Objective:To provide basis for preventing flight safety accidents caused by hypoxia by exploring the subjective and objective performance of pilots in hypobaric hypoxia environment.Methods:The relevant data of pilots′ high altitude physiological training were retrospectively analyzed and a symptom questionnaire upon the training were summarized. The pilots were divided into excellent group (time of useful consciousness >6 min), good group (3 min ≤time of useful consciousness <6 min) and qualified group (2 min ≤time of useful consciousness <3 min) according to the time of useful consciousness. The hypoxia symptoms and physiological parameters of pilots in each group were statistically analyzed.Results:A total of 919 pilots were included, in which 416 were in excellent group, 490 were in good group and 13 were in qualified group. Among the 25 hypoxia symptoms, there were significant differences in the components of numbness and difficulty in calculation among 3 groups ( χ2=6.04, 7.79, P=0.049, 0.020), but there were no significant differences in the components of the other 23 hypoxia symptoms (all P>0.05). The changes of blood oxygen saturation were significant in group main effect, time main effect and their interaction ( F=25.65, 1 039.77, 25.22, all P<0.001). The change of heart rate was statistically significant in the main effect of time ( F=66.41, P<0.001) but in time main effect and their interaction (both P>0.05). There was no significant difference in respiratory rate among group main effect, time main effect and their interaction (all P>0.05). The distribution and variation of blood oxygen saturation were statistically significant differences among the 3 groups in the ranges of 81%-90%, 71%-80% and 65%-70% ( H=125.93, 372.83, 13.10, all P≤0.001) unlike the range of 91%-100% ( H=2.48, P=0.289). Conclusions:The excellent group showed better blood oxygen saturation maintaining and useful consciousness time enduring capabilities, and those imply them in better performance and consciousness that enable the operation in hypoxic environment with more ease.

Objective:To provide scientific basis for pilots′ hypoxia training by comparing and analyzing the effects of hypoxia training under normobaric and hypobaric environments.Methods:Forty-two healthy subjects were selected. The pilot reduced oxygen breathing device and hypobaric chamber were used to simulate 7 500 m hypoxia training, and blood oxygen saturation, heart rate, respiratory rate and hypoxia endurance time were monitored and recorded. The hypoxia symptom questionnaire was filled out by the subjects after 2 training sessions. The hypoxia endurance time and hypoxia tolerance grade of normobaric and hypobaric hypoxia training were analyzed, and the differences of blood oxygen saturation and hypoxia symptoms were compared between 2 hypoxia trainings.Results:Forty-two subjects completed the normobaric and hypobaric hypoxia trainings. The survival curve analysis of hypoxia endurance time showed that the median hypoxia endurance time of normobaric and hypobaric hypoxia training was [3.17(2.70, 3.64)] min and [3.67(3.46, 3.88)] min respectively, with no significant difference ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the grade distribution of hypoxia tolerance between 2 hypoxia trainings ( P>0.05). The blood oxygen saturation curves of 2 hypoxia trainings were basically consistent. There was no significant difference between 2 hypoxia trainings on blood oxygen saturation, heart rate and respiratory rate (all P>0.05). There were significant differences in difficulty in calculation, difficulty in concentration and with palpitation ( χ2=4.81, 3.97, 3.98, P=0.028, 0.046, 0.046). Conclusions:The analysis showed that most physiological responses and subjective symptoms of pilots are quite similar in the normobaric and hypobaric hypoxia training at simulated 7 500 m. Both normobaric and hypobaric exposures show the similar hypoxia training effect.

Objective:To provide basis for preventing flight safety accidents caused by hypoxia by exploring the subjective and objective performance of pilots in hypobaric hypoxia environment.Methods:The relevant data of pilots′ high altitude physiological training were retrospectively analyzed and a symptom questionnaire upon the training were summarized. The pilots were divided into excellent group (time of useful consciousness >6 min), good group (3 min ≤time of useful consciousness <6 min) and qualified group (2 min ≤time of useful consciousness <3 min) according to the time of useful consciousness. The hypoxia symptoms and physiological parameters of pilots in each group were statistically analyzed.Results:A total of 919 pilots were included, in which 416 were in excellent group, 490 were in good group and 13 were in qualified group. Among the 25 hypoxia symptoms, there were significant differences in the components of numbness and difficulty in calculation among 3 groups ( χ2=6.04, 7.79, P=0.049, 0.020), but there were no significant differences in the components of the other 23 hypoxia symptoms (all P>0.05). The changes of blood oxygen saturation were significant in group main effect, time main effect and their interaction ( F=25.65, 1 039.77, 25.22, all P<0.001). The change of heart rate was statistically significant in the main effect of time ( F=66.41, P<0.001) but in time main effect and their interaction (both P>0.05). There was no significant difference in respiratory rate among group main effect, time main effect and their interaction (all P>0.05). The distribution and variation of blood oxygen saturation were statistically significant differences among the 3 groups in the ranges of 81%-90%, 71%-80% and 65%-70% ( H=125.93, 372.83, 13.10, all P≤0.001) unlike the range of 91%-100% ( H=2.48, P=0.289). Conclusions:The excellent group showed better blood oxygen saturation maintaining and useful consciousness time enduring capabilities, and those imply them in better performance and consciousness that enable the operation in hypoxic environment with more ease.

Objective:To provide scientific basis for pilots′ hypoxia training by comparing and analyzing the effects of hypoxia training under normobaric and hypobaric environments.Methods:Forty-two healthy subjects were selected. The pilot reduced oxygen breathing device and hypobaric chamber were used to simulate 7 500 m hypoxia training, and blood oxygen saturation, heart rate, respiratory rate and hypoxia endurance time were monitored and recorded. The hypoxia symptom questionnaire was filled out by the subjects after 2 training sessions. The hypoxia endurance time and hypoxia tolerance grade of normobaric and hypobaric hypoxia training were analyzed, and the differences of blood oxygen saturation and hypoxia symptoms were compared between 2 hypoxia trainings.Results:Forty-two subjects completed the normobaric and hypobaric hypoxia trainings. The survival curve analysis of hypoxia endurance time showed that the median hypoxia endurance time of normobaric and hypobaric hypoxia training was [3.17(2.70, 3.64)] min and [3.67(3.46, 3.88)] min respectively, with no significant difference ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the grade distribution of hypoxia tolerance between 2 hypoxia trainings ( P>0.05). The blood oxygen saturation curves of 2 hypoxia trainings were basically consistent. There was no significant difference between 2 hypoxia trainings on blood oxygen saturation, heart rate and respiratory rate (all P>0.05). There were significant differences in difficulty in calculation, difficulty in concentration and with palpitation ( χ2=4.81, 3.97, 3.98, P=0.028, 0.046, 0.046). Conclusions:The analysis showed that most physiological responses and subjective symptoms of pilots are quite similar in the normobaric and hypobaric hypoxia training at simulated 7 500 m. Both normobaric and hypobaric exposures show the similar hypoxia training effect.

Objective:To study the simplified oxygen supply protection scheme below 15.0 km, and to evaluate its protection performance through tests.Methods:The parameter of YX-5 oxygen system was modified, by reducing its total oxygen supply pressure and closing a large number of oxygen supply mechanisms, and compensatory suit was cancelled. A dummy and 4 volunteers with helmet and oxygen mask using modified YX-5 oxygen system underwent 5 tests in hypobaric chamber, included ① normal oxygen supply performance test at 0-10.0 km; ② pure oxygen supply performance test at 0-10.0 km; ③ positive pressure supplying oxygen performance test at 13.0, 15.0, 16.0 km; ④ impact test of pressured oxygen supply; ⑤ pressured oxygen supplying performance physiological test at 15.0 km.Results:Under the normal oxygen supply, the oxygen pressure of modified YX-5 oxygen system below 12.0 km was >21.0 kPa. When high-altitude pressurized oxygen supply was used, the oxygen pressure was >15.8 kPa at 12.0-15.0 km. Inspiration resistance of modified YX-5 oxygen system was <0.34 kPa when the dummy′s respiration ventilation rate was 20 L/min. The impact pressure of mask was 1.25 kPa when pressured oxygen supply switched on but without compensatory suit connected to modified YX-5 oxygen system. Four volunteers completed the human physiological test up to 15.0 km high-altitude pressurized oxygen supply to verify the protective performance of the scheme, and they had no adverse physiological reactions after the test.Conclusions:The simplified protection scheme can provide protection against hypoxia for pilots at 0-15.0 km altitude.

