclusions Our study revealed that ASS1 and L-arginine exhibited anticancer effects in HCC and sensitized cisplatin-resistant HCC cells to chemotherapy. The combination of ASS1 and L-arginine significantly enhanced the anticancer effects, even in HCC cell lines with low or absent ASS1 expression. These findings highlight the critical roles of arginine and ASS1 in HCC and suggest that increasing arginine availability could be a promising therapeutic strategy.

EW-7197, a potent oral ALK5 inhibitor, was assessed for its impact on transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1)–induced fibrosis in a three-dimensional (3D) renal fibrosis-on-a-chip and a mouse model. The evaluation included tubular epithelial- mesenchymal transition, angiogenesis, and inflammatory cytokine expression. Methods: In a 3D renal fibrosis-on-a-chip model, three cell types(kidney fibroblasts, human proximal tubular cells, and human umbilical vein endothelial cells) were cultured and treated with TGF-β1 and EW-7197. Alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and keratin 8 (KRT-8) was assessed, angiogenesis observed via confocal microscopy, and cytokine levels measured by polymerase chain reaction, immunoassay, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In a cisplatin-induced renal fibrosis mouse model, blood urea nitrogen levels, TGF-β, and Smad 2/3 were determined, and fibrosis was assessed with Masson’s trichrome stain. Results: The α-SMA expression was significantly lower in the EW-7197 group than in the TGF-β fibrosis group. TGF-β decreased the expression of the epithelial marker KRT-8, an effect that was reversed by EW-7197 and SB431542. In the TGF-β–induced fibrosis model, the length of the thick vessels was reduced, and the diameter of both thick and thin vessels was decreased, but EW-7197 reversed these effects. EW-7197 significantly reduced the messenger RNA expression of TGF-β and increased the levels of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, interleukin (IL)-10, and IL-6. EW-7197 reduced the levels of secretory cytokines TGF-β1, TGF-β3, IL- 1β. In the cisplatin-induced renal fibrosis mouse model, EW-7197 reduced renal fibrosis by down-regulating TGF-β signaling. Conclusion: EW-7197 attenuated the TGF-β1–induced fibrotic cellular response in the 3D chip model and animal model. These findings indicate the potential effect of EW-7197 in attenuating renal fibrosis.

Since the role of the liver in metabolic dysfunction, including type 2 diabetes mellitus, was demonstrated, studies on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) have shown associations between fatty liver disease and other metabolic diseases. Unlike the exclusionary diagnostic criteria of NAFLD, MAFLD diagnosis is based on the presence of metabolic dysregulation in fatty liver disease. Renaming NAFLD as MAFLD also introduced simpler diagnostic criteria. In 2023, a new nomenclature, steatotic liver disease (SLD), was proposed. Similar to MAFLD, SLD diagnosis is based on the presence of hepatic steatosis with at least one cardiometabolic dysfunction. SLD is categorized into metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-related/-associated liver disease, alcoholrelated liver disease, specific etiology SLD, and cryptogenic SLD. The term MASLD has been adopted by a number of leading national and international societies due to its concise diagnostic criteria, exclusion of other concomitant liver diseases, and lack of stigmatizing terms. This article reviews the diagnostic criteria, clinical relevance, and differences among NAFLD, MAFLD, and MASLD from a diabetologist’s perspective and provides a rationale for adopting SLD/MASLD in the Fatty Liver Research Group of the Korean Diabetes Association.

Since the role of the liver in metabolic dysfunction, including type 2 diabetes mellitus, was demonstrated, studies on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) have shown associations between fatty liver disease and other metabolic diseases. Unlike the exclusionary diagnostic criteria of NAFLD, MAFLD diagnosis is based on the presence of metabolic dysregulation in fatty liver disease. Renaming NAFLD as MAFLD also introduced simpler diagnostic criteria. In 2023, a new nomenclature, steatotic liver disease (SLD), was proposed. Similar to MAFLD, SLD diagnosis is based on the presence of hepatic steatosis with at least one cardiometabolic dysfunction. SLD is categorized into metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-related/-associated liver disease, alcoholrelated liver disease, specific etiology SLD, and cryptogenic SLD. The term MASLD has been adopted by a number of leading national and international societies due to its concise diagnostic criteria, exclusion of other concomitant liver diseases, and lack of stigmatizing terms. This article reviews the diagnostic criteria, clinical relevance, and differences among NAFLD, MAFLD, and MASLD from a diabetologist’s perspective and provides a rationale for adopting SLD/MASLD in the Fatty Liver Research Group of the Korean Diabetes Association.

