1.Erratum: Guidelines for the Use of Botulinum Toxin in Otolaryngology From the Korean Society of Laryngology, Phoniatrics and Logopedics Guideline Task Force
; Myung Jin BAN ; Chang Hwan RYU ; Joo Hyun WOO ; Young Chan LEE ; Dong Kun LEE ; Minsu KWON ; Yong Tae HONG ; Gil Joon LEE ; Hyung Kwon BYEON ; Seung Ho CHOI ; Seung Won LEE
Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology 2026;19(2):209-209
2.The Korean Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary Committee Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rectal Cancer version 2.0
Hyo Seon RYU ; Hyun Jung KIM ; Dong Hyun KANG ; Yoo-Kang KWAK ; Han Deok KWAK ; Yoon-Hye KWON ; Dalyon KIM ; Baek-Hui KIM ; Jae Hyun KIM ; Ji Hun KIM ; Jin Won KIM ; Tae Hyung KIM ; Hae Young KIM ; Soo Min NAM ; Gyoung Tae NOH ; Jun Woo BONG ; Nak Song SUNG ; Seon Hui SHIN ; Kil-Yong LEE ; Sung Chul LEE ; Sea-Won LEE ; Jung Won LEE ; Jong Min LEE ; Myung Hoon IHN ; Joo Han LIM ; Woong Bae JI ; Dae Hee PYO ; Young Ki HONG ; Jung-Myun KWAK ;
Annals of Coloproctology 2026;42(1):4-33
Rectal cancer, which accounts for approximately 40% of colorectal cancers, remains a major clinical concern. Recent advances in diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment have steadily improved rectal cancer outcomes. Considering this, the Korean Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary (KRCM) Committee has aimed to provide clinicians and policymakers with up-to-date, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to support optimal decision-making, reflecting current evidence, the Korean healthcare context, and patient values and preferences. The Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rectal Cancer version 2.0 were developed through multidisciplinary collaboration with related academic societies, building upon and updating the KRCM Clinical Practice Guidelines version 1.0 (titled “Multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of rectal cancer”). These consensus guidelines of the KRCM were established based on a comprehensive literature review, evidence synthesis, with recommendation development guided by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology, and consideration of applicability in real-world clinical practice under the national health insurance system. Each recommendation has been presented with its strength and level of evidence.
3.Clinical Guideline for the Use of Biodegradable Rectal Spacers During Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
Hyun Ho HAN ; Jong Kyou KWON ; Do Kyung KIM ; Jin Hyung JEON ; Chan Woo WEE ; Jae Ho CHO ; Ji Hee JUNG ; A Young YOO ; Jae Young JOUNG ; Gee Hyun SONG ; Seung Ju LEE ; Won PARK ; Chan Kyo KIM ; Young Seok KIM ; Yeon Joo KIM ; Ah Ram CHANG ; Jae Sik KIM ; Sung Hwan BAE ; Byoung Kyu HAN ; Kang Su CHO
Journal of Urologic Oncology 2026;24(1):3-12
Purpose:
Radiotherapy (RT) remains a cornerstone of curative treatment for localized and locally advanced prostate cancer. However, dose escalation to improve tumor control is often constrained by the proximity of the rectum, which increases the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary toxicities. Biodegradable rectal spacers inserted between the prostate and rectum have emerged as an effective approach to reduce rectal radiation exposure. This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations on indications, contraindications, procedural standards, and clinical management for biodegradable rectal spacer insertion during prostate cancer RT.
Materials and Methods:
This guideline was developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel through a systematic review of the literature, analysis of international guidelines (National Comprehensive Cancer Network, European Association of Urology, American Society for Radiation Oncology), and expert consensus among radiation oncologists, radiologists, and urologists with clinical experience in spacer insertion. The strength of each recommendation and the level of evidence were classified according to the modified GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system.
Results:
Spacer insertion is conditionally recommended (Grade C, Level I) for patients receiving definitive external-beam RT without rectal invasion. It reduces the high-dose rectal irradiation volume (V70–75) by >50%, decreases acute GI toxicity, and helps maintain bowel-related quality of life. However, the benefit for late severe toxicity (grade 2 or higher) remains debated in recent meta-analyses. Contraindications include rectal invasion, anatomical inaccessibility, infection, and material hypersensitivity. Procedures should be performed under local anesthesia in a sterile environment by trained physicians. Short-course antibiotics and simulator-based training, including completion of multiple supervised cases, are advised.
