OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy combined with tislelizumab or sintilimab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer （NSCLC）， and to analyze the influential factors of prognostic. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted on 163 patients with advanced NSCLC who received chemotherapy combined with tislelizumab or sintilimab at the First People’s Hospital of Yunnan Province from September 1， 2021 to November 30， 2024. Among them， there were 90 patients in the tislelizumab group and 73 patients in the sintilimab group. The objective response rate （ORR）， disease control rate （DCR）， progression free survival （PFS）， and overall survival （OS） of two groups were observed， and the occurrence of adverse drug reactions in patients was evaluated. Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot PFS and OS survival curves， Log-rank test was applied for univariate analysis， and Cox regression model was used to evaluate the independent prognostic factors of PFS and OS. RESULTS The median PFS of patients in the tislelizumab group and the sintilimab group were 14.14 months （95%CI of 10.95-17.33） and 10.95 months （95%CI of 8.75-13.15）， respectively. The median OS was 25.89 months （95%CI of 22.67-29.11） and 24.25 months （95%CI of 19.34-29.16）， with ORR of 45.56% and 49.32%， DCR of 94.44% and 90.41%， and the incidence of adverse drug reactions of 84.44% and 79.45%， respectively， the differences were not statistically significant （P＞0.05）. Age ≥60 years （HR＝1.542， 95%CI of 1.044-2.278， P＝0.029） and systemic immune inflammatory nutritional index （SIINI）＞ 116.58 （HR＝1.541， 95%CI of 1.058-2.245， P＝0.024） were risk factors for PFS in NSCLC patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy； the use of antibiotics may affect the overall survival of patients （P＝0.001）. CONCLUSIONS The efficacy and safety of chemotherapy combined with tislelizumab or sintilimab for advanced NSCLC are comparable； age≥60 years and SIINI ＞116.58 are risk factors for PFS in NSCLC patients， and the use of antibiotics may affect the patients’ OS.

OBJECTIVE:To provide reference for rational use of opioids analgesics. METHODS:1 882 prescriptions of opi-oids analgesics for cancer pain collected from our hospital in 2014 were analyzed by defined daily dose(DDD)and drug utilization index(DUI). RESULTS:The diseases of opioids analgesics prescriptions for cancer pain in our hospital in 2014 were mainly lung cancer,accounting for 42.19%. Commonly used opioids analgesics included Morphine sulfate sustained-release tablets,Oxycodone Hydrochloride sustained-release tablets and so on,and their DUI were all below 1.0. Top one drug in the list of amount and con-sumption sum was Morphine sulfate sustained-release tablets,and its main dosage form were tablets,injection and patches,in which tablets occupied the largest proportion,reaching 97.30%. CONCLUSIONS:The application of opioids analgesics for cancer pain in our hospital is basically rational in terms of drug types,dosage form and route of administration,but the dose of opioids an-algesics is small and their DUI is lower than 1;at the same time,there are a few irrational prescription.

Objective To investigate risk factors for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infected AECOPD patients and the signifi-cance of immune regulation .Methods The clinical pharmacist is involved in the administration and guardianship of immuno-compromised patients with recurrent AECOPD .The clinical pharmacist provides recommendations and theoretical support in antimicrobial drug selection and regulating immunity .Results Clinical pharmacist gave rationalized medication recommenda-tions .It made anti-infective programs more reasonable and effective .Conclusion By assisting physicians in formulating regi-mens ,clinical pharmacists can provide more optimal individualized treatment for patients .