Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of lumbar intervertebral space implantation with single and two fusion devices in treatment of lumbar instability under intervertebral foraminoscopy.Methods 101 patients(101 vertebral bodies)diagnosed with L4,L5 or S1 segment Ⅰ° to Ⅱ° spondylolisthesis from January 2019 to June 2022 were enrolled and the patients were randomly divided into group A(single fusion device group)and group B(double fusion devices group)by intervertebral foraminoscopy.Among of them,there were 51 cases of vertebral spondylolisthesis in group A and 50 cases of vertebral spondylolisthesis in group B.The patients were followed up at 1 week,1 month,6 months,9 months and 15 months after surgery,and the differences in spondylolisthesis distance,intervertebral space height,intervertebral space fusion,vertebral sedimentation rate,lumbar pain visual analogue scale(VAS)and lumbar Oswerry disability index(ODI)between the two groups were compared.Results All the 101 patients were followed up throughout the whole process,and there were no significant differences in operation time,intraoperative blood loss,and postoperative drainage between the two groups(P＞0.05),and the VAS was(7.32±0.57)in group A and(7.14±0.61)in group B one week after operation,there was no significant difference between the two groups(P＜0.05).At 6 months after surgery,the ODI of group A was(27.44±9.52)%and group B was(21.89±8.46)%,and there was no significant difference between the two groups(P＞0.05).And at 6,9 and 15 months follow-up,the fusion rates of group A were 11.76%,68.63%and 90.20%,respectively,and the fusion rates of group B were 18.00%,80.00%and 96.00%,respectively,and there was significant difference between the two groups(P＜0.05).At 15 months postoperative follow-up,the intervertebral space height of group A(0.45±0.07)cm was significantly smaller than that of group B(0.58±0.06)cm,and the difference was statistically significant(P=0.038).There was no significant difference between group A and group B(0.33±0.18)mm and(0.28±0.21)mm(P=0.079)of spondylolisthesis distance.Conclusion Implantation of the double fusion devices can provide more contact area and better stability,shorten the vertebral fusion time,increase the vertebral fusion rate,and reduce the occurrence of vertebral settlement.It is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Hepatolenticular degeneration is an autosomal recessive hereditary disease characterized by copper metabolism disorder,which affects the liver,kidneys,and brain.In traditional Chinese medicine,this disease is closely associated with dysfunction of the"liver-kidney-brain"axis.The liver,kidney,and brain form a physiological whole through the mutual transformation and distribution of essence and blood,the coordination of qi transformation,and the connection of meridians and collaterals.This article explores the pathogenesis of hepatolenticular degeneration based on the"liver-kidney-brain"axis.The deficiency of liver and kidney essence leads to the malnutrition of brain marrow,which is the fundamental cause of the disease.The internal accumulation of copper toxins generates dampness-heat and phlegm-stasis,which are the key factors causing the disease.In view of the characteristics of this disease with deficiency in nature and excess in superficiality,the principle of dynamic treating both manifestation and root cause of disease is established:treating the manifestation starts with eliminating copper and detoxifying,combined with clearing heat and dampness,and removing phlegm and stasis;treating the root cause follows the concept of the same origin of yi and gui,emphasizing the simultaneous treatment of liver and kidney to nourish the brain marrow.Throughout the treatment process,copper elimination(treating the symptoms)should be taken into account,and stratified measures should be applied based on the primary focus of the lesion:either treating the liver as the main focus and supplemented by tonifying the kidney and filling the marrow;or treating the kidney as the main focus and assisted by regulating the liver and nourishing the brain;or co-regulating the three zang-organs of liver,kidney,and brain,to achieve the therapeutic goal of eliminating pathogenic factors and restoring normal functions,and combining tonification and purgation.

Hepatolenticular degeneration is an autosomal recessive hereditary disease characterized by copper metabolism disorder,which affects the liver,kidneys,and brain.In traditional Chinese medicine,this disease is closely associated with dysfunction of the"liver-kidney-brain"axis.The liver,kidney,and brain form a physiological whole through the mutual transformation and distribution of essence and blood,the coordination of qi transformation,and the connection of meridians and collaterals.This article explores the pathogenesis of hepatolenticular degeneration based on the"liver-kidney-brain"axis.The deficiency of liver and kidney essence leads to the malnutrition of brain marrow,which is the fundamental cause of the disease.The internal accumulation of copper toxins generates dampness-heat and phlegm-stasis,which are the key factors causing the disease.In view of the characteristics of this disease with deficiency in nature and excess in superficiality,the principle of dynamic treating both manifestation and root cause of disease is established:treating the manifestation starts with eliminating copper and detoxifying,combined with clearing heat and dampness,and removing phlegm and stasis;treating the root cause follows the concept of the same origin of yi and gui,emphasizing the simultaneous treatment of liver and kidney to nourish the brain marrow.Throughout the treatment process,copper elimination(treating the symptoms)should be taken into account,and stratified measures should be applied based on the primary focus of the lesion:either treating the liver as the main focus and supplemented by tonifying the kidney and filling the marrow;or treating the kidney as the main focus and assisted by regulating the liver and nourishing the brain;or co-regulating the three zang-organs of liver,kidney,and brain,to achieve the therapeutic goal of eliminating pathogenic factors and restoring normal functions,and combining tonification and purgation.

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of lumbar intervertebral space implantation with single and two fusion devices in treatment of lumbar instability under intervertebral foraminoscopy.Methods 101 patients(101 vertebral bodies)diagnosed with L4,L5 or S1 segment Ⅰ° to Ⅱ° spondylolisthesis from January 2019 to June 2022 were enrolled and the patients were randomly divided into group A(single fusion device group)and group B(double fusion devices group)by intervertebral foraminoscopy.Among of them,there were 51 cases of vertebral spondylolisthesis in group A and 50 cases of vertebral spondylolisthesis in group B.The patients were followed up at 1 week,1 month,6 months,9 months and 15 months after surgery,and the differences in spondylolisthesis distance,intervertebral space height,intervertebral space fusion,vertebral sedimentation rate,lumbar pain visual analogue scale(VAS)and lumbar Oswerry disability index(ODI)between the two groups were compared.Results All the 101 patients were followed up throughout the whole process,and there were no significant differences in operation time,intraoperative blood loss,and postoperative drainage between the two groups(P＞0.05),and the VAS was(7.32±0.57)in group A and(7.14±0.61)in group B one week after operation,there was no significant difference between the two groups(P＜0.05).At 6 months after surgery,the ODI of group A was(27.44±9.52)%and group B was(21.89±8.46)%,and there was no significant difference between the two groups(P＞0.05).And at 6,9 and 15 months follow-up,the fusion rates of group A were 11.76%,68.63%and 90.20%,respectively,and the fusion rates of group B were 18.00%,80.00%and 96.00%,respectively,and there was significant difference between the two groups(P＜0.05).At 15 months postoperative follow-up,the intervertebral space height of group A(0.45±0.07)cm was significantly smaller than that of group B(0.58±0.06)cm,and the difference was statistically significant(P=0.038).There was no significant difference between group A and group B(0.33±0.18)mm and(0.28±0.21)mm(P=0.079)of spondylolisthesis distance.Conclusion Implantation of the double fusion devices can provide more contact area and better stability,shorten the vertebral fusion time,increase the vertebral fusion rate,and reduce the occurrence of vertebral settlement.It is worthy of clinical promotion and application.