Since the role of the liver in metabolic dysfunction, including type 2 diabetes mellitus, was demonstrated, studies on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) have shown associations between fatty liver disease and other metabolic diseases. Unlike the exclusionary diagnostic criteria of NAFLD, MAFLD diagnosis is based on the presence of metabolic dysregulation in fatty liver disease. Renaming NAFLD as MAFLD also introduced simpler diagnostic criteria. In 2023, a new nomenclature, steatotic liver disease (SLD), was proposed. Similar to MAFLD, SLD diagnosis is based on the presence of hepatic steatosis with at least one cardiometabolic dysfunction. SLD is categorized into metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-related/-associated liver disease, alcoholrelated liver disease, specific etiology SLD, and cryptogenic SLD. The term MASLD has been adopted by a number of leading national and international societies due to its concise diagnostic criteria, exclusion of other concomitant liver diseases, and lack of stigmatizing terms. This article reviews the diagnostic criteria, clinical relevance, and differences among NAFLD, MAFLD, and MASLD from a diabetologist’s perspective and provides a rationale for adopting SLD/MASLD in the Fatty Liver Research Group of the Korean Diabetes Association.

Since the role of the liver in metabolic dysfunction, including type 2 diabetes mellitus, was demonstrated, studies on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) have shown associations between fatty liver disease and other metabolic diseases. Unlike the exclusionary diagnostic criteria of NAFLD, MAFLD diagnosis is based on the presence of metabolic dysregulation in fatty liver disease. Renaming NAFLD as MAFLD also introduced simpler diagnostic criteria. In 2023, a new nomenclature, steatotic liver disease (SLD), was proposed. Similar to MAFLD, SLD diagnosis is based on the presence of hepatic steatosis with at least one cardiometabolic dysfunction. SLD is categorized into metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-related/-associated liver disease, alcoholrelated liver disease, specific etiology SLD, and cryptogenic SLD. The term MASLD has been adopted by a number of leading national and international societies due to its concise diagnostic criteria, exclusion of other concomitant liver diseases, and lack of stigmatizing terms. This article reviews the diagnostic criteria, clinical relevance, and differences among NAFLD, MAFLD, and MASLD from a diabetologist’s perspective and provides a rationale for adopting SLD/MASLD in the Fatty Liver Research Group of the Korean Diabetes Association.

Purpose: This study aimed to identify clinical and radiologic characteristics that could predict response to atezolizumab-bevacizumab combination therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 108 advanced HCC patients with intrahepatic lesions who were treated with atezolizumab-bevacizumab. Two radiologists independently analyzed imaging characteristics of the index tumor on pretreatment computed tomography. Predictive factors associated with progressive disease (PD) at the best response based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, ver. 1.1 were evaluated using logistic regression analysis. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Results: Of 108 patients with a median PFS of 15 weeks, 40 (37.0%) had PD during treatment. Factors associated with PD included the presence of extrahepatic metastases (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19 to 14.35; p=0.03), the infiltrative appearance of the tumor (aOR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.05 to 8.93; p=0.04), and the absence of arterial-phase hyperenhancement (APHE) (aOR, 6.34; 95% CI, 2.18 to 18.47; p < 0.001). Patients with two or more of these factors had a PD of 66.7% and a median PFS of 8 weeks, indicating a significantly worse outcome compared to the patients with one or no of these factors. Conclusion In patients with advanced HCC treated with atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment, the absence of APHE, infiltrative appearance of the intrahepatic tumor, and presence of extrahepatic metastases were associated with poor response and survival. Evaluation of early response may be necessary in patients with these factors.