Conclusion
Biodegradable rectal spacer insertion is clinically validated and effective in reducing acute rectal toxicity. Although pivotal trials demonstrated a favorable procedural safety profile, real-world postmarket data include reports of rare but severe procedural complications. This guideline provides standardized recommendations tailored to Korean clinical practice while remaining consistent with international standards, emphasizing the importance of operator training and careful patient selection.
4.Intradialytic hypotension and worse outcomes in patients with acute kidney injury requiring intermittent hemodialysis
Yeong-Won PARK ; Donghwan YUN ; Yeojin YU ; Sang Hyun KIM ; Sehoon PARK ; Yong Chul KIM ; Dong Ki KIM ; Kook-Hwan OH ; Kwon Wook JOO ; Yon Su KIM ; Seong Geun KIM ; Seung Seok HAN
Kidney Research and Clinical Practice 2026;45(1):77-85
Background:
Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a critical complication related to worse outcomes in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Herein, we addressed the impact of IDH on mortality and other outcomes in patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring intermittent hemodialysis.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed 1,009 patients who underwent intermittent hemodialysis due to severe AKI. IDH was defined as either dialysis discontinuation due to hemodynamic instability or a decrease in systolic blood pressure (BP) of ≥30 mmHg, with or without a nadir systolic BP of <90 mmHg during the first session. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to unstable status was additionally analyzed. Hazard ratios (HRs) of outcomes were calculated using a Cox regression model after adjusting for multiple variables. Risk factors for IDH were evaluated using a logistic regression model.
Results:
IDH occurred in 449 patients (44.5%) during the first hemodialysis session. Patients with IDH had a higher mortality rate than those without IDH (40% vs. 23%; HR, 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02–1.65). The rate of ICU transfer was higher in patients experiencing IDH than in those without IDH (17% vs. 11%; HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.02–2.02). Factors such as old age, high BP and pulse rate, active malignancy, cirrhosis, and hypoalbuminemia were associated with an increased risk of IDH episodes.
Conclusion
The occurrence of IDH is associated with worse outcomes in patients with AKI requiring intermittent hemodialysis. Therefore, careful monitoring and early intervention of IDH may be necessary in this patient subset.
5.No difference in inflammatory mediator expression between mast cell-rich and mast cell-poor rosacea lesions in Korean patients: a comparative study
Jin Ju LEE ; Bo Ram KWON ; Min Young LEE ; Ji Yeon BYUN ; Joo Young ROH ; Hae Young CHOI ; You Won CHOI
The Ewha Medical Journal 2025;48(1):e78-
6.No difference in inflammatory mediator expression between mast cell-rich and mast cell-poor rosacea lesions in Korean patients: a comparative study
Jin Ju LEE ; Bo Ram KWON ; Min Young LEE ; Ji Yeon BYUN ; Joo Young ROH ; Hae Young CHOI ; You Won CHOI
The Ewha Medical Journal 2025;48(1):e78-
7.2025 Korean Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Radioactive Iodine Therapy in Patients with Hyperthyroidism
Kyeong Jin KIM ; Eyun SONG ; Mijin KIM ; Hyemi KWON ; Eu Jeong KU ; Hyun Woo KWON ; Jee Hee YOON ; Eun Kyung LEE ; Won Woo LEE ; Young Joo PARK ; Dong-Jun LIM ; Sun Wook KIM ; Ho-Cheol KANG ; Jae Hoon CHUNG ; Tae Yong KIM ; Sin Gon KIM ; Dong Gyu NA ; Jee Soo KIM
International Journal of Thyroidology 2025;18(1):65-79
