1.Analysis of reoperation causes in unilateral biportal endoscopy for treating lumbar degenerative diseases
Yuquan LIU ; Guangpeng LI ; Xiang LI ; Bin ZHU ; Weiyang ZUO ; Haining TAN ; Ning LIU ; Qi FEI ; Haibo SUN ; Tianqi FAN ; Yong YANG ; Lingjia YU
International Journal of Surgery 2025;52(2):108-113
Objective:To analyze the reoperation rate and causes during the early adoption phase of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE).Methods:The clinical data of 180 patients who underwent UBE performed by a single surgeon at Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University from October 2021 to June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical and imaging data of patients who underwent reoperation were collected to analyze the causes of reoperation, and the clinical efficacy of the reoperations was also followed up. Measurement data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation ( ± s), and t-test was used before and after treatment. Results:A total of 180 patients who underwent UBE were included in this study, of which 6 patients underwent reoperation, and the reoperation rate was 3.33%. Among them, 3 cases occurred in the first 90 surgeries and the other 3 occurred in the subsequent 90 surgeries. The causes of reoperation were as follows: recurrent lumbar disc herniation at the same segment postoperatively in 2 cases, insufficient decompression in 2 cases, disc herniation following isolated decompression in 1 case, and immediate postoperative perianal numbness in 1 case. The time between the initial surgery and reoperation ranged from 0 to 187 days, with an average of 63.3 days. The average follow-up time after reoperation was 18.3 months. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores of the patients at the last follow-up were significantly improved compared with those before operation (VAS score of low back pain: 5.2 ± 1.7 before operation, 1.2 ± 0.8 at the last follow-up, P<0.001; VAS score of leg pain: 7.2 ± 1.5 before operation, 1.2 ± 1.2 at the last follow-up, P<0.001; ODI score: 67.3 ± 5.7 before operation, 20.2 ± 8.2 at the last follow-up, P<0.001). The postoperative modified MacNab scores were generally satisfactory (4 cases were rated as excellent, accounting for 66.7%; 2 cases were rated as good, accounting for 33.3%). Except for one patient who experienced dural injury during open revision surgery, there were no serious complications such as nerve damage. Conclusions:In the early stages of UBE surgery, recurrent lumbar disc herniation and inadequate decompression are the primary reasons for reoperation, typically occurring within the first three months postoperatively. Reoperation does not significantly increase the risk of nerve injury. Enhanced early postoperative follow-up is recommended. For symptomatic patients, a second surgery with thorough decompression can yield satisfactory treatment outcomes.
2.Current status of diagnosis and treatment of adjacent segment diseases after lumbar fusion surgery
Tianqi FAN ; Menghao WU ; Yuquan LIU ; Weiyang ZUO ; Yong YANG
International Journal of Surgery 2024;51(7):493-499
Adjacent segment disease(ASD) refers to the degeneration of adjacent segments after lumbar fusion surgery, including intervertebral disc herniation, stress vertebral fractures, slippage, segmental scoliosis, spinal canal stenosis, and facet joint degeneration, which can lead to corresponding clinical symptoms such as lumbosacral pain, root lower limb pain, or intermittent claudication. The treatment of different pathological types of ASD varies. The patients with mild symptoms require conservative treatment and patients with severe symptoms require surgical treatment. In the past, open fusion surgery with posterior approach or intervertebral foramen approach was commonly used for surgical treatment, which had definite therapeutic effects. However, there were drawbacks such as large surgical trauma, excessive intraoperative blood loss, and slow postoperative recovery. With the booming development of minimally invasive spinal surgery technology in recent years, spinal surgeons actively use minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of ASD. It has advantages such as less bleeding, short hospital stay, fast recovery, and fewer complications (such as deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism), but its indications are limited. Therefore, this article provides a reference for the choice of ASD treatment by reviewing the treatment modalities of ASD with different pathological types.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail