Allergen-specific Immunotherapy (AIT) is currently the only allopathic treatment capable of modifying the natural course of immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergic diseases. Currently, there is a lack of recognized clinical markers for evaluating and predicting the efficacy of AIT, and some biological markers may have some potential for application. This article will summarize the currently known indicators for evaluating and predicting the therapeutic effects of AIT, with the aim of providing assistance in evaluating and monitoring the efficacy of AIT.

The prevalence of allergic diseases is on the rise,posing a significant global health challenge.Allergen specific immunotherapy(AIT)is the only treatment capable of altering the natural course of allergic diseases,offering long-term efficacy and the potential to prevent disease progression.However,its widespread application is hindered by factors such as lengthy treatment duration,adverse reactions,and patient compliance issues.In recent years,biologics targeting type 2 inflammatory pathways have played a crucial role at various stages of different allergic diseases.Research indicates that for patients with moderate to severe allergic diseases,using biologics during or prior to AIT can significantly enhance the safety of AIT,reduce the time required to reach maintenance doses,and markedly improve symptom scores.This article elucidates the synergistic mechanisms and recent advancements in the combined application of biologics and AIT in the treatment of allergic diseases.The aim is to provide a reference for the standardized treatment of allergic diseases.

Allergen-specific Immunotherapy (AIT) is currently the only allopathic treatment capable of modifying the natural course of immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergic diseases. Currently, there is a lack of recognized clinical markers for evaluating and predicting the efficacy of AIT, and some biological markers may have some potential for application. This article will summarize the currently known indicators for evaluating and predicting the therapeutic effects of AIT, with the aim of providing assistance in evaluating and monitoring the efficacy of AIT.

The prevalence of allergic diseases is on the rise,posing a significant global health challenge.Allergen specific immunotherapy(AIT)is the only treatment capable of altering the natural course of allergic diseases,offering long-term efficacy and the potential to prevent disease progression.However,its widespread application is hindered by factors such as lengthy treatment duration,adverse reactions,and patient compliance issues.In recent years,biologics targeting type 2 inflammatory pathways have played a crucial role at various stages of different allergic diseases.Research indicates that for patients with moderate to severe allergic diseases,using biologics during or prior to AIT can significantly enhance the safety of AIT,reduce the time required to reach maintenance doses,and markedly improve symptom scores.This article elucidates the synergistic mechanisms and recent advancements in the combined application of biologics and AIT in the treatment of allergic diseases.The aim is to provide a reference for the standardized treatment of allergic diseases.

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of anticoagulation management by physician-clinical pharmacist team for patients with valvular atrial fibrillation. Methods One hundred and seventy two patients with valvular atrial fibrillation received warfarin therapy for anticoagulation during hospitalization in Linyi People′s Hospital from January 2014 to December 2016, the patients continued to receive warfarin therapy for>6 months after discharge. The patients were randomly assigned in two groups:the anticoagulation management was given by physician-clinical pharmacist team in 87 cases (trial group), while the dosage of wargarin was adjusted in outpatient department by physicians alone in 85 cases (control group). The goal attainment rate of international normalized ratio (INR), the proportion of patients with a stable warfarin dose, knowledge of anticoagulants, belief of medication, medication compliance were compared between two groups. Results There were no significant differences in age, sex, body weight, smoking and drinking habits, valvular disease type, comorbidities; and the initial INR, knowledge of anticoagulants, belief of medication and medication compliance at admission between two groups (all P>0.05). The goal attainment rate of INR (52.17％vs. 41.02％,χ2=8.178, P=0.004), the proportion of patients with a stable dose of warfarin (74.71％ vs. 56.47％,χ2=6.349, P=0.012), the knowledge of anticoagulants (11.03 ± 2.25 vs. 10.08 ± 1.86, t=3.018, P=0.003), the belief of medication[(12.23 ± 2.07) vs. (11.67 ± 1.48), t=2.042, P=0.043], and the medication compliance[(7.36 ± 0.89) vs. (7.04 ± 1.10), t=2.1128, P=0.036] in the trial group were significantly higher than those in control group. Conclusion Anticoagulation management by physician - clinical pharmacist team can improve the management level of anticoagulation and the knowledge of anticoagulans, enhance the medication belief, improve the goal attainment rate of INR and the compliance rate of medication in patients with valvular atrial fibrillation.