Objective:This study aims to construct a quality evaluation index system for specialized disease databases. Through systematic assessment and optimization, it seeks to comprehensively enhance the quality and standardization of specialized disease cohort data. This initiative will provide more precise and reliable data support for disease research, the development of innovative drugs and medical devices, as well as policy formulation.Methods:By conducting a thorough analysis of domestic and international literature and policies related to clinical research data quality evaluation systems, preliminary quality evaluation indicators for specialized disease databases were established. Utilizing the Delphi method in two rounds, a quality evaluation system for specialized disease databases was constructed. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and YAAHP 7.5 software were then employed to calculate the relative weights of indicators at various levels and their composite weights.Results:The two rounds of expert consultation achieved a 100.00% valid response rate, with an expert authority coefficient of 0.81 in both rounds. In the second round, the Kendall′s coordination coefficients for the first-level and second-level indicators reached 0.311 and 0.218, respectively ( P<0.05), indicating a good level of consensus among experts. The final specialized disease database quality evaluation system consists of 3 first-level indicators, 10 second-level indicators, and 32 third-level indicators. The first-level indicators include database construction, data quality, and cohort development, with weight coefficients of 31.82%, 41.49%, and 26.69%, respectively. The scientific validity of the indicator system was confirmed through reliability and validity analyses. When applied to assessing 58 specialized disease database projects from 36 medical institutions in a certain city, the results showed significant improvements in scores for database construction, data quality, and cohort development, with the most notable improvement observed in database construction. Conclusions:This study successfully developed a scientific, practical, and rationally weighted quality evaluation system for specialized disease databases, demonstrating high expert consensus and broad applicability.Validation studies have shown that this system effectively enhances the standardization and data quality of databases, providing robust technical support and assurance for specialized disease research and data resource sharing.

Objective:This study aims to construct a quality evaluation index system for specialized disease databases. Through systematic assessment and optimization, it seeks to comprehensively enhance the quality and standardization of specialized disease cohort data. This initiative will provide more precise and reliable data support for disease research, the development of innovative drugs and medical devices, as well as policy formulation.Methods:By conducting a thorough analysis of domestic and international literature and policies related to clinical research data quality evaluation systems, preliminary quality evaluation indicators for specialized disease databases were established. Utilizing the Delphi method in two rounds, a quality evaluation system for specialized disease databases was constructed. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and YAAHP 7.5 software were then employed to calculate the relative weights of indicators at various levels and their composite weights.Results:The two rounds of expert consultation achieved a 100.00% valid response rate, with an expert authority coefficient of 0.81 in both rounds. In the second round, the Kendall′s coordination coefficients for the first-level and second-level indicators reached 0.311 and 0.218, respectively ( P<0.05), indicating a good level of consensus among experts. The final specialized disease database quality evaluation system consists of 3 first-level indicators, 10 second-level indicators, and 32 third-level indicators. The first-level indicators include database construction, data quality, and cohort development, with weight coefficients of 31.82%, 41.49%, and 26.69%, respectively. The scientific validity of the indicator system was confirmed through reliability and validity analyses. When applied to assessing 58 specialized disease database projects from 36 medical institutions in a certain city, the results showed significant improvements in scores for database construction, data quality, and cohort development, with the most notable improvement observed in database construction. Conclusions:This study successfully developed a scientific, practical, and rationally weighted quality evaluation system for specialized disease databases, demonstrating high expert consensus and broad applicability.Validation studies have shown that this system effectively enhances the standardization and data quality of databases, providing robust technical support and assurance for specialized disease research and data resource sharing.