Hyperthyroidism is a clinical condition characterized by excessive production of thyroid hormones, leading to thyrotoxicosis, with Graves’ disease being the most common underlying etiology. The treatment options for hyperthyroidism include antithyroid drug (ATD) therapy, radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy, and thyroidectomy. To establish standardized clinical recommendations specific to RAI therapy focusing on the safety, efficacy, pre- and post-treatment protocols, and follow-up monitoring, the Korean Thyroid Association convened a Task Force dedicated to developing evidence-based guidelines. Six key clinical questions were identified through expert panel discussion. A systematic review of literature published between 2013 and 2022 was conducted using PubMed and Embase with “hyperthyroidism” and “Graves’ disease” as search terms. Additional studies published during manuscript development were also included. The guideline classifies the clinical indications for RAI therapy into three categories: cases in which RAI is strongly recommended, may be considered, or not recommended. A fixed dose of 10–15 mCi is recommended for RAI therapy. While a routine low-iodine diet is not required, patients should avoid iodine-rich foods for at least one week before treatment. ATD should be discontinued 3–7 days prior to RAI and may be resumed afterward in selected cases. Prophylactic glucocorticoids are advised for patients with mild active thyroid eye disease and may be considered in those with additional risk factors. Thyroid function should be monitored at 4–6 weeks post-treatment, then every 2–3 months until stabilization, and subsequently at 6–12 month intervals or as clinically indicated. This guideline reflects recent advances in RAI therapy for hyperthyroidism and emphasizes the importance of individualized treatment decisions based on clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and patient preferences in Korea.
8.2025 Korean Thyroid Association Clinical Management Guideline on Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
Eun Kyung LEE ; Min Joo KIM ; Seung Heon KANG ; Bon Seok KOO ; Kyungsik KIM ; Mijin KIM ; Bo Hyun KIM ; Ji-hoon KIM ; Shin Je MOON ; Kyorim BACK ; Young Shin SONG ; Jong-hyuk AHN ; Hwa Young AHN ; Ho-Ryun WON ; Won Sang YOO ; Min Kyoung LEE ; Jeongmin LEE ; Ji Ye LEE ; Kyong Yeun JUNG ; Chan Kwon JUNG ; Yoon Young CHO ; Dong-Jun LIM ; Sun Wook KIM ; Young Joo PARK ; Dong Gyu NA ; Jee Soo KIM
International Journal of Thyroidology 2025;18(1):30-64
The increasing detection of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) has raised concerns about overtreatment.For low-risk PTMC, either immediate surgery or active surveillance (AS) can be considered. To support AS implementation, the Korean Thyroid Association convened a multidisciplinary panel and developed the first Korean guideline. AS is recommended to adults with pathologically proven Bethesda V-VI PTMC without clinical evidence of lymph node or distant metastasis, gross extrathyroidal extension, tracheal or recurrent laryngeal nerve invasion, or aggressive histology. Baseline assessment requires high‑resolution cervical ultrasound by experienced operators to rule out extrathyroidal extension, tracheal or recurrent laryngeal nerve invasion, and lymph node metastasis;contrast‑enhanced neck computed tomography is optional. Patient characteristics such as age, comorbidities, and capacity for long-term follow-up should be assessed. Shared decision-making should weigh the benefits and risks of surgery and AS, expected oncologic outcomes, complications, quality of life, anxiety, medical cost, and patient preference. Follow-up includes cervical ultrasound and thyroid function test every six months for two years, then annually. Disease progression, defined as significant tumor growth or newly detected nodal or distant metastasis, warrants surgery. Despite remaining uncertainties, this guideline offers a framework to ensure oncologic safety and support patient-centered active surveillance.
9.No difference in inflammatory mediator expression between mast cell-rich and mast cell-poor rosacea lesions in Korean patients: a comparative study
Jin Ju LEE ; Bo Ram KWON ; Min Young LEE ; Ji Yeon BYUN ; Joo Young ROH ; Hae Young CHOI ; You Won CHOI
The Ewha Medical Journal 2025;48(1):e78-
10.No difference in inflammatory mediator expression between mast cell-rich and mast cell-poor rosacea lesions in Korean patients: a comparative study
Jin Ju LEE ; Bo Ram KWON ; Min Young LEE ; Ji Yeon BYUN ; Joo Young ROH ; Hae Young CHOI ; You Won CHOI
The Ewha Medical Journal 2025;48(1):e78-

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail