In patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), initial recurrence risk stratification based on clinical, histopathological, and perioperative data remains the key determinant for guiding management strategies during the first 1-2 years post-treatment. However, the adoption of ongoing risk stratification (ORS), which dynamically reassesses risk by integrating longitudinal clinical data and treatment response, enables more precise long-term prognostic assessment and facilitates highly individualized management. Building upon recent guidelines, the 2026 KTA guideline has been further refined by incorporating robust evidence from large-scale national cohorts and comprehensive systematic reviews. These updated recommendations outline contemporary concepts of ORS, risk-adapted TSH suppression targets, optimized surveillance modalities for recurrence detection, and disease-specific long-term follow-up strategies. Reflecting the paradigm shift toward de-escalated treatment, this revision integrates evolved perspectives on TSH suppression intensity, the clinical interpretation of thyroglobulin levels, and tailored follow-up intervals. These evidence-based recommendations aim to minimize unnecessary treatment and excessive surveillance in the large proportion of patients with excellent prognosis after initial therapy, while ensuring that each patient receives appropriately tailored and effective long-term management.

Background: An international reference measurement laboratory network for creatinine (Cr) is lacking; therefore, Korea developed an independent evaluation and certification system. The in vitro diagnostics (IVD) certification program, launched in 2017, formed part of a broader Cr standardization initiative intended to enhance accuracy at the manufacturing stage. Methods: The program was designed to evaluate analytical systems, including all reagent lots, calibrators, and instrument models, twice annually. Bias, imprecision, total error (TE), and linearity were evaluated based on established acceptance criteria. A post-certification process allows submission for a second challenge and validation of corrective actions. Results: Between 2017 and 2023, 489 analytical systems were evaluated. Average acceptance rates for bias, imprecision, TE, and linearity were 70.8%, 95.9%, 87.7%, and 87.8%, respectively. The lowest acceptance rate for bias evaluation was 8.7% for the kinetic Jaffe method without compensation in 2018. Over the 7-year period, the mean absolute percentage bias (absBias%), coefficient of variation (CV), and TE were 4.62%, 1.37%,and 7.29%, respectively. The highest absBias% (7.94%) was observed in the 0.0 ≤ Cr < 1.0target value range. Since 2019, a consistent reduction in absBias% has been observed. Conclusions This program is a pioneering response to the absence of a global certification program for Cr assays. It offers significant advantages, including comprehensive evaluations, fee-free participation, and a robust post-certification process. Continuous participation and improvement efforts by manufacturers have contributed to enhanced accuracy in Cr assays.

Digital therapeutics (DTx) are emerging as a transformative innovation in healthcare offering evidence-based digital interventions for the treatment, management, and prevention of various diseases and disorders. In Korea, DTx have gained significant attention as potential solutions to the increasing burden of chronic diseases and mental health conditions. However, the Korean DTx market faces several challenges that hinder its widespread adoption and integration into the national healthcare system. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the current state of the DTx market in Korea, identifies the key challenges impeding its growth, and proposes strategies for overcoming these obstacles. This study utilized a literature review and market analysis approach to examine the latest research, industry reports, and regulatory documents related to DTx. The analysis focused on three primary areas: (1) the current regulatory landscape, (2) technological advancements and challenges, and (3) economic and commercial factors influencing DTx adoption in Korea. A comparative analysis of global regulatory practices was also conducted to identify best practices. The findings revealed that while Korea has made significant strides in supporting DTx development, the market remains in its early stages. The key challenges include underdeveloped regulatory frameworks, issues with data quality and security, and a lack of established reimbursement pathways. We recommend developing tailored regulatory frameworks for DTx, enhancing policy support for small and medium-sized enterprises involved in DTx development, and increasing investments in technological infrastructure. By addressing these challenges, Korea could position itself as a leader in the global DTx market, delivering innovative and effective treatments to enhance patient care and outcomes.

Digital therapeutics (DTx) are emerging as a transformative innovation in healthcare offering evidence-based digital interventions for the treatment, management, and prevention of various diseases and disorders. In Korea, DTx have gained significant attention as potential solutions to the increasing burden of chronic diseases and mental health conditions. However, the Korean DTx market faces several challenges that hinder its widespread adoption and integration into the national healthcare system. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the current state of the DTx market in Korea, identifies the key challenges impeding its growth, and proposes strategies for overcoming these obstacles. This study utilized a literature review and market analysis approach to examine the latest research, industry reports, and regulatory documents related to DTx. The analysis focused on three primary areas: (1) the current regulatory landscape, (2) technological advancements and challenges, and (3) economic and commercial factors influencing DTx adoption in Korea. A comparative analysis of global regulatory practices was also conducted to identify best practices. The findings revealed that while Korea has made significant strides in supporting DTx development, the market remains in its early stages. The key challenges include underdeveloped regulatory frameworks, issues with data quality and security, and a lack of established reimbursement pathways. We recommend developing tailored regulatory frameworks for DTx, enhancing policy support for small and medium-sized enterprises involved in DTx development, and increasing investments in technological infrastructure. By addressing these challenges, Korea could position itself as a leader in the global DTx market, delivering innovative and effective treatments to enhance patient care and outcomes.

Digital therapeutics (DTx) are emerging as a transformative innovation in healthcare offering evidence-based digital interventions for the treatment, management, and prevention of various diseases and disorders. In Korea, DTx have gained significant attention as potential solutions to the increasing burden of chronic diseases and mental health conditions. However, the Korean DTx market faces several challenges that hinder its widespread adoption and integration into the national healthcare system. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the current state of the DTx market in Korea, identifies the key challenges impeding its growth, and proposes strategies for overcoming these obstacles. This study utilized a literature review and market analysis approach to examine the latest research, industry reports, and regulatory documents related to DTx. The analysis focused on three primary areas: (1) the current regulatory landscape, (2) technological advancements and challenges, and (3) economic and commercial factors influencing DTx adoption in Korea. A comparative analysis of global regulatory practices was also conducted to identify best practices. The findings revealed that while Korea has made significant strides in supporting DTx development, the market remains in its early stages. The key challenges include underdeveloped regulatory frameworks, issues with data quality and security, and a lack of established reimbursement pathways. We recommend developing tailored regulatory frameworks for DTx, enhancing policy support for small and medium-sized enterprises involved in DTx development, and increasing investments in technological infrastructure. By addressing these challenges, Korea could position itself as a leader in the global DTx market, delivering innovative and effective treatments to enhance patient care and outcomes.

Digital therapeutics (DTx) are emerging as a transformative innovation in healthcare offering evidence-based digital interventions for the treatment, management, and prevention of various diseases and disorders. In Korea, DTx have gained significant attention as potential solutions to the increasing burden of chronic diseases and mental health conditions. However, the Korean DTx market faces several challenges that hinder its widespread adoption and integration into the national healthcare system. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the current state of the DTx market in Korea, identifies the key challenges impeding its growth, and proposes strategies for overcoming these obstacles. This study utilized a literature review and market analysis approach to examine the latest research, industry reports, and regulatory documents related to DTx. The analysis focused on three primary areas: (1) the current regulatory landscape, (2) technological advancements and challenges, and (3) economic and commercial factors influencing DTx adoption in Korea. A comparative analysis of global regulatory practices was also conducted to identify best practices. The findings revealed that while Korea has made significant strides in supporting DTx development, the market remains in its early stages. The key challenges include underdeveloped regulatory frameworks, issues with data quality and security, and a lack of established reimbursement pathways. We recommend developing tailored regulatory frameworks for DTx, enhancing policy support for small and medium-sized enterprises involved in DTx development, and increasing investments in technological infrastructure. By addressing these challenges, Korea could position itself as a leader in the global DTx market, delivering innovative and effective treatments to enhance patient care and outcomes.