Objective:To evaluate the protection performance of military transport aircraft oxygen system for aircrew and provide the physiological tests basis for product design finalization.Methods:Four dummies and 4 healthy volunteers who were equipped with individual protection equipment and military transport aircraft oxygen system completed 4 tests in altitude chamber including the oxygen supply performance physical test of oxygen system, the rapid decompression physical test of oxygen system, the physiological tests of oxygen continuously supplying for 6 h and oxygen supply performance test in rapid decompression at 12.0 km. Oxygen concentration, respiratory resistance, safety pressure, peak value, peak duration and steady pressure of mask under rapid decompression were tested. Electrocardiograph and oxygen saturation of volunteers were monitored.Results:The oxygen partial pressure provided by military transport aircraft oxygen system under 12.0 km was ≥19.1 kPa corresponding to the respiration ventilation volume of 20 L/min of dummy. The expiratory resistance was no higher than 441.3 Pa and the inspiration resistance was no higher than 490.3 Pa before the safety pressure connected. The peak pressure value in rapid decompression with 1.0 L lung volume of dummy was no higher than 5.8 kPa. The oxygen partial pressure provided by military transport aircraft oxygen system for volunteers was over 21.9 kPa in the 6 h cruising flight. All 4 volunteers successfully completed the rapid decompression physiological tests at 12.0 km with good subjective and objective responses.Conclusions:The protection performance of military transport aircraft oxygen system for aircrew can provide enough protection against the hypoxia up to 12.0 km

Objective:To evaluate the protection performance of military transport aircraft oxygen system for aircrew and provide the physiological tests basis for product design finalization.Methods:Four dummies and 4 healthy volunteers who were equipped with individual protection equipment and military transport aircraft oxygen system completed 4 tests in altitude chamber including the oxygen supply performance physical test of oxygen system, the rapid decompression physical test of oxygen system, the physiological tests of oxygen continuously supplying for 6 h and oxygen supply performance test in rapid decompression at 12.0 km. Oxygen concentration, respiratory resistance, safety pressure, peak value, peak duration and steady pressure of mask under rapid decompression were tested. Electrocardiograph and oxygen saturation of volunteers were monitored.Results:The oxygen partial pressure provided by military transport aircraft oxygen system under 12.0 km was ≥19.1 kPa corresponding to the respiration ventilation volume of 20 L/min of dummy. The expiratory resistance was no higher than 441.3 Pa and the inspiration resistance was no higher than 490.3 Pa before the safety pressure connected. The peak pressure value in rapid decompression with 1.0 L lung volume of dummy was no higher than 5.8 kPa. The oxygen partial pressure provided by military transport aircraft oxygen system for volunteers was over 21.9 kPa in the 6 h cruising flight. All 4 volunteers successfully completed the rapid decompression physiological tests at 12.0 km with good subjective and objective responses.Conclusions:The protection performance of military transport aircraft oxygen system for aircrew can provide enough protection against the hypoxia up to 12.0 km

Objective:To study the simplified oxygen supply protection scheme below 15.0 km, and to evaluate its protection performance through tests.Methods:The parameter of YX-5 oxygen system was modified, by reducing its total oxygen supply pressure and closing a large number of oxygen supply mechanisms, and compensatory suit was cancelled. A dummy and 4 volunteers with helmet and oxygen mask using modified YX-5 oxygen system underwent 5 tests in hypobaric chamber, included ① normal oxygen supply performance test at 0-10.0 km; ② pure oxygen supply performance test at 0-10.0 km; ③ positive pressure supplying oxygen performance test at 13.0, 15.0, 16.0 km; ④ impact test of pressured oxygen supply; ⑤ pressured oxygen supplying performance physiological test at 15.0 km.Results:Under the normal oxygen supply, the oxygen pressure of modified YX-5 oxygen system below 12.0 km was >21.0 kPa. When high-altitude pressurized oxygen supply was used, the oxygen pressure was >15.8 kPa at 12.0-15.0 km. Inspiration resistance of modified YX-5 oxygen system was <0.34 kPa when the dummy′s respiration ventilation rate was 20 L/min. The impact pressure of mask was 1.25 kPa when pressured oxygen supply switched on but without compensatory suit connected to modified YX-5 oxygen system. Four volunteers completed the human physiological test up to 15.0 km high-altitude pressurized oxygen supply to verify the protective performance of the scheme, and they had no adverse physiological reactions after the test.Conclusions:The simplified protection scheme can provide protection against hypoxia for pilots at 0-15.0 km altitude.

Objective To compare the ear baric function between 4000m altitude chamber test with inhaling air and 6900m altitude chamber test with inhaling pure oxygen.Methods Eleven healthy male volunteers attended two tests as two groups by self-comparison. As the air group the volunteers inhaled air at 4000m, while as the pure oxygen group they inhaled pure oxygen at 6900m altitude, and the time interval between the two tests was more than two weeks. During the test, the volunteers breathed air or pure oxygen at random for 1h, and then were exposed at a speed of 20m/s to the target altitude for 5min. Hereafter they were sent back to the ground at the same speed. The changes of subjective symptoms, degree of tympanic congestion, acoustic immitance index and pure-tone auditory threshold were recorded before and after the test. The acoustic impedance index and pure-tone threshold were statistically analyzed.ResultsFour volunteers (4 ears) in air group and 7 volunteers (7 ears) in pure oxygen group reported ear pain in altitude chamber exposures, respectively. The pain-triggering altitude was higher in the pure oxygen group. Immediately after tests, there were 3 (3 ears) and 5 volunteers (5 ears) with Ⅲ degree congestion of the tympanic membrane in the two groups respectively. Four volunteers (6 ears) developed gradually aggravated hemorrhages after altitude exposure. And the tympanic membrane congestion difference between groups was statistically significant at 3 and 24h after tests (P<0.01). The type A tympanogram appeared in 11 (15 ears) and 11 (14 ears) volunteers respectively immediately after tests. The increase of static compliance value was significantly greater in pure oxygen group than in air group immediately after tests (P<0.05), the decrease of middle ear pressure was more significant in pure oxygen group than in air group at 3 and 24h after tests (P<0.05). Both the two altitude exposure tests resulted in eustachian tube dysfunction. At 3 and 24h after the tests, the increase of individual frequency pure-tone threshold was significantly higher in pure oxygen group than in air group (P<0.05).Conclusion Breathing pure oxygen and lifting height could increase the screening degree of ear baric function test in hypobaric chamber, and have greater influence on degree of tympanic congestion, acoustic immittance and pure-tone auditory threshold in 24 hours.

Objective To develop a kind of rapid decompression equipment replacing the toughened glass simulating the state of aircraft cabin glass bursting on the fly.Methods The metallic membrane was used to isolate both chambers with different air pressures.The areas of decompression membrane and path were determined by calculating on the basis of aircraft decompression altitude,cabin pressure differential and decompression time.The structural strength was determined according to enduring force of the metallic membrane.The membrane was ejected by high pressure air using the ejection launch technology of aircraft missile.The result of simulating aircraft cabin glass bursting on the fly was achieved.Results The rapid decompression equipment ejected by air pressure in low-pressure chamber could achieve the state of simulating aircraft cabin glass bursting on the fly,and the best decompression time was 0.16 s.Conclusion The rapid decompression equipment ejected by air pressure accomplishes the decompression preparative in short time with easy operation,and can satisfy the desired requirements for the performance and precision.