Objective: This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lurasidone (160 mg/day) compared to quetiapine XR (QXR; 600 mg/day) in the treatment of acutely psychotic patients with schizophrenia. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with lurasidone 160 mg/day (n=105) or QXR 600 mg/day (n=105). Primary efficacy measure was the change from baseline to week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score and Clinical Global Impressions severity (CGI-S) score. Adverse events, body measurements, and laboratory parameters were assessed. Results: Lurasidone demonstrated non-inferiority to QXR on the PANSS total score. Adjusted mean±standard error change at week 6 on the PANSS total score was -26.42±2.02 and -27.33±2.01 in the lurasidone and QXR group, respectively. The mean difference score was -0.91 (95% confidence interval -6.35–4.53). The lurasidone group showed a greater reduction in PANSS total and negative subscale on week 1 and a greater reduction in end-point CGI-S score compared to the QXR group. Body weight, body mass index, and waist circumference in the lurasidone group were reduced, with significantly lower mean change compared to QXR. Endpoint changes in glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein levels were also significantly lower. The most common adverse drug reactions with lurasidone were akathisia and nausea. Conclusion Lurasidone 160 mg/day was found to be non-inferior to QXR 600 mg/day in the treatment of schizophrenia with comparable efficacy and tolerability. Adverse effects of lurasidone were generally tolerable, and beneficial effects on metabolic parameters can be expected.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture leads to weakened quadriceps muscle strength and a decline in proprioception, impairing the neuromuscular control of the lower extremities. ACL reconstruction, aimed at addressing such structural and functional instability, has become a primary treatment method for young and active patients. Consequently, there have been significant advancements in surgical techniques, resulting in improved clinical outcomes. However, achieving successful outcomes after ACL reconstruction is not solely dependent on the surgery itself; pre- and postoperative rehabilitation and management are equally crucial. A well-designed functional recovery program based on medical evidence before and after ACL reconstruction plays a vital role in restoring function to preinjury levels. The process of the functional recovery program, from presurgery to sports return, should adhere to certain principles. These principles involve prompt and accurate clinical diagnosis and patient classification after injury, systematic programs addressing joint swelling and inflammation control, reduction of arthrogenic muscle inhibition, restoration of range of motion, muscle strength recovery, and proprioception restoration. Postoperatively, it is essential to go beyond traditional methods (such as range of motion restoration and muscle strengthening) by implementing a functional recovery program that includes enhancement of proprioception and neuromuscular control system from the early stages, considering the biological healing response of the graft. This comprehensive approach is vital for achieving optimal outcomes in the recovery of function after ACL reconstruction.

n patients who have undergone knee joint surgery or suffer from osteoarthritis, weakened quadriceps muscle strength is often observed. This can lead to various pathological issues in the long term, such as abnormal gait and persistent knee pain. Due to the need to protect against pain or surgical site complications, high-intensity exercise is often restricted for most patients with muscle atrophy in the knee joint due to surgery or osteoarthritis or surgery. To overcome this challenge, various methods are being attempted, including exercise combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation, blood flow restriction (BFR) exercise, and biofeedback exercise. Recently, BFR exercise has garnered attention in line with these strategic trends. Applying low-intensity BFR exercise to patients who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery or suffer from knee joint osteoarthritis, most studies report improvements in strength, muscle mass, and functional enhancement of the knee joint. Compared to non-BFR high-intensity exercise, it has been reported that increases in maximal strength and muscle mass are similar, but pain reduction is superior with BFR exercise. Engaging in low-intensity BFR exercise for a sufficient duration can minimize the risk of injury associated with high-intensity exercise while maximizing the exercise’s effectiveness, leading to symptom improvement and enhancement of knee joint function. Furthermore, when conducted according to specified manuals, the likelihood of cardiovascular imbalance, muscle damage, thrombosis, and embolism due to BFR is low, making it a safe rehabilitation method.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of administering intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) as a boost during breast-conserving surgery (BCS) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients at high risk of breast cancer recurrence. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy received a single 20-Gy dose of IORT during BCS, followed by external beam radiotherapy 4–6 weeks after surgery. Results: The median follow-up duration was 31.0 months (range, 18.0–59.0 months). Initial tumor sizes had a median of 2.6 cm (range: 0.8–5.3 cm), reducing to 0.3 cm (range: 0–4.0 cm) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The most common neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen was doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, followed by paclitaxel (n=42, 73.7%). Among 57 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before BCS and IORT, 2 patients (3.5%) required secondary surgery to achieve negative resection margins due to initially positive margins. Regional lymph node irradiation was performed in 37 (64.9%) patients. There was no grade 3 or higher adverse events, with 4 patients (7.0%) experiencing grade 2 acute radiation dermatitis and 3 (5.3%) having less than grade 2 breast edema. Binary correlation analysis did not reveal statistically significant associations between applicator size or radiation therapy modality and the risk of treatment-related toxicity. Furthermore, chi-square analysis showed that the grade of treatment-related toxicity was not associated with the fractionated regimen (p=0.375). Conclusion Most patients successfully received IORT as a tumor bed boost after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Thus, IORT may be a safe and feasible option for patients with advanced-stage breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.